Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-030-49904-4_17guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Depth and Colour Perception in Real and Virtual Robot Cells in the Context of Occupational Safety and Health

Published: 19 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Investigations into comparisons of real and virtual environments serve multiple purposes. Results may improve development, implementation and application of virtual environments, inform about potentials for positive transfer of effects and facilitate decision making about appropriate virtual reality techniques in specific situations on human factors and ergonomics in human-system interaction. Absolute and relative estimations of object sizes, colours and greyscales were differentially investigated in virtual and real robot cells. Analyses revealed differences for environments (e.g. size, colour) and in some cases even for specific characteristics under investigation (e.g. robot cell size, 10% greyscales). Differential results on human task performance in virtual environments with potential technical constraints are crucial for safety and health reasons and because they provide a basis for human behaviour consequences and work system design decisions and requirements for transfer research. Results support informed decision making about virtual reality techniques and media selection in OSH applications on training and work systems design.

References

[1]
WHO: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019). World Health Organization, Geneva (2020). http://apps.who.int/gb/bd/
[2]
Radandt, S., Rantanen, J., Renn, O.: Governance of occupational safety and health environmental risks. In: Bischoff, H.-J. (ed.) Risks in Modern Society. TISRRAQ, vol. 13, pp. 127–258. Springer, Dordrecht (2008).
[3]
Lehto MR and Cook BT Salvendy G Occupational health and safety management Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2012 Hoboken Wiley 701-733
[4]
Nickel P Nah FF-H and Tan C-H Extending the effective range of prevention through design by OSH applications in virtual reality HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations: Information Systems 2016 Cham Springer 325-336
[5]
EU OSH Framework Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (with amendments 2008). Official Journal of the European Union L 183, 29/06/1989, 1–8 (2008)
[6]
EN ISO 6385: Ergonomic principles in the design of work systems. CEN, Brussels (2016)
[7]
Nickel P et al. Arezes PM et al. Human-system interaction design requirements to improve machinery and systems safety Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors 2020 Cham Springer 3-13
[8]
Nickel P, Janning M, Wachholz T, and Pröger E Bagnara S, Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Alexander T, and Fujita Y Shaping future work systems by OSH risk assessments early on Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) 2019 Cham Springer 247-256
[9]
Miller, C., et al.: Human-machine interface. In: Hockey, G.R.J. (ed.) THESEUS Cluster 2: Psychology and Human-Machine Systems – Report, Indigo, Strasbourg, pp. 22–38 (2012)
[10]
Hale KS and Stanney KM Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications 2015 Boca Raton CRC Press
[11]
Zhou W, Whyte J, and Sacks R Construction safety and digital design: a review Autom. Constr. 2012 22 102-111
[12]
Grabowski A Duffy VG Innovative and comprehensive support system for training people working in dangerous conditions Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Body and Motion 2019 Cham Springer 394-405
[13]
Lawson G, Shaw E, Roper T, Nilsson T, Bajorunaite L, and Batool A Immersive virtual worlds: multi-sensory virtual environments for health and safety training 2019 Leicestershire IOSH
[14]
Helin, K., Karjalainen, J., Kuula, T., Philippon, N.: Virtual/mixed/augmented reality laboratory research for the study of augmented human and human-machine systems. In: Proceedings of 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Environments, IE 2016, September 2016, London, pp. 14–16 (2016)
[15]
Kaufeld M and Nickel P Duffy VG Level of robot autonomy and information aids in human-robot interaction affect human mental workload – an investigation in virtual reality Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Body and Motion 2019 Cham Springer 278-291
[16]
Eastgate RM, Wilson JR, and D’Cruz M Hale KS and Stanney KM Structured development of virtual environments Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications 2015 Boca Raton CRC Press 353-390
[17]
De Kort YAW, Ijsselsteijn WA, Kooijman J, and Schuurmans Y Virtual laboratories: comparability of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology Presence 2003 12 4 360-373
[18]
Champney RK, Carroll M, Surpris G, and Cohn J Hale KS and Stanney KM Conducting training transfer studies in virtual environments Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications 2015 Boca Raton CRC Press 781-795
[19]
Witmer BG and Singer MJ Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire Presence 1998 7 3 225-240
[20]
Simpson BD, Cowgill JL, Gilkey RH, and Weisenberger JM Hale KS and Stanney KM Technological considerations in the design of multisensory virtual environments: how real does it need to be? Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications 2015 Boca Raton CRC Press 313-333
