-
Hold Tight: Identifying Behavioral Patterns During Prolonged Work in VR through Video Analysis
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Forouzan Farzinnejad,
Rinaldo Schuster,
Seyedmasih Tabaei,
Leon Lindlein,
Jinghui Hu,
Negar Nouri,
John J. Dudley,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Jörg Müller,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
VR devices have recently been actively promoted as tools for knowledge workers and prior work has demonstrated that VR can support some knowledge worker tasks. However, only a few studies have explored the effects of prolonged use of VR such as a study observing 16 participant working in VR and a physical environment for one work-week each and reporting mainly on subjective feedback. As a nuanced…
▽ More
VR devices have recently been actively promoted as tools for knowledge workers and prior work has demonstrated that VR can support some knowledge worker tasks. However, only a few studies have explored the effects of prolonged use of VR such as a study observing 16 participant working in VR and a physical environment for one work-week each and reporting mainly on subjective feedback. As a nuanced understanding of participants' behavior in VR and how it evolves over time is still missing, we report on the results from an analysis of 559 hours of video material obtained in this prior study. Among other findings, we report that (1) the frequency of actions related to adjusting the headset reduced by 46% and the frequency of actions related to supporting the headset reduced by 42% over the five days; (2) the HMD was removed 31% less frequently over the five days but for 41% longer periods; (3) wearing an HMD is disruptive to normal patterns of eating and drinking, but not to social interactions, such as talking. The combined findings in this work demonstrate the value of long-term studies of deployed VR systems and can be used to inform the design of better, more ergonomic VR systems as tools for knowledge workers.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2024; v1 submitted 26 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Working with XR in Public: Effects on Users and Bystanders
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Snehanjali Kalamkar,
John J Dudley,
Jinghui Hu,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Jörg Müller,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
Recent commercial off-the-shelf virtual and augmented reality devices have been promoted as tools for knowledge work and research findings show how this kind of work can benefit from the affordances of extended reality (XR). One major advantage that XR can provide is the enlarged display space that can be used to display virtual screens which is a feature already readily available in many commerci…
▽ More
Recent commercial off-the-shelf virtual and augmented reality devices have been promoted as tools for knowledge work and research findings show how this kind of work can benefit from the affordances of extended reality (XR). One major advantage that XR can provide is the enlarged display space that can be used to display virtual screens which is a feature already readily available in many commercial devices. This could be especially helpful in mobile contexts, in which users might not have access to their optimal physical work setup. Such situations often occur in a public setting, for example when working on a train while traveling to a business meeting. At the same time, the use of XR devices is still uncommon in public, which might impact both users and bystanders. Hence, there is a need to better understand the implications of using XR devices for work in public both on the user itself, as well as on bystanders. We report the results of a study in a university cafeteria in which participants used three different systems. In one setup they only used a laptop with a single screen, in a second setup, they combined the laptop with an optical see-through AR headset, and in the third, they combined the laptop with an immersive VR headset. In addition, we also collected 231 responses from bystanders through a questionnaire. The combined results indicate that (1) users feel safer if they can see their physical surroundings; (2) current use of XR in public makes users stand out; and (3) prior XR experience can influence how users feel when using XR in public.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Video Analysis of Behavioral Patterns During Prolonged Work in VR
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Forouzan Farzinnejad,
Rinaldo Schuster,
Seyedmasih Tabaei,
Leon Lindlein,
Jinghui Hu,
Negar Nouri,
John J. Dudley,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Jörg Müller,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
VR has recently been promoted as a tool for knowledge workers and studies have shown that it has the potential to improve knowledge work. However, studies on its prolonged use have been scarce. A prior study compared working in VR for one week to working in a physical environment, focusing on performance measures and subjective feedback. However, a nuanced understanding and comparison of participa…
▽ More
VR has recently been promoted as a tool for knowledge workers and studies have shown that it has the potential to improve knowledge work. However, studies on its prolonged use have been scarce. A prior study compared working in VR for one week to working in a physical environment, focusing on performance measures and subjective feedback. However, a nuanced understanding and comparison of participants' behavior in VR and the physical environment is still missing. To this end, we analyzed video material made available from this previously conducted experiment, carried out over a working week, and present our findings on comparing the behavior of participants while working in VR and in a physical environment.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Remote Monitoring and Teleoperation of Autonomous Vehicles $-$ Is Virtual Reality an Option?
