Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions

Published: 01 January 2020 Publication History

Highlights

Strong interest towards virtual factory based learning with real-life problem solving tasks.
Needs for easily accessible platform for knowledge sharing.
Willingness to participate in designing one’s own work.
Doubts towards worker monitoring, highlighting that solutions need to be designed in close collaboration with workers.

Abstract

Industry 4.0 has potential for qualitative enrichment of factory work: a more interesting working environment, greater autonomy and opportunities for self-development. A central element of Industry 4.0 is human-centricity, described as development towards Operator 4.0. Our Operator 4.0 vision includes smart factories of the future that are perfectly suited for workers with different skills, capabilities and preferences. The vision is achieved by solutions that empower the workers and engage the work community. Empowering the worker is based on adapting the factory shop floor to the skills, capabilities and needs of the worker and supporting the worker to understand and to develop his/her competence. Engaging the work community is based on tools, with which the workers can participate in designing their work and training, and share their knowledge with each other. We gathered requirements from three manufacturing companies in different industries and interviewed 44 workers in four factories in order to study their expectations and concerns related to the proposed Operator 4.0 solutions. Adaptation was considered useful both in manufacturing systems and in production planning. However, worker measuring and modelling raised many doubts within workers and also with factory management. Therefore it is important to provide early demonstrations of the ideas and to design them further with the workers in order to find acceptable and ethically sustainable ways for worker modelling. The workers would like to be more involved in the design of the work place and manufacturing processes, and they thought that participation would decrease many problems that they currently face in their work. However, there were also doubts concerning whether they really could have possibilities to impact on their work. The results show that there are clear needs for knowledge sharing and adaptive learning solutions that would support personalized competence development and learning while working. An easily accessible platform for knowledge sharing could evolve to a forum where good work practices and ways to solve problems are shared not only within the work community, but also with machine providers and other stakeholders. The interviewees saw the virtual factory as a promising platform for participatory design and training.

