ReneeWrites

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ReneeWrites!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Archives 2019–2023 2024 (1) 2024 (2)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel 47 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel 20 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The cropped automobile is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 12:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Mauritsstraat 16 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The cropped automobile is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 12:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Mauritsstraat 18 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The cropped automobile is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 12:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Spanjaardsgat 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Van Coothplein 37 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dank Vapes Vaping Cartridge.jpg

Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 06:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk rouwbord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk toren 2024-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk beeld M. Tydeman Jr. zijkant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 23 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Prinsenkade 9–10 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Oude Postkantoor 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf Van Heemstraweg-West 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gppd quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf Van Heemstraweg-West 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Oudemannen- en vrouwenhuis beelden voorgevel 2024-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Janstraat zicht op de Grote Markt 2024-09-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ in Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk, Zaltbommel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Haven Fietsenstalling 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --6uy7t44t 16:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste aan de Sint Janstraat ingang 2024-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Regentesseplein 2024-08-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:44, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Breda beeld van een heilige - Sint-Antoniuskathedraal 2024-09-17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breda beeld van een heilige - Sint-Antoniuskathedraal 2024-09-17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Tramsingel T63 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Wilhelminapark 19 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk gewelf zijbeuk 2024-09-24-1 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk middenbeuk 2024-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 21:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk apsis 2024-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf zuidelijk fietspad 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf zuidelijk fietspad 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda bord Haagdijk bij Rozemarijnstraat 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It lacks specific cats about the subject --Poco a poco 12:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)  Done Added more specific categories ReneeWrites 12:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)  Support Thank you, QI --Poco a poco 16:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk koorbank 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel bord schoolzone met Jip en Janneke 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel bord schoolzone met Jip en Janneke 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Bernardus 2024-10-06-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Lucia 2024-10-06-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda 't Hout 2024-08-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulvenhout Dorpstraat 60 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk zilveren godslamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk koperen deksel doopvontkastje 2024-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mespilus germanica 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Bernardus 2024-10-06-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molen De Korenbloem, Ulvenhout 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molen De Korenbloem, Ulvenhout achterkant 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 18:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk nis met koperen deksel doopvontkastje 2024-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024

Hello!

As we close the curtains on a successful Wiki Loves Folklore 2024, we'd love to hear your thoughts! Your valuable feedback will help us improve future campaigns and ensure the continued preservation of cultural heritage around the globe.

Please take a few minutes to share your experience by filling out the following feedback form.

The form will be open for submissions until November 10th, 2024, at 23:59 UTC (Coordinated Universal Time). We appreciate your participation and support! See you in February 2025!

Sincerely, The Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Lucia 2024-10-06-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck three-quarter back view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck three-quarter front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Haven Fietsenstalling 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:05, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk doopvont 2024-10-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:02, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerpen beeld het Vreedzame Hand 2023-05-16-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerpen beeld het Vreedzame Hand 2023-05-16-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Koningin Wilhelmina Paviljoen voorkant 2023-05-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk stergewelf bij ingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 16:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 16:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 12:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk koorbank 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 16:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerpen beeld het Vreedzame Hand 2023-05-16-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaltbommel Buitengracht 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice --Buidhe 05:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk doopkapel 2024-10-06-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Galderse Heide 2024-10-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Koningin Wilhelmina Paviljoen 2023-05-29-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 16:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Haagdijk 168 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Emmastraat 16 voorkant 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Emmastraat 14 voorkant 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 29 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 28 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 48 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerpen Centraal Station 2023-05-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you remove the CA? --Poco a poco 15:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)  Done ReneeWrites 16:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)  Support A bit soft but still ok --Poco a poco 19:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --WikiLucas00 07:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 39 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The bad crop person at left is disturbing. --Sebring12Hrs 09:56, 21 October 2024 (UTC)  Done, cropped the person out ReneeWrites 10:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam links 2024-10-26-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam links 2024-10-26-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Buidhe 23:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam links 2024-10-26-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Buidhe 23:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Woonboulevard 2024-10-23-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Škoda Kodiaq side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 37, Terheijden 2023-06-15-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 37, Terheijden 2023-06-15-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam rechts 2024-10-26-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 20:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam rechts 2024-10-26-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 20:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam rechts 2024-10-26-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 20:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 6 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Willemstraat 1–3 venster 2024-10-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Beatrixstraat appartementencomplex 2024-10-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Plaquette Hendrik Gerard Seelig 2024-10-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Mauritsstraat 34 torentje 2024-10-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Mastbos Vlonderpad 2024-10-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Woonboulevard 2024-10-23-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akkermolen, Zundert 2023-06-13-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groenendijk 2, Lage Zwaluwe voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 21:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Haagsemarkt 5 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 21:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Achtmaal Sint-Corneliuskerk gevelbeeld Jozef met kind 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen ingang Sint Janstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 111–113 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 87–89 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk beeld M. Tydeman Jr. zijkant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeld Sint Trudo.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeld Sint Trudo 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 123–125 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 135–137 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 75–77 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Achtmaal Sint-Corneliuskerk gevelbeeld Maria 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hooge Zwaluwe ingang aan de Kerkdijk 2023-06-15-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Canon EOS R50