Authors:
Snehanjali Kalamkar,
Verena Biener,
Fabian Beck,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
While the promise of autonomous vehicles has led to significant scientific and industrial progress, fully automated, SAE level 5 conform cars will likely not see mass adoption anytime soon. Instead, in many applications, human supervision, such as remote monitoring and teleoperation, will be required for the foreseeable future. While Virtual Reality (VR) has been proposed as one potential interfac…
▽ More
While the promise of autonomous vehicles has led to significant scientific and industrial progress, fully automated, SAE level 5 conform cars will likely not see mass adoption anytime soon. Instead, in many applications, human supervision, such as remote monitoring and teleoperation, will be required for the foreseeable future. While Virtual Reality (VR) has been proposed as one potential interface for teleoperation, its benefits and drawbacks over physical monitoring and teleoperation solutions have not been thoroughly investigated. To this end, we contribute three user studies, comparing and quantifying the performance of and subjective feedback for a VR-based system with an existing monitoring and teleoperation system, which is in industrial use today. Through these three user studies, we contribute to a better understanding of future virtual monitoring and teleoperation solutions for autonomous vehicles. The results of our first user study (n=16) indicate that a VR interface replicating the physical interface does not outperform the physical interface. It also quantifies the negative effects that combined monitoring and teleoperating tasks have on users irrespective of the interface being used. The results of the second user study (n=24) indicate that the perceptual and ergonomic issues caused by VR outweigh its benefits, like better concentration through isolation. The third follow-up user study (n=24) specifically targeted the perceptual and ergonomic issues of VR; the subjective feedback of this study indicates that newer-generation VR headsets have the potential to catch up with the current physical displays.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2023; v1 submitted 21 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
VocabulARy replicated: comparing teenagers to young adults
Authors:
Maheshya Weerasinghe,
Verena Biener,
Jens Grubert,
Jordan Aiko Deja,
Nuwan T. Attygalle,
Karolina Trajkovska,
Matjaž Kljun,
Klen Čopič Pucihar
Abstract:
A critical component of user studies is gaining access to a representative sample of the population researches intend to investigate. Nevertheless, the vast majority of human-computer interaction (HCI)studies, including augmented reality (AR) studies, rely on convenience sampling. The outcomes of these studies are often based on results obtained from university students aged between 19 and 26 year…
▽ More
A critical component of user studies is gaining access to a representative sample of the population researches intend to investigate. Nevertheless, the vast majority of human-computer interaction (HCI)studies, including augmented reality (AR) studies, rely on convenience sampling. The outcomes of these studies are often based on results obtained from university students aged between 19 and 26 years. In order to investigate how the results from one of our studies are affected by convenience sampling, we replicated the AR-supported language learning study called VocabulARy with 24 teenagers, aged between 14 and 19 years. The results verified most of the outcomes from the original study. In addition, it also revealed that teenagers found learning significantly less mentally demanding compared to young adults, and completed the study in a significantly shorter time. All this at no cost to learning outcomes.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Content Transfer Across Multiple Screens with Combined Eye-Gaze and Touch Interaction -- A Replication Study
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
In this paper, we describe the results of replicating one of our studies from two years ago which compares two techniques for transferring content across multiple screens in VR. Results from the previous study have shown that a combined gaze and touch input can outperform a bimanual touch-only input in terms of task completion time, simulator sickness, task load and usability. Except for the simul…
▽ More
In this paper, we describe the results of replicating one of our studies from two years ago which compares two techniques for transferring content across multiple screens in VR. Results from the previous study have shown that a combined gaze and touch input can outperform a bimanual touch-only input in terms of task completion time, simulator sickness, task load and usability. Except for the simulator sickness, these findings could be validated by the replication. The difference with regards to simulator sickness and variations in absolute scores of the other measures could be explained by a different set of user with less VR experience.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Improving Understanding of Biocide Availability in Facades through Immersive Analytics
