Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Experimental Verification and Analysis of the Acceleration Factor Model for 3-D nand Flash Memory

Published: 01 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

With the increasing density of flash memory, its service life is declining. As the most important technical index of a flash device, flash retention parameters often need to consume a substantial amount of time to be tested. With a view toward reducing the test period, the most popular method currently is to speedup the retention loss of flash memory at high temperatures. However, since the retention loss of flash memory is the result of a mixture of multiple failure mechanisms, the Arrhenius model with a single apparent activation energy (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E_{aa}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) has significant limitations in calculating the high-temperature acceleration factor for the retention loss of flash memory. In this article, based on a large number of real experiments, we have studied the retention characteristics of the flash memory in high-temperature environments and closely tracked the change of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E_{aa}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> at different temperatures, retention time, and program/erase (P/E) cycle count. The experimental results show that the equivalent acceleration factor (AF) grows rapidly with retention time at the beginning of flash retention and that flash with a high P/E cycle count has a faster AF growth rate.

References

[1]
Y. S. Kimet al., “New scaling limitation of the floating gate cell in NAND flash memory,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Rel. Phys. Symp., Anaheim, CA, USA, 2010, pp. 599–603.
[2]
R. Bez, E. Camerlenghi, A. Modelli, and A. Visconti, “Introduction to flash memory,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 489–502, Apr. 2003.
[3]
B. Schroeder, A. Merchant, and R. Lagisetty, “Reliability of NAND-based SSDs: What field studies tell us,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1751–1769, Sep. 2017.
[4]
H. Kim, S.-J. Ahn, Y. G. Shin, K. Lee, and E. Jung, “Evolution of NAND flash memory: From 2D to 3D as a storage market leader,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Memory Workshop (IMW), Monterey, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 1–4.
[5]
Y. Cai, S. Ghose, Y. Luo, K. Mai, O. Mutlu, and E. F. Haratsch, “Vulnerabilities in MLC NAND flash memory programming: Experimental analysis, exploits, and mitigation techniques,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. High Perform. Comput. Archit. (HPCA), Austin, TX, USA, 2017, pp. 49–60.
[6]
Y. Cai, Y. Luo, S. Ghose, and O. Mutlu, “Read disturb errors in MLC NAND flash memory: Characterization, mitigation, and recovery,” in Proc. 45th Annu. IEEE/IFIP Int. Conf. Depend. Syst. Netw., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2015, pp. 438–449.
[7]
Y. Di, L. Shi, C. Gao, Q. Li, C. J. Xue, and K. Wu, “Minimizing retention induced refresh through exploiting process variation of flash memory,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 83–98, Jan. 2019.
[8]
Z. Xiaet al., “Comprehensive modeling of NAND flash memory reliability: Endurance and data retention,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. (IRPS), Anaheim, CA, USA, 2012, pp. 1–4.
[9]
D. Wei, H. Feng, X. Chen, L. Qiao, and X. Peng, “Research on 3D TLC NAND flash reliability from the perspective of threshold voltage distribution,” Microelectron. Rel., vol. 114, Nov. 2020, Art. no.
[10]
D. Wei, L. Qiao, X. Chen, H. Feng, and X. Peng, “Prediction models of bit errors for NAND flash memory using 200 days of measured data,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 90, no. 6, 2019, Art. no.
[11]
K. Wang, G. Du, Z. Lun, and X. Liu, “Investigation of retention noise for 3-D TLC NAND flash memory,” IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc., vol. 7, pp. 150–157, 2019.
[12]
Solid-State Reliability Assessment and Qualification Methodologies, JEDEC Standard, Jan.2019.
[13]
Failure Mechanisms and Models for Semiconductor Devices, JEDEC Standard, Mar.2006.
[14]
Q. Li, M. Ye, T.-W. Kuo, and C. J. Xue, “How the common retention acceleration method of 3D NAND flash memory goes wrong?” in Proc. 13th ACM Workshop Hot Topics Storage File Syst., 2021, pp. 1–7.
[15]
S. Kim, K. Lee, C. Woo, Y. Hwang, and H. Shin, “Analysis of failure mechanisms during the long-term retention operation in 3-D NAND flash memories,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 5472–5478, Dec. 2020.
[16]
K. Leeet al., “Separation of corner component in TAT mechanism in retention characteristics of sub 20-nm NAND flash memory,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 51–53, Jan. 2014.
[17]
D. Wei, X. Li, L. Niu, L. Qiao, and X. Peng, “The influence of NAND flash self-recovery effect on retention error,” in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Instrum. Meas. Comput. Commun. Control (IMCCC), Harbin, China, 2018, pp. 1764–1769.
[18]
T. Nakamura, Y. Deguchi, and K. Takeuchi, “Adaptive artificial neural network-coupled LDPC ECC as universal solution for 3-D and 2-D, charge-trap and floating-gate NAND flash memories,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 745–754, Mar. 2019.
[19]
X. Jiaet al., “Impact of cycling induced intercell trapped charge on retention charge loss in 3-D NAND flash memory,” IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc., vol. 8, pp. 62–66, 2020.
[20]
C. Zambelli, R. Micheloni, S. Scommegna, and P. Olivo, “First evidence of temporary read errors in TLC 3D-NAND flash memories exiting from an idle state,” IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc., vol. 8, pp. 99–104, 2020.
[21]
Y. Cai, S. Ghose, E. F. Haratsch, Y. Luo, and O. Mutlu, “Error characterization, mitigation, and recovery in flash-memory-based solid-state drives,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1666–1704, Sep. 2017.
[22]
M. Kang, J.-S. Yang, and I.-J. Chang, “Studying trapped tunneling-electron migration due to program and erase cycles in NAND flash,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 284–286, Mar. 2016.
[23]
Y. Kong, M. Zhang, X. Zhan, R. Cao, and J. Chen, “Retention correlated read disturb errors in 3-D charge trap NAND flash memory: Observations, analysis, and solutions,” IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 4042–4051, Nov. 2020.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Edge Word-Line Reliability Problem in 3-D NAND Flash Memory: Observations, Analysis, and SolutionsIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems10.1109/TVLSI.2023.324918331:6(861-873)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023

Index Terms

  1. Experimental Verification and Analysis of the Acceleration Factor Model for 3-D nand Flash Memory
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              Publisher

              IEEE Press

              Publication History

              Published: 01 October 2022

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
              Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              Cited By

              View all
              • (2023)Edge Word-Line Reliability Problem in 3-D NAND Flash Memory: Observations, Analysis, and SolutionsIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems10.1109/TVLSI.2023.324918331:6(861-873)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023

              View Options

              View options

              Get Access

              Login options

              Media

              Figures

              Other

              Tables

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media