[21]
Lampton DR, Knerr BW, Goldberg SL, Bliss JP, Moshell MJ, and Blau BS The Virtual Environment Performance Assessment Battery: Development and evaluation (TR 1029) 1995 Alexandria US Army Research Institute
[22]
McCauley Bell P Stanney KM Ergonomics in virtual environments Handbook of Virtual Environments 2002 Mahwah LEA 807-826
[23]
Marc J, Belkacem N, and Marsot J Virtual reality: a design tool for enhanced consideration of usability ‘validation elements’ Saf. Sci. 2007 45 589-601
[24]
Nickel P and Lungfiel A Duffy VG Improving occupational safety and health (OSH) in human-system interaction (HSI) through applications in virtual environments Digital Human Modeling. Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk Management 2018 Cham Springer 85-96
[25]
Renner, R.S., Velichkovsky, B.M., Helmert, J.R.: The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments – a review. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 46(2), 40, Article 23 (2013).
[26]
Badcock DR, Palmisano S, and May JG Hale KS and Stanney KM Vision and virtual environments Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications 2015 Boca Raton CRC Press 39-85
[27]
Goldstein EB and Brockmole JR Sensation and Perception 2017 Boston Cengage Learning
[28]
Maruhn P, Schneider S, and Bengler K Measuring egocentric distance perception in virtual reality: influence of methodologies, locomotion and translation gains PLoS ONE 2019 14 10 e0224651
[29]
Stahre, B., Billger, M.: Physical measurements vs visual perception: comparing colour appearance in reality to virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision, CGIV 2006, 19–22 June 2006, Leeds, pp. 146-151 (2006)
[30]
Plumert JM, Kearney JK, Cremer JF, and Recker K Distance perception in real and virtual environments ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2005 2 3 216-233
[31]
EN ISO 8596: Ophthalmic optics - Visual acuity testing - Standard and clinical optotypes and their presentation (ISO 8596:2017). Brussels, CEN (2018)
[32]
Ishihara S Tests for Colour Blindness 1917 Tokyo Handaya Hongo Harukich
[33]
TNO: Test for stereoscopic vision (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Institut for Perception, 17th ed.). Lameris Ootech, Nieuwegein (1972)
[34]
Nickel, P., Lungfiel, A.: SUTAVE. Safety and usability through applications in virtual environments. Virtual reality in occupational safety and health. An IFA service. DGUV, Berlin (2014). www.dguv.de/ifa/sutave
[35]
EN ISO 10218: Robots and robotic devices - Safety requirements for industrial robots - Part 1: Robots. Part 2: Robot systems and integration. CEN, Brussels (2012)
[36]
Nickel P, Lungfiel A, and Trabold R-J Barbic J, D’Cruz M, Latoschik ME, Slater M, and Bourdot P Reconstruction of near misses and accidents for analyses from virtual reality usability study Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality 2017 Cham Springer 182-191
[37]
EN ISO 216: Writing paper and certain classes of printed matter - Trimmed sizes - A and B series, and indication of machine direction (ISO 216:2007). CEN, Brussels (2007)
[38]
Hart SG and Staveland LE Hancock PA and Meshkati N Development of the NASA task load index (TLX): results of empirical and theoretical research Human Mental Workload 1988 Amsterdam North-Holland 139-183
[39]
Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, and Singer MJ The factor structure of the presence questionnaire Presence 2005 14 3 298-312
[40]
Weibel, D., Schmutz, J., Pahud, O., Wissmath, B.: Measuring spatial presence: introducing and validating the pictorial presence SAM. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 24(1), 44–61 (2015)
[41]
Kennedy RS, Berbaum KS, and Lilienthal MG Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 1993 3 3 203-220
[42]
Pfendler, C., Thun, J.: Der Simulator Sickness Questionnaire von Kennedy et al. (1993) und seine rechnergestützte Version (Technischer Bericht). Forschungsinstitut für Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie (FKIE), Wachtberg (2001)
[43]
Stanney, K.M., Kennedy, R.S., Drexler, J.M.: Cybersickness is not simulator sickness. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 1997, 22–26 September 1997, Albuquerque, pp. 1138--1142. HFES, San Diego (1997)
[44]
Nickel P and Nachreiner F De Waard D, Brookhuis KA, van Egmond R, and Boersema T Differential usability of paper-based and computer-based work documents for control room operators in the chemical process industry Human Factors in Design, Safety, and Management 2005 Maastricht Shaker Publishing 299-314
[45]
Noyes, J.M., Garland, K.J.: Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics 51(9), 1352–1375 (2008)

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Posture, Motion and Health: 11th International Conference, DHM 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part I
Jul 2020
655 pages
ISBN:978-3-030-49903-7
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-49904-4

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 19 July 2020

Author Tags

  1. Size estimation
  2. Colour estimation
  3. Greyscale estimation
  4. Virtual reality
  5. Human-system interaction
  6. OSH
  7. Robot cell
  8. Human factors

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media