References

[1]
S. Aromaa, I. Aaltonen, E. Kaasinen, J. Elo, I. Parkkinen, Use of wearable and augmented reality technologies in industrial maintenance work, in: Proceedings of the 20th international academic Mindtrek conference, ACM, 2016, pp. 235–242.
[2]
K.M. Baird, W. Barfield, Evaluating the effectiveness of augmented reality displays for a manual assembly task, Virtual Reality 4 (4) (1999) 250–259.
[3]
H. Beyer, K. Holtzblatt, Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems, Elsevier, 1997.
[4]
V. Braun, V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2) (2006) 77–101,.
[5]
F. Bruno, M. Muzzupappa, Product interface design: A participatory approach based on virtual reality, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68 (5) (2010) 254–269,.
[6]
T.Y. Chen, Y.C. Huang, T.S. Chou, C.S. Shih, J.W. Liu, Model-based development of user-centric automation and assistive devices/systems, IEEE Systems Journal 6 (3) (2012) 388–400.
[7]
S.Y. Choi, H. Lee, Y. Yoo, The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study, MIS Quarterly (2010) 855–870.
[8]
S. Colucci, T. Noia, E. Sciascio, F. Donini, M. Mongiello, G. Pisticelli, Semantic-based approach to task assignment of individual profiles, Journal of Universal Computer Science 10 (6) (2004) 723–731.
[9]
P.N. Day, G. Ferguson, P.O.B. Holt, S. Hogg, D. Gibson, Wearable augmented virtual reality for enhancing information delivery in high precision defence assembly: An engineering case study, Virtual Reality 8 (3) (2005) 177–184,.
[10]
K. Edwards, P.L. Jensen, Design of systems for productivity and well being, Applied Ergonomics 45 (1) (2014) 26–32.
[11]
P. Ehn, Scandinavian design: On participation and skill, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices (1993) 41–77.
[12]
H.A. ElMaraghy, Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 17 (4) (2005) 261–276.
[13]
European Union (2018). The general data protection regulation (GDPR) (EU) 2016/679.
[14]
M. Gonzalez-Franco, R. Pizarro, J. Cermeron, K. Li, J. Thorn, W. Hutabarat, …., P. Bermell-Garcia, Immersive mixed reality for manufacturing training, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4 (2017) 3.
[15]
D. Gorecky, M. Schmitt, M. Loskyll, D. Zühlke, Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era, in: 12th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), IEEE, 2014, July, IEEE, 2014, pp. 289–294.
[16]
A. Goryachev, S. Kozhevnikov, E. Kolbova, O. Kuznetsov, E. Simonova, P. Skobelev, …., Y. Shepilov, “Smart factory”: Intelligent system for workshop resource allocation, scheduling, optimization and controlling in real time, in: Advanced materials research, Trans Tech Publications, 2013, pp. 508–513.
[17]
P. Heikkilä, A. Honka, E. Kaasinen, Quantified factory worker: designing a worker feedback dashboard, in: 10th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (NordiCHI '18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2018, pp. 515–523.
[18]
J. Heilala, P. Voho, Human touch to efficient modular assembly system, Assembly Automation 17 (4) (1997) 298–302.
[19]
S.J. Henderson, S.K. Feiner, Augmented reality in the psychomotor phase of a procedural task, in: Mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE international symposium on, IEEE, 2011, pp. 191–200.
[20]
A. Jain, P.K. Jain, F.T. Chan, S. Singh, A review on manufacturing flexibility, International Journal of Production Research 51 (19) (2013) 5946–5970.
[21]
Järvenpää, E. (2012). Capability-based adaptation of production systems in a changing environment. Doctoral thesis. Tampere University of Technology. Publication, Vuosikerta. 1082, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere.
[22]
C. Jaturanonda, S. Nanthavanij, Analytic-based decision analysis tool for employee-job assignments based on competency and job preference, Industrial Journal of Industrial Engineering 18 (2) (2011) 58–70.
[23]
B. Johansson, Å. Fasth, J. Stahre, J. Heilala, S. Leong, Y.T. Lee, F. Riddick, Enabling flexible manufacturing systems by using level of automation as design parameter, in: Winter simulation conference, Winter Simulation Conference, 2009, pp. 2176–2184. Retrieved from http://www.informs-sim.org/wsc09papers/209.pdf.
[24]
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0, final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, Forschungsunion.
[25]
H. Lasi, P. Fettke, H.G. Kemper, T. Feld, M. Hoffmann, Industry 4.0, Business & Information Systems Engineering 6 (4) (2014) 239–242.
[26]
Leino, S.-P. (2015). Reframing the value of virtual prototyping. Intermediary virtual prototyping - the evolving approach of virtual environments based virtual prototyping in the context of new product development and low volume production. VTT, Espoo.
[27]
Y.-T. Leung, Handbook of scheduling: Algorithms, models and performance analysis, Chapman & Hall. London, London, 2004.
[28]
E.A. Locke, The nature and causes of job satisfaction, in: M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1976, pp. 1297–1349.
[29]
F. Longo, L. Nicoletti, A. Padovano, Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context, Computers & Industrial Engineering 113 (2017) 144–159.
[30]
D. Ma, X. Zhen, Y. Hu, D. Wu, X. Fan, H. Zhu, Collaborative virtual assembly operation simulation and its application, in: D. Ma, J. Gausemeier, X. Fan, M. Grafe (Eds.), Virtual reality & augmented reality in industry, Springer, Berlin, 2011, pp. 55–82.
[31]
T.J. Määttä, Virtual environments in machinery safety analysis and participatory ergonomics, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 17 (5) (2007) 435–443.
[32]
MacDougall, W. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Smart manufacturing for the future. Germany Trade & Invest.
[33]
C. Maslach, M.P. Leiter, The truth about burnout, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1997.
[34]
E. Mattila, A.L. Orsama, A. Ahtinen, L. Hopsu, T. Leino, I. Korhonen, Personal health technologies in employee health promotion: Usage activity, usefulness, and health-related outcomes in a 1-year randomized controlled trial, JMIR mHealth and uHealth 1 (2) (2013).
[35]
D. Mavrikios, N. Papakostas, D. Mourtzis, G. Chryssolouris, On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: A conceptual, cognitive and technology framework, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 24 (3) (2013) 473–485.
[36]
K. Mertins, P. Heisig, J. Vorbeck, Knowledge management: Concepts and best practices, Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.
[37]
A. Mital, A. Pennathur, Advanced technologies and humans in manufacturing workplaces: An interdependent relationship, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 33 (2004) 295–313.
[38]
D. Mourtzis, M. Doukas, The evolution of manufacturing systems: From craftsmanship to the era of customisation, in: Handbook of research on design and management of lean production systems, IGI Global, 2014, pp. 1–29.
[39]
M.J. Muller, S. Kuhn, Participatory design, Communications of the ACM 36 (6) (1993) 24–28.
[40]
I. Nonaka, A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science 5 (1) (1994) 14–37.
[41]
J. Novak-Marcincin, J. Barna, M. Janak, L. Novakova-Marcincinova, Augmented reality aided manufacturing, Procedia Computer Science 25 (2013) 23–31.
[42]
M. Obrist, W. Reitberger, D. Wurhofer, F. Förster, M. Tscheligi, User experience research in the semiconductor factory: A contradiction?, in: IFIP conference on human-computer interaction, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 144–151. September.
[43]
Öztürk, C., Tunalı, S., Hnich, B., & Örnek, A. (2010). Simultaneous balancing and scheduling of flexible mixed model assembly lines with sequence dependent task time increments. In Kasımbeyli, R., Dinçer, C., Özpeynirci, S., Sakalauskas, L. (Eds.), MEC EurOPT 2010 Selected papers, (pp. 237–240). Vilnius, ISBN 978-9955-28-598-4.
[44]
C. Öztürk, S. Tunali, B. Hnich, A.M. Örnek, Simultaneous balancing and scheduling of flexible mixed model assembly lines with sequence-dependent setup times, Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics 36 (2010) 65–72.
[45]
A. Radziwon, A. Bilberg, M. Bogers, E.S. Madsen, The smart factory: Exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions, Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 1184–1190.
[46]
G.M. Re, M. Bordegoni, An augmented reality framework for supporting and monitoring operators during maintenance tasks, in: International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality, Springer, Cham, 2014, pp. 443–454.
[47]
L. Rentzos, D. Mavrikios, G. Chryssolouris, A two-way knowledge interaction in manufacturing education: The teaching factory, Procedia CIRP 32 (2015) 31–35.
[48]
D. Romero, P. Bernus, O. Noran, J. Stahre, Å. Fast-Berglund, The operator 4.0: human cyber-physical systems & adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems, in: IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 677–686.
[49]
Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., Noran, O., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Å., & Gorecky, D. (2016, October). Towards an operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. In International conference on computers & industrial engineering (CIE46) (pp. 1–11).
[50]
L. Rothrock, R. Koubek, F. Fuchs, M. Haas, G. Salvendy, Review and reappraisal of adaptive interfaces: Toward biologically inspired paradigms, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3 (1) (2002) 47–84.
[51]
Saari, L. M., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Human resource management: Published in cooperation with the school of business administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the society of human resources management, 43(4), 395–407.
[52]
W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker, Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept, in: A.B. Bakker, M.P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research, Psychology Press, 2010.
[53]
W.B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. González-Romá, A.B. Bakker, The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Happiness Studies 33 (1) (2002) 71–92.
[54]
R. Seim, O. Broberg, Participatory workspace design: A new approach for ergonomists?, Industrial Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40 (2010) 25–33.
[55]
Y. Shen, S.K. Ong, A.Y. Nee, Augmented reality for collaborative product design and development, Design Studies 31 (2) (2010) 118–145.
[56]
V. Shpilevoy, A. Shishov, P. Skobelev, E. Kolbova, D. Kazanskaia, Y. Shepilov, A. Tsarev, Multi-agent system “Smart Factory” for real-time workshop management in aircraft jet engines production, in: Proceedings of the 11th IFAC workshop on intelligent manufacturing systems (IMS’13), 2013, pp. 204–209.
[57]
P.E. Spector, Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences, Sage, London, London, 1997.
[58]
A. Tang, C. Owen, F. Biocca, W. Mou, Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 2003, pp. 73–80.
[59]
M. Tisch, C. Hertle, E. Abele, J. Metternich, R. Tenberg, Learning factory design: A competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 29 (12) (2016) 1355–1375.
[60]
M. Tisch, C. Hertle, J. Cachay, E. Abele, J. Metternich, R. Tenberg, A systematic approach on developing action-oriented, competency-based learning factories, Procedia CIRP 7 (2013) 580–585.
[61]
C.J. Turner, W. Hutabarat, J. Oyekan, A. Tiwari, Discrete event simulation and virtual reality use in industry: New opportunities and future trends, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46 (6) (2016) 882–894.
[62]
B. Zhou, B. Zhang, Y. Liu, K. Xing, User model evolution algorithm: forgetting and reenergizing user preference, in: 2011 IEEE international conferences on internet of things, and cyber, physical and social computing, IEEE, 2011, pp. 444–447.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing a Tool to Collect Worker Feedback on Novel Solutions in Industrial Work ContextProceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 202410.1145/3673805.3673821(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The realities of achieving a Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive shopfloor in the age of Industry 5.0.Procedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.059232:C(2406-2415)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Data-driven analysis and human-centric assignment for manual assembly production linesComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2024.109896188:COnline publication date: 17-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Computers and Industrial Engineering
          Computers and Industrial Engineering  Volume 139, Issue C
          Jan 2020
          1387 pages

          Publisher

          Pergamon Press, Inc.

          United States

          Publication History

          Published: 01 January 2020

          Author Tags

          1. Adaptation
          2. Worker model
          3. Empowerment
          4. Engagement
          5. Factory automation
          6. Training
          7. Knowledge sharing
          8. Participatory design
          9. User studies
          10. Factory work

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Designing a Tool to Collect Worker Feedback on Novel Solutions in Industrial Work ContextProceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 202410.1145/3673805.3673821(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
          • (2024)The realities of achieving a Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive shopfloor in the age of Industry 5.0.Procedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.059232:C(2406-2415)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
          • (2024)Data-driven analysis and human-centric assignment for manual assembly production linesComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2024.109896188:COnline publication date: 17-Apr-2024
          • (2024)Supporting Employee Engagement and Knowledge Transfer via Gamification in the Context of Sheltered Workplaces: A Literature Review and Interview StudyUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60884-1_7(94-111)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
          • (2023)Empirical study for human engagement in collaborative robot programmingJournal of Integrated Design & Process Science10.3233/JID-22101226:2(159-181)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
          • (2023)A model to evaluate the Human Error Probability in inspection tasks of a production systemProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.377217:C(1775-1783)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
          • (2023)Advanced visualization of ergonomic assessment data through industrial Augmented RealityProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.346217:C(1470-1478)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
          • (2023)The forgotten teammateComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107763145:COnline publication date: 24-May-2023
          • (2023)Promises of industry 4.0 under the magnifying glass of interdisciplinarity: revealing operators and managers work and challenging collaborative robot designCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-023-00726-625:2-3(251-271)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
          • (2023)Job Crafting to Improve Low-Usability Automation: Sustainability Through Human Work Interaction DesignsDesign for Equality and Justice10.1007/978-3-031-61688-4_37(377-387)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          View options

          Get Access

          Login options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media