Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Carbon Offsetting with Eco-Conscious Consumers

Published: 01 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we model a firm that can reduce its carbon footprint in the presence of a segment of eco-conscious consumers, who consider the product’s carbon footprint when making purchasing decisions. The firm can reduce its controllable emissions at increased fixed and variable costs. The firm can also buy carbon offsets, at the price set by a nongovernmental organization (NGO), for both its controllable and uncontrollable emissions in the supply chain. We find that the firm should not use these two emission reduction methods as simple substitutes. In particular, as the offset price decreases, the firm may spend more efforts reducing its controllable emissions. Also, a firm’s decision to buy carbon offsets depends on the correlation between consumers’ preferences for the product function and for its environmental attributes, and this has implications for NGOs selling offsets. Specifically, although NGOs should price offsets as low as possible in most cases, we find some instances where a premium pricing strategy may be more effective in promoting lower-carbon footprint products, especially when eco-conscious consumers have a significantly higher valuation for the product than those who do not care about the environment, on average.
This paper was accepted by Jayashankar Swaminathan, operations management.
Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4293.

References

[1]
Aflaki S, Netessine S (2017) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources: The effect of supply intermittency. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):489–507.
[2]
Agrawal V, Lee D (2019) The effect of sourcing policies on supplier’s sustainable practices. Production Oper. Management 28(4):767–787.
[3]
Agrawal VV, Kavadias S, Toktay LB (2015) The limits of planned obsolescence for conspicuous durable goods. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):216–226.
[4]
Akkas A, Honhon D (2020) Shipment policies for products with fixed shelf lives: Impact on profits and waste. Preprint, submitted May 4, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3247290.
[5]
Akkas A, Gaur V, Simchi-Levi D (2019) Drivers of product expiration in consumer packaged goods retailing. Management Sci. 65(5):2179–2195.
[6]
Anderson K (2012) The inconvenient truth of carbon offsets. Nature 484(7392):7.
[7]
Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100:464–477.
[8]
Apple (2019) Environmental responsibility report. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Responsibility_Report_2019.pdf.
[9]
Arora N, Henderson T (2007) Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Sci. 26(4):514–531.
[10]
Aydinliyim T, Pangburn MS (2012) Reducing packaging waste and cost via consumer price discounts. Decision Sci. 43(6):1063–1089.
[11]
Belavina E, Girotra K, Kabra A (2016) Online grocery retail: Revenue models and environmental impact. Management Sci. 63(6):1781–1799.
[12]
Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M (2013) Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Trans. Automation Sci. Engrg. 10(1):99–116.
[13]
Beverage Daily (2020) AB InBev to brew beer with renewable electricity in Europe. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.beveragedaily.com/Article/2020/01/09/AB-InBev-to-brew-all-beers-with-renewable-electricity-in-Europe.
[14]
Brouwer R, Brander L, Van Beukering P (2008) “A convenient truth”: Air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Climate Change 90(3):299–313.
[15]
Cachon G (2014) Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Management Sci. 60(8):1907–1925.
[16]
Caro F, Corbett C, Tan T, Zuidwijk R (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.
[17]
CDP (2019) Top FMCGs in race to keep up with conscious consumers. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/media/top-fmcgs-in-race-to-keep-up-with-conscious-consumers.
[18]
Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Sci. 47(2):250–263.
[19]
Chen X, Benjaafar S, Elomri A (2013) The carbon constrained EOQ. Oper. Res. Lett. 41(2):172–179.
[20]
Chen J, Qi A, Dawande M (2020) Supplier centrality and auditing priority in socially responsible supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1199–1214.
[21]
Cho S-H, Fang X, Tayur S, Xu Y (2019) Combating child labor: Incentives and information disclosure in global supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):692–711.
[22]
Cohen B, Munoz P (2017) Entering conscious consumer markets: Toward a new generation of sustainability strategies. Calif. Management Rev. 59(4):23–48.
[23]
Corbett C, DeCroix G (2001) Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Sci. 47(7):881–893.
[24]
Danone (2016) Climate policy: Target zero net carbon through solutions co-created with Danone’s ecosystem. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.danone.com/content/dam/danone-corp/danone-com/about-us-impact/policies-and-commitments/en/2016/2016_05_18_ClimatePolicyFullVersion.pdf.
[25]
Dell (2010) Carbon footprint of a typical Dell business laptop. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/vn/corporatecorp-commen/documentsdell-laptop-carbon-footprint-whitepaper.pdf.
[26]
Diederich J, Goeschl T (2014) Willingness to pay for voluntary climate action and its determinants: Field-experimental evidence. Environ. Resource Econom. 57(3):405–429.
[27]
Drake D (2018) Carbon tariffs: Effects in settings with technology choice and foreign production cost advantage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):667–686.