Authors:
Negar Nouri,
Snehanjali Kalamkar,
Forouzan Farzinnejad,
Verena Biener,
Fabian Schick,
Stefan Kalkhof,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
The durability of facades is heavily affected by multiple factors like microbial growth and weather conditions among others. Biocides are often used to resist these factors and protect the facades. However, the biocides get washed out due to rains and other factors like geometric structure of the facade, orientation of the building. It is therefore, important to understand how these factors affect…
▽ More
The durability of facades is heavily affected by multiple factors like microbial growth and weather conditions among others. Biocides are often used to resist these factors and protect the facades. However, the biocides get washed out due to rains and other factors like geometric structure of the facade, orientation of the building. It is therefore, important to understand how these factors affect the durability of facades, leading to a requirement of expert analysis. In this paper, we propose a technical pipeline and a set of interaction techniques to support data analysis within the immersive environment for our case study. Our technical pipeline mainly consists of three steps: 3D reconstruction, embedding sensor data and visualization and interaction techniques. We made a formative evaluation of our prototype to get insights from microbiology, biology and VR experts. The remarks from the experts and the results of the evaluation suggest that an immersive analytic system in our case study could be beneficial for both experts and non-expert users.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
VocabulARy: Learning Vocabulary in AR Supported by Keyword Visualisations
Authors:
Maheshya Weerasinghe,
Verena Biener,
Jens Grubert,
Aaron J Quigley,
Alice Toniolo,
Klen Čopič Pucihar,
Matjaž Kljun
Abstract:
Learning vocabulary in a primary or secondary language is enhanced when we encounter words in context. This context can be afforded by the place or activity we are engaged with. Existing learning environments include formal learning, mnemonics, flashcards, use of a dictionary or thesaurus, all leading to practice with new words in context. In this work, we propose an enhancement to the language le…
▽ More
Learning vocabulary in a primary or secondary language is enhanced when we encounter words in context. This context can be afforded by the place or activity we are engaged with. Existing learning environments include formal learning, mnemonics, flashcards, use of a dictionary or thesaurus, all leading to practice with new words in context. In this work, we propose an enhancement to the language learning process by providing the user with words and learning tools in context, with VocabulARy. VocabulARy visually annotates objects in AR, in the user's surroundings, with the corresponding English (first language) and Japanese (second language) words to enhance the language learning process. In addition to the written and audio description of each word, we also present the user with a keyword and its visualisation to enhance memory retention. We evaluate our prototype by comparing it to an alternate AR system that does not show an additional visualisation of the keyword, and, also, we compare it to two non-AR systems on a tablet, one with and one without visualising the keyword. Our results indicate that AR outperforms the tablet system regarding immediate recall, mental effort and task completion time. Additionally, the visualisation approach scored significantly higher than showing only the written keyword with respect to immediate and delayed recall and learning efficiency, mental effort and task-completion time.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Quantifying the Effects of Working in VR for One Week
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Snehanjali Kalamkar,
Negar Nouri,
Eyal Ofek,
Michel Pahud,
John J. Dudley,
Jinghui Hu,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Maheshya Weerasinghe,
Klen Čopič Pucihar,
Matjaž Kljun,
Stephan Streuber,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
Virtual Reality (VR) provides new possibilities for modern knowledge work. However, the potential advantages of virtual work environments can only be used if it is feasible to work in them for an extended period of time. Until now, there are limited studies of long-term effects when working in VR. This paper addresses the need for understanding such long-term effects. Specifically, we report on a…
▽ More
