Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Additive Manufacturing of functionalised atomic vapour cells for next-generation quantum technologies

F. Wang Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK ppzfw@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk    N. Cooper School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK nathan.cooper@nottingham.ac.uk    Y. He1 Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    B. Hopton School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    D. Johnson School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    P. Zhao Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    T. M. Fromhold School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    C. J. Tuck Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    R. Hague Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    R. D. Wildman Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    L. Turyanska Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK    L. Hackermüller School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
(June 21, 2024)
Abstract

Atomic vapour cells are an indispensable tool for quantum technologies (QT), but potential improvements are limited by the capacities of conventional manufacturing methods. Using an additive manufacturing (AM) technique - vat polymerisation by digital light processing - we demonstrate, for the first time, a 3D-printed glass vapour cell. The exploitation of AM capacities allows intricate internal architectures, overprinting of 2D optoelectronical materials to create integrated sensors and surface functionalisation, while also showing the ability to tailor the optical properties of the AM glass by in-situ growth of gold nanoparticles. The produced cells achieve ultra-high vacuum of 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar and enable Doppler-free spectroscopy; we demonstrate laser frequency stabilisation as a QT application. These results highlight the transformative role that AM can play for QT in enabling compact, optimised and integrated multi-material components and devices.

preprint: APS/123-QED

I Introduction

Growing understanding of fundamental quantum processes offers benefits in multiple sectors, from medicine [1, 2] and sensing applications [3, 4, 5], positioning and security [6, 7] to quantum computing [8]. However, realising these benefits requires innovations in quantum technology (QT) hardware, which must become smaller, lighter, cheaper, and better suited to the needs of specific applications. Additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to transform QT [9, 10] by enabling miniaturised, robust devices that can be fabricated on demand with advanced architectures for enhanced operation, such as the innovative ultra-high vacuum apparatus [11] previously reported. AM also presents opportunities for integration, both of novel hardware with existing equipment [12, 13] or of functionalised components within a larger device.

A critical QT component is the atomic vapour cell [14, 15], it underpins many technologies, spanning laser frequency stabilisation [16, 17], atom, molecule and ion-trapping [18, 19, 20] thermal vapour magnetometers [21], medical imaging [1, 2] and industrial scanning applications [22, 23]. However, vapour cells are difficult to manufacture, rely on the art of glass-blowing and are consequently limited in size and shape. They are usually cylindrical with dimensions on the order of centimetres, and have only limited scope for miniaturisation or customisation.

Planar lithographic processes [24, 25] and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) with anodic bonding [26, 27, 28] can produce microfabricated cells with great potential for miniaturisation, but lack 3D-versatility and offer only two optical interfaces, which is insufficient for some applications; nor do they have the same transformative potential for integration and customisation as AM.

Additive manufacturing can provide the means to overcome these limitations. AM of glass was demonstrated using fused filament fabrication of molten glass [29, 30], selective laser melting with silica powder [31, 32] and direct ink writing using silica sol-gel inks [33]. However, significant technological challenges such as limited building resolution, evident surface roughness, cracking and low optical transparency have also been identified. Glass printing via the use of photocurable polymer / silica nanoparticle composites has led to optically useful constructs [34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39], but to date, the use of these formulations has been limited to structural ornaments, classical optics and fluidics.

Here we provide the first demonstration of an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) compatible AM glass QT component and show that, by modifying the inks and printing procedures, transparent printed structures with integrated active elements (i.e. electronics, photodetectors) can be realised. These structures are of high optical quality, have the potential to transform vapour cell based QTs and open a route to the scalable manufacture of key components for spectroscopy and quantum sensing (Figure 1a)).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Additive manufacturing of a vapour cell for QT applications. a Schematic diagram of the AM vapour cell for QT applications. Left: Illustration of the design of the cell mounted on an ultra-high vacuum flange via a copper tube. Middle: The photo of AM cell mounted for pumping to a pressure of 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar and loading with Rb atomic vapour. Right: Doppler-free pump-probe absorption spectroscopy of Rb vapour in the AM vapour cell and applications for QT. b Vat polymerisation of glass vapour cells via DLP and optical images of the printed green, brown and final parts following debinding and sintering steps. c Photograph of the printed cell with red and green laser beams propagating through the cell. d New structures are achievable: photograph of two inter-connected cells. e Integrated functionalisation: Inkjet printed graphene and silver inter-digit electrodes for direct photon detection on the cell.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Absorption spectroscopy of Rb vapour in the AM vapour cell. a Rb fluorescence image inside the cell under exposure to λex=780subscript𝜆𝑒𝑥780\lambda_{ex}=780italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 780 nm laser light. b and c CAD model and a scheme of the vacuum and optical setups. d Single beam absorption spectroscopy. The scale of the reference signal (yellow) is vertically offset by 0.02 for clarity. The frequency scale in d and e is set relative to the 87Rb F=2F=2×3𝐹2superscript𝐹23F=2\rightarrow F^{\prime}=2\times 3italic_F = 2 → italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2 × 3 transition. e Doppler-free pump-probe absorption spectroscopy. For clarity, the scale of the reference signal (yellow) is vertically offset by -0.05.

We describe the fabrication of glass vapour cells with sizes <1absent1<1~{}< 1cm3 by a vat polymerisation method based on digital light processing (DLP) of high loading silica nanoparticles resins (Figure 1b). As a QT application, the cells are used to demonstrate atomic spectroscopy and show excellent vacuum performance, with pumped cells reaching pressures below 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar and sustaining this pressure throughout the experiments. The cells were thermally tested up to 150superscript150150^{\circ}150 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC and were not noticeably degraded by exposure to high-temperature Rb vapour.

We performed atomic vapour spectroscopy within the cells and demonstrated its application to laser frequency stabilisation [40] on the D2 line of 85Rb.

The fabrication methodology is further applied to create complex cell geometries, while in-situ growth of metal nanoparticles is used to selectively tune the optical transmission of the produced glass, providing a clear demonstration of the versatility and transformative potential of such a method for creating optical materials for QT.

These functionalised cells enable exciting applications, e.g. for the creation of sub-cm sized optically pumped magnetometers incorporating magnetic-field shielding conductors and photodetectors directly printed on the cell, thereby providing a significant jump in system flexibility and imaging resolution for non-invasive magnetoencephalography [41].

II Results and Discussion

II.1 Additive manufacturing of a vapour cell

To manufacture the glass vapour cell (Figure 1), a resin was formulated based on [34] containing fumed silica nanoparticles with an average size of 40 nm, dispersed in a mixture of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), tetra(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (TEGDA) and phenoxyethanol (POE). HEMA forms a solvation layer on the nanoparticles, hence allowing high silica loading of the resin. TEGDA is used to improve cross-linking, thus strengthening the mechanical structure of the printed part. A concentration of 50 wt% silica nanoparticles was achieved following a multi-step homogenising process [42]. The viscosity of the resin was measured to be 297 mPa\cdots at a shear rate of 1000 s-1. For demonstration purposes, and to facilitate comparison with existing vapour cells used in commercial QTs, our cells have a cuboid shape featuring two pairs of parallel optical interfaces, in contrast to the single pair of parallel interfaces in wafer-based cells [43] and most glass-blown cells. The intended cell dimensions were 7.2 mm (L) ×7.2absent7.2\times~{}7.2× 7.2 mm (W) ×7.2absent7.2\times~{}7.2× 7.2 mm (H) with 1.5 mm wall thickness; the initial print was therefore 1 cm3 with 2 mm thick walls, to allow for shrinkage. An inlet on one side (Figure 1b) enables vapour loading and connection to our experimental apparatus.

To optimise the degree of curing during printing and obtain a high shape fidelity between the printed part and the design, the exposure time of each layer and the concentration of the absorber was adjusted by measuring the curing depth with different absorber concentrations (Appendix A1, Figure A1). The optimal degree of polymerisation, curing depth and shape fidelity, was achieved with 6.5 s exposure time, 45 mW/cm2 intensity and 0.035 wt% absorber content. A simulation of light-scattering from the silica nanoparticles showed an anisotropic distribution, however an isotropic degree of polymerisation can be achieved using this resin composition (Appendix A2, Figure A2).
The residual uncured resin was removed in washing and post-curing steps, resulting in a green part with good mechanical strength. Thermal debinding followed, with a gradual and uniform release of the internal mechanical stress, which was tailored to avoid cracking or collapse of the structure. The resulting debound porous brown part maintained the same geometry as the green part without volume shrinkage, but with a 51% weight loss as a consequence of the debinding process.
To eliminate porosity, the part was sintered in an inert argon atmosphere at a temperature of T=1150𝑇superscript1150T=1150\,^{\circ}italic_T = 1150 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC for 12 h. This process allows the silica nanoparticles to merge and form amorphous glass (Figure A3). We note that the argon atmosphere prevents the risk of crystallisation, which was previously observed in synthesis of parts in the presence of oxygen [44]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirmed the amorphous structure of the printed material (Figure A3a) [45]. The density of the sintered part is 2.2 gcm-3 and the sintered part had no observable porosity (see SEM images in Figure A3b)). The cells printed using this formulation show high mechanical stability under external pressures and good optical flatness/transparency (see below) and enabled us to achieve and retain vacuum down to 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar.

For our formulation, we observed 27%similar-toabsentpercent27\sim 27\%∼ 27 % linear shrinkage, both horizontally and vertically. The shrinkage of the part matched the estimation based on the solid weight concentration of the silica [42] and was accounted for in the design. The two pairs of parallel transparent flat surfaces of the cells allow two perpendicular beams to pass through with minimal distortion (Figure A1c). An additional polishing step (Grit 1000 polishing paper) was introduced to reduce outer wall roughness.

II.2 QT sensing with an additively manufactured cell

To demonstrate the suitability of the printed cells for quantum technology applications, we performed rubidium spectroscopy in the cell. For this, the cell was mounted to an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) flange via an annealed copper tube (Figure 2a) and connected to a vacuum test system (Figure 2b). The cells were leak tested and found to retain pressures down to 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar. The annealed copper tube allows for a separation of the cells from the vacuum apparatus after evacuation and use of the cell as a stand-alone device, via a standard copper pinch-off technique. The cell was then filled with a mixture of 85Rb and 87Rb via atomic dispensers. The geometry of the cell is also compatible with alternative filling methods, reported previously [46, 43]. The cell performance was first characterised through single-pass absorption spectroscopy. A single-mode, Gaussian laser beam with a diameter of 1.25 mm, a wavelength of 780 nm and a power of 0.06 mW was passed through the printed cell and detected on a photodiode (see Figure 2c). The transmission through the cell without Rb vapour is >90absent90>90\,> 90%.

The frequency of the laser light was scanned across the D2 resonance of rubidium 85 and fluorescence observed (inset of Figure 2a). The single-pass transmission spectrum (Figure 2d) displays the typical Voigt-profiles with all expected features. The yellow line shows Doppler-free absorption spectroscopy for comparison - this was obtained with a standard, commercial 75 mm long glass cell. The Doppler-valleys corresponding to the D2 absorption lines of 85Rb and 87Rb are clearly resolved, showing single pass absorption along the 87Rb F=2𝐹2F=2italic_F = 2 transition manifold and the 87Rb F=3𝐹3F=3italic_F = 3 transition manifold (Figure 2d). The frequency axis in Figure 3e is given relative to the 87Rb F=2F=2×3𝐹2𝐹23F=2\rightarrow F’=2\times 3italic_F = 2 → italic_F ’ = 2 × 3 transition. As an example of QT-sensing, Doppler-free saturated absorption spectroscopy was demonstrated with the cell at room temperature. Counter-propagating linearly polarised beams with powers of 0.06 mW (probe) and 0.3 mW (pump) were set up as shown in Figure 2c. The transmission of the probe beam (blue line in Figure 2e) shows the Doppler-free spectrum that allows the resolution of the hyperfine states, 87Rb F=2F=1,2,3formulae-sequence𝐹2superscript𝐹123F=2\rightarrow F^{\prime}=1,2,3italic_F = 2 → italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 , 2 , 3 and 85Rb F=3F=2,3,4formulae-sequence𝐹3superscript𝐹234F=3\rightarrow F^{\prime}=2,3,4italic_F = 3 → italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2 , 3 , 4 (Figure 5e).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Allan deviation of the unlocked laser, and with the laser locked using the printed vapour cell. Inset: The error signal (red) is shown for reference.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Transmission and polarisation measurement of the AM vapour cell. a Beam profile of a 780 nm test laser beam with and without passing through the cell.b Azimuth and ellipticity measured using a polarisation analyser for varying angles of polarisation, with and without the presence of the printed vapour cell, for initially linearly polarised light. c The Azimuth and ellipticity for varying angles of a preceding quarter-waveplate, with and without the presence of the printed vapour cell, for initially linearly polarised light.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Functionalisation of AM glass - AuNP doping and graphene tracks. a Photographs of printed glass slabs of 1.25×1.251.251.251.25\times 1.251.25 × 1.25 cm, with different concentrations of AuNP dopant, positioned over the University of Nottingham logo. b Measured absorbance of glass printed with different concentrations of AuNP dopant. c Representative I(V) dependence of a graphene track (10 mm by 2 mm) inkjet printed onto the 0.5 mM AuNP doped glass and (inset) optical microscopy image of the printed graphene track. d Electrical resistance, Rgr, of the graphene track printed onto an AuNP doped glass slab (0.5mM) measured in the dark and under continuous illumination with green laser light (λ=550𝜆550\lambda=550italic_λ = 550 nm, P=25𝑃25P=25italic_P = 25 mW). Inset: Schematic of the measurement scheme.

