Optimal control of large quantum systems: assessing memory and runtime performance of GRAPE
Authors:
Yunwei Lu,
Sandeep Joshi,
Vinh San Dinh,
Jens Koch
Abstract:
Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering (GRAPE) is a popular technique in quantum optimal control, and can be combined with automatic differentiation (AD) to facilitate on-the-fly evaluation of cost-function gradients. We illustrate that the convenience of AD comes at a significant memory cost due to the cumulative storage of a large number of states and propagators. For quantum systems of increasing Hi…
▽ More
Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering (GRAPE) is a popular technique in quantum optimal control, and can be combined with automatic differentiation (AD) to facilitate on-the-fly evaluation of cost-function gradients. We illustrate that the convenience of AD comes at a significant memory cost due to the cumulative storage of a large number of states and propagators. For quantum systems of increasing Hilbert space size, this imposes a significant bottleneck. We revisit the strategy of hard-coding gradients in a scheme that fully avoids propagator storage and significantly reduces memory requirements. Separately, we present improvements to numerical state propagation to enhance runtime performance. We benchmark runtime and memory usage and compare this approach to AD-based implementations, with a focus on pushing towards larger Hilbert space sizes. The results confirm that the AD-free approach facilitates the application of optimal control for large quantum systems which would otherwise be difficult to tackle.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
Quantum computing hardware for HEP algorithms and sensing
Authors:
M. Sohaib Alam,
Sergey Belomestnykh,
Nicholas Bornman,
Gustavo Cancelo,
Yu-Chiu Chao,
Mattia Checchin,
Vinh San Dinh,
Anna Grassellino,
Erik J. Gustafson,
Roni Harnik,
Corey Rae Harrington McRae,
Ziwen Huang,
Keshav Kapoor,
Taeyoon Kim,
James B. Kowalkowski,
Matthew J. Kramer,
Yulia Krasnikova,
Prem Kumar,
Doga Murat Kurkcuoglu,
Henry Lamm,
Adam L. Lyon,
Despina Milathianaki,
Akshay Murthy,
Josh Mutus,
Ivan Nekrashevich
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantum information science harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to realize computational algorithms with complexities vastly intractable by current computer platforms. Typical applications range from quantum chemistry to optimization problems and also include simulations for high energy physics. The recent maturing of quantum hardware has triggered preliminary explorations by several ins…
▽ More
Quantum information science harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to realize computational algorithms with complexities vastly intractable by current computer platforms. Typical applications range from quantum chemistry to optimization problems and also include simulations for high energy physics. The recent maturing of quantum hardware has triggered preliminary explorations by several institutions (including Fermilab) of quantum hardware capable of demonstrating quantum advantage in multiple domains, from quantum computing to communications, to sensing. The Superconducting Quantum Materials and Systems (SQMS) Center, led by Fermilab, is dedicated to providing breakthroughs in quantum computing and sensing, mediating quantum engineering and HEP based material science. The main goal of the Center is to deploy quantum systems with superior performance tailored to the algorithms used in high energy physics. In this Snowmass paper, we discuss the two most promising superconducting quantum architectures for HEP algorithms, i.e. three-level systems (qutrits) supported by transmon devices coupled to planar devices and multi-level systems (qudits with arbitrary N energy levels) supported by superconducting 3D cavities. For each architecture, we demonstrate exemplary HEP algorithms and identify the current challenges, ongoing work and future opportunities. Furthermore, we discuss the prospects and complexities of interconnecting the different architectures and individual computational nodes. Finally, we review several different strategies of error protection and correction and discuss their potential to improve the performance of the two architectures. This whitepaper seeks to reach out to the HEP community and drive progress in both HEP research and QIS hardware.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2022; v1 submitted 18 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