Hi, Renее,
сongratulations on your new camera Canon EOS R50.
Excellent result. Now technical equipment does not limit your creative potential.
I wish you more new creative success!
Respectfully, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg

File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xeror (talk) 04:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Whoo, File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg is now moved to File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg! I hope you're happy about it. :) OperationSakura6144 (talk) 01:44, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akkermolen, Zundert 2023-06-13-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Oosterhoutseweg 15 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 15:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Jansklooster 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint Jansklooster 2024-08-05-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dethleffs Camper 450 DB side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Dodge Challenger SRT side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 10:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Laurentiuskerk toren 2024-11-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Laurentiuskerk Agnus Dei voorgevel 2024-11-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 39 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 48 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sophiastraat 42 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herweg 23, Den Hout voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herweg 23, Den Hout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herweg 25, Den Hout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 37, Terheijden voorkant 2023-06-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 39, Terheijden voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Haagdijk 141 2024-08-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but left side is slightly leaning out --Plozessor 04:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)  Done Fixed it ReneeWrites 08:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marksluis, Oosterhout 2023-08-23 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste aan de Sint Janstraat ingang kraagsteen 2024-09-17-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Exterior of Sint-Laurentiuskerk (Ginneken), tower of the church, seen from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Useful to add the direction of the view to the scope. Otherwise, good for VI --Tagooty (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I added the direction to the scope. ReneeWrites (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 07:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Galderse Heide 2024-10-05 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 00:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld Barbara Belcrumwatertoren 2024-10-25-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 00:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 39 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld van Generaal P. van Ham 2024-11-06-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 08:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nieuwe watertoren (Zaltbommel), view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda beeld Barbara Belcrumwatertoren 2024-10-25-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Den Arent 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marksluis, Oosterhout 2023-08-23-2 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Koningin Wilhelmina Paviljoen, front facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

A small favour (and a small apology to User:MacOS Weed).

Hi, User:ReneeWrites. I was focusing on other things such as taking care of non-empty categories, deleting useless categories, etc. Anyway, I need you to do me a small favour. I want Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available to be cleared (I've moved that category from Category:Flags of municipialities of Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available to make you clear, no pun intended). So, I'd like your help in that.

Also, I said something heartwrenching in File talk:Emblem of Nishiki, Kumamoto.svg, because I feel sorry for talking rude to User:MacOS Weed and still remember that bitter moment. User:MacOS Weed haven't forgiven me for that yet. I wish I was considerate of that user's feelings. I don't know about you, but that unforgiving nature of User:MacOS Weed still haunts me. It's my fault after all. I am very sorry. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 10:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Hey OperationSakura6144, I hope you've been doing well. I wouldn't worry too much about MacOS Weed. You've already apologised to him, and it's up to him to accept the apology or not. That's not something you can make him do. At this point you've done all you can do on your end, so it's best to put all of this behind you and move forward having learned from the experience. They say the best apology is changed behaviour. ReneeWrites (talk) 11:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. I'll try to forget about it and move forward. Also, thank you for clearing Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available. I feel better with a good friend like you. Anyway, see you tomorrow. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 11:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Sint-Martinuskerk (Schijf), view from the south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Oblique front view is not a usual indication. The direction of exposure would be more acceptable: North exposure, North-west etc.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Adjusted the scope. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

A small favour again.

Hi, User:ReneeWrites. Sorry to disturb you, but I want Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available to be cleared, again. The category currently has over 20 files, which is kinda enough for me, and, so, I can't resist my wanting to have it cleared. I'm not treating you like a slave, though, but I'd like you to help me in this thing immediately. I'm sorry if I said anything wrong.

