Showing 1–17 of 17 results for author: Jannin, P

Measuring proximity to standard planes during fetal brain ultrasound scanning

Authors: Chiara Di Vece, Antonio Cirigliano, Meala Le Lous, Raffaele Napolitano, Anna L. David, Donald Peebles, Pierre Jannin, Francisco Vasconcelos, Danail Stoyanov

Abstract: This paper introduces a novel pipeline designed to bring ultrasound (US) plane pose estimation closer to clinical use for more effective navigation to the standard planes (SPs) in the fetal brain. We propose a semi-supervised segmentation model utilizing both labeled SPs and unlabeled 3D US volume slices. Our model enables reliable segmentation across a diverse set of fetal brain images. Furthermo… ▽ More This paper introduces a novel pipeline designed to bring ultrasound (US) plane pose estimation closer to clinical use for more effective navigation to the standard planes (SPs) in the fetal brain. We propose a semi-supervised segmentation model utilizing both labeled SPs and unlabeled 3D US volume slices. Our model enables reliable segmentation across a diverse set of fetal brain images. Furthermore, the model incorporates a classification mechanism to identify the fetal brain precisely. Our model not only filters out frames lacking the brain but also generates masks for those containing it, enhancing the relevance of plane pose regression in clinical settings. We focus on fetal brain navigation from 2D ultrasound (US) video analysis and combine this model with a US plane pose regression network to provide sensorless proximity detection to SPs and non-SPs planes; we emphasize the importance of proximity detection to SPs for guiding sonographers, offering a substantial advantage over traditional methods by allowing earlier and more precise adjustments during scanning. We demonstrate the practical applicability of our approach through validation on real fetal scan videos obtained from sonographers of varying expertise levels. Our findings demonstrate the potential of our approach to complement existing fetal US technologies and advance prenatal diagnostic practices. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures

ACM Class: I.2.0; I.4.0; J.2.0; J.3.0

Why is the winner the best?

Authors: Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Vivienn Weru, Minu Dietlinde Tizabi, Fabian Isensee, Tim J. Adler, Sharib Ali, Vincent Andrearczyk, Marc Aubreville, Ujjwal Baid, Spyridon Bakas, Niranjan Balu, Sophia Bano, Jorge Bernal, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Alessandro Casella, Veronika Cheplygina, Marie Daum, Marleen de Bruijne, Adrien Depeursinge, Reuben Dorent, Jan Egger, David G. Ellis, Sandy Engelhardt, Melanie Ganz , et al. (100 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To addre… ▽ More International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multi-center study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and postprocessing (66%). The "typical" lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: accepted to CVPR 2023

Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation

Authors: Annika Reinke, Minu D. Tizabi, Michael Baumgartner, Matthias Eisenmann, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, A. Emre Kavur, Tim Rädsch, Carole H. Sudre, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko, Florian Buettner, M. Jorge Cardoso, Veronika Cheplygina, Jianxu Chen, Evangelia Christodoulou, Beth A. Cimini, Gary S. Collins, Keyvan Farahani, Luciana Ferrer, Adrian Galdran, Bram van Ginneken , et al. (53 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibilit… ▽ More Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibility of metric-related knowledge: While taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multi-stage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides the first reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. To facilitate comprehension, illustrations and specific examples accompany each pitfall. As a structured body of information accessible to researchers of all levels of expertise, this work enhances global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: Shared first authors: Annika Reinke and Minu D. Tizabi; shared senior authors: Lena Maier-Hein and Paul F. Jäger. Published in Nature Methods. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2206.01653

Journal ref: Nature methods, 1-13 (2024)

Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation

Authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Patrick Godau, Minu D. Tizabi, Florian Buettner, Evangelia Christodoulou, Ben Glocker, Fabian Isensee, Jens Kleesiek, Michal Kozubek, Mauricio Reyes, Michael A. Riegler, Manuel Wiesenfarth, A. Emre Kavur, Carole H. Sudre, Michael Baumgartner, Matthias Eisenmann, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, Tim Rädsch, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko , et al. (49 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, our large international ex… ▽ More Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, our large international expert consortium created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. The framework was developed in a multi-stage Delphi process and is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint - a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), data set and algorithm output. Based on the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as a classification task at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool, which also provides a point of access to explore weaknesses, strengths and specific recommendations for the most common validation metrics. The broad applicability of our framework across domains is demonstrated by an instantiation for various biological and medical image analysis use cases. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Shared first authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.05642 Published in Nature Methods

Journal ref: Nature methods, 1-18 (2024)

PEg TRAnsfer Workflow recognition challenge report: Does multi-modal data improve recognition?

