Embedding equality, diversity and inclusion in usability testing: : Recommendations and a research agenda
References
[1]
K.R. Acharya, Promoting Social Justice Through Usability in Technical Communication: an Integrative Literature Review, Tech. Commun. 69 (2022) 6–26.
[2]
S.A. Alerasoul, G. Afeltra, H. Hakala, E. Minelli, F. Strozzi, Organisational learning, learning organisation, and learning orientation: an integrative review and framework, Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 32 (2022),.
[3]
C.A. Bohnert, R.M. Combs, E.J. Noonan, A.E. Weathers, L.A. Weingartner, Gender minorities in simulation: a mixed methods study of medical school standardized patient programs in the United States and Canada, Simul. Healthc. 16 (2021) e151–e158,.
[4]
J. Brooks, N. King, Template Analysis for Business and Management Students, 2016.
[5]
D. Caliz, L. Martínez, R. Caliz, Helping people with down syndrome through an usability testing guide proposal for mobile applications, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 7 (2017) 1–19,.
[6]
B. Colliver, Representation of Lgbtq communities in the grand theft auto series, Video Games, Crime and Next-Gen Deviance: Reorienting the Debate, 131–149, 2020,.
[7]
V.P. Cornet, T. Toscos, D. Bolchini, R.R. Ghahari, R. Ahmed, C. Daley, R.J. Holden, 2020. Untold stories in user-centered design of mobile health: practical challenges and strategies learned from the design and evaluation of an app for older adults with heart failure, JMIR mHealth uHealth 8 (2020).
[8]
J. Craven, H. Booth, Putting awareness into practice: practical steps for conducting usability tests, Libr. Rev. 55 (2006) 179–194,.
[9]
T. Darin, R. Andrade, J. Sánchez, Usability evaluation of multimodal interactive virtual environments for learners who are blind: an empirical investigation, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 158 (2022),.
[10]
H.T.O. Davies, S.M. Nutley, Developing learning organisations in the new NHS, Br. Med. J. 320 (2000) 998–1001,.
[11]
Disability Rights UK., n.d. About us [WWW Document]. Disabil. Rights UK. URL https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/about-us/.
[12]
Disability Unit, Gov.UK. URL 2021, (2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inclusive-communication/inclusive-language-words-to-use-and-avoid-when-writing-about-disability.
[13]
K. Elmore, L. Meloncon, C.A. James, Embracing interdependence: technology developers, autistic users, and technical communicators, Rhetorical Accessability: At the Intersection of Technical Communication and Disability Studies, Routledge, 2014, pp. 15–38.
[14]
I. Etikan, Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling, Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5 (2016) 1,.
[15]
A. Fernandez, E. Insfran, S. Abrahão, Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study, Inf. Softw. Technol. 53 (2011) 789–817,.
[16]
S. Gagnon, T. Augustin, W. Cukier, Interplay for change in equality, diversity and inclusion studies, Hum. Relation. 75 (2022) 1327–1353,.
[17]
D.A. Garvin, Building a learning organization, Harv. Bus. Rev. 71 (1993) 78–91.
[18]
L. Hanna, K. Risden, K. Alexander, Guidelines for usability testing with children, interactions 4 (1997) 9–14,.
[19]
S. Harihareswara, User experience is a social justice issue. [WWW Document], Code4Lib J 28 (2015).
[20]
Henry, S.L., 2007. Just Ask: integrating Accessibility Throughout Design. [WWW Document]. Just Ask. URL www.uiAccess.com/JustAsk/.
[21]
L. Hutter, H.M. Lawrence, Promoting inclusive and accessible design in usability testing, Commun. Des. Q. 6 (2018) 21–30,.
[22]
C. Imison, M. Kaur, S. Dawson, Supporting Equity and Tackling Inequality: How can NIHR Promote Inclusion in public Partnerships? An Agenda for Action, 2022.
[23]
ISO, Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts, 2018.
[24]
J. Johnstone, Technology as empowerment: a capability approach to computer ethics, Ethics Inf. Technol. 9 (2007) 73–87,.
[25]
A. Joyce, Usability Testing with Minors: 16 Tips. [WWW Document], NN/g Nielsen Norman Group, 2019, URL https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-minors/.
[26]
J.L. Korte, L.E. Potter, S.H. Nielsen, An experience in requirements prototyping with young Deaf children, J. Usability Stud. 10 (2015) 195–214.
[27]
Á. López-Cabrales, J.C. Real, R. Valle, Relationships between human resource management practices and organizational learning capability: the mediating role of human capital, Pers. Rev. 40 (2011) 344–363,.
[28]
K. Mack, E. McDonnell, What do we mean by accessibility research? a literature survey of accessibility papers in chi and assets from 1994 to 2019, Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2021),.
[29]
J. Mankoff, G.R. Hayes, D. Kasnitz, Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology, in: ASSETS’10 - Proc. 12th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. Comput. Access. 3–10, 2010,.
[30]
S. Marsh, Designing and researching with people with aphasia. User research in government, User Res. Gov. (2019) URL https://userresearch.blog.gov.uk/2019/08/30/designing-and-researching-with-people-with-aphasia/.
[31]
G. Meiselwitz, B. Wentz, J. Lazar, Universal usability: past, present, and future, Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2009,.
[32]
A. Mihoc, Conducting remote research with people with access needs, User Res. Gov. (2020) URL https://userresearch.blog.gov.uk/2020/05/20/conducting-remote-research-with-people-with-access-needs/.
[33]
K. Moran, Usability Testing 101. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. [WWW Document], Nielsen Norman Group logoNielsen Norman Group, 2019, URL.
[34]
J. Nielsen, Thinking aloud: The #1 Usability tool. [WWW Document], NN/g Nielsen Norman Group, 2012, URL https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/.
