article

Teaming up humans with autonomous synthetic characters

Authors:

Ana PaivaAuthors Info & Claims

Artificial Intelligence, Volume 173, Issue 1

Pages 80 - 103

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.08.006

Published: 01 January 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Autonomous synthetic characters have the potential to promote the social engagement of users in virtual environments, enhancing their interaction experience. In computer games, for example, poor interaction with game characters can drastically detract from the gaming experience, making the design of autonomous synthetic characters an important issue. In particular, in Role Playing Games (RPGs), for example, users and autonomous characters often perform in a group. Usually, the role of such characters is very limited since they lack the social skills to perform coherently in group scenarios. The goal of the work presented here is to endow autonomous synthetic characters with social skills that allow them to perform in groups with human members. However, to successfully achieve this, it is not enough to assure that the characters behave in a coherent manner from an individual perspective or that they are able to perform the group task optimally. It is also necessary that the autonomous characters exhibit behaviours that are coherent with the group's composition, context and structure. For this reason, we have developed a model to support group dynamics of autonomous synthetic characters (SGD model) inspired by theories developed in human social psychological sciences. This model defines the knowledge that each individual should build about the others and the group, and how this knowledge drives their interactions. The model was used in a collaborative computer game that was tested with users. The results showed that the model had a positive effect on the users' social engagement, namely, on their trust and identification with the group.

References

[1]

http://www.personalityresearch.org/bigfive.html

[2]

K. Allen, R. Bergin, K. Pickar, Exploring trust, group satisfaction, and performance in geographically dispersed and co-located university technology commercialisation teams, in: Proceedings of the NCIIA 8th Annual Meeting: Education that Works, March 18--20, 2004

[3]

Ang, J. and Soh, P.H., User information satisfaction, job satisfaction and computer background: An exploratory study. Information and Management. v32. 255-266.

[4]

Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F.A., Social identity and the organization. Academy of Management Review. v14. 2-39.

[5]

Back, K.W., Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. v46. 9-23.

[6]

Bales, R.F., Interaction Process Analysis. 1950. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[7]

Bates, J., Virtual reality, art and entertainment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]

Bates, J., The role of emotions in believable characters. Communications of the ACM. v37 i7. 122-125.

[9]

Bickmore, T. and Cassell, J., Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems---CHI'2001, ACM Press, Seattle, USA.

[10]

http://www.lucasarts.com/products/swkotor/

[11]

Blumberg, B., (void*): A cast of characters. In: Visual Proceedings of the Conference on SIGGRAPH 99, ACM Press. pp. 169

[12]

Carley, K.M. and Lin, Z., Organizational designs suited to high performance under stress. IEEE---Systems Man and Cybernetics. v25 i1. 221-230.

[13]

Carley, K.M. and Lin, Z., A theoretical study of organizational performance under information distortion. Management Science. v43 i7. 976-997.

[14]

Cartwright, D. and Zander, A., Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. 1968. Harper and Row, New York.

[15]

Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E., Embodied Conversational Agents. 2000. MIT Press.

[16]

Castelfranchi, C., Guaranties for autonomy in cognitive agent architectures. In: Intelligent Agents---ECAI-94 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Springer Verlag. pp. 56-70.

[17]

Castelfranchi, C., Modelling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence. v103 i1--2. 157-182.

[18]

Cohen, P.R. and Levesque, H.J., Teamwork. Noûs. Special Issue on Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence. v25 i4. 487-512.

[19]

Collins, B.E. and Raven, B.H., Group structure: Attraction, coalitions, communication, and power. In: The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 4, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

[20]

Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G., The measurement of end user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly. v12 i2. 259-274.

[21]

Doreian, P., Kapuscinski, R., Krackhardt, D. and Szczypula, J., A brief history of balance through time. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. v21. 113-131.

[22]

Driscoll, J.W., Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal. v21. 44-56.

[23]

Evans, R. and Lamb, T.B., Social activities: Implementing Wittgenstein. Gamasutra.

[24]

French, J.R.P. and Raven, B.H., Bases of social power. In: Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, Harper and Row, New York.

[25]

J.D. Funge, Making them behave: Cognitive models for computer animation, PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 1998

[26]

Gross, E., Primary functions of the small group. American Journal of Sociology. v60. 24-30.

[27]

Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L., Plans for discourse. In: Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. pp. 417-425.