Doppler-free spectroscopy enables laser frequency stabilisation (“locking”) to the hyperfine transitions. We stabilised a laser to the 85Rb F=3F=3×4𝐹3superscript𝐹34F=3\rightarrow F^{\prime}=3\times 4italic_F = 3 → italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3 × 4 crossover transition and thus demonstrated that the cell can be used as a frequency standard. The laser current was modulated with a frequency of 100 kHz, the photodiode signal was demodulated and an error signal obtained that corresponds to the derivative of the spectroscopy signal. This signal was used to frequency-stabilise the laser through feedback to the laser diode drive current.

To analyse the resulting frequency stability, the error signal was recorded over a period of twenty minutes, while the laser was frequency locked via the signal from the printed vapour cell. By analysing the error signal, the Allan deviation was obtained for the locked laser and compared to the unlocked or free-running laser (see Figure 3).

The stabilisation based on the printed vapour cell reaches ΔF/F=2×1010Δ𝐹𝐹2superscript1010\Delta F/F=2\times 10^{-10}roman_Δ italic_F / italic_F = 2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at long interrogation times (t1ssimilar-to𝑡1𝑠t\sim 1\,sitalic_t ∼ 1 italic_s), an improvement of 1-2 orders of magnitude in comparison with the free-running laser, and provides significant stability improvements on all time scales. This demonstrates that the printed vapour cell can provide stable, Doppler-free laser locking. A similar setup based on polarisation can be used to operate the cell as a magnetometer [43, 47]. We compared the locking performance to a standard 75 mm long commercial vapour cell (Thorlabs, made by conventional glass blowing); taking the 15 times difference in optical path length into account, the Allan deviation normalised to optical path length is similar or slightly better for the printed cell (Figure A5).

To evaluate the applicability of printed vapour cells for magnetometry and polarisation dependent QT applications, the effect of the printed cell on beam shape and the polarisation of laser light (780 nm) was investigated with an internal vacuum of 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar. By analysing the Gaussian beam profile with and without the cell in the optical path, negligible distortion and a slight increase of the beam waist from the horizontally printed faces as shown in Figure 4a. For the vertically printed faces, the beam waist increased by 50%similar-toabsentpercent50\sim 50\%∼ 50 % [ωno_cell=(0.51±0.1)subscript𝜔no_cellplus-or-minus0.510.1\omega_{\mathrm{no\_cell}}=(0.51\pm 0.1)italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_no _ roman_cell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 0.51 ± 0.1 ) mm and ωcell=(0.78±0.1)subscript𝜔cellplus-or-minus0.780.1\omega_{\mathrm{cell}}=(0.78\pm 0.1)italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_cell end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 0.78 ± 0.1 ) mm] most likely due to curvature of the internal surface, which can be considered in future designs. Small undulations are caused by the layer-by-layer printing process.

The effect of the printed vapour cell on polarisation was analysed, for linearly polarised light, for various input polarisation angles obtained via tuning of a half-wave plate, with a measurement of the azimuth and ellipticity taken every 4superscript44^{\circ}4 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT using a polarisation analyser. The measurements with and without the printed vapour cell (Figure 4b) revealed negligible change (comparable to the resolution of the instrument) of azimuth and ellipticity when the cell is present in the optical path. The half-wave plate was then switched for a quarter-wave plate and the same measurement technique was repeated, to study the effect of the cell on elliptically polarised light. The results are shown in Figure 5c.

II.3 Functionalisation of AM vapour cell

Our method of 3D-printing vapour cells offers exceptional opportunities for improved quantum technologies. We are able to demonstrate a range of desirable features for vapour cell performance that are only made possible through additive manufacturing. The geometric design freedom of AM enabled printing of two inter-connected cells with a variable length tube (two 4.5 mm cuboid cells connected with a 3 mm channel, Figure 1d), thus offering increased optical depth, while by overprinting the cell with conductive materials (Figure 1e) we demonstrate integration and compactification potential for sensors and detectors. Tuneable modification of the optical transparency of 3D printed glass has previously been achieved by dipping the brown part into solutions containing metal salts [34, 48, tabellion2006]. We propose a facile method where AuNP are formed in situ to modify the glass absorption in the visible wavelength range.
Gold salt, AuCl3, was added to the resin before printing to form Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) in situ by a photothermal reduction process, thereby causing the glass to acquire a cranberry-red colour [49]. An absorption peak, characteristic of AuNPs, was observed at a wavelength of 565similar-toabsent565\sim 565\,∼ 565nm (Figure 5b) for the glass produced with 1 mM of AuCl3, indicating the formation of AuNPs with a size of 20similar-toabsent20\sim 20\,∼ 20nm. By varying the AuCl3 concentration from 0 to 2 mM, the colour of the resulting glass changes to dark deep red (Figure 5a), indicating the formation of larger size AuNPs, and the absorption peak shifts to a longer wavelength from 562 nm for 0.5 mM to 567 nm for 2 mM (Figure 5b). Importantly, the doped glass retains sufficient optical transparency in the near infrared range, as required for Rb atomic spectroscopy, while filtering out shorter wavelength visible light from environmental sources. In the context of magnetometer cells, doped glass offers the exciting exploitation of surface plasmon resonances (SPR) of AuNP for local optically-activated heating, which can be used to achieve higher vapour pressure in the cell faster than standard current-based heating methods [50].

