Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment

Published: 01 September 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This research refers to the self-regulated learning strategies proposed by Pintrich (1999) in developing a multiple-choice Web-based assessment system, the Peer-Driven Assessment Module of the Web-based Assessment and Test Analysis system (PDA-WATA). The major purpose of PDA-WATA is to facilitate learner use of self-regulatory learning behaviors to perform self-regulated learning and in turn improve e-Learning effectiveness. PDA-WATA includes five main strategies: 'Adding Answer Notes,' 'Stating Confidence,' 'Reading Peer Answer Notes,' 'Recommending Peer Answer Notes' and 'Querying Peers' Recommendation on Personal Answer Notes'. Using these strategies, examinees are allowed to add answer notes to explain why they chose a certain option as the correct answer and state their confidence in their own answer and answer notes, for peers' reference. In addition to reading peer answer notes, examinees can also recommend peer answer notes as valuable references. The recommendation information can also be queried by all examinees. Quasi-experimental design was adopted to understand the effectiveness of PDA-WATA in facilitating learner use of self-regulatory learning behaviors to perform self-regulated learning and in improving learner e-Learning effectiveness. Participants were 123 seventh-grade junior high school students from four classes. These four classes were randomly divided into the PDA-WATA group (n=63) and the N-WBT group (n=60). Before e-Learning instruction, all students took the pre-test of the Learning Process Inventory (LPI), used to understand how often learners use self-regulatory learning behaviors in the learning process, and the pre-test of the summative assessment. After a two-week e-Learning instruction, the students all took the post-test of the LPI and the summative assessment. Results indicate that students in the PDA-WATA group appear to be more willing to take the Web-based formative assessment than students in the N-WBT group. In addition, PDA-WATA appears to be significantly more effective than N-WBT in facilitating learner use of self-regulatory learning behaviors to perform self-regulated learning and in improving their e-Learning effectiveness. Moreover, this research also finds that in the PDA-WATA group, there is no significant difference between the learning effectiveness of students with a low level of self-regulated learning and students with a high level of self-regulated learning, but similar result cannot be found in the N-WBT group.

References

[1]
Arnold, R. (n.d.). Blended learning in international human resource development. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://www.gtz.de/en/dokumente/en-elearning-blended-learning-in-international-human-resource-development.pdf.
[2]
The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. v5 i1. 85-103.
[3]
The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research. v30 i1&2. 87-111.
[4]
Engagement in self-regulated deep learning of successful immigrant and non-immigrant students in inner city schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education. v23 i1. 41-58.
[5]
Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
[6]
Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research. v65 i3. 245-281.
[7]
Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Information Age Publishing Inc, Greenwich, CT.
[8]
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
[9]
Children and computers in school. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
[10]
Teacher education and the World Wide Web. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. v9 i1. 43-61.
[11]
Do teachers' own learning behaviors influence their classroom goal orientation and control ideology?. Teaching and Teacher Education. v23 i1. 36-46.
[12]
Students' perceptions of their self-regulatory and other directed study strategies: a factor analysis. Psychological Reports. v86 i1. 102-108.
[13]
Studying in higher education: students' approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education. v31 i1. 99-117.
[14]
Learning strategies for success in a web-based course: a descriptive exploration. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. v10 i2. 123-134.
[15]
Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education. v9 i2. 7-26.
[16]
Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research. v30 i1&2. 139-161.
[17]
Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen - Konzeption und Entwicklung. R. Oldenbourg Verlag, München.
[18]
Self-regulatory behavior influences in distance learning. International Journal of Instructional Media. v27 i2. 147-155.
[19]
Student responses to computers: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Computing Research. v8 i2. 215-227.
[20]
Beliefs about learning, self-regulated strategies and text comprehension among Chinese children. British Journal of Educational Psychology. v78 i1. 51-73.
[21]
Self-regulated learning using multimedia programs in dentistry postgraduate students: a multimethod approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. v2 i1. 101-121.
[22]
Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor.
[23]
Engagement in academic work: the role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology. v21 i4. 388-422.
[24]
Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist. v36 i2. 89-101.
[25]
Motivation, learning strategies, and academic performance: a study of the college finance classroom. Financial Practice & Education. v5 i1. 78-89.
[26]
Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education. v24 i1. 17-31.
[27]
Introduction: using qualitative methods to enrich understandings of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist. v37 i1. 1-5.
[28]
The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research. v31 i6. 459-470.
[29]
A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology. v95 i4. 667-686.
[30]
Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research. v63 i2. 167-199.
[31]
Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education. v22 i2. 72-89.
[32]
The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on students' motivation and information-processing. Learning and Instruction. v15 i2. 141-160.
[33]
Commentary on self-regulation in school contexts. Learning and Instruction. v15 i2. 173-177.
[34]
Self-regulated learning: the educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist. v40 i2. 85-94.
[35]
Qualitative findings of students' perception on practice of self-regulated strategies in online community discussion. Computers & Education. v53 i1. 94-103.
[36]
Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. v39 i1. 105-118.
[37]
What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-Learning environment?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. v23 i3. 171-186.
[38]
Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: Development and evaluation. Computers & Education. v51 i3. 1247-1263.
[39]
Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students' e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education. v54 i4. 1157-1166.
[40]
Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education. v56 i4. 1062-1071.
[41]
Web-based Assessment and Test Analyses (WATA) system: development and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. v20 i1. 59-71.
[42]
Designing a Web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers & Education. v51 i1. 448-462.
[43]
The teaching of learning strategies. In: Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, Macmillan, New York, NY. pp. 315-327.
[44]
Measuring self-regulated learning. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. (pp. 531-566), Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
[45]
Commentary: toward a cyclically interactive view of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research. v31 i6. 545-551.
[46]
Attaining self-regulated learning: a social-cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. pp. 13-39.
[47]
Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
[48]
Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A new approach for assessing the quality of online coursesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12247-w29:11(13929-13956)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Boosting self-regulated learning with mobile interventionsComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104879205:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Examining impacts of information system success and perceived stress on students’ self-regulated learning mediated by intrinsic motivation in online learning environments: second-order structural equation modelling analysesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11685-w28:10(12945-12968)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Ltd.

    United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2011

    Author Tags

    1. PDA-WATA
    2. Self-regulated learning
    3. Teaching/learning strategies
    4. WATA system
    5. Web-based formative assessment
    6. e-Learning

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A new approach for assessing the quality of online coursesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12247-w29:11(13929-13956)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
    • (2023)Boosting self-regulated learning with mobile interventionsComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104879205:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Examining impacts of information system success and perceived stress on students’ self-regulated learning mediated by intrinsic motivation in online learning environments: second-order structural equation modelling analysesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11685-w28:10(12945-12968)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
    • (2022)University students’ use of mobile technology in self-directed language learningComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104413179:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Acceptance of and self-regulatory practices in online learning and their effects on the participation of Hong Kong secondary school students in online learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11546-y28:7(8715-8732)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Video-Assisted Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Training: COVID-19 EditionEducating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_5(59-73)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
    • (2020)Learning or Forgetting? A Dynamic Approach for Tracking the Knowledge Proficiency of StudentsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/337950738:2(1-33)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2020
    • (2020)Continuance model of formative computer-based assessment (CBA): Considering the effects of self-regulation and social influenceUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-019-00701-x19:4(905-918)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020
    • (2019)Effects of formative assessment in an augmented reality approach to conducting ubiquitous learning activities for architecture coursesUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-017-0588-y18:2(221-230)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019
    • (2018)SVM and PCA Based Learning Feature Classification Approaches for E-Learning SystemInternational Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies10.4018/IJWLTT.201804010313:2(32-45)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media