Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Juliet Lyon Prison Reform Trust
Juliet Lyon, Prison Reform Trust director, says 'wasting time rather than doing time is a far cry from the rehabilitation revolution'. Photograph: Graham Turner for the Guardian
Juliet Lyon, Prison Reform Trust director, says 'wasting time rather than doing time is a far cry from the rehabilitation revolution'. Photograph: Graham Turner for the Guardian

A4e ends £17m prisoner education contract citing budget constraints

This article is more than 10 years old
Inmates across 12 London prisons would have received training until July 2016, although the east of England will still benefit

The welfare-to-work provider A4e has prematurely pulled out of a £17m contract to deliver education and training to prisoners in 12 London prisons on the grounds that it was unable to run the contract at a profit.

The decision was criticised by prison charities as likely to cause significant disruption for inmates.

Announcing that it would be terminating its contract, the company said delivering the Offender Learning and Skills Service (OLASS) had become "extremely challenging" in the past two years because of "a number of constraints" which had "a heavy impact on learner attendance, completion and achievements".

"We have concluded, in order to not continue to deliver the contract at a loss, to terminate our provision of [the contract] in London," it said. "This has been a very hard decision to make because A4e and its employees are passionate about the delivery of education services to offenders and believe education is critical to an offender's long-term rehabilitation."

The company, which was due to continue providing training until July 2016, employs 400 teaching and support staff within London prisons. A4e runs another teaching contract in prisons in the east of England which it has decided not to terminate.

A4e did not specify the constraints it cited in its statement but prison charities said access to education in a number of prisons had been impeded by staff shortages which had hampered prisoners' ability to get to lessons. The company is paid according to the amount of training it provides.

Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said: "It's difficult to know precisely why A4e finds itself running this contract at a loss but it is clear that prisoners are spending more and more time locked down in overcrowded cells in understaffed prisons. Wasting time rather than doing time is a far cry from the rehabilitation revolution. Withdrawal of prison education calls into question both this government's capacity to award contracts for delivery of essential services and its commitment to rehabilitation. Our prisons are being reduced to warehouses – nothing more."

Rod Clark, chief executive of the Prisoners Education Trust, said: "The delivery of education for prisoners across the country is being seriously affected by overcrowding and staff shortages which are leaving people locked up for longer, so they can't get to class and providers struggle to meet their targets. These pressures are having a negative impact on safety and rehabilitation. It may be that this latest decision by A4e to stop working in London's prisons is a result of these problems."

The Skills Funding Agency said efforts had been made to find ways to allow A4e to continue delivering the contract but discussions had failed. The agency said it was working "to minimise disruption for learners in London prisons".

The start of A4e's prison education contract was complicated by a delay of several months as the company underwent an extra level of auditing, amid fraud allegations in its welfare-to-work contracts.

This is not the first time that A4e has prematurely terminated a prison education contract; the firm ended a similar contract providing education to eight prisons in Kent early in 2008, citing huge losses.

The decision to terminate service provision then was criticised by teaching unions, as evidence that outsourcing education contracts to private providers was not a reliable way to guarantee a good quality service.

Sadiq Khan, shadow secretary of state for justice, said: "This is a vote of no confidence by the private sector in the disastrous way the Government have allowed our prisons to descend into crisis. Providing good training and skills to offenders in prison is crucial in rehabilitation to stop them reoffending on release. Leaving prisoners to fester in their cells or on landings as a result of this shambles is no good for anyone."

The A4e announcement came as the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman published conclusions from his investigation into the 89 self-inflicted deaths of 18-24-year-old prisoners that occurred between April 2007 and March 2014. He noted that "in too many cases, suicide risk assessments and monitoring arrangements were poor", and that "67% of the young adults had mental health needs and 27% had previously been admitted for psychiatric care". Many young adults were distressed to find themselves in a crowded system and many had spent time in segregation. Nigel Newcomen, prisons and probation ombudsman, called for "more timely referrals for mental health treatment". "In too many cases, suicide risk assessments and monitoring arrangements were poor. In a number of cases, concerns expressed by families were not acted upon by staff," the report said.

More on this story

More on this story

  • Prison lights-out policy could worsen mental health crisis, campaigners say

  • Ordeal of a suicidal young man on remand

  • David Cameron backs prisoners' reading restrictions

  • Grayling denies prison service crisis as inmate numbers rise

  • Number of prisoners over 60 in England and Wales doubles in 10 years

  • £230m wasted on needlessly holding people on remand, says Howard League

  • Prison inmates held without electricity or running water for over two days

  • How can Chris Grayling deny our prisons crisis?

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed