Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Spectrum management reform: Rethinking practices

Published: 01 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Unparalleled growth in wireless communications has increased the pressure for more spectrum to support more users, more uses and more capacity. To alleviate that pressure, major regulatory changes were introduced in several countries in two key areas of spectrum management, namely spectrum assignment and allocation. This paper analyzes those changes and discusses strategies and tactics for deregulating the use of radio spectrum. Spectrum management reforms are considered within the theoretical framework of transition economics, which is concerned with optimal reform speed and sequencing. The paper shows how Anglo-Saxon and European countries have been implementing gradual reforms. Meanwhile, Central American reformers have chosen a fast transition from command-and-control regulation to market mechanisms. Transition economics is used to evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of different spectrum reform strategies.

References

[1]
ACMA - Australian Communications and Media Authority (2008). Spectrum trading. Available from {http://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib310771/spectrum_trading.pdf}.
[2]
Analysys, Dotecon, Hogan, & Hartson (2004). Study on conditions and options in introducing secondary trading of radio spectrum in the European Community. Final report for the European Commission. Cambridge: Author.
[3]
Baumol, W.J., & Robyn, D. (2006). Toward an evolutionary regime for spectrum governance: Licensing or unrestricted policy? Washington, D.C.: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
[4]
Bohlin, E., Blackman, C., Forge, S., & Renda, A. (2007). A common European spectrum policy: Barriers and prospects. Available from {http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/dv/itre_st_2007_spectrum_poli/itre_st_2007_spectrum policy.pdf}.
[5]
Management of the radio frequency spectrum: An economic analysis. Australian Govt. Pub. Service, Canberra.
[6]
Cave, M. (2002). Review of radio spectrum management: An independent review for the department of trade and industry and HM treasury. Available from {http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/ra/spectrum-review/index.htm}.
[7]
Anti-competitive behavior in spectrum markets: Analysis and response. Telecommunications Policy. v34 i5. 251-261.
[8]
Essentials of modern spectrum management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[9]
The unfinished history of usage rights for spectrum. Telecommunications Policy. v36 i4. 293-300.
[10]
The design of reform packages under uncertainty. American Economic Review. v85 i5. 1207-1223.
[11]
ERG & RSPG - European Regulators Group and Radio Spectrum Policy Group (2009). Report on transitional radio spectrum issues: Report on competition issues arising from the transition towards more flexible radio spectrum management for electronic communications networks and services. ERG(08)60rev1, RSPG09-277. Available from {http://rspg.groups.eu.int/_documents/documents/meeting/rspg19/rspg09_277_erg_rspg_report_on_transitional_spectrum_issues_090603.pdf}.
[12]
The question of spectrum: Technology, management, and regime change. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. v5 i1. 111-158.
[13]
FCC - Federal Communications Commission (2002). Spectrum Policy Task Force report. ET Docket 02-135. Available from {http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228542A1.pdf}.
[14]
Forge, S., Horvitz, R., & Blackman, C. (2012). Perspectives on the value of shared spectrum access. Available from {http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/radio_spectrum/_document_storage/studies/shared_use_2012/scf_study_shared_spectrum_access_20120210.pdf}.
[15]
A policy spectrum for spectrum economics. Information Economics and Policy. v21 i2. 128-144.
[16]
Allocative vs. technical spectrum efficiency. Telecommunications Policy. v35 i4. 291-300.
[17]
Liberalizing US spectrum allocation. Telecommunications Policy. v27 i7. 485-499.
[18]
Optimal abolition of FCC spectrum allocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. v22 i1. 103-128.
[19]
Property rights and wireless license values. Journal of Law and Economics. v51 i3. 563-598.
[20]
Property rights to radio spectrum in Guatemala and El Salvador: An experiment in liberalization. Review of Law and Economics. v3 i2. 437-484.
[21]
Spectrum allocation in Latin America: An economic analysis. Information Economics and Policy. v21 i4. 261-278.
[22]
Holland, O., De Nardis, L., Nolan, K., Medeisis, A., Anker, P., Minervini, L. F., Velez, F., Matinmikko, M., & Sydor, J. (2012). Pluralistic licensing. In IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks, pp. 33-41.
[23]
Liberating the radio spectrum in Guatemala. Telecommunications Policy. v27 i7. 543-554.
[24]
Coase and the New Zealand spectrum reforms. Journal of Law and Economics. S189-S205.
[25]
Kwerel, E., & Williams, J. (2002). A Proposal for a rapid transition to market allocation of spectrum. Available from {http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228552A1.pdf}.
[26]
Kwerel, E., & Williams, J. (2010). The spectrum regulator's dilemma in a dynamic world: Limiting interference without stifling innovation. Available from {http://siliconflatirons.com/documents/conferences/2010.11.12-862/KwerelWilliams.html}.
[27]
Lie, E. (2004). Radio spectrum management for a converging world. Available from {http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ni/spectrum/RSM-BG.pdf}.
