Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Prompting Responses through Linguistic Cues: : A Comparison of User and Chatbot Support for Consumers' Questions

Published: 15 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

When interacting with chatbots, questioning is the starting point of the conversations. A well‐phrased question can elicit desired responses and enhance information‐seeking efficiency. Specifically, consumers can use various linguistic cues (e.g., emotional expressiveness) to phrase questions and shape responses. However, research on how to effectively phrase questions for chatbots was limited. This study focuses on consumers' questions for chatbots, examining how various linguistic cues (e.g., emotional expressiveness) influence responses. Further, it compares responses generated by community users and chatbots. Preliminary results showed that askers' self‐disclosure attracted emotional support from chatbots. Chatbots demonstrated higher expertise in responses to high‐specificity questions and produced more analytical and unified responses. In contrast, user‐generated responses were perceived with higher authenticity. This research underscores the role of question cues prompting chatbot‐generated responses and illustrates the strengths and limits of chatbot‐generated responses. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the final section.

References

[1]
Agnihotri, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2023). Chatbots' effectiveness in service recovery. International Journal of Information Management, 102679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102679
[2]
Banerjee, S. (2017). Study of authentic and fictitious online reviews [Doctoral dissertation. Nanyang Technological University]. https://doi.org/10.32657/10220/46219
[3]
Boyd, R. L. (2022). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC‐22. University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app
[4]
Deng, S., Tong, J., Lin, Y., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Motivating scholars' responses in academic social networking sites: An empirical study on ResearchGate Q&A behavior. Information Processing & Management, 56(6), 102082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102082
[5]
Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Grewal, D., Wulf, J., & Schoegel, M. (2019). Detecting, preventing, and mitigating online firestorms in brand communities. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918822300
[6]
Hu, X., Chen, X., & Davison, R. M. (2019). Social support, source credibility, social influence, and impulsive purchase behavior in social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(3), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1619905
[7]
Jeon, G. Y., & Rieh, S. Y. (2015). Social search behavior in a social Q&A service: Goals, strategies, and outcomes. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010039
[8]
Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word‐of‐mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71
[9]
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
[10]
Lee, C. S., Yeo, R. Q. Y., Zhang, S., Goh, D. H.‐L., Ang, R. P., & Ng, B. (2023). Gen Z transitions to university: A preliminary study on everyday information‐seeking practices. In D. H. Goh, S.‐J. Chen, & S. Tuarob (Eds.), Leveraging Generative Intelligence in Digital Libraries: Towards Human‐Machine Collaboration (Vol. 14457, pp. 255–262). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8085-7_23
[11]
Markowitz, D. M. (2023). Analytic thinking as revealed by function words: What does language really measure? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(3), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4057
[12]
Moore, R. L., Yen, C.‐J., & Powers, F. E. (2021). Exploring the relationship between clout and cognitive processing in MOOC discussion forums. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13033
[13]
Ostermaier‐Grabow, A., & Linek, S. B. (2019). Communication and self‐presentation behavior on academic social networking sites: An exploratory case study on profiles and discussion threads on ResearchGate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1153–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24186
[14]
Te'eni, D. (1990). Perceived costs and benefits as determinants of user behaviour: An experiment with matchmaking. Behaviour & Information Technology, 9(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299008924223
[15]
Wu, Q., Lee, C. S., & Goh, D. H.‐L. (2023a). Making sense of responders' evaluations of question answerability from academic Q&A sites. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1191–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.988
[16]
Wu, Q., Lee, C. S., & Goh, D. H.‐L. (2023b). Understanding user‐generated questions in social Q&A: A goal‐framing approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(8), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24770

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology  Volume 61, Issue 1
October 2024
1190 pages
EISSN:2373-9231
DOI:10.1002/pra2.v61.1
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2024

Author Tags

  1. Chatbot
  2. Linguistic cues
  3. Prompt
  4. Question
  5. Text analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media