Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Framework for evolving spectrum management regimes

Published: 01 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

India has seen a marked change in spectrum policy over the past decade from a legacy administrative regime to a more market oriented one wherein it has adopted auctions in the primary market, trading in the secondary market and has liberalised spectrum to make it technology and service neutral. It has faced numerous challenges, constraints, and legacy issues in its transition, thus providing a rich context for analysis. Using the case study of India, we developed a framework that highlights the various dimensions to be considered while migrating from an administrative to a market regime for spectrum management. The framework also helps to assess the current orientation of a spectrum policy regime and provides a direction for adopting a higher market orientation. We used the framework in the Indian context to show that while India had adopted market mechanisms, it had a low level of market orientation. Case study on transition of Indian spectrum regime from command-and-control to market.New planning framework for migrating to market regimes.New implementation framework that helps assess current level of market orientation.Legacy issues faced in migrating to market regimes.

References

[1]
R. Akalu, A. Diaz Arias, Assessing the policy of spectrum trading in the UK, Info, 14 (2012) 36-54.
[2]
D. Bach, International cooperation and the logic of networks: Europe and the global system for mobile communications (GSM), Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy (2000). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7365v5g5
[3]
M. Bichler, J. Goeree, S. Mayer, P. Shabalin, Spectrum auction design: Simple auctions for complex sales, Telecommunications Policy, 38 (2014) 613-622.
[4]
E. Bohlin, C. Blackman, S. Forge, A. Renda, A Common European Spectrum policy: Barriers and prospects (2007). http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/89549
[5]
E. Bohlin, B. Preissel, A. Weber, P. Xavier, D. Ypsilanti, Policy issues in spectrum trading, Info, 8 (2006) 34-61.
[6]
M. Bykowsky, A secondary market for the trading of spectrum: Promoting market liquidity, Telecommunications Policy, 27 (2003) 533-541.
[7]
M. Cave, W. Webb, The unfinished history of usage rights for spectrum, Telecommunications Policy, 36 (2012) 293-300.
[8]
M. Cave, W. Webb, Spectrum management: using the airwaves for maximum social and economic benefit, Cambridge University Press, 2015. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zJqNCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=auctions+spectrum+cave&ots=52UHi_VY6x&sig=j2NxKXwIooH6She4We_ZVwk-RFc
[9]
M. Cave, N. Pratt, Taking account of service externalities when spectrum is allocated and assigned, Telecommunications Policy (2016).
[10]
Cave, M., Minervini, L.F., & Mfuh, W. (2008). Review of the Literature on Marketbased Methods of Spectrum Management: Report to the ITU. Retrieved from file:///Users/rishabhdara/Downloads/Case_Study_August08_CLEAN.pdf.
[11]
R.H. Coase, The Federal Communications Commission, Journal of Law and Economics, 2 (1959) 1-40.
[12]
Commission, P. (2003). Radiocommunications (Microeconomics No. 305005). EconWPA. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpmi/0305005.html.
[13]
P. Cramton, Spectrum auction design, Review of Industrial Organization, 42 (2013) 161-190.
[14]
P. Cramton, A. Ockenfels, The German 4G Spectrum Auction: Design and Behavior (2014). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8e13/d0e655f1f7556f2cd4d537af73414bf8a3f0.pdf
[15]
P. Crocioni, Is allowing trading enough? Making secondary markets in spectrum work, Telecommunications Policy, 33 (2009) 451-468.
[16]
S. Delaere, European policy trends towards flexible spectrum management, African Journal of Information and Communication, 8 (2007) 8-29.
[17]
M.C. Farquhar, A.Q. Fitzgerald, Legal and regulatory issues regarding spectrum rights trading, Telecommunications Policy, 27 (2003) 527-532.
[18]
S.P.T. Force, Spectrum policy task force report et docket, Federal Communications Commission, US, 2002.
[19]
B. Freyens, A policy spectrum for spectrum economics, Information Economics and Policy, 21 (2009) 128-144.
[20]
T. Hazlett, I. Giancarlo, L. Wayne, Property rights to radio spectrum in Guatemala and El Salvador: An experiment in Liberalization, Review of Law & Economics, 3 (2007) 437-484.
[21]
T.W. Hazlett, Optimal abolition of FCC spectrum allocation, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22 (2008) 103-128.
[22]
J.A. Holton, The coding process and its challenges, 2007.
[23]
D.L. Horowitz, Is there a third-world policy process?, Policy Sciences, 22 (1989) 197-212.
[24]
R. Jain, Changing role of regulation: Lessons from US spectrum auctions, Utilities Policy, 8 (1999) 61-73.
[25]
R. Jain, Challenges in adopting market mechanisms for spectrum: Lessons from India and the Philippines, Journal of Telecommunications Management, 3 (2010) 78-99.
[26]
R. Jain, The Indian broadband plan: A review and implications for theory, Telecommunications Policy, 38 (2014) 278-290.
[27]
Jain, R. (2016). May 17). Trais approach to valuing the digital dividend band. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from http://www.livemint.com/Industry/bPPKq6AkT8eVnf642nu3qI/Trais-approach-to-valuing-the-digital-dividend-band.html.
