-
Electric Switching of the Charge-Density-Wave and Normal Metallic Phases in Tantalum Disulfide Thin-Film Devices
Authors:
A. Geremew,
S. Rumyantsev,
F. Kargar,
B. Debnath,
A. Nosek,
M. Bloodgood,
M. Bockrath,
T. Salguero,
R. K. Lake,
A. A. Balandin
Abstract:
We report on switching among three charge-density-wave phases - commensurate, nearly commensurate, incommensurate - and the high-temperature normal metallic phase in thin-film 1T-TaS2 devices induced by application of an in-plane electric field. The electric switching among all phases has been achieved over a wide temperature range, from 77 K to 400 K. The low-frequency electronic noise spectrosco…
▽ More
We report on switching among three charge-density-wave phases - commensurate, nearly commensurate, incommensurate - and the high-temperature normal metallic phase in thin-film 1T-TaS2 devices induced by application of an in-plane electric field. The electric switching among all phases has been achieved over a wide temperature range, from 77 K to 400 K. The low-frequency electronic noise spectroscopy has been used as an effective tool for monitoring the transitions, particularly the switching from the incommensurate charge-density-wave phase to the normal metal phase. The noise spectral density exhibits sharp increases at the phase transition points, which correspond to the step-like changes in resistivity. Assignment of the phases is consistent with low-field resistivity measurements over the temperature range from 77 K to 600 K. Analysis of the experimental data and calculations of heat dissipation suggest that Joule heating plays a dominant role in the electric-field induced transitions in the tested 1T-TaS2 devices on Si/SiO2 substrates. The possibility of electrical switching among four different phases of 1T-TaS2 is a promising step toward nanoscale device applications. The results also demonstrate the potential of noise spectroscopy for investigating and identifying phase transitions in materials.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Growing low-dimensional supramolecular crystals directly from 3D particles
Authors:
Alexander Eberle,
Adrian Nosek,
Johannes Büttner,
Thomas Markert,
Frank Trixler
Abstract:
We show that one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures and two-dimensional (2D) supramolecular crystals of organic semiconductors can be grown on substrates under ambient conditions directly from three-dimensional (3D) organic crystals. The approach does not require dissolving, melting or evaporating of the source crystals and is based on the Organic Solid-Solid Wetting Deposition (OSWD). We exemplify o…
▽ More
We show that one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures and two-dimensional (2D) supramolecular crystals of organic semiconductors can be grown on substrates under ambient conditions directly from three-dimensional (3D) organic crystals. The approach does not require dissolving, melting or evaporating of the source crystals and is based on the Organic Solid-Solid Wetting Deposition (OSWD). We exemplify our approach by the pigment quinacridone (QAC). Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy (STM) investigations show that the structures of the resulting 2D crystals are similar to the chain arrangement of the alpha and beta QAC polymorphs and are independent of the 3D source crystal polymorph (gamma). Furthermore, distinct 1D chains can be produced systematically.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability
Authors:
Brian A. Nosek,
Jeffrey R. Spies,
Matt Motyl
Abstract:
An academic scientist's professional success depends on publishing. Publishing norms emphasize novel, positive results. As such, disciplinary incentives encourage design, analysis, and reporting decisions that elicit positive results and ignore negative results. Prior reports demonstrate how these incentives inflate the rate of false effects in published science. When incentives favor novelty over…
▽ More
An academic scientist's professional success depends on publishing. Publishing norms emphasize novel, positive results. As such, disciplinary incentives encourage design, analysis, and reporting decisions that elicit positive results and ignore negative results. Prior reports demonstrate how these incentives inflate the rate of false effects in published science. When incentives favor novelty over replication, false results persist in the literature unchallenged, reducing efficiency in knowledge accumulation. Previous suggestions to address this problem are unlikely to be effective. For example, a journal of negative results publishes otherwise unpublishable reports. This enshrines the low status of the journal and its content. The persistence of false findings can be meliorated with strategies that make the fundamental but abstract accuracy motive - getting it right - competitive with the more tangible and concrete incentive - getting it published. We develop strategies for improving scientific practices and knowledge accumulation that account for ordinary human motivations and self-serving biases.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2012; v1 submitted 18 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
-
Scientific Utopia: I. Opening scientific communication
Authors:
Brian A. Nosek,
Yoav Bar-Anan
Abstract:
Existing norms for scientific communication are rooted in anachronistic practices of bygone eras, making them needlessly inefficient. We outline a path that moves away from the existing model of scientific communication to improve the efficiency in meeting the purpose of public science - knowledge accumulation. We call for six changes: (1) full embrace of digital communication, (2) open access to…
▽ More
Existing norms for scientific communication are rooted in anachronistic practices of bygone eras, making them needlessly inefficient. We outline a path that moves away from the existing model of scientific communication to improve the efficiency in meeting the purpose of public science - knowledge accumulation. We call for six changes: (1) full embrace of digital communication, (2) open access to all published research, (3) disentangling publication from evaluation, (4) breaking the "one article, one journal" model with a grading system for evaluation and diversified dissemination outlets, (5) publishing peer review, and, (6) allowing open, continuous peer review. We address conceptual and practical barriers to change, and provide examples showing how the suggested practices are being used already. The critical barriers to change are not technical or financial; they are social. While scientists guard the status quo, they also have the power to change it.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