Authors: Arnaud Huaulmé, Kanako Harada, Quang-Minh Nguyen, Bogyu Park, Seungbum Hong, Min-Kook Choi, Michael Peven, Yunshuang Li, Yonghao Long, Qi Dou, Satyadwyoom Kumar, Seenivasan Lalithkumar, Ren Hongliang, Hiroki Matsuzaki, Yuto Ishikawa, Yuriko Harai, Satoshi Kondo, Mamoru Mitsuishi, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: This paper presents the design and results of the "PEg TRAnsfert Workflow recognition" (PETRAW) challenge whose objective was to develop surgical workflow recognition methods based on one or several modalities, among video, kinematic, and segmentation data, in order to study their added value. The PETRAW challenge provided a data set of 150 peg transfer sequences performed on a virtual simulator.… ▽ More This paper presents the design and results of the "PEg TRAnsfert Workflow recognition" (PETRAW) challenge whose objective was to develop surgical workflow recognition methods based on one or several modalities, among video, kinematic, and segmentation data, in order to study their added value. The PETRAW challenge provided a data set of 150 peg transfer sequences performed on a virtual simulator. This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, semantic segmentation, and workflow annotations which described the sequences at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity. Five tasks were proposed to the participants: three of them were related to the recognition of all granularities with one of the available modalities, while the others addressed the recognition with a combination of modalities. Average application-dependent balanced accuracy (AD-Accuracy) was used as evaluation metric to take unbalanced classes into account and because it is more clinically relevant than a frame-by-frame score. Seven teams participated in at least one task and four of them in all tasks. Best results are obtained with the use of the video and the kinematics data with an AD-Accuracy between 93% and 90% for the four teams who participated in all tasks. The improvement between video/kinematic-based methods and the uni-modality ones was significant for all of the teams. However, the difference in testing execution time between the video/kinematic-based and the kinematic-based methods has to be taken into consideration. Is it relevant to spend 20 to 200 times more computing time for less than 3% of improvement? The PETRAW data set is publicly available at www.synapse.org/PETRAW to encourage further research in surgical workflow recognition. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 11 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: Challenge report doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107561

Journal ref: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Volume 236, 2023

Towards responsible research in digital technology for health care

Authors: Pierre Jannin

Abstract: Digital technology is everywhere for the benefit of our daily and professional life. It strongly impacts our life and was crucial to maintain professional and social activities during the COVID19 crisis. Similarly, digital technologies are key within biomedical engineering research topics. Innovations have been generated and introduced over the last 40 years, demonstrating how computing and digita… ▽ More Digital technology is everywhere for the benefit of our daily and professional life. It strongly impacts our life and was crucial to maintain professional and social activities during the COVID19 crisis. Similarly, digital technologies are key within biomedical engineering research topics. Innovations have been generated and introduced over the last 40 years, demonstrating how computing and digital technologies have impacted health care. Although the benefits of digital technology are obvious now, we are at the convergence of several issues which makes us aware about social, societal and environmental challenges associated with this technology. In the social domain, digital technologies raise concern about exclusion (financial, geographical, educational, demographical, racial, gender, language, and disabled related exclusion) and physical and mental health. In the societal dimension, digital technologies raise concern about politics and democracy (sovereignty and governance, cognitive filters and citizen's engagement), privacy and security (data acquisition and usage transparency, level of personal approval, and level of anonymization), and economics. In the environmental dimension, digital technologies raise concern about energy consumption and hardware production. This paper introduces and defines these challenges for digital technology in general, as well as when applied to health care. The objective of this paper is to make the research community more aware about the challenges of digital technology and to promote more transparency for innovative and responsible research. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 28 September, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 16 pages, 1 table, 4 figures, 69 references

Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

Authors: Annika Reinke, Minu D. Tizabi, Carole H. Sudre, Matthias Eisenmann, Tim Rädsch, Michael Baumgartner, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Peter Bankhead, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko, Florian Buettner, M. Jorge Cardoso, Jianxu Chen, Veronika Cheplygina, Evangelia Christodoulou, Beth Cimini, Gary S. Collins, Sandy Engelhardt, Keyvan Farahani, Luciana Ferrer, Adrian Galdran, Bram van Ginneken , et al. (68 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using spe… ▽ More While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 12 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Shared first authors: Annika Reinke and Minu D. Tizabi. This is a dynamic paper on limitations of commonly used metrics. It discusses metrics for image-level classification, semantic and instance segmentation, and object detection. For missing use cases, comments or questions, please contact a.reinke@dkfz.de. Substantial contributions to this document will be acknowledged with a co-authorship

MIcro-Surgical Anastomose Workflow recognition challenge report

Authors: Arnaud Huaulmé, Duygu Sarikaya, Kévin Le Mut, Fabien Despinoy, Yonghao Long, Qi Dou, Chin-Boon Chng, Wenjun Lin, Satoshi Kondo, Laura Bravo-Sánchez, Pablo Arbeláez, Wolfgang Reiter, Manoru Mitsuishi, Kanako Harada, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: The "MIcro-Surgical Anastomose Workflow recognition on training sessions" (MISAW) challenge provided a data set of 27 sequences of micro-surgical anastomosis on artificial blood vessels. This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, and workflow annotations described at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity. The participants were given the option to use kinematic data a… ▽ More The "MIcro-Surgical Anastomose Workflow recognition on training sessions" (MISAW) challenge provided a data set of 27 sequences of micro-surgical anastomosis on artificial blood vessels. This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, and workflow annotations described at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity. The participants were given the option to use kinematic data and videos to develop workflow recognition models. Four tasks were proposed to the participants: three of them were related to the recognition of surgical workflow at three different granularity levels, while the last one addressed the recognition of all granularity levels in the same model. One ranking was made for each task. We used the average application-dependent balanced accuracy (AD-Accuracy) as the evaluation metric. This takes unbalanced classes into account and it is more clinically relevant than a frame-by-frame score. Six teams, including a non-competing team, participated in at least one task. All models employed deep learning models, such as CNN or RNN. The best models achieved more than 95% AD-Accuracy for phase recognition, 80% for step recognition, 60% for activity recognition, and 75% for all granularity levels. For high levels of granularity (i.e., phases and steps), the best models had a recognition rate that may be sufficient for applications such as prediction of remaining surgical time or resource management. However, for activities, the recognition rate was still low for applications that can be employed clinically. The MISAW data set is publicly available to encourage further research in surgical workflow recognition. It can be found at www.synapse.org/MISAW △ Less

Submitted 24 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: MICCAI2020 challenge report, 36 pages including 15 for supplementary material (complet results for each participating teams), 17 figures

Surgical Data Science -- from Concepts toward Clinical Translation

Authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Matthias Eisenmann, Duygu Sarikaya, Keno März, Toby Collins, Anand Malpani, Johannes Fallert, Hubertus Feussner, Stamatia Giannarou, Pietro Mascagni, Hirenkumar Nakawala, Adrian Park, Carla Pugh, Danail Stoyanov, Swaroop S. Vedula, Kevin Cleary, Gabor Fichtinger, Germain Forestier, Bernard Gibaud, Teodor Grantcharov, Makoto Hashizume, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, Hannes G. Kenngott, Ron Kikinis, Lars Mündermann , et al. (25 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Recent developments in data science in general and machine learning in particular have transformed the way experts envision the future of surgery. Surgical Data Science (SDS) is a new research field that aims to improve the quality of interventional healthcare through the capture, organization, analysis and modeling of data. While an increasing number of data-driven approaches and clinical applica… ▽ More Recent developments in data science in general and machine learning in particular have transformed the way experts envision the future of surgery. Surgical Data Science (SDS) is a new research field that aims to improve the quality of interventional healthcare through the capture, organization, analysis and modeling of data. While an increasing number of data-driven approaches and clinical applications have been studied in the fields of radiological and clinical data science, translational success stories are still lacking in surgery. In this publication, we shed light on the underlying reasons and provide a roadmap for future advances in the field. Based on an international workshop involving leading researchers in the field of SDS, we review current practice, key achievements and initiatives as well as available standards and tools for a number of topics relevant to the field, namely (1) infrastructure for data acquisition, storage and access in the presence of regulatory constraints, (2) data annotation and sharing and (3) data analytics. We further complement this technical perspective with (4) a review of currently available SDS products and the translational progress from academia and (5) a roadmap for faster clinical translation and exploitation of the full potential of SDS, based on an international multi-round Delphi process. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2021; v1 submitted 30 October, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Towards Generalizable Surgical Activity Recognition Using Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks

Authors: Duygu Sarikaya, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: Modeling and recognition of surgical activities poses an interesting research problem. Although a number of recent works studied automatic recognition of surgical activities, generalizability of these works across different tasks and different datasets remains a challenge. We introduce a modality that is robust to scene variation, and that is able to infer part information such as orientational an… ▽ More Modeling and recognition of surgical activities poses an interesting research problem. Although a number of recent works studied automatic recognition of surgical activities, generalizability of these works across different tasks and different datasets remains a challenge. We introduce a modality that is robust to scene variation, and that is able to infer part information such as orientational and relative spatial relationships. The proposed modality is based on spatial temporal graph representations of surgical tools in videos, for surgical activity recognition. To explore its effectiveness, we model and recognize surgical gestures with the proposed modality. We construct spatial graphs connecting the joint pose estimations of surgical tools. Then, we connect each joint to the corresponding joint in the consecutive frames forming inter-frame edges representing the trajectory of the joint over time. We then learn hierarchical spatial temporal graph representations using Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (ST-GCN). Our experiments show that learned spatial temporal graph representations perform well in surgical gesture recognition even when used individually. We experiment with the Suturing task of the JIGSAWS dataset where the chance baseline for gesture recognition is 10%. Our results demonstrate 68% average accuracy which suggests a significant improvement. Learned hierarchical spatial temporal graph representations can be used either individually, in cascades or as a complementary modality in surgical activity recognition, therefore provide a benchmark for future studies. To our knowledge, our paper is the first to use spatial temporal graph representations of surgical tools, and pose-based skeleton representations in general, for surgical activity recognition. △ Less

Submitted 13 August, 2020; v1 submitted 11 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges

Authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Michal Kozubek, Anne L. Martel, Tal Arbel, Matthias Eisenmann, Allan Hanbuary, Pierre Jannin, Henning Müller, Sinan Onogur, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Bram van Ginneken, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Bennett Landman

Abstract: The number of biomedical image analysis challenges organized per year is steadily increasing. These international competitions have the purpose of benchmarking algorithms on common data sets, typically to identify the best method for a given problem. Recent research, however, revealed that common practice related to challenge reporting does not allow for adequate interpretation and reproducibility… ▽ More The number of biomedical image analysis challenges organized per year is steadily increasing. These international competitions have the purpose of benchmarking algorithms on common data sets, typically to identify the best method for a given problem. Recent research, however, revealed that common practice related to challenge reporting does not allow for adequate interpretation and reproducibility of results. To address the discrepancy between the impact of challenges and the quality (control), the Biomedical I mage Analysis ChallengeS (BIAS) initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of challenges. The BIAS statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a biomedical image analysis challenge regardless of field of application, image modality or task category assessed. This article describes how the BIAS statement was developed and presents a checklist which authors of biomedical image analysis challenges are encouraged to include in their submission when giving a paper on a challenge into review. The purpose of the checklist is to standardize and facilitate the review process and raise interpretability and reproducibility of challenge results by making relevant information explicit. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2020; v1 submitted 9 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Comments: 2 Appendices - Appendix A: BIAS reporting guideline for biomedical image analysis challenges, Appendix B: Glossary; 2 Supplements - Suppl 1: Form for summarizing information on challenge organization, Suppl 2: Structured description of a challenge design

Offline identification of surgical deviations in laparoscopic rectopexy

Authors: Arnaud Huaulmé, Pierre Jannin, Fabian Reche, Jean-Luc Faucheron, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry, Sandrine Voros

