Critical properties of the optical field localization in a three-dimensional percolating system: Theory and experiment
Authors:
Gennadiy Burlak,
A. Díaz-de-Anda,
Boris A. Malomed,
E. Martinez-Sánchez,
G. Medina-Ángel,
R. Morales-Nava,
J. J. Martínez-Ocampo,
M. E. de-Anda-Reyes,
A. Romero-López
Abstract:
We systematically study the optical field localization in an active three-dimensional (3D) disordered percolating system with light nanoemitters incorporated in percolating clusters. An essential feature of such a hybrid medium is that the clusters are combined into a fractal radiation pattern, in which light is simultaneously emitted and scattered by the disordered structures. Theoretical conside…
▽ More
We systematically study the optical field localization in an active three-dimensional (3D) disordered percolating system with light nanoemitters incorporated in percolating clusters. An essential feature of such a hybrid medium is that the clusters are combined into a fractal radiation pattern, in which light is simultaneously emitted and scattered by the disordered structures. Theoretical considerations, based on systematic 3D simulations, reveal nontrivial dynamics in the form of propagation of localized field bunches in the percolating material. We obtain the length of the field localization and dynamical properties of such states as functions of the occupation probability of the disordered clusters. A transition between the dynamical states and narrow point-like fields pinned to the emitters is found. The theoretical analysis of the fractal field properties is followed by an experimental study of the light generation by nanoemitters incorporated in the percolating clusters. The experimental results corroborate theoretical predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2023; v1 submitted 20 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Recommendations on test datasets for evaluating AI solutions in pathology
Authors:
André Homeyer,
Christian Geißler,
Lars Ole Schwen,
Falk Zakrzewski,
Theodore Evans,
Klaus Strohmenger,
Max Westphal,
Roman David Bülow,
Michaela Kargl,
Aray Karjauv,
Isidre Munné-Bertran,
Carl Orge Retzlaff,
Adrià Romero-López,
Tomasz Sołtysiński,
Markus Plass,
Rita Carvalho,
Peter Steinbach,
Yu-Chia Lan,
Nassim Bouteldja,
David Haber,
Mateo Rojas-Carulla,
Alireza Vafaei Sadr,
Matthias Kraft,
Daniel Krüger,
Rutger Fick
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recom…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing.
A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations for the collection of test datasets.
We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries?
The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help regulatory agencies and end users verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