To demonstrate SPR, we inkjet printed a graphene (iGr) track (10 mm (L) × 2 mm (W)) onto one side of the glass slab as shown in Figure 5c. Upon exposure of the undecorated side of the AuNP-glass to green laser light (λ=550𝜆550\lambda=550italic_λ = 550 nm), the resistance of the graphene track decreased by 2% in 60 s (Figure 5d), which is a typical change in resistance expected for a temperature increase of 30superscript3030\,^{\circ}30 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC. An equivalent track on undoped glass produced no detectable response under the same conditions (Figure A4a), confirming that the localised heating was generated by SPR of AuNPs. For medical sensing applications, e.g. magnetometry for brain imaging, this is a very relevant feature as the vapour pressure can be increased without heating coils and without raising the temperature of the environment; this reduces power dissipation and the need for thermal insulation, hence allowing the sensor to be brought closer to the tissues being studied. The technique also enables glass with a customisable optical absorption range within one glass structure (see Figure A4 b)).

Similarly to the overprinted graphene path, the vapour cell can be surface-decorated with other functional materials, including conductive layers/devices that can be inkjet printed onto the cell. A pair of 300 µm wide interdigitated conductive tracks was deposited using inkjet printing of silver nanoparticle ink and graphene inks (Figure 1e), with a sheet resistance of 0.53Ω/0.53\,\Omega/0.53 roman_Ω /sq and 207Ω/207\,\Omega/207 roman_Ω /sq respectively, which is comparable to the values achieved on other substrates [51, 52]. The conductive tracks exhibit good adhesion to the printed glass cell, enabling e.g. heating or magnetic field shielding elements that are co-manufactured with, and integral to, the vapour cell. The AM build process also facilitates integration of other active components, such as inkjet-printed perovskite photon sensors [53], which can be used for in situ monitoring.

III Conclusions

Additive manufacturing of transparent glass elements has immense potential to improve components for quantum technologies. A glass vapour cell has been produced by digital light processing and a wide range of functionalisation capabilities have been demonstrated, including integrated 3D printed electronics and active optoelectronic components for enhanced device functionality, and wavelength-selective absorption for surface plasmonic heating.

The printed vapour cell was successfully pumped to the UHV regime (2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar) and loaded with atomic rubidium vapour. The cell exhibits high transparency and polarisation stability, enabling the observation of atomic spectroscopy, including signature Doppler-valley and sub-Doppler features. Used as a frequency reference, laser stabilisation has been achieved with an Allan deviation ΔF/F<109Δ𝐹𝐹superscript109\Delta F/F<10^{-9}roman_Δ italic_F / italic_F < 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, limited by electronic feedback hardware, not the AM vapour cell.

This work will inspire new AM-QT research directions, for example, how the sensitivity of a spin-exchange relaxation-free magnetometer based on modified surfaces in a 3D printed vapour cell compares to established designs [27]. The process could enable manufacture of >40absent40>40> 40 glass cells (green parts) per lab-based printer per hour and the times required for debinding and sintering each cell could be effectively shortened with large volume furnaces.

Our methods open the way for the creation of novel, high-performance sensors based on functionalised glass vapour cells for enhanced quantum technology devices, such as magneto-encephalography sensors or atomic clocks. The upscalability of the AM process, together with good optical quality and high vacuum performance, makes such devices a scalable, convenient and customisable fabrication solution for many QT application sectors.

Data availability statement

The data used in this work are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

The fabrication work of the glass vapour cell was supported by EPSRC grants EP/P031684/1, EP/T001046/1 and EP/M013294/1. The characterisation work was supported by IUK project No.133086, EPSRC grants EP/T001046/1, EP/R024111/1 and EP/M013294/1, and by the European Comission grant ErBeStA (no. 800942).

Experimental Methods

Resin formulation: A mixture of 60 vol% 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 10 vol% tetra (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (TEGDA) and 30 vol% phenoxyethanol (POE) was prepared, and blended with 0.2 wt% of bis (2,4,6 trimethylbenzoyl)phenylphosphineoxide as a photoinitiator, 0.1 wt% of hydroquinone monomethyl ether as an inhibitor and 0.035 wt% of Sudan Orange UV absorber. Aerosil OX50 silica nanopowder (50 wt%) was added in 10 small doses with 15 min bath sonication to prevent agglomeration. The final slurry was further bath sonicated for 30 mins and then degassed at a low pressure of 200 mbar for 3 min.

Additive manufacturing process: The design was printed on a Cellink Lumen X printer (45 mW/cm2 UV power intensity at 405 nm) with 50μ50𝜇50\,\mu50 italic_μm hatching distance and 6.5 s exposure time for each layer. The printed part was immersed in propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA) and washed using a tube roller at 80 rpm for 5 minutes to remove the residual non-polymerised material. The washing cycle was repeated three times. Then the part was exposed to ultraviolet floodlight using a Wicked Curebox for 10 minutes for post-curing.

Post-process debinding and sintering: The green part was debound in a high-temperature furnace (Carbolite HRF 7/22 box furnace) with the ambient temperature being increased at 0.35C/min to T=130𝑇superscript130T=130^{\circ}italic_T = 130 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC, held at this temperature for 2 hours, then increased at the same rate to 320superscript320320^{\circ}320 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC for 4 hours and 600superscript600600^{\circ}600 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC for 2 hours. The resulting brown part was further sintered at T=1150𝑇superscript1150T=1150^{\circ}italic_T = 1150 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC for 12 hours with 3superscript33^{\circ}3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC/min heating and cooling rates under 1 bar argon flow using a tube furnace (Carbolite STF 15/50).

Functionalisation: Doping with Au nanoparticles was achieved by adding AuCl3 to the resin, with final concentrations of 0.5 mM, 1 mM and 2 mM, before adding fumed silica powder. Conductive tracks were deposited with a 300μ300𝜇300\,\mu300 italic_μm wide interdigitated design using a Dimatix DMP-2831 inkjet printer and a Samba cartridgeof 2.4 pL drop volume. Three layers of AgNP ink (XTPL IJ36) were deposited using a 20μ20𝜇20\,\mu20 italic_μm drop spacing and ten layers of graphene ink (Merck 793663) were printed using 10μ10𝜇10\,\mu10 italic_μm drop spacings.

Electrical and optical characterisation: The sheet resistance of the printed silver and graphene samples was measured using a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter and a micromanipulator with a four-probe method, also known as the Kelvin technique, to eliminate contact resistance. Each I-V curve was measured three times using both forward and backwards scanning. The derivative of the I-V curve reveals the conductivity of the printed line with the exact geometry measured by an optical microscope.

Characterisation of polarised light: The laser beam was set up to pass through a linear polariser and a waveplate (either quarter-wave or half-wave as appropriate), before passing through the printed vapour cell, which was under internal vacuum so that no gases in the cell could alter the polarisation.

Atomic spectroscopy: The cell was connected to a UHV-flange via an annealed copper tube and attached to the tube using UV-curing glue (Dymax OP-67-LS). The system shown in Fig. 2b was used to demonstrate the vacuum compatibility of the cells. Following bake-out for 24hrs at 150superscript150150^{\circ}150 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTC and leak-testing, pressures down to 2×1092superscript1092\times 10^{-9}2 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mbar were achieved. Laser light resonant with the rubidium absorption lines from a Toptica 110 tapered amplifier laser was then guided into the cell and the resulting absorption measured on a Thorlabs DET10A amplified photodiode. Doppler-free spectroscopy was obtained using a pump-probe setup as shown in Fig. 2b with 0.06 mW probe beam power and 0.3 mW pump beam power in beams with a diameter of 1.25 mm. The commercial reference vapour cell of ⌀25.4mm×71.825.4mm71.825.4\mathrm{mm}\times 71.825.4 roman_mm × 71.8 mm was purchased from Thorlabs (GC25075-RB). For laser locking with this commercial cell, the probe beam is retro-reflected back through the cell, instead of separate probe and pump beams.