Abstract: Objective: A median of 14.4% of patient undergone at least one adverse event during surgery and a third of them are preventable. The occurrence of adverse events forces surgeons to implement corrective strategies and, thus, deviate from the standard surgical process. Therefore, it is clear that the automatic identification of adverse events is a major challenge for patient safety. In this paper, w… ▽ More Objective: A median of 14.4% of patient undergone at least one adverse event during surgery and a third of them are preventable. The occurrence of adverse events forces surgeons to implement corrective strategies and, thus, deviate from the standard surgical process. Therefore, it is clear that the automatic identification of adverse events is a major challenge for patient safety. In this paper, we have proposed a method enabling us to identify such deviations. We have focused on identifying surgeons' deviations from standard surgical processes due to surgical events rather than anatomic specificities. This is particularly challenging, given the high variability in typical surgical procedure workflows. Methods: We have introduced a new approach designed to automatically detect and distinguish surgical process deviations based on multi-dimensional non-linear temporal scaling with a hidden semi-Markov model using manual annotation of surgical processes. The approach was then evaluated using cross-validation. Results: The best results have over 90% accuracy. Recall and precision were superior at 70%. We have provided a detailed analysis of the incorrectly-detected observations. Conclusion: Multi-dimensional non-linear temporal scaling with a hidden semi-Markov model provides promising results for detecting deviations. Our error analysis of the incorrectly-detected observations offers different leads in order to further improve our method. Significance: Our method demonstrated the feasibility of automatically detecting surgical deviations that could be implemented for both skill analysis and developing situation awareness-based computer-assisted surgical systems. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2020; v1 submitted 24 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Surgical Gesture Recognition with Optical Flow only

Authors: Duygu Sarikaya, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: In this paper, we address the open research problem of surgical gesture recognition using motion cues from video data only. We adapt Optical flow ConvNets initially proposed by Simonyan et al.. While Simonyan uses both RGB frames and dense optical flow, we use only dense optical flow representations as input to emphasize the role of motion in surgical gesture recognition, and present it as a robus… ▽ More In this paper, we address the open research problem of surgical gesture recognition using motion cues from video data only. We adapt Optical flow ConvNets initially proposed by Simonyan et al.. While Simonyan uses both RGB frames and dense optical flow, we use only dense optical flow representations as input to emphasize the role of motion in surgical gesture recognition, and present it as a robust alternative to kinematic data. We also overcome one of the limitations of Optical flow ConvNets by initializing our model with cross modality pre-training. A large number of promising studies that address surgical gesture recognition highly rely on kinematic data which requires additional recording devices. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that addresses surgical gesture recognition using dense optical flow information only. We achieve competitive results on JIGSAWS dataset, moreover, our model achieves more robust results with less standard deviation, which suggests optical flow information can be used as an alternative to kinematic data for the recognition of surgical gestures. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2020; v1 submitted 1 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

Authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Sinan Onogur, Marko Stankovic, Patrick Scholz, Tal Arbel, Hrvoje Bogunovic, Andrew P. Bradley, Aaron Carass, Carolin Feldmann, Alejandro F. Frangi, Peter M. Full, Bram van Ginneken, Allan Hanbury, Katrin Honauer, Michal Kozubek, Bennett A. Landman, Keno März, Oskar Maier, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bjoern H. Menze, Henning Müller, Peter F. Neher, Wiro Niessen , et al. (13 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. Given their scientific impact, it is surprising that a critical analysis of common practices related to the organization of challenges has not yet been performed. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of biomedical image analysis challenges conducted up to now. We demonstrate the imp… ▽ More International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. Given their scientific impact, it is surprising that a critical analysis of common practices related to the organization of challenges has not yet been performed. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of biomedical image analysis challenges conducted up to now. We demonstrate the importance of challenges and show that the lack of quality control has critical consequences. First, reproducibility and interpretation of the results is often hampered as only a fraction of relevant information is typically provided. Second, the rank of an algorithm is generally not robust to a number of variables such as the test data used for validation, the ranking scheme applied and the observers that make the reference annotations. To overcome these problems, we recommend best practice guidelines and define open research questions to be addressed in the future. △ Less

Submitted 18 September, 2019; v1 submitted 6 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: Article published in Nature Communications: https://rdcu.be/bRmNr