[28]
Drake D, Kleindorfer P, Van Wassenhove LN (2016) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1006–1025.
[29]
Ecosystem Marketplace (2020) State of the voluntary markets 2020: Voluntary carbon and post-pandemic recovery. Technical report, Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://share.hsforms.com/1ICNqRm4gSRGccSuyRZF-dg1yp8f.
[30]
Ecotricity (2018) The carbon footprint of getting dressed. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.ecotricity.co.uk/news/news-archive/2018/the-carbon-footprint-of-getting-dressed.
[31]
Forbes (2020) Buying carbon offsets for your home or business is so cheap and easy you won’t believe it. (February 4), https://www.forbes.com/sites/devinthorpe/2020/02/04/buying-carbon-offsets-for-your-home-or-business-is-so-cheap-and-easy-you-wont-believe-it/?sh=86e99a632329.
[32]
Gao F (2020) Cause marketing: Product pricing, design and distribution. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):775–791.
[33]
Gil JM, Gracia A, Sanchez M (2000) Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. Internat. Food Agribusiness Management Rev. 3(2):207–226.
[34]
Golob U, Kronegger L (2019) Environmental consciousness of European consumers: A segmentation-based study. J. Cleaner Production 221:1–9.
[35]
Guo R, Lee H, Swinney R (2016) Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(9):2722–2744.
[36]
Hu S, Souza GC, Ferguson M, Wang W (2015) Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency: Data granularity matters! Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):480–494.
[37]
Huang M-H, Rust RT (2011) Sustainability and consumption. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(1):40–54.
[38]
IKEA (2018) IKEA sustainability report FY 18. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://preview.thenewsmarket.com/Previews/IKEA/DocumentAssets/535135.pdf.
[39]
İşlegen O, Reichelstein S (2011) Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: An economic analysis. Management Sci. 57(1):21–39.
[40]
Jira C, Toffel M (2013) Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):559–577.
[41]
Kalkanci B, Plambeck EL (2020a) Managing supplier social and environmental impacts with voluntary versus mandatory disclosure to investors. Management Sci. 66(8):3311–3328.
[42]
Kalkanci B, Plambeck EL (2020b) Reveal the supplier list? A trade-off in capacity vs. responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1251–1267.
[43]
Kammen D, Hendricks P, Pendleton-Knoll S, Stanley V, Strand R (2018) Patagonia’s path to carbon neutrality by 2025. Berkeley Haas Case Series No. B5916, University of California, Berkeley.
[44]
Karaer O, Kraft T, Khawam J (2017) Buyer and nonprofit levers to improve supplier environmental performance. Production Oper. Management 26(6):1163–1190.
[45]
Kesicki F, Strachan N (2011) Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: Confronting theory and practice. Environ. Sci. Policy 14:1195–1204.
[46]
Kök AG, Shang K, Yücel S (2018) Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Sci. 64(1):131–148.
[47]
Kraft T, Raz G (2017) Collaborate or compete: Examining manufacturers’ replacement strategies for a substance of concern. Production Oper. Management 26(9):1646–1662.
[48]
Kraft T, Valdes L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.
[49]
Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1035–1055.
[50]
Krishna A, Rajan U (2009) Cause marketing: Spillover effects of cause-related products in a product portfolio. Management Sci. 55(9):1469–1485.
[51]
Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):186–201.
[52]
Lanz B, Wurlod J, Panzone L, Swanson T (2018) The behavioral effect of pigovian regulation: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Environ. Econom. Management 87:190–205.
[53]
MacKerron G, Egerton C, Gaskell C, Parpia A, Mourato S (2009) Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high) flying young adults in the UK. Energy Policy 37(4):1372–1381.
[54]
MarketWatch (2016) Women are more likely to drive these cars. (March 6), https://www.marketwatch.com/story/women-are-more-likely-to-drive-these-cars-2016-03-02.
[55]
Maron D (2010) Women more likely than men to believe the science on global warming. Scientific American (September 16), https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/women-more-likely-than-men/.
[56]
Matthews H, Hendrickson C, Weber C (2008) The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(16):5839–5842.
[57]
Meinrenken C, Chen D, Esparza R, Iyer V, Paridis S, Prasad A, Whillas E (2020) Carbon emissions embodied in product value chains and the role of life cycle assessment in curbing them. Sci. Rep. 10(2020):6184.
[58]
Murali K, Lim M, Petruzzi N (2019) The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):519–535.
[59]
Muthulingam S, Corbett C, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.
[60]
Nielsen (2015a) Green generation: Millennials say sustainability is a shopping priority. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.sustainmag.ca/green-generation-millennial-say-sustainability-is-a-shopping-priority/.
[62]
Nielsen (2018a) Global consumers seek companies that care about environmental issues. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2018/global-consumers-seek-companies-that-care-about-environmental-issues/.
[63]
Nielsen (2018b) Was 2018 the year of the influential sustainable consumer? Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2018/was-2018-the-year-of-the-influential-sustainable-consumer/.
[64]