To let you know, I've been working on something important that I need to leave all my work to you, in which I'll be free to focus on other things. I'll talk about it in more detail after I finish it.

Anyway, I'll see you next time. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 08:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Hey OperationSakura6144, I've cleared the category. An increasing number of files in that category have nothing to do with Japanese seals/flags though, and include files from other areas of Commons. I think it might be a good idea to rename the category or make a new one to reflect this change of scope, and make it a maintenance category like all the others of its kind.

I also think it would be good to try to not be too bothered by the fact that this category may not be empty most or even all of the time.

Good luck with your other project. ReneeWrites (talk) 09:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

The project is ready.

Hey, User:ReneeWrites. I have something to tell. I have finished my project, which I have downloaded over 200 SVG files online. I also made some vectorized versions of flags and edited some of the flags by correcting the colors in them. Now, I want to share the files with you so that you could work on making the vector versions of Category:Symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics. I know I could put some work in it and upload the finished files myself, but the job is too heavy for me right now. If you like, I can share the files with you, if you have a spare cloud or whatever you like me to share them. Also, thank you for the help in Category:Symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics. I really appreciate your contributions in it. Anyway, see you later. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Hey OperationSakura6144, It's no problem. I think the easiest way to share these files is putting them in a single .zip file, uploading them to https://gofile.io/, and then posting the link to the download here. ReneeWrites (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I am posting this link to the ZIP containing the files I said: https://gofile.io/d/gvw6ak. I've done the steps you mentioned. Now, you can download all the files now by clicking the link before it's too late. See you if you're ready. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I downloaded the zip. I'm unsure what you want me to do with them? Aside from the folder with edited versions these are all emblems and flags already on Commons. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Look, I can explain. I downloaded some emblems for vectorizing the complete versions of flags, and some flags for extracting the emblems out of them. I know I could do the work myself, but I'm tired of doing it right now because it's too heavy for me. I need to focus on other things like study and stuff. So, I'm leaving all the work to you.

If you think it's absurd to see the files look like they're already on the Commons, please think twice. I didn't only download files from Commons but also elsewhere in the internet. Some of the files have irregularities like outlined emblems, unreasonably rounded corners instead of pointed one and so on. I'm sure you'd recognize the irregularities, and correct them in the flags and emblems, because you make professionally-looking SVGs.

To be clear, I'm sharing the files so that you could work on them and upload the final files to Commons. I don't have enough time to do the work myself, and, so, I thought it would be good to share the work with you. Please don't think it is a favor from me. I'm trying to help you in some way. We're working to replace the non-vector files with the vectorized ones. So, I don't think it's wrong to share the files.

I don't know about you, but I'm taking break from Commons for a while. Also, if you think I said something wrong, I'd apologize to you. Besides that, thank you for your contributions. I really appreciate them. Now, it's time for me to go. Hope I see you again. Bye. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 11:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

See you later, and good luck with your studies. ReneeWrites (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg

File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OperationSakura6144 (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Deleting other user's talk page contributions

Please refrain from doing that, as you did at [1].
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

I was clearly trying to leave this person alone, but you could have just pinged them or leave a normal message if you felt really strongly they should be notified instead of a "fake" CfD notice. ReneeWrites (talk) 07:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

There is nothing fake about the notice. I think it's a problem if you deliberately avoid notifying people about discussions they are most certainly interested in.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

The CfD notice gets automatically added to the talk page of the person who made the category - and it did. But that person wasn't Trung, it was Mdd - that was part of the problem. Trung already said in the VP and on his talk page that he doesn't like these categories, I wouldn't have started the discussion in the first place if he was fine with them. And again, a ping or a regular message would've been preferred. The CfD notice implies he made these categories, when he didn't. ReneeWrites (talk) 07:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

[Workshop] Identifying Win-Win Relationships with Partners for Wikimedia

Dear Recipient,
We are excited to invite you to the third workshop in our Advocacy series, part of the Feminism and Folklore International Campaign. This highly anticipated workshop, titled "Identifying Win-Win Relationships with Partners for Wikimedia," will be led by the esteemed Alex Stinson, Lead Program Strategist at the Wikimedia Foundation. Don't miss this opportunity to gain valuable insights into forging effective partnerships.