Journal ref: Nature communications 9.1 (2018): 5217

Analyzing Before Solving: Which Parameters Influence Low-Level Surgical Activity Recognition

Authors: Olga Dergachyova, Xavier Morandi, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: Automatic low-level surgical activity recognition is today well-known technical bottleneck for smart and situation-aware assistance for the operating room of the future. Our study sought to discover which sensors and signals could facilitate this recognition. Low-level surgical activity represents semantic information about a surgical procedure that is usually expressed by the following elements:… ▽ More Automatic low-level surgical activity recognition is today well-known technical bottleneck for smart and situation-aware assistance for the operating room of the future. Our study sought to discover which sensors and signals could facilitate this recognition. Low-level surgical activity represents semantic information about a surgical procedure that is usually expressed by the following elements: an action verb, surgical instrument, and operated anatomical structure. We hypothesized that activity recognition does not require sensors for all three elements. We conducted a large-scale study using deep learning on semantic data from 154 operations from four different surgeries. The results demonstrated that the instrument and verb encode similar information, meaning only one needs to be tracked, preferably the instrument. The anatomical structure, however, provides some unique cues, and it is thus crucial to recognize it. For all the studied surgeries, a combination of two elements, always including the structure, proved sufficient to confidently recognize the activities. We also found that in the presence of noise, combining the information about the instrument, structure, and historical context produced better results than a simple composition of all three elements. Several relevant observations about surgical practices were also made in this paper. Such findings provide cues for designing a new generation of operating rooms. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Knowledge transfer for surgical activity prediction

Authors: Olga Dergachyova, Xavier Morandi, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: Lack of training data hinders automatic recognition and prediction of surgical activities necessary for situation-aware operating rooms. We propose using knowledge transfer to compensate for data deficit and improve prediction. We used two approaches to extract and transfer surgical process knowledge. First, we encoded semantic information about surgical terms using word embedding which boosted le… ▽ More Lack of training data hinders automatic recognition and prediction of surgical activities necessary for situation-aware operating rooms. We propose using knowledge transfer to compensate for data deficit and improve prediction. We used two approaches to extract and transfer surgical process knowledge. First, we encoded semantic information about surgical terms using word embedding which boosted learning process. Secondly, we passed knowledge between different clinical datasets of neurosurgical procedures using transfer learning. Transfer learning was shown to be more effective than a simple combination of data, especially for less similar procedures. The combination of two methods provided 22% improvement of activity prediction. We also made several pertinent observations about surgical practices. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Surgical Data Science: Enabling Next-Generation Surgery

Authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Swaroop Vedula, Stefanie Speidel, Nassir Navab, Ron Kikinis, Adrian Park, Matthias Eisenmann, Hubertus Feussner, Germain Forestier, Stamatia Giannarou, Makoto Hashizume, Darko Katic, Hannes Kenngott, Michael Kranzfelder, Anand Malpani, Keno März, Thomas Neumuth, Nicolas Padoy, Carla Pugh, Nicolai Schoch, Danail Stoyanov, Russell Taylor, Martin Wagner, Gregory D. Hager, Pierre Jannin

Abstract: This paper introduces Surgical Data Science as an emerging scientific discipline. Key perspectives are based on discussions during an intensive two-day international interactive workshop that brought together leading researchers working in the related field of computer and robot assisted interventions. Our consensus opinion is that increasing access to large amounts of complex data, at scale, thro… ▽ More This paper introduces Surgical Data Science as an emerging scientific discipline. Key perspectives are based on discussions during an intensive two-day international interactive workshop that brought together leading researchers working in the related field of computer and robot assisted interventions. Our consensus opinion is that increasing access to large amounts of complex data, at scale, throughout the patient care process, complemented by advances in data science and machine learning techniques, has set the stage for a new generation of analytics that will support decision-making and quality improvement in interventional medicine. In this article, we provide a consensus definition for Surgical Data Science, identify associated challenges and opportunities and provide a roadmap for advancing the field. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2017; v1 submitted 23 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 10 pages, 2 figures, White paper corresponding to http://www.surgical-data-science.org/workshop2016

Journal ref: Nature Biomedical Engineering 2017