References

  • Aslam et al. [2023] N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, and H. Park, Quantum sensors for biomedical applications, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 157 (2023).
  • Boto et al. [2018] E. Boto, N. Holmes, J. Legget, G. Roberts, V. Shah, S. Meyer, L. Munoz, K. Mullinger, T. Tierney, S. Bestmann, G. Barnes, R. Bowtell, and M. Brookes, Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system, Nature 555, 657 (2018).
  • Arita et al. [2013] Y. Arita, M. Mazilu, and K. Dholakia, Laser-induced rotation and cooling of a trapped microgyroscope in vacuum, Nature communications 4, 2374 (2013).
  • Bongs et al. [2019] K. Bongs, M. Holynski, J. Vovrosh, P. Bouyer, G. Condon, E. Rasel, C. Schubert, W. Schleich, and A. Roura, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 731 (2019).
  • Lee et al. [2023] J. Lee, M. Lisanti, W. A. Terrano, and M. Romalis, Laboratory constraints on the neutron-spin coupling of fev-scale axions, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011050 (2023).
  • Feng [2019] D. Feng, Review of quantum navigation, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 237 (IOP Publishing, 2019) p. 032027.
  • Stray et al. [2022] B. Stray, A. Lamb, A. Kaushik, J. Vovrosh, A. Rodgers, J. Winch, F. Hayati, D. Boddice, A. Strabawa, and A. Niggebaum, Quantum sensing for gravity cartography, Nature 602, 590 (2022).
  • Evered et al. [2023] S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023).
  • Ruchka et al. [2022] P. Ruchka, S. Hammer, M. Rockenhäuser, R. Albrecht, J. Drozella, S. Thiele, H. Giessen, and T. Langen, Microscopic 3d printed optical tweezers for atomic quantum technology, Quantum Science and Technology 7, 045011 (2022).
  • Vovrosh et al. [2018] J. Vovrosh, G. Voulazeris, P. Petrov, J. Zou, Y. Gaber, L. Benn, D. Woolger, M. M. Attallah, V. Boyer, K. Bongs, and M. Holynski, Additive manufacturing of magnetic shielding and ultra-high vacuum flange for cold atom sensors, Scientific Reports 8, 2023 (2018).
  • Cooper et al. [2021] N. Cooper, L. Coles, S. Everton, I. Makery, R. Campion, S. Madkhaly, C. Morley, J. O’Shea, W. Evans, R. Saint, P. Krüger, F. Orucevic, C. Tuck, R. Wildman, T. Fromhold, and L. Hackermüller, Additively manufactured ultra-high vacuum chamber for portable quantum technologies, Additive Manufacturinig 40, 101898 (2021).
  • Madkhaly et al. [2021] S. Madkhaly, L. Coles, C. Morley, C. Colquhoun, T. Fromhold, N. Cooper, and L. Hackermüller, Performance-optimized components for quantum technologies via additive manufacturing, PRX Quantum 2, 030326 (2021).
  • Stærkind et al. [2023] H. Stærkind, K. Jensen, J. H. Müller, V. O. Boer, E. T. Petersen, and E. S. Polzik, Precision measurement of the excited state landé g-factor and diamagnetic shift of the cesium d2subscriptd2{\mathrm{d}}_{2}roman_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT line, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021036 (2023).
  • Liew et al. [2004] L. A. Liew, S. Knappe, J. Moreland, H. Robinson, L. Hollberg, and J. Kitching, Microfabricated alkali atom vapor cells, Applied Physics Letters 84, 2694 (2004).
  • Maurice et al. [2022] V. Maurice, C. Carle, S. Keshavarzi, R. Chutani, S. Queste, L. Gauthier-Manuel, J.-M. Cote, R. Vicarini, M. Abdel Hafiz, R. Boudot, and N. Passilly, Wafer-level vapor cells filled with laser-actuated hermetic seals for integrated atomic devices, Microsystems & Nanoengineering 8, 129 (2022).
  • Cooper et al. [2023a] N. Cooper, S. Madkhaly, D. Johnson, B. Hopton, D. Baldolini, and L. Hackermüller, Dual-frequency doppler-free spectroscopy for simultaneous laser stabilization in compact atomic physics experiments, Phys. Rev. A 108, 013521 (2023a).
  • Martinez et al. [2023] G. D. Martinez, C. Li, A. Staron, J. Kitching, C. Raman, and W. R. McGehee, A chip-scale atomic beam clock, Nature Communications 14, 3501 (2023).
  • Vilas et al. [2022] N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, L. Anderegg, P. Robichaud, A. Winnicki, D. Mitra, and J. M. Doyle, Magneto-optical trapping and sub-doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule, Nature 606, 70 (2022).
  • Häffner et al. [2008] H. Häffner, C. Roos, and R. Blatt, Quantum computing with trapped ions, Physics Reports 469, 155 (2008).
  • Marciniak et al. [2022] C. D. Marciniak, T. Feldker, I. Pogorelov, R. Kaubrugger, D. V. Vasilyev, R. van Bijnen, P. Schindler, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and T. Monz, Optimal metrology with programmable quantum sensors, Nature 603, 604 (2022).
  • Fabricant et al. [2023] A. Fabricant, I. Novikova, and G. Bison, How to build a magnetometer with thermal atomic vapor: a tutorial, New Journal of Physics 25, 025001 (2023).
  • Pross et al. [2005] A. Pross, A. Crisan, S. Bending, V. Mosser, and M. Konczykowski, Second-generation quantum-well sensors for room-temperature scanning hall probe microscopy, Journal of Applied Physics 97, 0964105 (2005).
  • Behzadirad et al. [2021] M. Behzadirad, S. Mecholdt, J. N. Randall, J. B. Ballard, J. Owen, A. K. Rishinaramangalam, A. Reum, T. Gotszalk, D. F. Feezell, I. W. Rangelow, et al., Advanced scanning probe nanolithography using gan nanowires, Nano Letters 21, 5493 (2021).
  • Pétremand et al. [2012] Y. Pétremand, C. Affolderbach, R. Straessle, M. Pellaton, D. Briand, G. Mileti, and N. F. de Rooij, Microfabricated rubidium vapour cell with a thick glass core for small-scale atomic clock applications, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 22, 025013 (2012).
  • Shah et al. [2007] V. Shah, S. Knappe, P. D. Schwindt, and J. Kitching, Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabricated vapour cell, Nature Photonics 1, 649 (2007).
  • Gong et al. [2006] F. Gong, Y.-Y. Jau, K. Jensen, and W. Happer, Electrolytic fabrication of atomic clock cells, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 076101 (2006).
  • Griffith et al. [2010] W. C. Griffith, S. Knappe, and J. Kitching, Femtotesla atomic magnetometry in a microfabricated vapor cell, Optics Express 18, 27167 (2010).
  • Lee et al. [2004] C. H. Lee, H. Guo, S. Radhakrishnam, A. Lal, C. Szekely, T. McClelland, and A. P. Pisano, in Proc. Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Workshop (Hilton Head Island, SC, 6–10 June 2004) (2004).
  • Luo et al. [2017] J. Luo, L. J. Gilbert, C. Qu, R. G. Landers, D. A. Bristow, and E. C. Kinzel, Additive manufacturing of transparent soda-lime glass using a filament-fed process, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 139, 061006 (2017).
  • Inamura et al. [2018] C. Inamura, M. Stern, D. Lizardo, P. Houk, and N. Oxman, Additive manufacturing of transparent glass structures, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 5, 269 (2018).
  • Datsiou et al. [2019] K. C. Datsiou, E. Saleh, F. Spirrett, R. Goodridge, I. Ashcroft, and D. Eustice, Additive manufacturing of glass with laser powder bed fusion, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 102, 4410 (2019).
  • Lei et al. [2019] J. Lei, Y. Hong, Q. Zhang, F. Peng, and H. Xiao, Additive manufacturing of fused silica glass using direct laser melting, in CLEO: Applications and Technology (Optica Publishing Group, 2019) pp. AW3I–4.
  • Sasan et al. [2020] K. Sasan, A. Lange, T. D. Yee, N. Dudukovic, D. T. Nguyen, M. A. Johnson, O. D. Herrera, J. H. Yoo, A. M. Sawvel, M. E. Ellis, et al., Additive manufacturing of optical quality germania–silica glasses, ACS applied materials & interfaces 12, 6736 (2020).
  • Kotz et al. [2017] F. Kotz, K. Arnold, W. Bauer, D. Schild, N. Keller, K. Sachsenheimer, T. M. Nargang, C. Richter, D. Helmer, and B. E. Rapp, Three-dimensional printing of transparent fused silica glass, Nature 544, 337 (2017).
  • Cooperstein et al. [2018] I. Cooperstein, E. Shukrun, O. Press, A. Kamyshny, and S. Magdassi, Additive manufacturing of transparent silica glass from solutions, ACS applied materials & interfaces 10, 18879 (2018).
  • Moore et al. [2020] D. G. Moore, L. Barbera, K. Masania, and A. R. Studart, Three-dimensional printing of multicomponent glasses using phase-separating resins, Nature materials 19, 212 (2020).
  • Toombs et al. [2022] J. T. Toombs, M. Luitz, C. C. Cook, S. Jenne, C. C. Li, B. E. Rapp, F. Kotz-Helmer, and H. K. Taylor, Volumetric additive manufacturing of silica glass with microscale computed axial lithography, Science 376, 308 (2022).
  • Kotz et al. [2021] F. Kotz, A. S. Quick, P. Risch, T. Martin, T. Hoose, M. Thiel, D. Helmer, and B. E. Rapp, Two-photon polymerization of nanocomposites for the fabrication of transparent fused silica glass microstructures, Advanced Materials 33, 2006341 (2021).
  • Han et al. [2019] D. Han, C. Yang, N. X. Fang, and H. Lee, Rapid multi-material 3d printing with projection micro-stereolithography using dynamic fluidic control, Additive Manufacturing 27, 606 (2019).
  • Cooper et al. [2023b] N. Cooper, S. Madkhaly, D. Johnson, B. Hopton, D. Baldolini, and L. Hackermüller, Dual-frequency doppler-free spectroscopy for simultaneous laser stabilization in compact atomic physics experiments, Phys. Rev. A 108, 013521 (2023b).
  • Brookes et al. [2022] M. J. Brookes, J. Legget, M. Rea, R. M. Hill, N. Holmes, E. Boto, and R. Bowtell, Magnetoencephalography with optically pumped magnetometers (opm-meg): the next generation of functional neuroimaging, Trends in Neurosciences 45, 621 (2022).
  • Cai et al. [2020] P. Cai, L. Guo, H. Wang, J. Li, J. Li, Y. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Q. Lue, Effects of slurry mixing methods and solid loading on 3d printed silica glass parts based on dlp stereolithography, Ceramics International 46, 16833 (2020).
  • Lucivero et al. [2022] V. G. Lucivero, A. Zanoni, G. Corrielli, R. Osellame, and M. W. Mitchell, Laser-written vapor cells for chip-scale atomic sensing and spectroscopy, Opt. Express 30, 27149 (2022).
  • Yong-Taeg et al. [2002] O. Yong-Taeg, S. Fujino, and K. Morinag, Fabrication of transparent silica glass by powder sintering, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 3, 297 (2002).
  • Milonjić et al. [2007] S. K. Milonjić, L. S. Čerović, D. M. Čokeša, and S. Zec, The influence of cationic impurities in silica on its crystallization and point of zero charge, Journal of colloid and interface science 309, 155 (2007).
  • Shun et al. [2021] K. Shun, Y. Hirai, O. Tabata, and T. Tsuchiya, Microfabricated cs vapor cells filled with an on-chip dispensing component, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 60, SCCL01 (2021).
  • Alvarez et al. [2022] S. P. Alvarez, P. Gomez, S. Coop, R. Zamora-Zamora, C. Mazzinghi, and M. W. Mitchell, Single-domain bose condensate magnetometer achieves energy resolution per bandwidth below Planck-constant-over-2-pi\hbarroman_ℏPNAS 119, e2115339119 (2022).
  • Liu et al. [2018] C. Liu, B. Qian, R. Ni, and J. Qiu, 3d printing of multicolor luminescent glass, RSC Advances 8, 31564 (2018).
  • Hu et al. [2017] Q. Hu, X.-Z. Sun, C. D. Parmenter, M. W. Fay, E. F. Smith, G. A. Rance, Y. He, F. Zhang, Y. Liu, and D. Irvine, Scientific reports 7, 17150 (2017).
  • Bharadwaj and Mukherji [2014] R. Bharadwaj and S. Mukherji, Gold nanoparticle coated u-bend fibre optic probe for localized surface plasmon resonance based detection of explosive vapours, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 192, 804 (2014).
  • Trindade et al. [2021] G. F. Trindade, F. Wang, J. Im, Y. He, A. Balogh, D. Scurr, I. Gilmore, M. Tiddia, E. Saleh, D. Pervan, et al., Residual polymer stabiliser causes anisotropic electrical conductivity during inkjet printing of metal nanoparticles, Communications Materials 2, 47 (2021).
  • Wang et al. [2021] F. Wang, J. H. Gosling, G. F. Trindade, G. A. Rance, O. Makarovsky, N. D. Cottam, Z. Kudrynskyi, A. G. Balanov, M. T. Greenaway, R. D. Wildman, et al., Inter-flake quantum transport of electrons and holes in inkjet-printed graphene devices, Advanced Functional Materials 31, 2007478 (2021).
  • Austin et al. [2023] J. S. Austin, N. D. Cottam, C. Zhang, F. Wang, J. H. Gosling, O. Nelson-Dummet, T. S. James, P. H. Beton, G. F. Trindade, Y. Zhou, et al., Photosensitisation of inkjet printed graphene with stable all-inorganic perovskite nanocrystals, Nanoscale 15, 2134 (2023).
  • Faria-E-Silva and Pfeifer [2017] A. L. Faria-E-Silva and C. S. Pfeifer, Impact of thio-urethane additive and filler type on light-transmission and depth of polymerization of dental composites, Dental Materials 33, 1274 (2017).
  • Zhao et al. [2021] P. Zhao, Y. He, G. F. Trindade, M. Baumers, D. J. Irvine, R. J. Hague, I. A. Ashcroft, and W. R. D., Modelling the influence of uv curing strategies for optimisation of inkjet based 3d printing, Materials & Design 208, 109889 (2021).

