Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Reengineering professional services through automation, remote outsourcing, and task delegation

Published: 24 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Digital technology has enabled significant productivity gains in many industries. Manufacturers have benefited from robotics, and service businesses have benefited from self‐service technologies. An area that has seen only meager productivity gains is professional services, such as healthcare, consulting, legal services, and higher education. Despite the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and other new technologies, professional services continue to be labor intensive with high labor costs. In 2021, Sampson published an empirically‐based framework suggesting that emerging technologies would allow professional services to improve productivity by automating some tasks with self‐service technologies, outsourcing some tasks to remote professionals, and delegating some tasks to semiprofessional workers. The underlying theory was that this restructuring hinges on the creative and interpersonal skill requirements of various tasks. Our research builds on Sampson's framework by modeling a professional service operation and studying the influence of task offloading on costs and quality. Our model involves discrete event simulation parameterized by empirical data. We consider labor costs, managerial costs, delay costs (including customer balking), and assessment costs. Results show contexts wherein increased task offloading can reduce costs with negligible impact on quality, suggesting great opportunities for reengineering professional services through increased automation, offshore outsourcing, and task delegation.

References

[1]
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
[2]
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1043–1171). Elsevier.
[3]
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from us labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244.
[4]
Akinola, M., Martin, A. E., & Phillips, K. W. (2018). To delegate or not to delegate: Gender differences in affective associations and behavioral responses to delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1467–1491.
[5]
Altbach, P. G., & Pacheco, I. F. (2012). Paying the professoriate: A global comparison of compensation and contracts. Routledge.
[6]
Appleby, J., Raleigh, V., Frosini, F., Bevan, G., Gao, H., & Lyscom, T. (2011). Variations in health care: The good, the bad and the inexplicable. King's Fund.
[7]
Argenziano, R., Severinov, S., & Squintani, F. (2016). Strategic information acquisition and transmission. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8(3), 119–155.
[8]
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.
[9]
Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low‐skill service jobs and the polarization of the us labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553–1597.
[10]
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.
[11]
Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Herz, H. (2014). The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica, 82(6), 2005–2039.
[12]
BLS . (2019). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – National occupational employment and wage estimates, March 2019 update. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm
[13]
Brynjolfsson, E., Mitchell, T., & Rock, D. (2018). What can machines learn, and what does it mean for occupations and the economy? American Economic Association (AEA) Papers and Proceedings, 108, 43–47.
[14]
Chandrasekaran, A., Linderman, K., & Sting, F. J. (2018). Avoiding epistemological silos and empirical elephants in om: How to combine empirical and simulation methods? Journal of Operations Management, 63, 1–5.
[15]
De Varo, J., & Prasad, S. (2015). The relationship between delegation and incentives across occupations: Evidence and theory. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 63(2), 279–312.
[16]
Dobrzykowski, D. D., McFadden, K. L., & Vonderembse, M. A. (2016). Examining pathways to safety and financial performance in hospitals: A study of lean in professional service operations. Journal of Operations Management, 42‐43, 39–51.
[17]
Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Billington, C. (2008). Offshore outsourcing of professional services: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 148–163.
[18]
Fehr, E., Herz, H., & Wilkening, T. (2013). The lure of authority: Motivation and incentive effects of power. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1325–1359.
[19]
Feng, T., Ren, Z. J., & Zhang, F. (2019). Service outsourcing: Capacity, quality and correlated costs. Production and Operations Management, 28(3), 682–699.
[20]
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
[21]
Garicano, L., & Rossi‐Hansberg, E. (2006). Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1383–1435.
[22]
Goodale, J. C., Kuratko, D. F., & Hornsby, J. S. (2008). Influence factors for operational control and compensation in professional service firms. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 669–688.
[23]
Green, L. (2013). Queueing analysis in health care. In Patient flow (pp. 361–384). Springer.
[24]
Grimes, A., Ren, C., & Stevens, P. (2012). The need for speed: Impacts of internet connectivity on firm productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37(2), 187–201.
[25]
Haanwinckel, D. (2018). Supply, demand, institutions, and firms: A theory of labor market sorting and the wage distribution. Unpublished manuscript.
[26]
Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2006). Operations management (8th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
[27]
Hicks, M. J., & Devaraj, S. (2015). The myth and the reality of manufacturing in America. Ball State University.
[28]