Workshop Objectives

• Introduction to Partnerships: Understand the importance of building win-win relationships within the Wikimedia movement.
• Strategies for Collaboration: Learn practical strategies for identifying and fostering effective partnerships.
• Case Studies: Explore real-world examples of successful partnerships in the Wikimedia community.
• Interactive Discussions: Engage in discussions to share experiences and insights on collaboration and advocacy.

Workshop Details

📅 Date: 7th December 2024
⏰ Time: 4:30 PM UTC (Check your local time zone)
📍 Venue: Zoom Meeting

How to Join:

Registration Link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Identifying_Win-Win_Relationships_with_Partners_for_Wikimedia
Meeting ID: 860 4444 3016
Passcode: 834088

We welcome participants to bring their diverse perspectives and stories as we drive into the collaborative opportunities within the Wikimedia movement. Together, we’ll explore how these partnerships can enhance our advocacy and community efforts.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:27, 03 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk gewelfschildering hoogkoor 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 23:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Graphic art "Renewal" at Ted Weiss Federal Building, New York, New York LCCN2010720143.jpg

File:Graphic art "Renewal" at Ted Weiss Federal Building, New York, New York LCCN2010720143.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager links detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 23:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager rechts detail 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 23:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager rechts detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager rechts detail 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 23:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht close-up Engelbrecht II van Nassau 2024-12-04-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht close-up Engelbrecht II van Nassau 2024-12-04-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht close-up Cimburga van Baden 2024-12-04-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht close-up Cimburga van Baden 2024-12-04-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Atilius Regulus detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Caesar detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager links detail 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager links 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 02:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Atilius Regulus detail 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Caesar detail 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Caesar detail 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht hoofdeinde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Doopvont 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk koorhek detail engel 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Atilius Regulus detail rug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager links 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht wapenschild Nassau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager rechts 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager rechts 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht aanzicht schuin 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht aanzicht schuin 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager links detail 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Epitaaf Joris van Froenhuijsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 22:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Doopvont detail 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs more specific CAT(s). Otherwise good. --Tagooty 01:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)  Done ReneeWrites 13:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Zuid misericorde bovenste rij 07 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Zuid misericorde bovenste rij 09 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 19:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Zuid misericorde bovenste rij 11 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Zuid misericorde bovenste rij 12 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Zuid misericorde bovenste rij 16 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk zicht vanaf hoogkoor 2024-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

A small favour.

Hey, User:ReneeWrites. Sorry to disturb you, but I'm here to tell you something. I've done all the work I had to do in Commons today. Now, I'd like you to do me a favor. Would you like to clear Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available, like you often do? See, I'm too tired to do the work in Commons now, and it's night in my city. So, I need to go to bed and have a good sleep. I hope I see you tommorow. Bye. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to reiterate something I said earlier: it's normal for maintenance categories to not always be empty. This isn't a critical issue, and it's okay to leave it for others to address in time. It'll get picked up eventually. I'd also prefer not to receive messages about this on my talk page whenever you do another sweep of these files, and I don't think it's necessary to message others about it, either. I hope you understand. ReneeWrites (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

That's okay. But, I'd like to have regular maintenance of the category, so that I wouldn't be asking you and others to clear it. I hope you understand it too. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

I know that that is something you want, but this isn't urgent, important or time-sensitive, and someone else will pick it up eventually - whether this is hours or months from now truly doesn't matter. I've helped with this in the past, but I don't think it's healthy or sustainable to treat this as something that needs constant attention, so I'd prefer not to be contacted about this again. There are a million things to do on Commons at any given time, if you're unable to do this specific thing yourself, it's okay to leave it for others while you occupy your time with something else. ReneeWrites (talk) 20:16, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitaph of Joris van Froenhuijsen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Thi (talk) 18:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Atilius Regulus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht aanzicht schuin 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht aanzicht schuin 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht Atilius Regulus detail 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Praalgraf Engelbrecht drager links detail 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 01:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Noord misericorde bovenste rij 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Noord misericorde bovenste rij 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Noord misericorde bovenste rij 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Noord misericorde onderste rij 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk Koorbank Noord misericorde bovenste rij 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal apsis 2024-12-13-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal apsis 2024-12-13-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal preekstoel engelen 2024-12-13-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal preekstoel engelen 2024-12-13-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal hoofdorgel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent 't Stuk voorkant 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:25, 16 December 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent De Lent voorkant 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Klein-Zundert zijkant 2023-06-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 02:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organs of Sint-Antoniuskathedraal, Breda, main organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent 't Kapelleke 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Sint-Antoniuskathedraal preekstoel - De verzoeking van de heilige Antonius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2024 - Fenrir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Klein-Zundert voorkant 2023-06-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left part is hanging a little bit to the right --Michielverbeek 12:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC)  Done Fixed the tilt. I used the verticals of the tent and house, as the left flagpole isn't entirely straight. ReneeWrites 22:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC) I only trust the verticals of the house, it's QI now --Michielverbeek 06:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Murals of Sint-Antoniuskathedraal, Breda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Stadhouderspoort 2024-11-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 14:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breda Stadhouderspoort close-up 2024-11-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2025! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2025!