[28]
H. Jenkins-Smith, G.S. Clair, The politics of offshore energy: Empirically testing the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Change and Learning (1993) 149-175.
[29]
Kar, P. (2016). April 19). Pricing Rationale of 700 MHz band. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/pricing-rationale-700-mhz-band-parag-kar.
[30]
E.R. Kwerel, J. Williams, A proposal for a rapid transition to market allocation of spectrum, Federal Communications Commission, Office of Plans and Policy, 2002. http://msl1.mit.edu/classes/5cmi2/2005/lect_04/CMI_Spectrum_Policy_Readings_Lehr_2004_Lec4/Kwerel%20and%20Williams%20Spectrum%20Nov2002%20DOC-228552A1.pdf
[31]
C. Liu, K. Jayakar, The evolution of telecommunications policy-making: Comparative analysis of China and India, Telecommunications Policy, 36 (2012) 13-28.
[32]
L.F. Minervini, Spectrum management reform: Rethinking practices, Telecommunications Policy, 38 (2014) 136-146.
[33]
Pahl, J. (2006). Spectrum liberalisation and interference management. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/osg/spu/stn/spectrum/workshop_proceedings/Background_Papers_Final/Spectrum%20Liberalisation%20and%20Interference%20Management.pdf.
[34]
J.M. Peha, Emerging Technology and Spectrum Policy Reform (2007). http://repository.cmu.edu/epp/13/
[35]
J. Pelkmans, The GSM standard: Explaining a success story, Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (2001) 432-453.
[36]
R. Prasad, V. Sridhar, The dynamics of spectrum management: legacy, technology, and economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2014.
[37]
R. Prasad, R. Kathuria, The value of 1800MHz and 2100MHz spectrums in India and implications for auction design, Telecommunications Policy, 38 (2014) 223-235.
[38]
N. Pratt, J. Bellis, Spectrum liberalisation: The benefits of re-farming spectrum, The Vodafone Policy Paper Series (2006) 29-32.
[39]
Ramsdale, P. (2005). Trading and liberalisation of spectrum. In Broadcasting Spectrum: The Issues, 2005. The IEE Seminar on (Ref. No. 2005/11049) (p. 12).
[40]
RSPG (2010). Radio spectrum policy group report on "cognitive technologies. Retrieved from http://rspg-spectrum.eu/_documents/documents/meeting/rspg21/rspg10_306_cognitivetechnologies_report_0421.pdf.
[41]
P.T. Spiller, C. Cardilli, Towards a property rights approach to communications spectrum, Yale Journal on Regulation, 16 (1999) 53.
[42]
V. Sridhar, R. Prasad, Towards a new policy framework for spectrum management in India, Telecommunications Policy, 35 (2011) 172-184.
[43]
S. Sukhtankar, The impact of corruption on consumer markets: Evidence from the allocation of second-generation wireless spectrum in India, The Journal of Law & Economics, 58 (2015) 75-109.
[44]
Sutherland, E. (2006). European Spectrum Management: Successes, Failures & Lessons (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1752484). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1752484.
[45]
G. Taylor, Spectrum policy in Canada, Wireless Communications, IEEE, 22 (2015) 8-9.
[46]
A.K. Thiruvengadam, P. Joshi, Judiciaries as crucial actors in Southern regulatory systems: A case study of Indian telecom regulation, Regulation & Governance, 6 (2012) 327-343.
[47]
TRAI (2012). Recommendations on Auction of Spectrum. Retrieved from http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/Recommendation/Documents/Finally%20final%20recommendations230412.pdf.
[48]
TRAI (2014). TRAI Recommendations on Valuation and Reserve Price of Spectrum: Licences Expiring in 2015-16. Retrieved from http://trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Recommendations-Final15102014_0.pdf.
[49]
TRAI (2016). TRAI Recommendations on Valuation and Reserve Price of Spectrum in 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, 2300 MHz and 2500 MHz Bands. Retrieved from http://trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Recc_27_1_2016.pdf.
[50]
T. Valletti, Spectrum property rights, Info-The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, 3 (2001) 375-380.
[51]
W. Webb, An optimal way to licence the radio spectrum, Telecommunications Policy, 33 (2009) 230-237.
[52]
B. Willis, The Advantages and Limitations of Single Case Study Analysis (2014). http://www.e-ir.info/2014/07/05/the-advantages-and-limitations-of-single-case-study-analysis/
[53]
R.K. Yin, Case study research: design and methods, SAGE Publications, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Network Investment as Drivers of Mobile Subscription – A Firm-level AnalysisInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10322-025:5(1811-1828)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Telecommunications Policy
Telecommunications Policy  Volume 41, Issue 5
June 2017
231 pages

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2017

Author Tags

  1. Command and control
  2. Market orientation
  3. Spectrum allocation
  4. Spectrum assignment
  5. Spectrum management
  6. Transition

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Network Investment as Drivers of Mobile Subscription – A Firm-level AnalysisInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10322-025:5(1811-1828)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media