-
Development of Fe$_2$O$_3$/YSZ ceramic plates for cryogenic operation of resistive-protected gaseous detectors
Authors:
L. Olano-Vegas,
I. Pardo,
S. Leardini,
M. Morales,
A. R. Carreira,
R. M. Corral,
D. González-Díaz,
A. Tesi,
L. Moleri,
C. D. R. Azevedo,
L. Carramate,
F. Guitián
Abstract:
We present a ceramic material based on hematite (Fe$_2$O$_3$) and zirconia stabilized with yttria at 8% molar (YSZ), that exhibits stable electrical properties with transported charge and that can be tuned to the resistivities necessary to induce spark-quenching in gaseous detectors ($ρ= 10^9-10^{12}$ $Ω\cdot$cm), from room temperature down to the liquid-vapor coexistence point of nitrogen (77 K).…
▽ More
We present a ceramic material based on hematite (Fe$_2$O$_3$) and zirconia stabilized with yttria at 8% molar (YSZ), that exhibits stable electrical properties with transported charge and that can be tuned to the resistivities necessary to induce spark-quenching in gaseous detectors ($ρ= 10^9-10^{12}$ $Ω\cdot$cm), from room temperature down to the liquid-vapor coexistence point of nitrogen (77 K). It, thus, allows covering the operating temperatures of most immediate interest to gaseous instrumentation. The ceramics have been produced in a region of mass concentrations far from what has been usually explored in literature: optimal characteristics are achieved for Fe$_2$O$_3$ concentrations of 75%wt (LAr boiling temperature), 35%wt (LXe boiling temperature), and 100%wt (room temperature). The nine order of magnitude enhancement observed for the electrical conductivity of the mixed phases relative to that of pure Fe$_2$O$_3$ is startling, however it can be qualitatively understood based on existing literature. Plates of 4 cm x 4 cm have been manufactured and, prior to this work, operated in-detector at the LXe boiling point (165 K), demonstrating spark-free operation. Preliminary results obtained for the first time on a spark-protected amplification structure (RP-WELL) at around the LAr boiling point (90 K) are now presented, too.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2023; v1 submitted 22 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Gain characteristics of a 100 micrometer thick GEM in Krypton-CO2 mixtures
Authors:
R. C. Roque,
H. Natal da Luz,
L. F. N. D. Carramate,
C. D. R. Azevedo,
J. A. Mir,
F. D. Amaro
Abstract:
The operation of a Micropattern Gaseous Detector (MPGD) comprising a cascade of two non-standard Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) made from a 100 micrometer kapton foil was evaluated in pure krypton and in krypton-CO2 mixtures. The final avalanche charge was collected in a 2D strip readout, providing an active area of 10x10 cm2 for the entire detection system. For each mixture, the effective gain an…
▽ More
The operation of a Micropattern Gaseous Detector (MPGD) comprising a cascade of two non-standard Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM) made from a 100 micrometer kapton foil was evaluated in pure krypton and in krypton-CO2 mixtures. The final avalanche charge was collected in a 2D strip readout, providing an active area of 10x10 cm2 for the entire detection system. For each mixture, the effective gain and energy resolution were measured as a function of the electric field in the drift, transfer and induction regions. Using X-rays from a 55Fe radioactive source (5.9 keV), gains close to 104 and energy resolution of 22% (FWHM) were achieved in pure krypton under stable conditions, showing the potential of the experimental setup for the following imaging studies.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
THGEM gain calculations using Garfield++: Solving discrepancies between the simulation and experimental data
Authors:
C. D. R. Azevedo,
P. M. Correia,
L. F. N. D. Carramate,
A. L. M. Silva,
J. F. C. A. Veloso
Abstract:
Discrepancies between the measured and simulated gain in Thick Micropatterned gaseous detectors (MPGD), namely THGEM, have been observed by several groups. In order to simulate the electron avalanches and the gain the community relies on the calculations performed in Garfield++, known to produce differences of 2 orders of magnitude in comparison to the experimental data for thick MPGDs.
In this…
▽ More
Discrepancies between the measured and simulated gain in Thick Micropatterned gaseous detectors (MPGD), namely THGEM, have been observed by several groups. In order to simulate the electron avalanches and the gain the community relies on the calculations performed in Garfield++, known to produce differences of 2 orders of magnitude in comparison to the experimental data for thick MPGDs.
In this work, simulations performed for Ne/5%CH4, Ar/5%CH4 and Ar/30%CO2 mixtures shows that Garfield++ is able to perfectly describe the experimental data if Penning effect is included in the simulation. The comparison between the number of excitations which may lead to a Penning transfer, is shown for THGEM and GEM, explaining the less pronounced gain discrepancies observed in GEM.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2016; v1 submitted 15 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Pressure effect in the X-ray intrinsic position resolution in noble gases and mixtures
Authors:
C. D. R. Azevedo,
P. M. Correia,
D. Gonzalez-Diaz,
S. Biagi,
A. L. M. Silva,
L. F. N. D. Carramate,
J. F. C. A. Veloso
Abstract:
A study of the gas pressure effect in the position resolution of an interacting X- or gamma-ray photon in a gas medium is performed. The intrinsic position resolution for pure noble gases (Argon and Xenon) and their mixtures with CO2 and CH4 were calculated for several gas pressures (1-10bar) and for photon energies between 5.4 and 60.0 keV, being possible to establish a linear match between the i…
▽ More
A study of the gas pressure effect in the position resolution of an interacting X- or gamma-ray photon in a gas medium is performed. The intrinsic position resolution for pure noble gases (Argon and Xenon) and their mixtures with CO2 and CH4 were calculated for several gas pressures (1-10bar) and for photon energies between 5.4 and 60.0 keV, being possible to establish a linear match between the intrinsic position resolution and the inverse of the gas pressure in that energy range. In order to evaluate the quality of the method here described, a comparison between the available experimental data and the calculated one in this work, is done and discussed. In the majority of the cases, a strong agreement is observed.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2016; v1 submitted 20 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.