article

Virtual laboratories: comparability of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology

Authors:

Yvonne A. W. de Kort,

Wijnand A. Ijsselsteijn,

Jolien Kooijman,

Yvon SchuurmansAuthors Info & Claims

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Volume 12, Issue 4

Pages 360 - 373

https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322391604

Published: 01 August 2003 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual environments have the potential to become important new research tools in environment behavior research, They could even become the future (virtual) laboratories, if reactions of people to virtual environments are similar to those in real environments. The present study is an exploration of the comparability of research findings in real and virtual environments. In the study, 101 participants explored an identical space, either in reality or in a computer-simulated environment, Additionally, the presence of plants in the space was manipulated, resulting in a 2 (environment) × 2 (plants) between-subjects design. Employing a broad set of measurements, we found mixed results. Performances on size estimations and a cognitive mapping task were significantly better in the real environment. Factor analyses of bipolar adjectives indicated that, although four dimensions were similar for both environments, a fifth dimension of environmental assessment--termed arousal--was absent in the virtual environment. In addition, we found significant differences on the scores of four of the scales. However, no significant interactions appeared between environment and plants. Experience of and behavior in virtual environments have similarities to that in real environments, but there are important differences as well, We conclude that this is not only a necessary, but also a very interesting research subject for environmental psychology.

References

[1]

Appleyard, D., & Craik, K. H. (1978). The Berkeley Environmental Simulation Laboratory and its research programme. International Review of Applied Psychology, 27, 53-55.

[2]

Bateson, J. E., & Hui, M. K. (1992). The ecological validity of photographic slides and videotapes in simulating the service setting. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 271-281.

[3]

Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, I. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental Psychology, (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishing.

[4]

Bergen, S. D., Ulbricht, C. A., Fridley, J. L., & Ganter, M. A. (1995). The validity of computer-generated graphic images of forest landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 135-146.

[5]

Billinghurst, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1995). The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 Virtual Reality International Symposium, 40-47.

[6]

Biocca, F. (2002). Preface. In G. Riva, F. Davide, & W. A. IJsselsteijn (Eds.), Being there: Concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments (vol. 5.). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

[7]

Bosselman, P. (1993). Dynamic simulations of urban environments. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental simulation: Research and policy issues (pp. 279-302). New York: Plenum Press.

[8]

Bosselman, P., & Craik, K. H. (1987). Perceptual simulations of environments. In R. B. Bechtel, R. W. Marans, & W. Michelson (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 162-190). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

[9]

Brooks, F. P. (1999). What's real about virtual reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(6), 16-27.

Digital Library

[10]

Brown, T. C., Richards, M. T., Daniel, T. C., & King, D. A. (1989). Recreation participation and the validity of photo-based preference judgments. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(1), 40-60.

[11]

Canter, D. (1991). Understanding, assessing, and acting in places: Is an integrative framework possible? In T. Gärling & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Environmental cognition and action: An integrated approach (pp. 191-209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[12]

Catalano, R., & Arenstein, W. (1993). Strategies of environmental simulation: Theoretical, methodological, and policy issues. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental Simulation: Research and Policy Issues (pp. 303-313) New York: Plenum Press.

[13]

Craik, K. H., & Feimer, N. R. (1987). Environmental assessment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 891-918). Chichester: Wiley-Interscience.

[14]

Custers, R., Aarts, H., & Timmermans, H. (2001). Evaluaties van de gebouwde omgeving: Het effect van impressieformatiedoelen op de relatie tussen geheugen en oordeel {Evaluations of built environments: The effect of impression formation goals on the relationship between memory and assessment}. Sociale Psychologie & haar toepassingen, XV, 9-21.

[15]

Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of Space and Motion (pp. 69-117). Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

[16]

Daniel, T. C., & Meitner, M. M. (2001). Representational validity of landscape visualizations: The effects of graphical realism on perceived beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 61-72.

[17]

Decker, J. (1994). The validation of computer simulations for design guideline dispute resolution. Environment and Behavior, 26, 421-443.

[18]

Ellis, S. R. (1991). Nature and origin of virtual environments: A bibliographical essay. Computer Systems in Engineering, 2, 321-346.