Nike (2019) FY 18 Nike, Inc. Impact Report. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://purpose.nike.com/fy19-nike-impact-report.
[65]
Örsdemir A, Hu B, Deshpande V (2019) Ensuring corporate social and environmental responsibility through vertical integration and horizontal sourcing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):417–434.
[66]
Park SJ, Cachon G, Lai G, Seshadri S (2015) Supply chain design and carbon penalty: Monopoly vs. monopolistic competition. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1494–1508.
[67]
Pigors M, Rockenbach B (2016) Consumer social responsibility. Management Sci. 62(11):3123–3137.
[68]
Pindyck R (2019) The social cost of carbon revisited. J. Environ. Econom. Management 94:140–160.
[69]
Plambeck E (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management. Energy Econom. 32:S64–S74.
[70]
Plambeck E, Taylor T (2016) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Management Sci. 18(2):184–197.
[71]
Porteous A, Rammohan S, Lee H (2015) Carrots or sticks? Improving social and environmental compliance at suppliers through incentives and penalties. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1402–1413.
[74]
[75]
Sunar N, Plambeck E (2016) Allocating emissions among co-products: Implications for procurement and climate policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):414–428.
[76]
The Economist (2006) Sins of emission. (August 5), https://www.economist.com/leaders/2006/08/03/sins-of-emission.
[77]
The Grocer (2020) Quorn to add carbon footprint of products to on-pack labelling. (January 8), https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/plant-based/quorn-to-add-carbon-footprint-of-products-to-on-pack-labelling/600789.article.
[78]
The Guardian (2011) A complete guide to carbon offsetting. (September 16), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/sep/16/carbon-offset-projects-carbon-emissions.
[79]
The Guardian (2016) The rise of vegan teenagers: “More people are into it because of Instagram.” (May 27), https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/27/the-rise-of-vegan-teenagers-more-people-are-into-it-because-of-instagram.
[80]
The Guardian (2018) Scientists calculate carbon emissions of your sandwich. (January 25), https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jan/25/scientists-calculate-carbon-emissions-of-your-sandwich.
[81]
The Guardian (2020) Businesses making eco-friendly claims to be vetted by watchdog. (November 4), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/nov/02/businesses-making-eco-friendly-claims-to-be-vetted-by-uk-watchdog.
[82]
The Washington Post (2020) How do carbon offsets work? (September 23), https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2020/09/23/climate-curious-advice/.
[83]
UN Environment Programme (2019) Carbon offsets are not our get-out-of-jail free card. Accessed July 11, 2021, https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/carbon-offsets-are-not-our-get-out-jail-free-card.
[84]
UNEP (2018) The emissions gap report 2018. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Accessed, http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/26895/EGR2018_FullReport_EN.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
[85]
Villena V (2019) The missing link? The strategic role of procurement in building sustainable supply networks. Production Oper. Management 28(5):1149–1172.
[86]
Wall Street Journal (2007) Look for the carbon label. (March 16), https://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2007/03/16/look-for-the-carbon-label/.
[87]
Wall Street Journal (2008) Scrutiny rises over carbon-offset sales process. (January 9), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119983728240176249.
[88]
Wall Street Journal (2014) McDonald’s faces ‘millennial’ challenge. (August 24), https://www.wsj.com/articles/mcdonalds-faces-millennial-challenge-1408928743.
[89]
Wang P, Deng X, Zhou H, Yu S (2019) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: A review based on meta-analysis. J. Cleaner Production 209:1494–1507.
[90]
Wang W, Ferguson M, Hu S, Souza GC (2013) Dynamic capacity investment with two competing technologies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):616–629.
[91]
White K, Simpson B (2013) When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? J. Marketing 77(2):78–95.
[92]
Yalabik B, Fairchild RJ (2011) Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. Internat. J. Production Econom. 131(2):519–527.
[93]
Yenipazarli A, Vakharia A (2015) Pricing, market coverage and capacity: Can green and brown products co-exist? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242(1):304–315.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Carbon Offsetting with Eco-Conscious Consumers
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Management Science
          Management Science  Volume 68, Issue 11
          November 2022
          724 pages
          ISSN:0025-1909
          DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.68.issue-11
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Publisher

          INFORMS

          Linthicum, MD, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 01 November 2022
          Accepted: 15 September 2021
          Received: 22 August 2020

          Author Tags

          1. carbon footprint
          2. carbon offsets
          3. eco-conscious consumers
          4. game theory

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all

          View Options

          View options

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media