User talk:TongcyDai
is not a poem.--GZWDer (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GZWDer: Sorry, I've set the parameter "Depth" to "1", and there are mistakes in the categories of zhws, so it just went wrong.--TongcyDai ฅ • ω • ฅ 12:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- I think I'll have to check them one by one now...--TongcyDai ฅ • ω • ฅ 12:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Classical Chinese templates and articles
Hello.
Can you translate and upload en:Template:Country data Azerbaijan, en:Template:Az icon, en:.az and en:Azerbaijani Wikipedia in Classical Chinese Wikipedia?
Yours sincerely, Karalainza (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Karalainza: Sure, the two templates and the article "Azerbaijani Wikipedia" has been created. For ".az", I'll have to ask other editors, since there's a rule saying "Articles in lzhwp should only use Han characters", but I can't think of an alternative way if I don't use Latin alphabet. --TongcyDai ฅ • ω • ฅ 11:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- By the way, may I ask you why do you want me to translate these articles? --TongcyDai ฅ • ω • ฅ 11:44, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the uploads. The reason is to enrich Wikipedia in any language, even if it is in a very small way. Karalainza (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Karalainza: Well, but why these articles? And good news, it seems that we can still use latin alphabet directly for such of these special cases. If it don't work, I will use the whole name like "Internet country code top-level domain for Azerbaijan". But I'll do that after my midterm exams on Tuesday :P --TongcyDai ฅ • ω • ฅ 17:18, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Re: 臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典例句
我自己看法,還是要有某種權威單位撰寫的例句,所以才要用引用方式寫上臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典的例句。目前台文的現況是還沒有太多語料,公視新聞網台文新聞部分勉強可以達到著作權的合理引用部分字句。感謝你提醒,臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典直接用他們例句,在引述比例上面用上的確會太多,你有什麼建議嗎?Supaplex (talk) 08:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
P11535 and its values
Note that if you are using identifiers from sutian.moe.edu.tw as values for this property, the URLs generated for it will not work (the identifiers for that site and those for the twblg.dict.edu.tw site that preceded it are generally distinct); see for yourself on some of the lexemes you have recently created. Mahir256 (talk) 17:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)