[19]

Ellis, S. R., & Menges, B. M. (1997). Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 452-460.

Digital Library

[20]

Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D. E., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2000). Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9, 149-164.

Digital Library

[21]

Gale, N., Golledge, R. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Doherty, S. (1990). The acquisition and integration of root knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(1), 3-25.

[22]

Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996). Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 290-301.

Digital Library

[23]

Hu, H. H., Gooch, A. A., Thompson, W. B., Smits, B. E., Rieser, J. J., & Shirley, P. (2000). Visual cues for imminent object contact in realistic virtual environments. IEEE Visualization Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization '00, 179-185.

[24]

Hull, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(2), 101-114.

[25]

Hunt, M. E. (1984). Environmental knowing without being there. Environment and Behavior, 16, 307-334.

[26]

IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J., & Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement. Proceedings of the SPIE, 3959, 520-529.

[27]

IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., & Bouwhuis, D. (2001). Effects of stereoscopic presentation, image motion, and screen size on subjective and objective corroborative measures of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 298-311.

Digital Library

[28]

Ishikawa, T., Okabe, A., Sadahiro, Y., & Kakumoto, S. (1998). An experimental analysis of the perception of the area of an open space using 3-D stereo dynamic graphics. Environment and Behavior, 30(2), 216-234.

[29]

Janzen, G., Schade, M., Katz, S., & Herrmann, T. (2001) Strategies for detour finding in a virtual maze: The role of the visual perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 149-163.

[30]

Kaplan, R. (1993). Physical models in decision making for design: Theoretical and methodological issues. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental Simulation: Research and Policy Issues (pp. 61-86). New York: Plenum Press.

[31]

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Deardorff, H. L. (1974). The perception and evaluation of a simulated environment. Man-Environment Systems, 4, 191-192.

[32]

Larsen, L., Adams, J., Deal, B., Kweon, B.-S., & Tyler, E. (1998). Plants in the workplace: The effects of plant density on productivity, attitudes and perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 30, 261-281.

[33]

Lombard, M. (1995). Direct responses to people on the screen: Television and personal space. Communication Research, 22(3), 288-324.

[34]

Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2), {on-line}. Available: http://www.ascusc. org/jcmc/vol 3/issue 2/Lombard.html.

[35]

Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31(4), 557-564.

[36]

Murray, C. D., Bowers, J. M., West, A., Pettifer, S., & Gibson, S. (2000). Navigation, wayfinding, and place experience within a virtual city. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(5), 435-447.

Digital Library

[37]

Nash, E. B., Edwards, G. W., Thompson, J. A., & Barfield, W. (2000). A review of presence and performance in virtual environments. International Journal of human-computer Interaction, 12, 1-41.

[38]

Oh, K. (1994). A perceptual evaluation of computer-based landscape simulations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, 201-216.

[39]

O'Malley, M., & Goldfarb, M. (2002). Comparison of human size identification and discrimination performance in real and simulated environments. Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Haptics 2002, pp. 10-17.

[40]

Ornstein, S. (1992). First impressions of the symbolic meanings connoted by reception area design. Environment and Behavior, 24(1), 85-110.

[41]

Rohrmann, B., & Bishop, I. (2002). Subjective responses to computer simulations of urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 319-331.

[42]

Riecke, B. E., Van Veen, H. A. H. C., & Büülthof, H. H. (2002). Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(5), 443-473.

Digital Library

[43]

Rose, D., & Foreman, N. (1999). Virtual reality. The Psychologist, 12(11), 550-554.

[44]

Seaton, R. W., & Collins, J. B. (1972). Validity and reliability of ratings of simulated buildings. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.), Environmental Design: Research and Practice (pp. 6-10-1-6-10-12). Washington, D.C.: EDRA.

[45]

Stamps, A. E. (1990). Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 907-913.

[46]

Steuer, J. S. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.

[47]

Ulrich, R., Simons, R., Losito, B., Fiorito, E., Miles, M., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.

[48]

Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M. C., Bastos, R., Steed, A., Slater, M., & Brooks, F. P. Jr. (1999). Walking >> walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments. SIGGRAPH 99, Los Angeles, (pp. 359-364).