Virtual Reality (VR) provides new possibilities for modern knowledge work. However, the potential advantages of virtual work environments can only be used if it is feasible to work in them for an extended period of time. Until now, there are limited studies of long-term effects when working in VR. This paper addresses the need for understanding such long-term effects. Specifically, we report on a comparative study (n=16), in which participants were working in VR for an entire week -- for five days, eight hours each day -- as well as in a baseline physical desktop environment. This study aims to quantify the effects of exchanging a desktop-based work environment with a VR-based environment. Hence, during this study, we do not present the participants with the best possible VR system but rather a setup delivering a comparable experience to working in the physical desktop environment. The study reveals that, as expected, VR results in significantly worse ratings across most measures. Among other results, we found concerning levels of simulator sickness, below average usability ratings and two participants dropped out on the first day using VR, due to migraine, nausea and anxiety. Nevertheless, there is some indication that participants gradually overcame negative first impressions and initial discomfort. Overall, this study helps lay the groundwork for subsequent research, by clearly highlighting current shortcomings and identifying opportunities for improving the experience of working in VR.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2022; v1 submitted 7 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
PoVRPoint: Authoring Presentations in Mobile Virtual Reality
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Travis Gesslein,
Daniel Schneider,
Felix Kawala,
Alexander Otte,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Michel Pahud,
Eyal Ofek,
Cuauhtli Campos,
Matjaž Kljun,
Klen Čopič Pucihar,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to support mobile knowledge workers by complementing traditional input devices with a large three-dimensional output space and spatial input. Previous research on supporting VR knowledge work explored domains such as text entry using physical keyboards and spreadsheet interaction using combined pen and touch input. Inspired by such work, this paper probes the…
▽ More
Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to support mobile knowledge workers by complementing traditional input devices with a large three-dimensional output space and spatial input. Previous research on supporting VR knowledge work explored domains such as text entry using physical keyboards and spreadsheet interaction using combined pen and touch input. Inspired by such work, this paper probes the VR design space for authoring presentations in mobile settings. We propose PoVRPoint -- a set of tools coupling pen- and touch-based editing of presentations on mobile devices, such as tablets, with the interaction capabilities afforded by VR. We study the utility of extended display space to, for example, assist users in identifying target slides, supporting spatial manipulation of objects on a slide, creating animations, and facilitating arrangements of multiple, possibly occluded, shapes. Among other things, our results indicate that 1) the wide field of view afforded by VR results in significantly faster target slide identification times compared to a tablet-only interface for visually salient targets; and 2) the three-dimensional view in VR enables significantly faster object reordering in the presence of occlusion compared to two baseline interfaces. A user study further confirmed that the interaction techniques were found to be usable and enjoyable.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Extended Reality for Knowledge Work in Everyday Environments
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Eyal Ofek,
Michel Pahud,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
Virtual and Augmented Reality have the potential to change information work. The ability to modify the workers senses can transform everyday environments into a productive office, using portable head-mounted displays combined with conventional interaction devices, such as keyboards and tablets. While a stream of better, cheaper and lighter HMDs have been introduced for consumers in recent years, t…
▽ More
Virtual and Augmented Reality have the potential to change information work. The ability to modify the workers senses can transform everyday environments into a productive office, using portable head-mounted displays combined with conventional interaction devices, such as keyboards and tablets. While a stream of better, cheaper and lighter HMDs have been introduced for consumers in recent years, there are still many challenges to be addressed to allow this vision to become reality. This chapter summarizes the state of the art in the field of extended reality for knowledge work in everyday environments and proposes steps to address the open challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Accuracy Evaluation of Touch Tasks in Commodity Virtual and Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays
Authors:
Daniel Schneider,
Verena Biener,
Alexander Otte,
Travis Gesslein,
Philipp Gagel,
Cuauhtli Campos,
Klen Čopič Pucihar,
Matjaž Kljun,
Eyal Ofek,
Michel Pahud,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
An increasing number of consumer-oriented head-mounted displays (HMD) for augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) are capable of finger and hand tracking. We report on the accuracy of off-the-shelf VR and AR HMDs when used for touch-based tasks such as pointing or drawing. Specifically, we report on the finger tracking accuracy of the VR head-mounted displays Oculus Quest, Vive Pro and the Leap Moti…