[35]
J. Nielsen, Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. [WWW Document], NN/g Nielsen Norman Group, 2012, URL https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/.
[36]
J. Nielsen, Why You Only Need to Test With 5 users. [WWW Document], NN/g Nielsen Norman Group, 2000, URL https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/.
[37]
M.J.M. Opiniano, Object-centered interviews in mixed methods: yielding the emotions of overseas migrant households in family financial socialization, Method. Psychol. 5 (2021),.
[38]
J. Paylor, C. McKevitt, The Possibilities and Limits of “Co-producing”, Research. Front. Sociol. 4 (2019) 1–5,.
[39]
K. Pernice, J. Nielsen, How to Conduct Usability Studies for Accessibility Methodology Guidelines for Testing Websites and Intranets With People Who Use Assistive Technology, 2012.
[40]
H. Petrie, F. Hamilton, N. King, P. Pavan, Remote usability evaluations with disabled people, Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 2 (2006) 1133–1141,.
[41]
D. Potnis, B. Gala, Best practices for conducting fieldwork with marginalized communities, Inf. Process. Manag. 57 (2020),.
[42]
S.A. Raza, Managing ethical requirements elicitation of complex socio-technical systems with critical systems thinking: a case of course-timetabling project, Technol. Soc. 66 (2021),.
[43]
F.H.A. Razak, H. Hafit, N. Sedi, N.A. Zubaidi, H. Haron, Usability testing with children: laboratory vs field studies, in: Proc. - 2010 Int. Conf. User Sci. Eng. i-USEr, 2010, 2010, pp. 104–109,.
[44]
J. Rubin, D. Chisnell, Handbook of Usability testing: How to plan, design, and Conduct Effective Tests, 2nd ed., Wiley Publisher, 2008.
[45]
A. Schlesinger, W.K. Edwards, R.E. Grinter, Intersectional HCI: engaging identity through gender, race, and class, in: Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 2017-May, 2017, pp. 5412–5427,.
[46]
B. Shneiderman, Universal usability, Commun. ACM 43 (2000) 84–91,.
[47]
H. Smith, A. Manzini, J. Ives, Inclusivity in TAS research: an example of EDI as RRI, J. Responsible Technol. 12 (2022),.
[48]
A. Strohmayer, R. Bellini, J. Meissner, E. Alabdulqader, A. Toombs, S.M. Finnigan, M. Balaam, CHIversity: implications for equality, diversity, and inclusion campaigns, Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2018) 1–10,. 2018-April.
[49]
C.M. Sum, R. Alharbi, F. Spektor, C.L. Bennett, C.N. Harrington, K. Spiel, R.M. Williams, Dreaming disability justice in HCI, Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2022),.
[50]
W.B. Tindale, P. Dimitri, MedTech innovation across the life course–the importance of users and usability, J. Med. Eng. Technol. 46 (2022) 427–432,.
[51]
M.K. Tornblad, K.S. Jones, F.A. Inan, Individuals with Autism spectrum disorder: a review of human factors considerations and usability testing guidelines, in: Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 2019-Octob, 2019, pp. 1575–1579,.
[52]
M.B. Twidale, D.M. Nichols, C.P. Lueg, Everyone everywhere: a distributed and embedded paradigm for usability, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 72 (2021) 1272–1284,.
[53]
UK Government, Running research sessions with disabled people, Gov.uK Serv. Man (2017) URL https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/running-research-sessions-with-people-with-disabilities.
[54]
A.C. van den Berg, S. Giest, W. Kraaij, Assessing inclusivity in online platforms through usability evaluation with Google Analytics, Policy and Internet 15 (2023) 55–77,.
[55]
T. Van Der Geest, Conducting usability studies with users who are elderly or have disabilities, Tech. Commun. 53 (2006) 23–31.
[56]
W3C WAI, 2016. Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion. [WWW Document]. W3C WAI. URL https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/.
[57]
D.M. Walls, User experience in social justice contexts, in: SIGDOC 2016 - 34th ACM Int. Conf. Des. Commun, 2016,.
[58]
G. Wheeler, N. Mills, U. Ankeny, P. Howsley, C. Bartlett, H. Elphick, P. Dimitri, Meaningful involvement of children and young people in health technology development, J. Med. Eng. Technol. 46 (2022) 462–471,.
[59]
P. Williams, Developing methods to evaluate web usability with people with learning difficulties, Br. J. Spec. Educ. 33 (2006) 173–179,.
[60]
R. Wood, E. Dixon, S. Elsayed-Ali, E. Shokeen, A. Lazar, J. Lazar, Investigating Best Practices for Remote Summative Usability Testing with People with Mild to Moderate Dementia, ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 14 (2021) 1–26,.
[61]
Y. Yoo, Qiarterjy, MIS Q. 34 (2010) 213–231.
Recommendations
Usability evaluation of assistive technologies through qualitative research focusing on people with mild dementia
The assistive technologies (ATs) are commonly used for the wellbeing of people with dementia (PWD). Research shows that current ATs are not performing to their best and high rate of AT abandonment still exist. Although empirical evaluations greatly ...
Measuring website usability for visually impaired people-a modified GOMS analysis
Assets '06: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibilityWeb designers regularly wonder which version of a design would suit best their target groups' needs. This becomes even more complicated if the design is to comply with accessibility rules. This paper describes an interaction model of blind users' ...
Testing for power usability
CHI EA '97: CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUsability studies are usually conducted in a compressed time scale (measured in hours) compared with a user's eventual experience with a product (often measured in years). For this reason, typical usability evaluations focus on success during initial ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
The Authors.
Publisher
Academic Press, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 18 July 2024
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in