I see Q126685212 was created with no data and was deleted accordingly. It's a regional development agency in Poland and I think it meets N2, and would also be useful in a Name Suggestion Index entry. Could you undelete it so I can add the appropriate data?
User talk:MisterSynergy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sure, done. Please expand it to a useful form.
Hi MisterSynergy,
I have recently created an item on Rudolph William Papperitz (Q126368485), which has been deleted by you as far as I can see. As I am new on wikidata, could you just let me know, why this was happening? I have used the wikidata ID already for linking this person to other data, so it would be useful if the link to wikidata would still exist. Many thanks!
Hello SarahTWagner, the data item has been created, but left empty (meaning: it did not have any claims or references or sitelinks). I also cannot find any backlinks to to from within Wikidata or Wikimedia Commons.
We can restore it, but I would like to ask you to add information about the person *within the item* and *including external references* right away. It is best practice to bring new items of a shape that makes them notable by themselves, independently of eventual backlinks (usage of the data items at other places). Would that be possible for you?
Thanks a lot for your comments! I will be able to add more information about that person. Thanks a lot for restoring the data item :-)
how do I see that more items created by me in the past, might have been deleted due to the same issue? I just noticed the deletion of Rudolph William Papperitz (Q126368485) by chance...
Pages created by you are listed here: https://xtools.wmcloud.org/pages/www.wikidata.org/SarahTWagner/all There are currently no deleted pages.
Q126368485 is meanwhile restored, please work on it in order to prevent it from being deleted again.
I updated the title with adding space between Top and 100. Will bot recognise this? Btw. is this possible to create a list of top 1000? ~~~~
The bot will not recognize this page move, as the old title is hard-coded into the bot script. It would be nice if you could leave such page where they are, or notify the involved bot operators in advance.
Top 1000 (or even a full list) are also possible, but I do not see what the use case is. Do you have anything in mind here?
Top 100 is kinda short, top 1000 would be more useful.
Hi. Please see the talkpage - I;ve added a note. And if you scroll down the page a bit, you can see the person's tombstone which clearly has the correct date
Please provide a reference if you change such data. Here is how this is supposed to look like: Help:Sources#Headstones at Commons.
Hallo MisterSynergy,
bezüglich Änderungen wie beispielsweise
- https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q127803291&diff=2218358762&oldid=2218122866
- https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q127803291&diff=prev&oldid=2218358762
- https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q126902515&diff=prev&oldid=2218358664
siehe
- Wikidata:Forum#Wikidata:Project_chat#New_"mul"_term_language_code_on_Wikidata
- Help:Default values for labels and aliases
- Help_talk:Default_values_for_labels_and_aliases#What_Seems_Important - Stopping bots from creating new duplication of labels or aliases
MUL ist seit 29. Juli 2024 nach Aktivierung über den eigenen Sprachbabel-Baustein verfügbar:
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AM2k%7Edewiki&diff=2210339487&oldid=1875120243
Eeine generelle Aktivierung war ursprünglich für 12. August geplant, könnte sich aber laut Wikidata:Project_chat#Wikidata_weekly_summary_#639 verzögern.
Danke!
Das habe ich bisher nur beiläufig mitbekommen und noch nicht im Detail angeschaut. Bin ein bisschen skeptisch, ob das die Situation spürbar verbessern wird…
Die genannten Diffs sind von einem Skript, welches ich nur gelegentlich händisch ausführe. So gesehen ist erstmal nichts zu ändern, ich werde die Situation aber beobachten.
Q127179699 is used by c:File:Portrait of King Yeongjo - Chae Yong Shin (蔡龍臣 1850-1941) Cho Seok-jin (趙錫晉 1853-1920) et (cropped).jpg
=2520Cho=2520Seok-jin=2520(趙錫晉=25201853-1920)=2520et=2520(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
done
Hey! Can you restore Q125817059? I can add whatever is needed to it--I need it for a statement for an altarpiece, thanks!
done
Hi, I got a notification of the deletion of {{Q|127514921}} with the mention "Empty item: content was: "Template:European political organisation"". I am surprised, because I created this template (to supplement {{Q|10707879}}, which focused on registered European political parties, while the other one contained entities not registered at the EU level). Do you know why this was marked as empty? Last I checked it contained six entities. Thanks!