▽ More
An increasing number of consumer-oriented head-mounted displays (HMD) for augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) are capable of finger and hand tracking. We report on the accuracy of off-the-shelf VR and AR HMDs when used for touch-based tasks such as pointing or drawing. Specifically, we report on the finger tracking accuracy of the VR head-mounted displays Oculus Quest, Vive Pro and the Leap Motion controller, when attached to a VR HMD, as well as the finger tracking accuracy of the AR head-mounted displays Microsoft HoloLens 2 and Magic Leap. We present the results of two experiments in which we compare the accuracy for absolute and relative pointing tasks using both human participants and a robot. The results suggest that HTC Vive has a lower spatial accuracy than the Oculus Quest and Leap Motion and that the Microsoft HoloLens 2 provides higher spatial accuracy than Magic Leap One. These findings can serve as decision support for researchers and practitioners in choosing which systems to use in the future.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Breaking the Screen: Interaction Across Touchscreen Boundaries in Virtual Reality for Mobile Knowledge Workers
Authors:
Verena Biener,
Daniel Schneider,
Travis Gesslein,
Alexander Otte,
Bastian Kuth,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Eyal Ofek,
Michel Pahud,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to transform knowledge work. One advantage of VR knowledge work is that it allows extending 2D displays into the third dimension, enabling new operations, such as selecting overlapping objects or displaying additional layers of information. On the other hand, mobile knowledge workers often work on established mobile devices, such as tablets, limiting interact…
▽ More
Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to transform knowledge work. One advantage of VR knowledge work is that it allows extending 2D displays into the third dimension, enabling new operations, such as selecting overlapping objects or displaying additional layers of information. On the other hand, mobile knowledge workers often work on established mobile devices, such as tablets, limiting interaction with those devices to a small input space. This challenge of a constrained input space is intensified in situations when VR knowledge work is situated in cramped environments, such as airplanes and touchdown spaces.
In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of interacting jointly between an immersive VR head-mounted display and a tablet within the context of knowledge work. Specifically, we 1) design, implement and study how to interact with information that reaches beyond a single physical touchscreen in VR; 2) design and evaluate a set of interaction concepts; and 3) build example applications and gather user feedback on those applications.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Pen-based Interaction with Spreadsheets in Mobile Virtual Reality
Authors:
Travis Gesslein,
Verena Biener,
Philipp Gagel,
Daniel Schneider,
Per Ola Kristensson,
Eyal Ofek,
Michel Pahud,
Jens Grubert
Abstract:
Virtual Reality (VR) can enhance the display and interaction of mobile knowledge work and in particular, spreadsheet applications. While spreadsheets are widely used yet are challenging to interact with, especially on mobile devices, using them in VR has not been explored in depth. A special uniqueness of the domain is the contrast between the immersive and large display space afforded by VR, cont…
▽ More
Virtual Reality (VR) can enhance the display and interaction of mobile knowledge work and in particular, spreadsheet applications. While spreadsheets are widely used yet are challenging to interact with, especially on mobile devices, using them in VR has not been explored in depth. A special uniqueness of the domain is the contrast between the immersive and large display space afforded by VR, contrasted by the very limited interaction space that may be afforded for the information worker on the go, such as an airplane seat or a small work-space. To close this gap, we present a tool-set for enhancing spreadsheet interaction on tablets using immersive VR headsets and pen-based input. This combination opens up many possibilities for enhancing the productivity for spreadsheet interaction. We propose to use the space around and in front of the tablet for enhanced visualization of spreadsheet data and meta-data. For example, extending sheet display beyond the bounds of the physical screen, or easier debugging by uncovering hidden dependencies between sheet's cells. Combining the precise on-screen input of a pen with spatial sensing around the tablet, we propose tools for the efficient creation and editing of spreadsheets functions such as off-the-screen layered menus, visualization of sheets dependencies, and gaze-and-touch-based switching between spreadsheet tabs. We study the feasibility of the proposed tool-set using a video-based online survey and an expert-based assessment of indicative human performance potential.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.