Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1109/ISORC.2006.64guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Predictability of Earliest Deadline Zero Laxity Algorithm for Multiprocessor Real-Time Systems

Published: 24 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Validation methods for hard real-time jobs are usually performed based on the maximum execution time. The actual execution time of jobs are assumed to be known only when the jobs arrive or not known until they finish. A predictable algorithm must guarantee that it can generate a schedule for any set of jobs such that the finish time for the actual execution time is no later than the finish time for the maximum execution time. It is known that any job-level fixed priority algorithm (such as Earliest Deadline First) is predictable. However, job-level dynamic priority algorithms (such as Least Laxity First) may or may not. In this paper, we investigate the predictability of a job-level dynamic priority algorithm EDZL (Earliest Deadline Zero Laxity). We show that EDZL is predictable on the domain of integers regardless of the knowledge of the actual execution times. Based on this result, furthermore, we also show that EDZL can successfully schedule any periodic task set if the total utilization is not greater than (m + 1)/2, where m is the number of processors.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
ISORC '06: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing
April 2006
570 pages
ISBN:076952561X

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 24 April 2006

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)FPSL, FPCL and FPZL schedulability analysisReal-Time Systems10.1007/s11241-012-9149-x48:6(750-788)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012
  • (2011)A survey of hard real-time scheduling for multiprocessor systemsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/1978802.197881443:4(1-44)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2011
  • (2010)Generalized tardiness bounds for global multiprocessor schedulingReal-Time Systems10.1007/s11241-009-9089-244:1-3(26-71)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010
  • (2008)Portioned EDF-based scheduling on multiprocessorsProceedings of the 8th ACM international conference on Embedded software10.1145/1450058.1450078(139-148)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2008
  • (2008)EDZL scheduling analysisReal-Time Systems10.1007/s11241-008-9061-640:3(264-289)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008
  • (2007)Brute-force determination of multiprocessor schedulability for sets of sporadic hard-deadline tasksProceedings of the 11th international conference on Principles of distributed systems10.5555/1782394.1782399(62-75)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2007
  • (2007)Brute-Force Determination of Multiprocessor Schedulability for Sets of Sporadic Hard-Deadline TasksPrinciples of Distributed Systems10.1007/978-3-540-77096-1_5(62-75)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2007
  • (2006)Predictability of least laxity first scheduling algorithm on multiprocessor real-time systemsProceedings of the 2006 international conference on Emerging Directions in Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/11807964_76(755-764)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media