[28]

Guye-Vuilleme, Simulation of nonverbal social interaction and small groups dynamics in virtual environments, Technical report, PhD thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2004

[29]

Hackman, J.R. and Morris, C.G., Group process and group effectiveness: A reappraisal. In: Group Processes, Academic Press, New York.

[30]

Hare, A., Handbook of Small Group Research. 1976. Free Press, New York.

[31]

Heider, F., Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology. v21. 107-112.

[32]

Heider, F., The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. 1958. Wiley, New York.

[33]

Hurwitz, J.I., Zander, R.F. and Hymovitch, B., Some effects of power on the relations among group members. In: Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, Harper and Row, New York.

[34]

Jesuíno, J.C., Estrutura e processos de grupo: interacções e factores de eficácia. In: Psicologia Social, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

[35]

Kipnis, D., Does power corrupt?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. v24. 33-41.

[36]

Kipnis, D., Castell, P.J., Gergens, M. and Mauch, D., Metamorphic effects of power. Journal of Applied Psychology. v61. 127-135.

[37]

Lewin, K., Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology. v44. 868-897.

[38]

Lewin, K. and Cartwright, D., Field Theory in Social Science. 1951. Harper and Row, New York.

[39]

C.A. Lindley, The gameplay gestalt, narrative, and interactive storytelling, in: Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, 2002, pp. 203--215

[40]

Lippitt, R., Polansky, N., Redl, F. and Rosen, S., The dynamics of power. Human Relations. v5. 37-64.

[41]

Lott, A.J. and Lott, B.E., Group cohesiveness, communication level and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. v64. 408-412.

[42]

Lott, A.J. and Lott, B.E., Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin. v64. 259-303.

[43]

Marquis, D.G., Guetzkow, H. and Heyns, R.W., A social psychological study of the decision-making conference. In: Groups, Leadership and Men, Cognitive Press, Pittsburgh.

[44]

S.C. Marsella, D.V. Pynadath, S.J. Read, Psychsim: Agent-based modeling of social interaction and influence, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Modeling---ICCM 2004, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 2004

[45]

Martinho, C. and Paiva, A., Pathematic agents. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, ACM Press.

[46]

Mataric, M.J., Designing and understanding adaptive group behavior. Adaptive Behavior. v4 i1. 51-80.

[47]

Mateas, M. and Stern, A., A behavior language for story-based believable agents. Intelligent Systems. v17 i4. 29-47.

[48]

McCrae, R. and Costa, P., Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five factor model. In: The Five Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, Guilford, New York. pp. 51-87.

[49]

McGrath, J.E., Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction. 1964. Holt, New York.

[50]

McGrath, J.E., Groups: Interaction and Performance. 1984. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

[51]

http://kelley.iu.edu/bwheeler/ISWorld/index.cfm

[52]

Moreno, J.L., Who Shall Survive?. 1934. Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co., Washington DC.

[53]

Musse, S.R. and Thalmann, D., Hierarchical model for real time simulation of virtual human crowds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. v7 i2. 152-164.

[54]

http://www.lordoftherings.net

[55]

Newcomb, T.M., The Acquaintance Process. 1961. Holt, Rinchart and Winston, New York.

[56]

http://www.atari.com/nwn2

[57]

S. Pasquariello, C. Pelachaud, Greta: A simple facial animation engine, in: Sixth Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, 2001

[58]

Pepitone, A. and Kleiner, R., The effects of threat and frustration on group cohesiveness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. v54. 192-199.

[59]

Prada, R., Machado, I. and Paiva, A., Teatrix: Virtual environment for story creation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer.

[60]

D.V. Pynadath, S.C. Marsella, Psychsim: Modeling theory of mind with decision-theoretic agents, in: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005, pp. 1181--1186

[61]

Raven, B.H., Social influence and power. In: Current Studies in Social Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

[62]

W.S. Reilly, J. Bates, Natural negotiation for believable agents, Technical report, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1995

[63]

C.W. Reynolds, Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioural model, in: Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '87 Conference Proceedings), 1987, pp. 25--34

[64]

Reynolds, J., Tactical team AI using a command hierarchy. In: AI Game Programming Wisdom, Charles River Media. pp. 260-271.

[65]

J. Rickel, W.L. Johnson, Virtual humans for team training in virtual reality, in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on AI in Education, 1999, pp. 578--585

[66]

Schell, J., Understanding entertainment: Story and gameplay are one. Computers in Entertainment. v3 i1.

[67]

M. Schmitt, T. Rist, Avatar arena: Virtual group-dynamics in multi-character negotiation scenarios, in: 4th International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 2003, p. 358

[68]

Shaw, M.E., Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behaviour. 1981. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[69]

Simon, H.A., A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. v69 i1. 99-118.

[70]

Tambe, M., Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. v7. 83-124.

[71]

Tomlinson, B. and Blumberg, B., Social synthetic characters. Computer Graphics. v26 i2.

[72]

http://www.atari.com/toee/

[73]

http://www.valvesoftware.com/games.html

[74]

van der Sterren, W., Squad tactics: Team AI and emergent maneuvers. In: AI Game Programming Wisdom, Charles River Media. pp. 233-246.

[75]

van der Sterren, W., Squad tactics: Planned maneuvers. In: AI Game Programming Wisdom, Charles River Media. pp. 247-259.

[76]

C. Wiberg, From ease of use to fun of use: Usability evaluation guidelines for testing entertainment web sites, in: Proceedings of Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, Singapore, 2001

[77]

J. Yen, J. Yin, T.R. Ioerger, M.S. Miller, D. Xu, R.A. Volz, Cast: Collaborative agents for simulating teamwork, in: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2001

Cited By

Prada RRato D(2022)Socially Interactive Agents in GamesThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563675(493-526)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563659.3563675
Schmid DStaehelin DBucher ADolata MSchwabe G(2022)Does Social Presence Increase Perceived Competence?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928456:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3492845
(2022)The Handbook on Socially Interactive AgentsundefinedOnline publication date: 27-Oct-2022
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Teaming up humans with autonomous synthetic characters

Recommendations

Teaming up humans with autonomous synthetic characters

Autonomous synthetic characters have the potential to promote the social engagement of users in virtual environments, thus enhancing their interaction experience. This effect is supported by the interactions between users and synthetic characters ...
Believable groups of synthetic characters
AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems

In recent years, virtual environments have evolved from single user and single agent, to multi-user and multi-agent, all interacting, collaborating or competing with each other. This scenario created new challenges for the users' interaction with the ...
Synthetic group dynamics in entertainment scenarios: creating believable interactions in groups of synthetic characters
ACE '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology

Today, many interactive games and virtual communities engage several users and synthetic characters, all interacting in the same virtual environment. In addition, these interactive scenarios, often present tasks to the participants that must be solved ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence Volume 173, Issue 1

January, 2009

196 pages

ISSN:0004-3702

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier B.V. © 2008.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.

United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2009

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

19
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Prada RRato D(2022)Socially Interactive Agents in GamesThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563675(493-526)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563659.3563675
Schmid DStaehelin DBucher ADolata MSchwabe G(2022)Does Social Presence Increase Perceived Competence?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928456:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3492845
(2022)The Handbook on Socially Interactive AgentsundefinedOnline publication date: 27-Oct-2022
Liu TLiu ZMa MChen TLiu CChai Y(2019)3D visual simulation of individual and crowd behavior in earthquake evacuationSimulation10.1177/003754971775329495:1(65-81)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1177/0037549717753294
Oliveira MSantos PDeterding SKhosmood FPirker JApperley T(2019)A model for socially intelligent merchantsProceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games10.1145/3337722.3337729(1-8)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3337722.3337729
Plonsky OErev IHazan TTennenholtz MSingh SMarkovitch S(2017)Psychological forestProceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3298239.3298336(656-662)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3298239.3298336
Mancini MBiancardi BPecune FVarni GDing YPelachaud CVolpe GCamurri A(2017)Implementing and Evaluating a Laughing Virtual CharacterACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/299857117:1(1-22)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2998571
Guimaraes MSantos PJhala A(2017)CiF-CK: An architecture for social NPCS in commercial games2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG)10.1109/CIG.2017.8080425(126-133)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CIG.2017.8080425
Almeida JRossetti RJacob JFaria BLeça Coelho A(2017)Serious games for the human behaviour analysis in emergency evacuation scenariosCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-017-0765-z20:1(707-720)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10586-017-0765-z
Pecune FOchs MMarsella SPelachaud CJonker CMarsella SThangarajah JTuyls K(2016)SOCRATESProceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems10.5555/2936924.2937060(921-930)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2936924.2937060
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents