Cited By
View all- Secomandi N(2025)OM Forum—Asset-Level Perspectives on the Clean Energy TransitionManufacturing & Service Operations Management10.1287/msom.2024.142127:1(8-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025
Carbon neutrality: : Operations management research opportunities
Pages 344 - 354
Abstract
Climate change, primarily driven by greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), is a pressing environmental and societal concern. Carbon neutrality, or net zero, involves reducing carbon dioxide emissions, the most common GHG, and then balancing residual emissions through removing or offsetting. Particularly difficult challenges have emerged for firms seeking to reduce emissions from Scope 1 (internal operations) and Scope 3 (supply chain). Incremental changes are very unlikely to meet the objective of carbon neutrality. Synthesizing a framework that draws together both the means of achieving carbon neutrality and the scope of change helps to clarify opportunities for research by operations management scholars. Companies must assess and apply promising technologies, form new strategic relationships, and adopt novel practices while taking into account costs, risks, implications for stakeholders, and, most importantly, business sustainability. Research on carbon neutrality is encouraged to move beyond isolated discussions focused on specific tactics and embrace a more, though not fully, holistic examination. Research opportunities abound in both theoretical and empirical domains, such as exploring tradeoffs between different tactics, balancing portfolios, and investigating the strategic deployment of initiatives over time. As a research community, we are critically positioned to develop integrative insights at multiple levels, from individual processes to horizontal and vertical partnerships and ultimately to large‐scale systemic realignment and change.
References
[1]
Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341.
[2]
Anand, K., & Giraud‐Carrier, F. (2020). Pollution regulation of competitive markets. Management Science, 66(9), 4193–4206.
[3]
Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040.
[4]
Atasu, A., Corbett, C., Huang, X., & Toktay, L. (2020). Sustainable operations management through the perspective of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22, 146–157.
[5]
Blanco, C. (2021). Supply chain carbon footprinting and climate change disclosures of global firms. Production and Operations Management, 30, 3143–3160.
[6]
Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D., & Yap, P. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20, 2277–2310.
[7]
Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive‐linguistic perspective on firms' sustainability claims and stakeholders' interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 705–729.
[8]
Das, C., & Jharkharia, S. (2018). Low carbon supply chain: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29, 398–428.
[9]
Desai, H., Lam, P., Li, B., & Rajgopal, S. (2023). An analysis of carbon‐reduction pledges of U.S. oil and gas companies. Management Science, 69(6), 3748–3758.
[10]
Dooley, K., Pathak, S., Kull, T., Wu, Z., Johnson, J., & Rabinovich, E. (2019). Process network modularity, commonality, and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Operations Management, 65, 93–113.
[11]
Drake, D. F., Kleindorfer, P. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production and Operations Management, 25, 1006–1025.
[12]
Ertimur, Y., Francis, J., Gonzales, A., & Schipper, K. (2020). Financial reporting for pollution reduction programs. Management Science, 66(12), 6015–6041.
[13]
Fan, X., Chen, K., & Chen, Y. (2023). Is price commitment a better solution to control carbon emissions and promote technology investment? Management Science, 69(1), 325–341.
[14]
Fankhauser, S., Smith, S., Allen, M., Axelsson, K., Hale, T., Hepburn, C., Kendall, J., Khosla, R., Lezaun, J., Mitchell‐Larson, E., Obersteiner, M., Rajamani, L., Rickaby, R., Seddon, N., & Wetzer, T. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nature Climate Change, 12, 15–21.
[15]
Gao, F., & Souza, G. (2022). Carbon offsetting with eco‐conscious consumers. Management Science, 68, 7879–7897.
[16]
Gibbs, E., Mannion, P., Siccardo, G., & Patel, M. (2022). Now the IPCC has recognized that carbon removals are critical to addressing climate change, it's time to act. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our‐insights/sustainability‐blog/now‐the‐ipcc‐has‐recognized‐that‐carbon‐removals‐are‐critical‐to‐addressing‐climate‐change‐its‐time‐to‐act
[17]
Girotra, K., & Netessine, S. (2013). OM forum—Business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 15(4), 537–544.
[18]
Gopalakrishnan, S., Granot, D., Granot, F., Sošić, G., & Cui, H. (2021). Incentives and emission responsibility allocation in supply chains. Management Science, 67(7), 4172–4190.