Huang, M.‐H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172.
[29]
Kane, L., Schubsky, B., Locke, T., Kouimtzi, M., Duqueroy, V., Gottschling, C., Lopez, M., & Schwartz, L. (2019). International physician compensation report 2019: Do us physicians have it best? Medscape.
[30]
Leana, C. R. (1986). Predictors and consequences of delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 754–774.
[31]
Levina, N., & Su, N. (2008). Global multisourcing strategy: The emergence of a supplier portfolio in services offshoring. Decision Sciences, 39(3), 541–570.
[32]
Maister, D. H. (1993). Managing the professional service firm. Simon and Schuster.
[33]
Metters, R. (2008). A case study of national culture and offshoring services. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28, 727–747.
[34]
Metters, R., & Verma, R. (2008). History of offshoring knowledge services. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 141–147.
[35]
Narayanan, S., Balasubramanian, S., Swaminathan, J. M., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Managing uncertain tasks in technology‐intensive project environments: A multi‐method study of task closure and capacity management decisions. Journal of Operations Management, 66(3), 260–280.
[36]
Nedelkoska, L., & Quintini, G. (2018). Automation, skills use and training. OECD social, employment and migration working paper #202 (pp. 1–119).
[37]
Ocampo, S. (2022). A task‐based theory of occupations with multidimensional heterogeneity. In Centre for human capital and productivity working papers. Western University.
[38]
Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Levin, K. Y., Green, J., & Waksberg, J. (1999). Research method: Development and field testing of the content model. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century. Development of O*Net (pp. 31–47). American Psychological Association.
[39]
Roels, G. (2014). Optimal design of coproductive services: Interaction and work allocation. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 16(4), 578–594.
[40]
Rust, R. T., & Huang, M.‐H. (2012). Optimizing service productivity. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 47–66.
[41]
Sako, M. (2015). Outsourcing and offshoring of professional services. In The Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 327–347). Oxford University Press.
[42]
Sampson, S. E. (2018). Professional service jobs: Highly paid but subject to disruption? Service Science, 10(4), 457–475.
[43]
Sampson, S. E. (2021). A strategic framework for task automation in professional services. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 122–140.
[44]
Schmenner, R. W. (1986). How can service businesses survive and prosper? Sloan Management Review, 27(3), 21–32.
[45]
Spring, M., Faulconbridge, J., & Sarwar, A. (2022). How information technology automates and augments processes: Insights from artificial‐intelligence‐based systems in professional service operations. Journal of Operations Management, 68(6–7), 592–618.
[46]
Stringfellow, A., Teagarden, M. B., & Nie, W. (2008). Invisible costs in offshoring services work. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 164–179.
[47]
Susskind, R. E., & Susskind, D. (2022). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts (Updated ed.). Oxford University Press.
[48]
Tate, W. L., & Ellram, L. M. (2012). Service supply management structure in offshore outsourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(4), 8–29.
[49]
Tippins, N. T., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2010). A database for a changing economy: Review of the occupational information network (O*Net). National Academies Press.
[50]
Weijters, B., Rangarajan, D., Falk, T., & Schillewaert, N. (2007). Determinants and outcomes of customers' use of self‐service technology in a retail setting. Journal of Service Research, 10(1), 3–21.
[51]
Weiss, D. C. (2023). Latest version of Chatgpt aces bar exam with score nearing 90th percentile. ABA Journal. https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/latest-version-of-chatgpt-aces-the-bar-exam-with-score-in-90th-percentile
[52]
Wennberg, J. E. (2002). Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. British Medical Journal, 325(7370), 961–964.
[53]
Xiong Chen, Z., & Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 226–238.
[54]
Yamaguchi, S. (2012). Tasks and heterogeneous human capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(1), 1–53.
[55]
Youn, S., Heim, G. R., Kumar, S., & Sriskandarajah, C. (2021). Examining the impacts of clinical practice variation on operational performance. Production and Operations Management, 30(4), 839–863.
[56]
Youngdahl, W., & Ramaswamy, K. (2008). Offshoring knowledge and service work: A conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 212–221.
[57]
Yu, K. H., & Levy, F. (2010). Offshoring professional services: Institutions and professional control. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4), 758–783.
[58]
Zardkoohi, A., Bierman, L., Panina, D., & Chakrabarty, S. (2011). Revisiting a proposed definition of professional service firms. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 180–184.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Digital transformation in operations managementJournal of Operations Management10.1002/joom.127169:6(876-889)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management  Volume 69, Issue 6
September 2023
176 pages
ISSN:0272-6963
EISSN:1873-1317
DOI:10.1002/joom.v69.6
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2023

Author Tags

  1. automation
  2. professional service operations
  3. reengineering
  4. simulation
  5. technology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Digital transformation in operations managementJournal of Operations Management10.1002/joom.127169:6(876-889)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media