[28]
London Economics (2008). Economic impacts of increased flexibility and liberalization in European spectrum management. Available from {http://www.londecon.co.uk/le/publications/pdf/Spectrum%20Management%20Report.pdf}.
[29]
McLean Foster & Co. (2007). Study of market-based exclusive spectrum rights. Available from {http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09398.html}.
[30]
How to reform a planned economy: Lessons from China. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. v8 i1. 130-143.
[31]
MED - Ministry of Economic Development (2005). Review of radio spectrum policy in New Zealand. Available from {http://www.rsm.govt.nz/cms/pdf-library/licensing/review-of-radio-spectrum-policy-in-new-zealand-report-735-kb-pdf}.
[32]
MED - Ministry of Economic Development (2009). Spectrum management in the radio licensing regime. Available from {http://www.rsm.govt.nz/cms/pdf-library/policy-and-planning/radio-spectrum/spectrum-management-in-the-radio-licensing-regime/discussion-document-spectrum-management-in-the-radio-licensing-regime}.
[33]
Evolutionary and radical approaches to economic reform. Economics of Planning. v25 i1. 79-95.
[34]
The transition according to Cambridge, Mass. Journal of Economic Literature. vXXXIII iMarch. 164-178.
[35]
Ofcom (2004). Spectrum framework review: A consultation on Ofcom's views as to how radio spectrum should be managed. Available from {http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/sfr/summary/sfr.pdf}.
[36]
Ofcom (2006). Spectrum usage rights. Available from {http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/sur/summary/spur.pdf}.
[37]
Ofcom (2007). Future pricing of spectrum used for terrestrial broadcasting. Available from {http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/futurepricing/statement/statement.pdf}.
[38]
Radiocommunications inquiry report. Ausinfo, Canberra.
[39]
A race to liberalization? Diffusion of economic policy reform among OECD economies. Public Choice. v132 i1. 159-178.
[40]
Regulation and competition: Nine regimes of radio spectrum management: A 4-step decision guide. Communications and Strategies. v65 i1. 167-183.
[41]
Transition and economics: Politics, markets, and firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[42]
RSPG - Radio Spectrum Policy Group (2004). Opinion on secondary trading of rights to use radio spectrum. RSPG04-54. Available from {http://rspg.groups.eu.int/_documents/documents/opinions/rspg04_54_op_sec_trading.pdf}.
[43]
RSPG - Radio Spectrum Policy Group (2005). Opinion on wireless access policy for electronic communications services (WAPECS): A more flexible spectrum management approach. RSPG05-102. Available from {http://rspg.groups.eu.int/_documents/documents/opinions/rspg05_102_op_wapecs.pdf}.
[44]
RSPG - Radio Spectrum Policy Group (2009). Opinion on best practices regarding the use of spectrum by some public sectors. RSPG09-258. Available from {http://rspg.groups.eu.int/_documents/documents/opinions/rspg09_258_rspgopinion_pus_final.pdf}.
[45]
RSPG - Radio Spectrum Policy Group (2010). Opinion on the radio spectrum policy program. RSPG10-330. Available from {http://rspg.groups.eu.int/_documents/documents/opinions/rspg10_330_rspp_opinion.pdf}.
[46]
RSPG - Radio Spectrum Policy Group (2011). Report on collective use of spectrum (CUS) and other spectrum sharing approaches. RSPG11-392. Available from {http://rspg.groups.eu.int/_documents/documents/meeting/rspg26/rspg11_392_report_CUS_other_approaches_final.pdf}.
[47]
Spectrum trading. Telecommunications Policy. v25 i10-11. 655-670.
[48]
An optimal way to license the radio spectrum. Telecommunications Policy. v33 i3-4. 230-237.
[49]
Wellenius, B., & Neto, I. (2007). Managing the radio spectrum: Framework for reform in developing countries. Available from {http://siteresources.worldbank.org/extinformationandcommunicationandtechnologies/Resources/Wellenius-Neto.pdf}.
[50]
Policy issues in spectrum trading. Info. v8 i2. 34-59.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evolved spectrum usage rightsTelecommunications Policy10.1016/j.telpol.2024.10271548:3Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2021)Sixth Generation (6G) Cognitive Radio Network (CRN) Application, Requirements, Security Issues, and Key ChallengesWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2021/13314282021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2017)Framework for evolving spectrum management regimesTelecommunications Policy10.1016/j.telpol.2017.04.00241:5(473-485)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017

Index Terms

  1. Spectrum management reform: Rethinking practices
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Publisher

    Pergamon Press, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2014

    Author Tags

    1. Deregulatory reforms
    2. Spectrum management
    3. Spectrum policy
    4. Transition economics

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Evolved spectrum usage rightsTelecommunications Policy10.1016/j.telpol.2024.10271548:3Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
    • (2021)Sixth Generation (6G) Cognitive Radio Network (CRN) Application, Requirements, Security Issues, and Key ChallengesWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2021/13314282021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2017)Framework for evolving spectrum management regimesTelecommunications Policy10.1016/j.telpol.2017.04.00241:5(473-485)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media