Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Toward an optimum combination of English teachers for objective teaching

Published: 01 April 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Objective teaching refers to letting learners meet a preset goal over a certain time frame, and for this purpose it is essential to find suitable teachers, or a combination of teachers most appropriate for the task. This paper uses clustering and decision tree technologies to solve the problem of how to select teachers and students for objective teaching. First, students are classified into clusters according to their characteristics that are determined based on their pretest performance in English skill areas, such as listening, reading, and writing. Second, several classes of each skill area are available for the students freely to choose from, each class already assigned a teacher. After the course of instruction is completed, an analysis is made of the posttest results in order to evaluate both teaching and learning performances. Then, the participant teachers who have taught particularly well in a certain skill area are thus selected and recommended as appropriate for different clusters of students who have failed the posttest. This study, with the teaching experiment having turned out with highly encouraging results, not only proposes a new method of how to achieve objective teaching, but also presents a prototype system to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method.

References

[1]
McGraw-Hill, NY.
[2]
Classification and regression tree. Wadsworth Belmont, CA.
[3]
Chen, H.-C., & Chen, A. L. P. (2001). A music recommendation system based on music data grouping and user interests. In Proceedings of the CIKM'01 (pp. 231-238). Atlanta, Georgia.
[4]
Cheng, J., Fayyad, U.M., Irani, K.B., & Qian, Z. (1988). Improved decision trees: a generalized version of ID3. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on machine learning (Vol. 21, pp. 100-106). Morgan Kaufman
[5]
Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record. v64. 672-683.
[6]
Diamond Bullet (2004). Provider of usability & Web design services. Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary/term_962.txl.
[7]
Personalized information delivery: An analysis of information filtering methods. Communications of the ACM. v35 i12. 51-60.
[8]
Principles of instructional design. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Orlando, FL.
[9]
Standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement. v15. 237-261.
[10]
Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM. v35 i12. 61-70.
[11]
Instructional media and technologies for learning. Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[12]
A personalized English learning recommender system for ESL students. Expert Systems with Applications. v34. 683-688.
[13]
Jagadish, H. V., Koudas, N., & Muthukrishnan, S. (1999). Mining deviants in a time series database. In Proceedings of the VLDB'99 (pp. 102-113). Edinburgh, UK.
[14]
Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[15]
Kamber, M., Winstone, L., Gong, W., Cheng, S., & Han, J. (1997). Generalization and decision tree induction: Efficient classification in data mining. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on research issue in data engineering (pp. 111-121).
[16]
Goodbye, teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. v1. 79-89.
[17]
The Keller lan handbook. W.A. Benjamin Inc., Menlo Park, CA.
[18]
Grouplens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Communications of the ACM. v40 i3. 77-87.
[19]
Instructional regulation and control: Cybernetics, algorithmization, and heuristics in education. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[20]
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003). Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. In IEEE internet computing: Industry report, http://www.dsonline.computer.org/0301/d/w1lind.htm.
[21]
Lu, J. (2004). Personalized e-learning material recommender system. In International conference on information technology for application (pp. 374-379).
[22]
MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observation. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics, and probability (Vol. 1, pp. 281-297). CA.
[23]
Preparing instructional objectives. 2nd ed. David S. Lake, Belmont, CA.
[24]
Magidson, J. (1993). The CHAID approach to segmentation modeling. In Handbook of marketing research.
[25]
Component display theory. In: Reigeluth, C. (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[26]
Miller, B. N., Albert, I., Lam, S. K., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2003). Movielens unplugged: Experiences with an occasionally connected recommender system. In Proceedings of the IUI'03 (pp. 263-266). Miami, FL.
[27]
Mooney, R. J. & Roy, L. (2000). Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In Proceedings of the digital libraries (pp. 195-204). San Antonio, TX.
[28]
Learning efficient classification procedures and their applicationto chess end games. In: Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J.G., Mitchell, T.M. (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, Morgan Kaufmann. pp. 463-482.
[29]
Induction of decision tree. Machine Learning. v1 i1. 81-106.
[30]
Simplifying decision trees. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. v27 i3. 221-234.
[31]
Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 1999.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ.
[32]
Reigeluth, C. M. & Rodgers, C. A. (1980). The elaboration theory of instruction: Prescriptions for task analysis and design.
[33]
The elaboration theory of instruction. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[34]
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994). Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of Netnews. In Proceedings of the CSCW' 94 (pp. 175-186). Chapel Hill, NC.
[35]
Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM. v40 i3. 56-60.
[36]
The evolution of American educational technology. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO.
[37]
The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler, Ralph, Gagne, Robert, Scriven, Michael (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, Rand McNally & Co, Chicago, IL.
[38]
Shardanand, U., & Maes, P. (1995). Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "word of mouth". Proceedings of the CHI'95 (pp. 210-217). Denver, CO.
[39]
Svensson, M., Laaksolahti, J., Höök, K., & Waern, A. (2000). A recipe based on-line food store. In Proceedings of the IUI 2000 (pp. 260-263). New Orleans, LA.
[40]
Smart recommendation for an evolving e-learning system. International Journal on E-Learning. v4 i1. 105-129.
[41]
Utgoff, P.E. (1988). ID5: An incremental ID3. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on machine learning (pp. 107-120).
[42]
ID5: Incremental induction of decision trees. Machine Learning. v4 i2. 161-186.
[43]
Weiss, S. M., & Indurkhya, N. (1996). Decision tree pruning: Biased or optimal?. MA: AAAI96/MIT.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Multicriteria English Teaching Decision Model Based on Deep LearningComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/90306262022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal  Volume 36, Issue 3
April, 2009
3177 pages

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2009

Author Tags

  1. Clustering
  2. ESL
  3. Objective teaching
  4. Recommender system

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Multicriteria English Teaching Decision Model Based on Deep LearningComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/90306262022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media