Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Investigating the Failure of the Blockchain Technology and Suggested Recommendations

Published: 01 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The present study endeavors to undertake a comprehensive investigation of the shortcomings of Blockchain technology, while assessing its advantages and drawbacks. Blockchain is a type of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) that relies on a network of peers to achieve consensus. Furthermore, other DLTs with similar functions might offer more viable solutions to replace Blockchain. One of these alternatives is Hashgraph, which employs a unique mechanism to manage distributed ledgers, claiming to be faster, more secure, and impartial. As a result, a thorough comparative analysis was conducted between these two technologies to determine which would emerge as the dominant technology in the market. The fundamental features of DLTs include decentralization, security, transparency, and integrity, albeit not all DLTs possess the same structures or functionalities.

References

[1]
Ala’ Abu Hilala, Mohamad Badraa, Abdallah Tubaishatc, Building Smart Contracts for COVID-19 Pandemic Over the Blockchain Emerging Technologies, in: the 12th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN2021),  , Leuven, Belgium, 2021, November 1-4.
[2]
Bhabendu Kumar Mohanta, Soumyashree S. Panda, Debasish Jena, An overview of smart contract and use cases in blockchain technology, in: 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2018, pp. 1–4.
[3]
J. Malinowski, Hashgraph: A blockchain-like consensus algorithm, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 7 (5) (2018) 70–75. Sep.
[4]
Petter Olsen, Melania Borit, Shaheen Syed, Applications, limitations, costs, and benefits related to the use of blockchain technology in the food industry, Nofima rapportserie (2019).
[5]
Oliver Bischoff, Stefan Seuring, Opportunities and limitations of public blockchain-based supply chain traceability, Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2021.
[6]
Mikko Dufva, Problems with blockchain, Research Scientist of VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd (2017).
[7]
M.R. Islam, M.A. Hoque, Redundancy and Storage Costs in Distributed Systems: A Study of Blockchain Technology, IEEE Transactions on Computers 70 (8) (2021) 1226–1234,. Aug.
[8]
M.S. Rahman, M.M. Hassan, Challenges in Querying Blockchain Systems, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 14 (3) (2021) 473–485,. May-June.
[9]
M.A. Rahman, S.S. Islam, Security and Privacy in Blockchain: Opportunities and Challenges, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 38 (4) (2019) 53–63,. Dec.
[10]
Tonghe Wang, Haochen Hua, Zhiqian Wei, Junwei Cao, Challenges of blockchain in new generation energy systems and future outlooks, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems (2022).
[11]
Ayasha Malik, Siddharth Gautam, Shafiqul Abidin, Bharat Bhushan, Blockchain technology-future of IoT: including structure, limitations and various possible attacks, in: 2019 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT), 1, 2019, pp. 1100–1104.
[12]
M. Elarbi, A. Saadi, Security Analysis of Blockchain Technology: Attacks, Threats, and Challenges, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 218299–218315,.
[13]
Liehuang Zhu, Yulu Wu, Keke Gai, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, Controllable and trustworthy blockchain-based cloud data management, Future Generation Computer Systems (2019).
[14]
Duc-Phong Le, Huasong Meng, Le Su, Sze Ling Yeo, Vrizlynn Thing, Biff: A blockchain-based iot forensics framework with identity privacy, in: TENCON 2018-2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2018, pp. 2372–2377.
[15]
Laurie Hughes, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Santosh K. Misra, Nripendra P. Rana, Vishnupriya Raghavan, Viswanadh Akella, Blockchain research, practice, and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes, and research agenda, International Journal of Information Management (2019).
[16]
Ioannis Karamitsos, Maria Papadaki, Nedaa Baker Al Barghuthi, Design of the blockchain smart contract: A use case for real estate, Journal of Information Security 9 (03) (2018) 177.
[17]
“Hashgraph vs Blockchain: A detailed comparison,” 101 Blockchains, 11-Nov-2021. [Online]. Available: https://101blockchains.com/hashgraph-vs-blockchain/. [Accessed: 02-Dec-2021].
[18]
L. Baird, et al., Hashgraph: A Distributed Ledger Technology for Consensus-Based Systems, Swirlds, Inc, 2016, Technical Report.
[19]
Michael Crosby, Pradan Pattanayak, Sanjeev Verma, Vignesh Kalyanaraman, Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin, Applied Innovation 2 (2016) 6–10.
[20]
Narayanan, Arvind, Joseph Bonneau, Edward Felten, Andrew Miller, and Steven Goldfeder, “Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: a comprehensive introduction,” in Princeton University Press, 2016.
[21]
P. Kshirsagar, R. Kulkarni, Blockchain Technology: A Framework for Prototyping and Adoption, in: 2019 3rd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI),  , Tirunelveli, India, 2019, pp. 1094–1098,.
[22]
M. Zohar, T.A. Russell, The challenge of understanding blockchain technology, IEEE Security & Privacy 16 (4) (2018) 7–14,. Jul-Aug.
[23]
Dante Alighieri Disparte, Why Enterprise Blockchain Projects Fail, Social coordination marks a key point of failure for enterprise blockchain projects (2019).

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Procedia Computer Science
Procedia Computer Science  Volume 224, Issue C
2023
592 pages
ISSN:1877-0509
EISSN:1877-0509
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2023

Author Tags

  1. Blockchain Failure
  2. Hashgraph
  3. DLT
  4. Smart Contract

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media