Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_25guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Recommendation in reciprocal and bipartite social networks: a case study of online dating

Published: 02 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Many social networks in our daily life are bipartite networks that are built on reciprocity. How can we recommend users/friends to a user, so that the user is interested in and attractive to recommended users? In this research, we propose a new collaborative filtering model to improve user recommendations in reciprocal and bipartite social networks. The model considers a user's "taste" in picking others and "attractiveness" in being picked by others. A case study of an online dating network shows that the new model outperforms a baseline collaborative filtering model on recommending both initial contacts and reciprocal contacts.

References

[1]
Zhao, K., Kumar, A.: Who blogs what: understanding the publishing behavior of bloggers. World Wide Web Online First, 1-24 (2012)
[2]
Newman, M.: Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E 64, 025102 (2001)
[3]
Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. ACM, 641-650 (2010)
[4]
Zhao, K., Yen, J., Ngamassi, L. M., Maitland, C., Tapia, A.: Simulating interorganizational collaboration network: a multi-relational and event-based approach. Simulation 88, 617-631 (2012)
[5]
Hopcroft, J., Lou, T., Tang, J.: Who will follow you back?: reciprocal relationship prediction, 2063740. ACM, 1137-1146 (2011)
[6]
Huang, Z., Zeng, D. D.:Why does collaborative filtering work? transaction-based recommendation model validation and selection by analyzing bipartite random graphs. Informs Journal on Computing 23, 138-152 (2011)
[7]
Cai, X., Bain, M., Krzywicki, A., Wobcke, W., Kim, Y. S., Compton, P., Mahidadia, A.: Reciprocal and Heterogeneous Link Prediction in Social Networks. In: Tan, P.- N., Chawla, S., Ho, C. K., Bailey, J. (eds.) PAKDD 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7302, pp. 193-204. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
[8]
Madden, M., Lenhart, A.: Online dating. Technical report, Pew Research Center (2006), http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf.pdf
[9]
Abbott, M.: Internet dating defies economic gloom. BBC (December 2011)

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)New to online dating?Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.5555/3192424.3192511(467-470)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
SBP'13: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction
April 2013
532 pages
ISBN:9783642372094
  • Editors:
  • Ariel M. Greenberg,
  • William G. Kennedy,
  • Nathan D. Bos

Sponsors

  • The U.S. Army Research Office: The U.S. Army Research Office
  • National Institutes of Health: National Institutes of Health
  • Office of Naval Research
  • The National Science Foundation

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 02 April 2013

Author Tags

  1. bipartite social network
  2. online dating
  3. reciprocity
  4. user recommendation

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)New to online dating?Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.5555/3192424.3192511(467-470)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2016

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media