[19]
Han, Z., Hu, B., & Dawande, M. (2022). Curbing emissions: Environmental regulations and product offerings across markets. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 24(6), 3236–3251.
[20]
He, C., Ozturk, O., Gu, C., & Chintagunta, P. (2023). Consumer tax credits for EVs: Some quasi‐experimental evidence on consumer demand, product substitution, and carbon emissions. Management Science, 69(12), 7759–7783.
[21]
He, Q., Li, W., Zhang, P., & Guo, C. (2024). Corporate governance, policy robustness and carbon neutrality in the digital economy: Insights from the natural resource exploitation sector. Resources Policy, 88, 104477.
[22]
Işlegen, O., & Reichelstein, S. (2011). Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: An economic analysis. Management Science, 57(1), 21–39.
[23]
Jiang, K., Ashworth, P., Zhang, S., Liang, X., Sun, Y., & Angus, D. (2020). China's carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) policy: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109601.
[24]
Jira, C., & Toffel, M. (2013). Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 15(4), 559–577.
[25]
Kaps, C., Marinesi, S., & Netessine, S. (2023). When should the off‐grid sun shine at night? Optimum renewable generation and energy storage investments. Management Science, 69(12), 7633–7650.
[26]
Klassen, R., & Lynch, M. (2023). Corporate strategies for net zero: The emerging landscape for Canadian business, Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, Canada, 48.
[27]
Kök, A., Shang, K., & Yücel, S. (2016). Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Science, 64(1), 131–148.
[28]
Lenox, M., & Duff, R. (2021). The decarbonization imperative: Transforming the global economy by 2050. Stanford Business Books.
[29]
Linton, J., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1075–1082.
[30]
Liu, Y. S., Zhou, X., Yang, J. H., Hoepner, A. G. F., & Kakabadse, N. (2023). Carbon emissions, carbon disclosure and organizational performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102846.
[31]
McGahan, A., & Pongeluppe, L. (2023). There is no planet B: Aligning stakeholder interests to preserve the Amazon rainforest. Management Science, 69(12), 7860–7881.
[32]
Muthulingam, S., Corbett, C. J., Benartzi, S., & Oppenheim, B. (2013). Energy efficiency in small and medium‐sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15, 596–615.
[33]
Naumov, S., Keith, D., & Sterman, J. (2023). Accelerating vehicle fleet turnover to achieve sustainable mobility goals. Journal of Operations Management, 69, 36–66.
[34]
Odziemkowska, K. (2022). Frenemies: Overcoming audiences' ideological opposition to firm–activist collaborations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(2), 469–514.
[35]
Odziemkowska, K., & Henisz, W. (2021). Webs of influence: Secondary stakeholder actions and cross‐National Corporate Social Performance. Organization Science, 32(1), 233–255.
[36]
Park, H., Blanco, C., & Bendoly, E. (2022). Vessel sharing and its impact on maritime operations and carbon emissions. Production and Operations Management, 31, 2925–2942.
[37]
Pereira, G., Niesten, E., & Pinkse, J. (2022). Sustainable energy systems in the making: A study on business model adaptation in incumbent utilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121207.
[38]
Ritchie, H., Roser, M., & Rosado, P. (2020). CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Our world in data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions
[39]
Roemer, N., Souza, G., Tröster, C., & Voigt, G. (2023). Offset or reduce: How should firms implement carbon footprint reduction initiatives? Production and Operations Management, 32, 2940–2955.
[40]
Sartal, A., Rodríguez, M., & Vázquez, X. (2020). From efficiency‐driven to low‐carbon operations management: Implications for labor productivity. Journal of Operations Management, 66, 310–325.
[41]
Saunders, L., Brooks, J., Merrick, J., & Autry, C. (2020). Addressing economic/environmental sustainability tradeoffs in procurement episodes with industrial suppliers. Production and Operations Management, 29, 1256–1269.
[42]
Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) . (2024). Target Dashboard (beta). https://sciencebasedtargets.org/target-dashboard
[43]
Seddon, N. (2022). Harnessing the potential of nature‐based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change. Science, 376(6600), 1410–1416.
[44]
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.
[45]
Song, S., Dong, Y., Kull, T., Carter, C., & Xu, K. (2023). Supply chain leakage of greenhouse gas emissions and supplier innovation. Production and Operations Management, 32, 882–903.
[46]
Subramanian, R., Gupta, S., & Talbot, B. (2007). Compliance strategies under permits for emissions. Production and Operations Management, 16, 763–779.
[47]
UN Secretary‐General . (2020). The UN Secretary‐General speaks on the state of the planet. http://un.org/en/climatechange/un-secretary-general-speaks-state-planet
[48]
UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) . (2022). Carbon neutrality in the UNECE region: Technology interplay under the carbon neutrality concept, Geneva. https://unece.org/sustainable‐energy/publications/carbon‐neutrality‐unece‐region‐technology‐interplay‐under‐carbon
[49]
United Nations Climate Change (UNCC) . (2022). Climate plans remain insufficient: More ambitious action needed now. https://unfccc.int/news/climate‐plans‐remain‐insufficient‐more‐ambitious‐action‐needed‐now
[50]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) . (n.d.). The Paris agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
[51]
Vedula, S., York, J., Conger, M., & Embry, E. (2022). Green to gone? Regional institutional logics and firm survival in moral markets. Organization Science, 33(6), 2274–2299.
[52]
Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., & Lueg, R. (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance‐related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120063.
[53]
Villena, V., & Dhanorkar, S. (2020). How institutional pressures and managerial incentives elicit carbon transparency in global supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 66, 697–734.
[54]
Villena, V. H., & Gioia, D. A. (2018). On the riskiness of lower‐tier suppliers: Managing sustainability in supply networks. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 65–87.
[55]
World Economic Forum . (2021). Net‐zero challenge: The supply chain opportunity, Geneva, 46 pp.
[56]
World Economic Forum . (2024). The global risks report 2024, 19th ed., Geneva, 124 pp.
[57]
Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1633–1661.
[58]
Wu, X., Tian, Z., & Guo, J. (2022). A review of the theoretical research and practical progress of carbon neutrality. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 54–66.
[59]
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision‐making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 577–590.
[60]
Xu, X., Gou, X., Zhang, W., Zhao, Y., & Xu, Z. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of carbon neutrality: Research hotspots and future directions. Heliyon, 9(e18763), 1–15.
[61]
York, J., Vedula, S., & Lenox, M. (2018). It's not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1492–1523.
[62]
Zhang, Z., Hu, G., Mu, X., & Kong, L. (2022). From low carbon to carbon neutrality: A bibliometric analysis of the status, evolution and development trend. Journal of Environmental Management, 322, 116087.
[63]
Zhao, Y., Basu, A., Lontzek, T., & Schmedders, K. (2023). The social cost of carbon when we wish for full‐path robustness. Management Science, 69, 7585–7606.
[64]
Ziegler, F., Jafarzadeh, S., Skontorp Hognes, E., & Winther, U. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions of Norwegian seafoods: From comprehensive to simplified assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26, 1908–1919.
Index Terms
- Carbon neutrality: Operations management research opportunities
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Pathways for electric power industry to achieve carbon emissions peak and carbon neutrality based on LEAP model: A case study of state-owned power generation enterprise in China
Highlights- A LEAP model of electric power industry is proposed.
- Carbon neutrality pathways ...
AbstractGlobal climate change is a growing concern for the international community. China has played an active and constructive role in the global combat against climate change. Given the dominating role of coal in China’s power supply mix, it ...
Exploring pathway to achieving carbon neutrality in China under uncertainty
Highlights- SDA is used to identify the key drivers of China’s CO2 emission changes.
- The contribution of each driving force to reaching carbon neutrality is explored.
- Multiple policy efforts are needed for China to achieve carbon neutrality ...
AbstractChina has announced its long-term goal of achieving carbon-neutrality before 2060, and it is necessary to identify the main driving forces of carbon emission, so that future carbon emission can be projected and effective measures to reduce carbon ...
Analysis of Carbon Neutrality Scenarios of Industrial Consumers Using Electric Power Market Simulations
PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent SystemsAbstractThis study analyzed various electricity procurement scenarios for a factory in terms of carbon neutrality, using multi-agent simulations. We performed a multi-agent simulation with power-consuming and power-generating agents to simulate the ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© 2024 Association for Supply Chain Management, Inc.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 26 March 2024
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Editorial
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Secomandi N(2025)OM Forum—Asset-Level Perspectives on the Clean Energy TransitionManufacturing & Service Operations Management10.1287/msom.2024.142127:1(8-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025