Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_37guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Using Arduino in Service Learning to Engage Pre-service STEM Teachers into Collaborative Learning

Published: 19 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Engineers must be able to collaborate with colleagues to successfully respond to the complex challenges of a contemporary workplace, but the related training and research are limited, especially in the curriculum design. In addition, service learning uses community service to provide students with field experiences, situating concepts and objectives in the authentic context making links to students’ theoretic learning. When service learning is embedded in the context of learning and connected to a specific course, it could contribute positively to students’ content knowledge and professional growth.
In a program of teacher education, service learning has the potential to help pre-service teachers realize the challenges they are going to face in the context of school, and aids them in becoming reflective practitioners. This issue is more challenging for STEM education, in which pre-service teachers have been trained to teach students how to integrate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics knowledge and build up real-world problem-solving skills. The current study adopted Arduino as a technology tool for pre-service teachers to create teaching artifacts for elementary school technology education. Arduino has features of low floor and high ceiling, supporting many different types of projects so users with many different interests and backgrounds can all become engaged from the aspect of STEM education.
The participants of this study were fourteen pre-service teachers. Multiple methods were used to examine the learning benefits in this study, and included diary methods, thematic participants interviews, documents such as photos of making Arduino-supported artifacts and school carnival, and intrinsic motivation inventory and a reflection worksheet. The results show participants’ positive attitude to the collaborative service learning. Reflection sheets indicated that participants appreciated the opportunity in gaining different views of what they had learned in classrooms and how a STEM curriculum could be implemented in an elementary school. Participants had gained better understanding of STEM. The results seemed to support the proposed use of Arduino in a service learning to make pre-service teachers teach kids for STEM education. It hopes to broaden the spectrum of service learning, STEM education, and teacher education.

References

[1]
Tai Y and Ting Y-L English-learning mobile app designing for engineering students’ cross-disciplinary learning and collaboration: a sample practice and preliminary evaluation Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 2020 36 2 120-136
[2]
Ryan LB and Callahan J Making connections: service-learning competencies and beginning teacher standards Teach. Educ. 2002 38 2 126-140
[3]
Conrad D and Hedin D School-based community service: what we know from research and theory Phi Delta Kappan 1991 72 10 743-749
[4]
Bernadowski, C., Perry, R., Del Greco, R.: Improving preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through service learning: Lessons learned. Int. J. Inst. 6(2) (2013)
[5]
Lye SY and Koh JHL Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: what is next for K-12? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014 41 51-61
[6]
Papert S Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas 1980 New York Basic Books
[7]
Resnick M et al. Scratch: programming for all Commun. ACM 2009 52 60-67
[8]
Bringle RG and Hatcher JA Implementing service learning in higher education J. High. Educ. 1996 67 2 221-239
[9]
Deeley SJ Service-learning: thinking outside the box Act. Learn. High Educ. 2010 11 1 43-53
[10]
Moore KP and Sandholtz JH Designing successful service learning projects for urban schools Urban Educ. 1999 34 4 480-498
[11]
Stenhouse VL and Jarrett OS In the service of learning and activism: service learning, critical pedagogy, and the problem solution project Teach. Educ. Q. 2012 39 1 51-76
[12]
Butin, D.W.: Preface: disturbing normalizations of service-learning. In: Butin, D.W. (ed.) Service-Learning in Higher Education: Critical Issues and Directions, pp. vii–xx. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005)
[13]
Kearney KR ‘Students’ self-assessment of learning through service-learning Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2004 68 1 1-13
[14]
Batchelder TH and Root S Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes J. Adolesc. 1994 17 341-355
[15]
Lisman CD Toward a Civil Society 1998 Westport Bergin & Garvey
[16]
Howard JP Academic service learning: a counternormative pedagogy New Direct. Teach. Learn. 1998 73 21-29
[17]
Furman N and Sibthorp J Leveraging experiential learning techniques for transfer New Direct. Adult Contin. Educ. 2013 2013 137 17-26
[18]
Eyler J and Giles DE Jr Where’s the Learning in Service Learning? 1999 San Francisco Jossey-Bass
[19]
Honnet, E.P., Poulsen, S.J.: Principles of good practice in combining service and learning. Wingspread Special Report. The Johnson Foundation, Racine (1989)
[20]
Geleta, N.E., Gilliam, J.: An introduction to service-learning. In: Teacher Education Consortium in Service-Learning, Learning to Serve, Serving to Learn: A View from Higher Education, pp. 10–13. Salisbury University, Salisbury (2003)
[21]
Kenworthy-U’Ren, A.: Teaching ideas: service-learning and negotiation: engaging students in real world projects that make a difference. Negot. J. 19(1), 51–63 (2003)
[22]
Howard, J.: Community service learning in the curriculum. In: Howard, J. (ed.) Praxis I: A Faculty Casebook on Community Service Learning. OCSL Press, Ann Arbor (1993)
[23]
Kolb D Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development 1984 Upper Saddle River Prentice-Hall
[24]
Conradi, B., Lerch, V., Hommer, M., Kowalski, R., Vletsou, I., Hussmann, H.: Flow of electrons: an augmented workspace for learning physical computing experientially. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 182–191. ACM (2011)
[25]
Kolb D, Boyatzis RE, and Mainemelis C Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions Perspect. Cognit. Learn. Think. Styles 2000 1 227-247
[26]
Apedoe XS, Reynolds B, Ellefson MR, and Schunn CD Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2008 17 5 454-465
[27]
Kirschner PA, Sweller J, and Clark RE Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching Educ. Psychol. 2006 41 2 75-86
[28]
Ting, Y.L.: Engineering design explores STEM and hands-on education. National Civil Academy, T & D Taiwan, No. 258 (2019). https://www.nacs.gov.tw/Epaper_Send.aspx?s=EFE570E7CD987F5D. Accessed 1 Sept 2019
[29]
Davis EA Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts J. Learn. Sci. 2003 12 91-142
[30]
Woodward H Reflective journals and portfolios: learning through assessment Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 1998 23 415-426
[31]
Boyd EM and Fales AM Reflective learning: key to learning from experience J. Human. Psychol. 1983 23 2 99-117
[32]
Fischer G, Giaccardi E, Eden H, Sugimoto M, and Ye Y Beyond binary choices: integrating individual and social creativity Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 2005 63 4 482-512
[33]
Harrington D Albert R The ecology of human creativity: a psychological perspective Theories of Creativity 1990 Newbury Park Sage 143-169
[34]
Kim HJ, Park JH, Yoo S, and Kim H Fostering creativity in tablet-based interactive classrooms Educ. Technol. Soc. 2016 19 3 207-221
[35]
Star LS and Griesemer JR Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39 Soc. Stud. Sci. 1989 19 3 387-420
[36]
Arias, E., Fischer, G.: Boundary objects: their role in articulating the task at hand and making information relevant to it. In: International ICSC Symposium on Interactive & Collaborative Computing (ICC 2000), University of Wollongong, Australia, pp. 567–574. ICSC Academic Press, Wetaskiwin (2000)
[37]
Bowker GC and Star SL Sorting Things Out—Classification and Its Consequences 2000 Cambridge MIT Press
[38]
Sharples M Vavoula GN, Pachler N, and Kukulska-Hulme A Methods for evaluating mobile learning Researching Mobile Learning: Frameworks, Tools and Research Designs 2009 Oxford Peter Lang Publishing Group 17-39
[39]
Mathison S Why triangulate? Educ. Res. 1988 17 2 13-17
[40]
Bertacchini F, Bilotta E, Pantano P, and Tavernise A Motivating the learning of science topics in secondary school: a constructivist edutainment setting for studying Chaos Comput. Educ. 2012 59 1377-1386
[41]
Tseng, T.H., Tai, Y., Tsai, S.P., Ting, Y.L.: Students’ self-authoring mobile App for integrative learning of STEM. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 0020720918800438 (2018)
[42]
Mezirow J Perspective transformation Adult Educ. 1978 28 2 100-110
[43]
Hooks B Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom 1994 London Routledge
[44]
Kember D To control or not to control: the question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2003 28 1 89-101

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Human and Technology Ecosystems: 7th International Conference, LCT 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II
Jul 2020
685 pages
ISBN:978-3-030-50505-9
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 19 July 2020

Author Tags

  1. Service learning
  2. STEM
  3. Collaborative learning
  4. Boundary object
  5. Technology education

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media