A template item needs at least one sitelink to a page in template namespace in any Wikimedia project. This one never had any sitelinks, and is thus considered empty. If you just forgot to add these sitelinks, please let me know and we restore the item.
Hi, thanks for the quick reply. I am rather new and was not aware of this. I can take care of this if you restore the page!
It is restored. Please work on it, in order to avoid that it is being deleted again.
Thanks a lot. Quick question before we wrap this up: the most relevant template is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Political_organisations_at_European_Union_level this one]. However, it refers both to entities that are registered as European parties and entities that are not registered. As a result, it is already used by Q10707879, which leads me to an error when I try to add it to the template you just restored. Indeed, both template refer to quite similar entities -- some registered, some not -- that it kind of makes sense to add on a common template on Wikipedia. Any recommendation?
Any idea?
You cannot add a given Wikipedia page (here: that enwiki template) to more than one Wikidata item page as a sitelink.
Usually, we use template items as in this case for sitelinks only, with rather limited data that at best helps to organize these items internally. Actual data should not be organized inside template items. Could you maybe look into other ways to represent this information in Wikidata, specifically distributed over the items listed on the template item we initially looked at?
Thanks. I actually think you are right. I came across the other template and figured I could use it to quickly have a list of specific pages, but that doesn't seem to be the proper use of templates. What it a better way to quickly have a list of specific items? I guess a SPARQL query could work. Maybe by adding the specific elements (say European parties) under "has instances" on the page of the page of the item "European political party"? Is that an ok way to do this?
Yes, roughly like this. I have no domain knowledge here, thus I am not aware which property to use and which values. If all parties are properly tagged, you can create a list with SPARQL, and even write it to the Wiki using ListeriaBot. I could assist with the SPARQL query once the statements have been added to the items in question.
Hey, would this be it?
# list of European parties
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel
WHERE {
?item wdt:P31 wd:Q24649 . #the item is a European party
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en-gb". }
}
ORDER BY ?itemLabel
Hey, any suggestions to retain an easy-ish way to access all elements of a given category?
This is one of the project categories of our current project Digi-Kunst.nrw, which has the goal to make the digital heritage of the art and music colleges in Northrhine-Westphalia long-term available.
An important destinction in ethnomusicologal discourse is the destiction between art music and folklore. Some music, like Turkish court music or Peking Opera, which always had as one of their main functions to be art music, can be categorized under this term - making these types of msuic distinct from other kinds, like millitary or sacral music. Addtionally, knowing this is an euro-centristic view, the term "Außereuropäische Kunstmusik" is widely used, especially in the German-speaking countries - much to the dismay of ethnomusicologist here, I can only assume. But, like mentioned, a very practical term for keepin things distinct.
A list of links to demonstrate this, can be found below. I would much appreciate if this item would be restored.
https://hfm-wuerzburg.de/admin/Bibliothek/Systematik/Systematik_Tontraeger_2021.07.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/235860/2/235860.pdf
https://dasorchester.de/artikel/hier-klingt-wien/
https://www.booklooker.de/B%C3%BCcher/Au%C3%9Fereurop%C3%A4ische-Folklore-und-Kunstmusik/id/A02nM87C01ZZP?zid=hup80jkl4t5982ni3ofshhc7rb [One of the central works in that regard]
https://slub.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A37837/attachment/ATT-0/ [Page 2 - and old mention of the term that illuminates what makes it so difficult today]
Many other links can be fount mentioning the term.
Q123561622 is restored. Please expand it to make it formally compliant with the notability policy at WD:N.
I will do that. Thank you very much.
Hi. From 31 August 2021 (log), could you restore the items that have the "taluka" as suffix? They are referenced elsewhere and need to be merged. For example, Q106997302 with Wai taluka (Q123267169). Thanks
Please improve these items in order to make them compliant with the notability policy.