Appendix

A1 Optimisation of printing parameters for the resin

By comparing the curing depth of the resins containing different concentrations of UV absorbers of 0.01 wt%, 0.02 wt%, 0.035 wt% and 0.05%, as shown in Figure A1, the 0.035 wt% was chosen as the optimum for the 50μ50𝜇50\mu50 italic_μm layer thickness used by the Lumen X printer, which results in a high geometrical fidelity at short printing times.

Refer to caption
Figure A1: Measured curing depth versus exposure time under irradiance of 45 mW/cm2 UV light for resins with concentrations of UV absorbers of 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.035% and 0.05%.

A2 Modelling of scattered light of nanoparticles in the resin

Previous studies have highlighted that the existence of nanoparticles in UV curable resins promotes the curing depth due to the light scattered from the nanoparticles [54], and the extra energy overcures the photocurable material in the curing layer which reduces the printing resolution or even interferes with the curing of the next layer in DLP printing (A2a)). Following previous work on the modelling of polymerisation kinetics[55], the degree of curing caused by scattering in our resin formulation was calculated and confirmed that the formulated resin successfully suppressed the curing inhomogeneity caused by scattered light around the nanoparticles.

The scattered light intensity distribution, I(θ)𝐼𝜃I(\theta)italic_I ( italic_θ ), due to Rayleigh scattering of one OX 50 nanoparticle can be calculated by

I(θ)=I01+cosθ2R2(2πλ)4(n21n2+2)2(d2)6𝐼𝜃subscript𝐼01𝜃2superscript𝑅2superscript2𝜋𝜆4superscriptsuperscript𝑛21superscript𝑛222superscript𝑑26I(\theta)=I_{0}\frac{1+\cos\theta}{2R^{2}}\left(\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}\right)^{4% }\left(\frac{n^{2}-1}{n^{2}+2}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{d}{2}\right)^{6}italic_I ( italic_θ ) = italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 + roman_cos italic_θ end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_λ end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (1)

where I0=45subscript𝐼045I_{0}=45italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 45 mW/cm2 is the intensity of the Lumen X printer used in this work, R𝑅Ritalic_R is the mean distance between the particles, θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ is the scattering angle, n=1.45𝑛1.45n=1.45italic_n = 1.45 is the refractive index of the resin, d=40𝑑40d=40italic_d = 40 nm is the average diameter of the particle and λ=405𝜆405\lambda=405\,italic_λ = 405nm is the wavelength of the light.
Taking R=1.02d𝑅1.02𝑑R=1.02\,ditalic_R = 1.02 italic_d, which matches the 50 wt% of nanoparticles in the resin, the distribution of the scattered light intensity I(θ)𝐼𝜃I(\theta)italic_I ( italic_θ ) is anistropic and the scattered light is 1.9 times stronger along the direction of the incoming UV light (z-direction) than the perpendicular x-y-plane (Figure A1b)).

Refer to caption
Figure A2: a) Sketch showing the light scattering by the silica nanoparticles in the resin. b) Light scattering power density distribution from a silica nanoparticle when R=1.02d𝑅1.02𝑑R=1.02ditalic_R = 1.02 italic_d from equ. (1). c) The resulting, homogeneous consumption of the vinyl group χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ due to scattering around the nanoparticle from equ. (2), when R=1.02d𝑅1.02𝑑R=1.02ditalic_R = 1.02 italic_d is chosen.

Despite the anistropic angular distribution of the scattered light intensity, the formulated resin exhibits an isotropic degree of polymerisation. The total consumption of the vinyl groups during polymerisation, χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ, can be described by a model developed in [55], which combines classical theory of free radical polymerisation with consumption χpsubscript𝜒𝑝\chi_{p}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and an autoacceleration effect with consumption χasubscript𝜒𝑎\chi_{a}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,

χ=χp+χa=χmax,p(1ekpΛ)+χmax,a1+eka(ΛΛC),𝜒subscript𝜒𝑝subscript𝜒𝑎subscript𝜒maxp1superscript𝑒subscript𝑘𝑝Λsubscript𝜒maxa1superscript𝑒subscript𝑘𝑎ΛsubscriptΛ𝐶\chi=\chi_{p}+\chi_{a}=\chi_{\mathrm{max,p}}\left(1-e^{k_{p}\Lambda}\right)+% \frac{\chi_{\mathrm{max,a}}}{1+e^{k_{a}(\Lambda-\Lambda_{C})}},italic_χ = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max , roman_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 - italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max , roman_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Λ - roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (2)

where Λ=ItΛ𝐼𝑡\Lambda=\sqrt{I}troman_Λ = square-root start_ARG italic_I end_ARG italic_t is the UV radiation dose (t𝑡titalic_t = 6.5 s is the exposure time), χmax,p=0.2079subscript𝜒maxp0.2079\chi_{\mathrm{max,p}}=0.2079italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max , roman_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.2079 and χmax,a=0.5729subscript𝜒maxa0.5729\chi_{\mathrm{max,a}}=0.5729italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max , roman_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5729 are the maximum degrees of vinyl group consumption that can be achieved by the classical radical polymerisation and the autoacceleration polymerisation respectively. The rate constant of free radical polymerisation kp=0.0083(kg/s)1/2subscript𝑘𝑝0.0083superscriptkgs12k_{p}=-0.0083\mathrm{(kg/s)^{-1/2}}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 0.0083 ( roman_kg / roman_s ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the rate constant for the autoacceleration stage ka=0.1258(kg/s)1/2subscript𝑘𝑎0.1258superscriptkgs12k_{a}=-0.1258\mathrm{(kg/s)^{-1/2}}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 0.1258 ( roman_kg / roman_s ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the required UV radiation dose to achieve half of the maximum degree of vinyl group consumption at the autoacceleration stage ΛC=14.0719(kg/s)1/2subscriptΛ𝐶14.0719superscriptkgs12\Lambda_{C}=14.0719\mathrm{(kg/s)^{1/2}}roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 14.0719 ( roman_kg / roman_s ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are parameters determined by the compositions of the monomers, photoinitiators and absorbers in the formulation utilising the method described in [55]. For the used resin formulation, the expected angular distribution for the degree of curing χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ has an isotropic distribution as shown in Fig.A2, which indicates a similar degree of curing along all directions.

A3 Characterisation of printed and functionalised glass structures

Refer to caption
Figure A3: a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and b) a representative, cross-section scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the final printed glass part showing an amorphous structure after sintering.
Refer to caption
Figure A4: a) Resistance change of a graphene track printed onto a non-doped glass slab during exposure to continuous illumination with green laser light (550 nm, P = 25 mW). b) Printed glass structures with two different colours. The base is without doping and the standing surfaces are doped with 0.5 mM AuNP.

A4 Laser locking comparison to Thorlabs 75 mm vapour cell

For laser frequency stabilisation, we compared the performance of our printed vapour cell to a standard Thorlabs 75 mm vapour cell. For laser locking with this cell, the probe beam is retro-reflected back through the cell, instead of separate probe and pump beams. Note that the total path length is 15 times that for the printed vapour cell. The resulting Allen deviation is shown in Figure A5.

Refer to caption
Figure A5: Allan deviation comparison of the printed vapour cell and the commercial vapour cell, adjusted for the ratio of the corresponding optical path lengths.

A5 Polarisation characterisation of the printed vapour cell

The stability of the polarisation was also measured by analysing the polarisation over time (Figure A6). No time-dependent change (e.g. through a local temperature change) in polarisation was detected.

Refer to caption
Figure A6: The azimuth and ellipticity measured on a polarisation analyser over time, with and without the presence of the printed vapour cell, for a given incident polarisation.