[49]

Venturino, M., & Wells, M. J. (1990). Head movement as a function of field of view size on a helmet-mounted display. Proceedings of the Human-Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34th Annual Meeting, 2, 1572-1576.

[50]

Wanger, L. R., Ferwerda, J. A., & Greenberg, D. P. (1992). Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 12(3) 44-58.

Digital Library

[51]

Willemsen, P., & Gooch, A. A. (2002). Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments. IEEE Virtual Reality 2002 (VR'02), 275-276.

[52]

Witmer, B. G., Bailey, J. H., Knerr, B. W., & Parsons, K. C. (1996). Virtual spaces and real world places: Transfer of route knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 413-428.

Digital Library

[53]

Witmer, B. G., & Kline, P. B. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 144-167.

Digital Library

Cited By

Rentala GZhu YMukhopadhyay S(2024)Application of time series analysis to improve the validity of Immersive virtual environments for collecting occupant thermal state and adaptive behavioral intention dataAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2024.10244961:COnline publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102449
Dzardanova EKasapakis VGavalas DSylaiou S(2022)Virtual reality as a communication medium: a comparative study of forced compliance in virtual reality versus physical worldVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-021-00564-926:2(737-757)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-021-00564-9
Kuliga SMavros PBrösamle MHölscher C(2020)Comparing Human Wayfinding Behavior Between a Real, Existing Building, a Virtual Replica, and Two Architectural RedesignsSpatial Cognition XII10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_13(160-179)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_13
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Virtual laboratories: comparability of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology

Recommendations

Augmented reality in science laboratories

This study investigated the effects of the use of augmented reality (AR) technologies in science laboratories on university students' laboratory skills and attitudes towards laboratories. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design was ...
The effectiveness of using virtual laboratories to teach computer networking skills in zambia
Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios

Following the idea of using virtual environments (VEs) as mood induction procedures (MIPs), this study set out to examine whether five different virtual park scenarios would each elicit a specific affective state (i.e., joy, sadness, boredom, anger and ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments Volume 12, Issue 4

Fourth international workshop on presence

August 2003

111 pages

ISSN:1054-7460

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

MIT Press

Cambridge, MA, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2003

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

20
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Rentala GZhu YMukhopadhyay S(2024)Application of time series analysis to improve the validity of Immersive virtual environments for collecting occupant thermal state and adaptive behavioral intention dataAdvanced Engineering Informatics10.1016/j.aei.2024.10244961:COnline publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102449
Dzardanova EKasapakis VGavalas DSylaiou S(2022)Virtual reality as a communication medium: a comparative study of forced compliance in virtual reality versus physical worldVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-021-00564-926:2(737-757)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-021-00564-9
Kuliga SMavros PBrösamle MHölscher C(2020)Comparing Human Wayfinding Behavior Between a Real, Existing Building, a Virtual Replica, and Two Architectural RedesignsSpatial Cognition XII10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_13(160-179)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_13
Nickel P(2020)Depth and Colour Perception in Real and Virtual Robot Cells in the Context of Occupational Safety and HealthDigital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Posture, Motion and Health10.1007/978-3-030-49904-4_17(228-242)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-49904-4_17
Allameh EHeidari MDe Vries B(2018)Living preference modeling of smart homes for different target groupsJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments10.3233/AIS-18048410:2(103-125)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/AIS-180484
Fischer PKuliga SEisenberg MAmin I(2018)Space is Part of the ProductProceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3205873.3205875(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3205873.3205875
Mottelson AHornbæk KFjeld MFratarcangeli MSjölie DStaadt OUnger J(2017)Virtual reality studies outside the laboratoryProceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3139131.3139141(1-10)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3139131.3139141
Lee SLee J(2017)Does Spatial Attribute between 2D and 3D Virtual Spaces make Different User Immersion of Audio-Visual Events?Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering10.1145/3057039.3057092(56-59)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3057039.3057092
Brade JLorenz MBusch MHammer NTscheligi MKlimant P(2017)Being there again Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation taskInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.004101:C(76-87)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.004
Galloso IPalacios JFeijóo CSantamaría A(2016)On the influence of individual characteristics and personality traits on the user experience with multi-sensorial mediaMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-3360-z75:20(12365-12408)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11042-016-3360-z
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents