About: Federal and state environmental relations

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

There are benefits to leaving environmental regulation both to the federal government to the states.For example, wildlife conservation is much more of a concern for Alaska than for New York. New York, however, has much bigger air and light pollution issues than Alaska.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	There are benefits to leaving environmental regulation both to the federal government to the states.For example, wildlife conservation is much more of a concern for Alaska than for New York. New York, however, has much bigger air and light pollution issues than Alaska. Because of all of these factors, it almost never ends up being an either/or situation in terms of environmental regulation. One of the few areas that is under complete federal control is the storage and disposal of commercial-level nuclear waste, most likely because the consequences of not properly dealing with it are more dire than for most environmental concerns. States have greater regulatory freedom for areas like air and water pollution, presumably because they are not considered to be as high-stakes as nuclear waste. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID	31656964 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	24989 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1051142922 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Electronic_waste dbr:Electronic_waste_in_the_United_States dbr:Nonpoint_source_water_pollution_regulation dbc:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbr:Resource_Conservation_and_Recovery_Act dbr:Dormant_Commerce_Clause dbr:Wildlife_trade dbr:Corporate_Average_Fuel_Economy dbr:Safe_Drinking_Water_Act dbr:Clean_Air_Act_(United_States) dbr:Clean_Water_Act dbr:Coastal_Zone_Management_Act dbr:Endangered_Species_Act dbr:Concurrent_powers dbr:Laboratories_of_democracy dbr:Emergency_Planning_and_Community_Right-to-Know_Act dbr:Federal_preemption dbr:Poaching dbr:Supremacy_Clause dbr:Game_law dbc:Environmental_law_in_the_United_States dbr:Federal_Insecticide,_Fungicide,_and_Rodenticide_Act dbr:Taxing_and_Spending_Clause dbr:Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Alaska_Dept._of_Environmental_Conservation_v._EPA dbr:Mass._v._EPA dbr:Comprehensive_Environmental_Response,_Compensation,_and_Liability_Act
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Globalize dbt:Reflist dbt:United_States_topics
dcterms:subject	dbc:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbc:Environmental_law_in_the_United_States
rdfs:comment	There are benefits to leaving environmental regulation both to the federal government to the states.For example, wildlife conservation is much more of a concern for Alaska than for New York. New York, however, has much bigger air and light pollution issues than Alaska. (en)
rdfs:label	Federal and state environmental relations (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Federal and state environmental relations wikidata:Federal and state environmental relations https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4jfqe
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Federal_and_state_environmental_relations?oldid=1051142922&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Federal_and_state_environmental_relations
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Federal_and_State_Environmental_Relations
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Poaching dbr:Federal_and_State_Environmental_Relations
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Federal_and_state_environmental_relations

This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License