-
Paper II: Calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope
Authors:
A. A. Breeveld,
P. A. Curran,
E. A. Hoversten,
S. Koch,
W. Landsman,
F. E. Marshall,
M. J. Page,
T. S. Poole,
P. Roming,
P. J. Smith,
M. Still,
V. Yershov,
A. J. Blustin,
P. J. Brown,
C. Gronwall,
S. T. Holland,
N. P. M. Kuin,
K. McGowan,
S. Rosen,
P. Boyd,
P. Broos,
M. Carter,
M. M. Chester,
B. Hancock,
H. Huckle
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large scale variations in sensit…
▽ More
The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
-
Photometric Calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope
Authors:
T. S. Poole,
A. A. Breeveld,
M. J. Page,
W. Landsman,
S. T. Holland,
P. Roming,
N. P. M. Kuin,
P. J. Brown,
C. Gronwall,
S. Hunsberger,
S. Koch,
K. O. Mason,
P. Schady,
D. Vanden Berk,
A. J. Blustin,
P. Boyd,
P. Broos,
M. Carter,
M. M. Chester,
A. Cucchiara,
B. Hancock,
H. Huckle,
S. Immler,
M. Ivanushkina,
T. Kennedy
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the photometric calibration of the Swift UltraViolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) which includes: optimum photometric and background apertures, effective area curves, colour transformations, conversion factors for count rates to flux, and the photometric zero points (which are accurate to better than 4 per cent) for each of the seven UVOT broadband filters. The calibration was performed w…
▽ More
We present the photometric calibration of the Swift UltraViolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) which includes: optimum photometric and background apertures, effective area curves, colour transformations, conversion factors for count rates to flux, and the photometric zero points (which are accurate to better than 4 per cent) for each of the seven UVOT broadband filters. The calibration was performed with observations of standard stars and standard star fields that represent a wide range of spectral star types. The calibration results include the position dependent uniformity, and instrument response over the 1600-8000A operational range. Because the UVOT is a photon counting instrument, we also discuss the effect of coincidence loss on the calibration results. We provide practical guidelines for using the calibration in UVOT data analysis. The results presented here supersede previous calibration results.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2007; v1 submitted 16 August, 2007;
originally announced August 2007.
-
The Two-Component Afterglow of Swift GRB 050802
Authors:
S. R. Oates,
M. De Pasquale,
M. J. Page,
A. J. Blustin,
S. Zane,
K. McGowan,
K. O. Mason,
T. S. Poole,
P. Schady,
P. W. A. Roming,
K. L. Page,
A. Falcone,
N. Gehrels
Abstract:
This paper investigates GRB 050802, one of the best examples of a it Swift gamma-ray burst afterglow that shows a break in the X-ray lightcurve, while the optical counterpart decays as a single power-law. This burst has an optically bright afterglow of 16.5 magnitude, detected throughout the 170-650nm spectral range of the UVOT on-board Swift. Observations began with the XRT and UVOT telescopes…
▽ More
This paper investigates GRB 050802, one of the best examples of a it Swift gamma-ray burst afterglow that shows a break in the X-ray lightcurve, while the optical counterpart decays as a single power-law. This burst has an optically bright afterglow of 16.5 magnitude, detected throughout the 170-650nm spectral range of the UVOT on-board Swift. Observations began with the XRT and UVOT telescopes 286s after the initial trigger and continued for 1.2 x 10^6s. The X-ray lightcurve consists of three power-law segments: a rise until 420s, followed by a slow decay with alpha_2 = 0.63 +/- 0.03 until 5000s, after which, the lightcurve decays faster with a slope of alpha_3 = 1.59 +/- 0.03. The optical lightcurve decays as a single power-law with alpha_O = 0.82 +/- 0.03 throughout the observation. The X-ray data on their own are consistent with the break at 5000s being due to the end of energy injection. Modelling the optical to X-ray spectral energy distribution, we find that the optical afterglow can not be produced by the same component as the X-ray emission at late times, ruling out a single component afterglow. We therefore considered two-component jet models and find that the X-ray and optical emission is best reproduced by a model in which both components are energy injected for the duration of the observed afterglow and the X-ray break at 5000s is due to a jet break in the narrow component. This bright, well-observed burst is likely a guide for interpreting the surprising finding of Swift that bursts seldom display achromatic jet breaks.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2007;
originally announced June 2007.
-
Extreme Properties Of GRB061007: A Highly Energetic OR Highly Collimated Burst?