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2025!

Merry Christmas, User:ReneeWrites, or should I say "Vrolijk Kerstfeest" in Dutch XD? I wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas, becuase you're one of the best people I'd ever met! I never forget the fun we had in Commons, and the stupidity we did there. As a Christmas gift, I would share you my favorite YouTube channels I'd like to learn from, which I think they are the coolest. Here they are: Michael Penn, blackpenredpen, Dr. Trefor Bazett, Dr Sean, 3blue1brown, Mathemaniac, Morphocular, TheGrayCuber, Another Roof, Numberphile, Periodic Videos, SciShow (along with their subchannels Psych, Space, Kids, and their podcast, Tangents), PBS Eons, Bizarre Beasts, PBS Space Time, Be Smart, TheBackyardScientist, CodeParade, Mike Russell, The 8-Bit Guy, Dan Wood, Michael MJD, ThioJoe, Apple Explained, MacVince, The Linux Experiment, Om Narayan Singh, Computer Clan and here you go, have fun watching these! Also, best wishes for 2025 which I hope it'd be more great and fun than 2024. Also, when is your birthday? I am just asking to know it, because we're friends, right? Anyway, see you next time. Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2025. Bye. :-) ;-) OperationSakura6144 (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too, OperationSakura6144! Or Vrolijk Kerstfeest :) Thanks for the heartfelt message, I know some of these channels but I'll check out the ones I don't. Wishing you all the best for 2025 as well! ReneeWrites (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bloemencorso Zundert 2024 - Fenrir close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 06:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Wernhout 2024-08-28-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Veldstraat 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

	* Happy Holidays! *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

File:The sculpture "Companion (Passing Through)," by the artist KAWS (Brian Donnelly) at the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth, Texas LCCN2013650780.jpg

File:The sculpture "Companion (Passing Through)," by the artist KAWS (Brian Donnelly) at the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth, Texas LCCN2013650780.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Raamberg achterkant 2024-08-28-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahliaveld Achtmaal Buntweg 2024-08-28-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:23, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahliaveld Klein-Zundert Vossenbergstraat 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Helpt Elkander voorkant 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsotent Helpt Elkander 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Your recent speedy deletion noms

A handful of the files that you nominated for speedy deletion as being empty or corrupt now have content in them, such as File:Meccano Magazine 1929-03.pdf. I'm assuming they were empty when you nominated them for deletion and whatever bug was keeping them empty got resolved. I know there was another bug with .djvu files undeleted on the 1st not rendering, too. If they still need to be deleted for some reason, go ahead and put them in a regular DR and tag me. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey The Squirrel Conspiracy, I'd tagged these files as F7 because they're not generating a thumbnail. It's a minor glitch that doesn't render them unusable, but it's a glitch nonetheless. If you don't mind, I'd like to have the remaining files speedily deleted too. The files are eligible for that and the process is faster and less involved. I did see that you deleted a few files I'd tagged despite your reservations, and I appreciate that. They're back on Commons now and working properly (e.g. File:Meccano Magazine 1929-07.pdf). ReneeWrites (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I was able to reupload a few more files, but it seems as if a number of PDF's I'd uploaded that were fine before lose their thumbnails later, for instance File:McCall's Magazine 1922-09.pdf and File:Meccano Magazine 1929-09.pdf (two files I know beyond a doubt were fine before). I'll hold off on tagging more files for deletion for now, in case it's a bug and it's being worked on. Hopefully a few months from now I'll have a better idea of which files are glitchy, and I'll file a regular deletion request for those. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

About edits on File:Ganoderma applanatum fungus in Nuevo Laredo.jpg

Hello, I hope everything is good. I noticed your edits on File:Ganoderma applanatum fungus in Nuevo Laredo.jpg and wanted to ask you for your reasoning -- especially with deleting it from the cat of Funga of Nuevo Laredo. And concerning its identification, do you have a more correct ID on this particular fungus. Thanks in advance, and wish you a Happy New Year. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas: "Funga of Nuevo Laredo" was an incorrectly named category, I renamed and moved it to "Fungi of Nuevo Laredo". I removed the other categories because they were parent categories of a subcategory that was already on the file. "Fungi of Nuevo Laredo" is a subcategory of "Nuevo Laredo Municipality", so it can be removed from the parent category. Likewise Tamaulipas is a parent category of Nuevo Laredo. I hope my explanation is clear, but in case it isn't, they go a bit more in-depth about this at COM:OVERCAT. ReneeWrites (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

No, I was talking about the file, not the category. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 02:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas: I was talking a bit about both, but mostly about the file. Which part of my reply was unclear? ReneeWrites (talk) 02:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Also, shouldn't by this same reasoning all categories containing the words "Flora of" or "Fauna of" be deleted to have instead "Plants of" and "Animals of"? Thanks Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 02:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

That's a different discussion. I think COM:CfD or the Village Pump is a better place to ask that question. ReneeWrites (talk) 02:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Good news!

Hi, User:ReneeWrites. I've got good news to tell. I've uploaded File:Flag of Kakeya, Shimane (1913–2004).svg and File:Emblem of Kakeya, Shimane (1913–2004).svg which are vector versions I made for File:Flag of Kakeya Shimane.png and File:Kakeya Shimane chapter.gif. I know that sounds ordinary, but let me explain. I wanted File:Flag of Kakeya Shimane.png to be vectorized for a long time, and, as a result, I tried to vectorize the file and File:Flag of Kakeya, Shimane (1913–2004).svg is the result of it.

Also, File:Flag of Kakeya Shimane.png is (or was, to be real) the only file in Category:Simple symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics, and, to be honest, I thought that category is unnecessary and needs to be deleted. Maybe, you need to say what you think about Category:Simple symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics and if you still think it's useful. Anyway, it's a big feat for me that I vectorized File:Flag of Kakeya Shimane.png and File:Kakeya Shimane chapter.gif.

Besides that, I hope you're doing well. Before I go, I'd like you to take a look at some of the amazing images I got here in Commons which I think you'll like: ①, ②, ③, ④, ⑤, ⑥. Also, not to forget, I'd like to hear if you like my new cool signature. Anyway, see you next time. Bye. ★♚★♛★ 🅾🅿🅴🆁🅰🆃🅸🅾🅽𝒮𝒶𝓀𝓊𝓇𝒶⁶¹⁴⁴ ★♛★♚★ 《♦ talk • ♥ contributions • ♠ global • ♣ rights》 10:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

OperationSakura6144 You did a great job vectorizing that flag and emblem :)

I think it's okay to have the category deleted now that it's served it's purpose. I don't think there are currently any simple emblems left to be vectorized, the designs that are left are all a bit more complicated.

I like your new signature, it's flashy. Did you get into Balatro (so many of my friends are playing it) or is the card suit theme a coincidence? ReneeWrites (talk) 11:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, again. The card suit theme is just a good design. Also, did you check out the links with circled numbers in the main message? I think you'll like it. :) Anyway, bye. ★♚★♛★ 🅾🅿🅴🆁🅰🆃🅸🅾🅽𝒮𝒶𝓀𝓊𝓇𝒶⁶¹⁴⁴ ★♛★♚★ 《♦ talk • ♥ contributions • ♠ global • ♣ rights》 17:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I did, the images are pretty funny :p ReneeWrites (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Which images did you like the best? ★♚★♛★ 🅾🅿🅴🆁🅰🆃🅸🅾🅽𝒮𝒶𝓀𝓊𝓇𝒶⁶¹⁴⁴ ★♛★♚★ 《♦ talk • ♥ contributions • ♠ global • ♣ rights》 18:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

The 3rd and 4th ones. The 6th pic is also very pretty. ReneeWrites (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Anyway, good night. See you next time. Bye. ★♚★♛★ 🅾🅿🅴🆁🅰🆃🅸🅾🅽𝒮𝒶𝓀𝓊𝓇𝒶⁶¹⁴⁴ ★♛★♚★ 《♦ talk • ♥ contributions • ♠ global • ♣ rights》 19:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

But there are still other uploaded flags that needs correcting. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I know, and I plan on returning to that soon. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)