Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-60626-7_14guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Automation of Electronic Invoice Validation Using Knowledge Graph Technologies

Published: 26 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Invoicing is a crucial part of any business’s financial and administrative activities. Nowadays, invoicing is handled in the form of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), where invoices are managed in a standardized electronic or digital format rather than on paper. In this context, EDI increases the efficiency of creating, distributing, and processing invoices. The most used standard for representing electronic invoices is EDIFACT. Yet, the validation of EDIFACT invoices is not standardized. In this work, we tackle the problem of automatically validating electronic invoices in the EDIFACT format by leveraging KG technologies. The core of our proposed solution consists of representing EDIFACT invoices as RDF knowledge graphs (KGs). We developed an OWL ontology to model EDIFACT terms with semantic descriptions. The invoice KG can be validated using SHACL constraints acquired from domain experts. We evaluated our ontology and invoice validation process. The results show that our proposed solution is complete, correct, and efficient, and significantly undercuts the efforts of current human evaluation.

References

[1]
Baviskar D, Ahirrao S, and Kotecha K Multi-layout unstructured invoice documents dataset: a dataset for template-free invoice processing and its evaluation using AI approaches IEEE Access 2021 9 101494-101512
[3]
Desai, D., Jain, A., Naik, D., Panchal, N., Sawant, D.: Invoice processing using RPA & AI. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI 2021) (2021)
[4]
Dimou, A., et al.: RML: A generic language for integrated RDF mappings of heterogeneous data. Ldow 1184 (2014)
[5]
Emmanuel, M., Thakur, S.: An approach to develop invoice validation framework. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 1 (2012)
[6]
EN16931-1:2017: Electronic invoicing-part 1 : Semantic data model of the core elements of an electronic invoice. Technical report, European Committee for Standardization (2017)
[7]
García-González H, Boneva I, Staworko S, Labra-Gayo JE, and Lovelle JMC ShExMl: improving the usability of heterogeneous data mapping languages for first-time users PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2020 6 e318
[8]
Grüninger M and Fox MS Rolstadås A The role of competency questions in enterprise engineering Benchmarking — Theory and Practice 1995 Boston, MA Springer 22-31
[9]
Guha, R.V., Brickley, D., Macbeth, S.: Schema.org: evolution of structured data on the web. Commun. ACM 59(2), 44–51 (2016)
[10]
Gunaratne H and Pappel I Chugunov A, Khodachek I, Misnikov Y, and Trutnev D Enhancement of the e-invoicing systems by increasing the efficiency of workflows via disruptive technologies Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia 2020 Cham Springer 60-74
[11]
Horridge, M., Gonçalves, R.S., Nyulas, C.I., Tudorache, T., Musen, M.A.: Webprotégé: a cloud-based ontology editor. In: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 686–689 (2019)
[12]
Iglesias-Molina, A., Chaves-Fraga, D., Dasoulas, I., Dimou, A.: Human-friendly RDF graph construction: which one do you chose? In: Garrigós, I., Murillo Rodríguez, J.M., Wimmer, M. (eds.) Web Engineering, ICWE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13893, pp. 262–277. Springer, Cham (2023).
[13]
Knublauch, H., Kontokostas, D.: Shapes constraint language (SHACL). W3C recommendation, W3C (2017). https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-shacl-20170720/
[14]
[15]
Lohmann S, Link V, Marbach E, Negru S, et al. Lambrix P et al. WebVOWL: web-based visualization of ontologies Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management 2015 Cham Springer 154-158
[16]
McKinney, J., Iannella, R.: vCard Ontology - for describing People and Organizations. W3C note, W3C (2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-vcard-rdf-20140522/
[17]
Noy, N.F., et al.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology (2001)
[19]
Poveda-Villalón M, Gómez-Pérez A, and Suárez-Figueroa MC Oops!(ontology pitfall scanner!): an on-line tool for ontology evaluation Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS) 2014 10 2 7-34
[20]
Sál J Data mining as tool for invoices validation IT Pract. 2018 2018 121
[21]
Schulze M, Schröder M, Jilek C, Albers T, Maus H, Dengel A, et al. Verborgh R et al. P2P-O: a purchase-to-pay ontology for enabling semantic invoices The Semantic Web 2021 Cham Springer 647-663
[22]
Shimizu, C., Hirt, Q., Hitzler, P.: MODL: a modular ontology design library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05405 (2019)
[23]
Shotton, D.: FRAPO, the Funding, Research Administration and Projects Ontology. Technical report (2017). http://purl.org/cerif/frapo
[24]
Sommer, A., Car, N.: pySHACL (2022)., https://github.com/RDFLib/pySHACL
[25]
Suárez-Figueroa MC, Gómez-Pérez A, and Fernández-López M Suárez-Figueroa MC, Gómez-Pérez A, Motta E, and Gangemi A The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering Ontology Engineering in a Networked World 2012 Heidelberg Springer 9-34
[26]
Van Assche, D., Delva, T., Heyvaert, P., De Meester, B., Dimou, A.: Towards a more human-friendly knowledge graph generation & publication. In: ISWC2021, The International Semantic Web Conference, vol. 2980. CEUR (2021)

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
The Semantic Web: 21st International Conference, ESWC 2024, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, May 26–30, 2024, Proceedings, Part I
May 2024
366 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-60625-0
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-60626-7

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 26 May 2024

Author Tags

  1. Electronic Invoice
  2. Ontology
  3. EDIFACT
  4. RDF
  5. RML
  6. SHACL

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media