Authors:
P. Schady,
M. De Pasquale,
J. Cummings,
M. J. Page,
S. B. Pandey,
X. Y. Wang,
L. Vetere,
B. Zhang,
S. Zane,
A. Breeveld,
D. N. Burrows,
N. Gehrels,
C. Gronwall,
S. Hunsber ger,
C. Markwardt,
K. O. Mason,
P. Meszaros,
S. R. Oates,
C. Pagani,
T. S. Poole,
P. W. A. Roming,
P. Smith,
D. E. Vanden Berk
Abstract:
%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to dublicate submission. To download the paper please go to astro-ph/0611081
%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to dublicate submission. To download the paper please go to astro-ph/0611081
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2006; v1 submitted 2 November, 2006;
originally announced November 2006.
-
Extreme Properties Of GRB061007: A Highly Energetic Or A Highly Collimated Burst?
Authors:
P. Schady,
M. De Pasquale,
M. J. Page,
L. Vetere,
S. B. Pandey,
X. Y. Wang,
J. Cummings,
B. Zhang,
S. Zane,
A. Breeveld,
D. N. Burrows,
N. Gehrels. C. Gronwall,
S. Hunsberger,
C. Markwardt,
K. O. Mason,
P. Meszaros,
J. P. Norris,
S. R. Oates,
C. Pagani,
T. S. Poole,
P. W. A. Roming,
P. J. Smith,
D. E. Vanden Berk
Abstract:
GRB061007 is the brightest gamma-ray burst (GRB) to be detected by Swift and is accompanied by an exceptionally luminous afterglow that had a V-band magnitude <11.1 at 80s after the prompt emission. From the start of the Swift observations the afterglow decayed as a power law with a slope of α_X=1.66+/-0.01 in the X-ray and α_{opt}=1.64+/-0.01 in the UV/optical, up to the point that it was no lo…
▽ More
GRB061007 is the brightest gamma-ray burst (GRB) to be detected by Swift and is accompanied by an exceptionally luminous afterglow that had a V-band magnitude <11.1 at 80s after the prompt emission. From the start of the Swift observations the afterglow decayed as a power law with a slope of α_X=1.66+/-0.01 in the X-ray and α_{opt}=1.64+/-0.01 in the UV/optical, up to the point that it was no longer detected above background in the optical or X-ray bands. The brightness of this GRB and the similarity in the decay rate of the X-ray, optical and gamma-ray emission from 100s after the trigger distinguish this burst from others and present a challenge to the fireball model. The lack of a cooling or jet break in the afterglow up to \~10^5s constrains any model that can produce the large luminosity observed in GRB061007, which we found to require either an excessively large kinetic energy or highly collimated outflow. Analysis of the multi-wavelength spectral and high-resolution temporal data taken with Swift suggest an early time jet-break to be a more plausible scenario. This must have occurred within 80s of the prompt emission, which places an upper limit on the jet opening angle of θ_j=0.8deg. Such a highly collimated outflow resolves the energy budget problem presented in a spherical emission model, reducing the isotropic equivalent energy of this burst to E_γ^{corr}=10^{50} ergs; consistent with other GRBs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2007; v1 submitted 3 November, 2006;
originally announced November 2006.
-
Swift observations of GRB050712
Authors:
M. De Pasquale,
D. Grupe,
T. S. Poole,
A. A. Breeveld,
S. Zane,
S. R. Rosen,
M. J. Page,
K. O. Mason,
D. N. Burrows,
H. A. Krimm.,
N. Gehrels,
J. A. Nousek,
P. W. A. Roming,
S. Kobayashi,
B. Zhang
Abstract:
We present the results of X-ray and optical observations of GRB050712 performed by Swift. The X-ray lightcurve of this burst exhibits episodes of flares in the first 1000s, the same epoch at which the UVOT detected an optical counterpart. A shallow X-ray decay, with a decay slope of -0.73, followed and lasted ~70ks. This behaviour can be explained in terms of activity of GRB 'inner engine', with…
▽ More
We present the results of X-ray and optical observations of GRB050712 performed by Swift. The X-ray lightcurve of this burst exhibits episodes of flares in the first 1000s, the same epoch at which the UVOT detected an optical counterpart. A shallow X-ray decay, with a decay slope of -0.73, followed and lasted ~70ks. This behaviour can be explained in terms of activity of GRB 'inner engine', with the possibility of that the last flare is caused by the interaction of the ejecta with the surrounding medium. We also find interesting spectral parameters for the X-ray emission. In particular, data suggest the presence of an intrinsic absorption in the first 1000s, which can be explained if circumbust medium clouds lie along the line of sight.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2006;
originally announced May 2006.
