Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Poemage: Visualizing the Sonic Topology of a Poem

Published: 31 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The digital humanities have experienced tremendous growth within the last decade, mostly in the context of developing computational tools that support what is called distant reading - collecting and analyzing huge amounts of textual data for synoptic evaluation. On the other end of the spectrum is a practice at the heart of the traditional humanities, close reading - the careful, in-depth analysis of a single text in order to extract, engage, and even generate as much productive meaning as possible. The true value of computation to close reading is still very much an open question. During a two-year design study, we explored this question with several poetry scholars, focusing on an investigation of sound and linguistic devices in poetry. The contributions of our design study include a problem characterization and data abstraction of the use of sound in poetry as well as Poemage, a visualization tool for interactively exploring the sonic topology of a poem. The design of Poemage is grounded in the evaluation of a series of technology probes we deployed to our poetry collaborators, and we validate the final design with several case studies that illustrate the disruptive impact technology can have on poetry scholarship. Finally, we also contribute a reflection on the challenges we faced conducting visualization research in literary studies.

References

[1]
gicentre utilities. [Online]. Available: http://www.gicentre.net/utils/.
[2]
A. Abdul-Rahman, J. Lein, K. Coles, E. Maguire, M. Meyer, M. Wynne, C. R. Johnson, A. Trefethen, and M. Chen. Rule-based visual mappings-with a case study on poetry visualization. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 32, pages 381–390. Wiley Online Library, 2013.
[3]
B. Alper, N. H. Riche, G. Ramos, and M. Czerwinski. Design study of linesets, a novel set visualization technique. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2259–2267, 2011.
[4]
M. Bastian, S. Heymann, M. Jacomy, et al. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM, 8:: 361–362, 2009.
[5]
A. S. Bessa. Sound as subject: Augusto de campos's poetamenos. In M. Perloff and C. Dworkin, Eds., editors, The Sound of Poetry/The Poetry of Sound, pages 237–248. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[6]
R. Buchanan. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2)pp. 5–21, 1992.
[7]
H. Byelas and A. Telea. Visualizing metrics on areas of interest in software architecture diagrams. In Visualization Symposium, 2009. PacificVis' 09. IEEE Pacific, pages 33–40. IEEE, 2009.
[8]
M. Chaturvedi, G. Gannod, L. Mandell, H. Armstrong, and E. Hodgson. Myopia: A visualization tool in support of close reading. Digital Humanities, 2, 2012.
[9]
T. Clement. Distant listening or playing visualizations pleasantly with the eyes and ears. Digital Studies/Le champ numérique, 3 (2), 2012.
[10]
T. Clement, D. Tcheng, L. Auvil, B. Capitanu, and M. Monroe. Sounding for meaning: using theories of knowledge representation to analyze aural patterns in texts. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7, 2013.
[11]
K. Coles. Slippage, Slippage, spillage, pillage, bliss: Close reading, uncertainty, and machines. Wester Humanities Review, pages 39–65, Fall 2014.
[12]
K. Coles and J. Lein. Turbulence and temporality: (re)visualizing poetic time. things my computer taught me about poems. In MLA2014. Chicago, IL. Jan. 2014.
[13]
C. Collins. Docuburst: Document content visualization using language structure. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, Poster Compendium, 2006.
[14]
C. Collins, G. Penn, and S. Carpendale. Bubble sets: Revealing set relations with isocontours over existing visualizations. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6):1009–1016, 2009.
[15]
C. Collins, F. B. Viegas, and M. Wattenberg. Parallel tag clouds to explore and analyze faceted text corpora. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2009. VAST 2009. IEEE Symposium on, pages 91–98. IEEE, 2009.
[16]
M. Correll, M. Witmore, and M. Gleicher. Exploring collections of tagged text for literary scholarship. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 30, pages 731–740. Wiley Online Library, 2011.
[17]
W. Cui, H. Zhou, H. Qu, P. C. Wong, and X. Li. Geometry-based edge clustering for graph visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 14(6):1277–1284, 2008.
[18]
P. DeCamp, A. Frid-Jimenez, J. Guiness, and D. Roy. Gist icons: Seeing meaning in large bodies of literature. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005.
[19]
K. Dinkla, M. J. van Kreveld, B. Speckmann, and M. A. Westenberg. Kelp diagrams: Point set membership visualization. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 31, pages 875–884. Wiley Online Library, 2012.
[20]
A. Don, E. Zheleva, M. Gregory, S. Tarkan, L. Auvil, T. Clement, B. Shneiderman, and C. Plaisant. Discovering interesting usage patterns in text collections: integrating text mining with visualization. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, pages 213–222. ACM, 2007.
[21]
J. Drucker. Not sound. In M. Perloff and C. Dworkin, Eds., editors, The Sound of Poetry/The Poetry of Sound, pages 237–248. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[22]
J. Drucker. Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1):1–21, 2011.
[23]
J. EIIson, E. Gansner, E. Koutsofios, S. North, and G. Woodhull. Graphviz. URL: [Online]. Available: http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz. 1998.
[24]
O. Ersoy, C. Hurter, F. V. Paulovich, G. Cantareiro, and A. Telea. Skeleton-based edge bundling for graph visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2364–2373, 2011.
[25]
J.-D. Fekete and N. Dufournaud. Compus: visualization and analysis of structured documents for understanding social life in the 16th century. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, pages 47–55. ACM, 2000.
[26]
S. Fish. Mind your ps and bs: the digital humanities and interpretation. New York Times, 23 (1), 2012.
[27]
B. Fry and C. Reas. Processing. org. Processing. org, 2010.
[28]
N. K. Hayles. Translating media: Why we should rethink textuality. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 16(2):263–290, 2003.
[29]
N. K. Hayles. Print is flat, code is deep: The importance of media-specific analysis. Poetics Today, 25(1):67–90, 2004.
[30]
J. Heer and D. Boyd. Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005. IEEE Symposium on, pages 32–39. IEEE, 2005.
[31]
P. Hertz. Synesthetic art-an imaginary number? Leonardo, 32(5):399–404, 1999.
[32]
H. Hutchinson, W. Mackay, B. Westerlund, B. B. Bederson, A. Druin, C. Plaisant, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, S. Conversy, H. Evans, H. Hansen, et al. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 17–24. ACM, 2003.
[33]
E. Irizarry. Tampering with the text to increase awareness of poetry's art.(theory and practice with a hispanic perspective). Literary and linguistic computing, 11(4):155–162, 1996.
[34]
H. Lam, E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. Seven guiding scenarios for information visualization evaluation. 2011.
[35]
A. Lambert, R. Bourqui, and D. Auber. Winding roads: Routing edges into bundles. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 29, pages 853–862. Wiley Online Library, 2010.
[36]
J. Lein. Sounding the surfaces: Computers, context, and poetic consequence. Wester Humanities Review, pages 84–109, Fall 2014.
[37]
E. Lieberman, J.-B. Michel, J. Jackson, T. Tang, and M. A. Nowak. Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature, 449(7163):713–716, 2007.
[38]
D. Lopes. A philosophy of computer art. Routledge, 2009.
[39]
S.-J. Luo, C.-L. Liu, B.-Y. Chen, and K.-L. Ma. Ambiguity-free edge-bundling for interactive graph visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(5):810–821, 2012.
[40]
N. McCurdy, V. Srikumar, and M. Meyer. Rhymedesign: A tool for analyzing sonic devices in poetry. In Proceedings of Computational Linguistics for Literature, 2015.
[41]
J. McGann and L. Samuels. Deformance and interpretation. New Literary History, 30(1):25–56, 1999.
[42]
W. Meulemans, N. H. Riche, B. Speckmann, B. Alper, and T. Dwyer. Kelpfusion: A hybrid set visualization technique. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(11) pp. 1846–1858, 2013.
[43]
A. Muralidharan and M. A. Hearst. Supporting exploratory text analysis in literature study. Literary and linguistic computing, 28(2):283–295, 2013.
[44]
M. Nöllenburg. An improved algorithm for the metro-line crossing minimization problem. In Graph Drawing, pages 381–392. Springer, 2010.
[45]
W. B. Paley. Textarc: Showing word frequency and distribution in text. In Poster presented at IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, volume 2002, 2002.
[46]
S. Pupyrev, L. Nachmanson, S. Bereg, and A. E. Holroyd. Edge routing with ordered bundles. In Graph Drawing, pages 136–147. Springer, 2012.
[47]
S. Ramsay. The hermeneutics of screwing around; or what you do with a million books. Stephen Ramsay, 17: 103, 2010.
[48]
S. Ramsay. Reading machines: Toward an algorithmic criticism. University of Illinois Press, 2011.
[49]
H. W. Rittel and M. M. Webber. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2):155–169, 1973.
[50]
M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(12):2431–2440, 2012.
[51]
B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization, pages 1–7. ACM, 2006.
[52]
J. Stasko, C. Görg, and Z. Liu. Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information visualization, 7(2) 118–132, 2008.
[53]
M. Suri. Don't expect math to make sense. The New York Times.
[54]
F. Van Ham, M. Wattenberg, and F. B. Viégas. Mapping text with phrase nets. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6) pp. 1169–1176, 2009.
[55]
F. B. Viegas, M. Wattenberg, and J. Feinberg. Participatory visualization with wordle. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6):1137–1144, 2009.
[56]
M. Wattenberg. Arc diagrams: Visualizing structure in strings. In Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002. IEEE Symposium on, pages 110–116. IEEE, 2002.
[57]
M. Wattenberg and F. B. Viégas. The word tree, an interactive visual concordance. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 14(6):1221–1228, 2008.
[58]
J. A. Wise, J. J. Thomas, K. Pennock, D. Lantrip, M. Pottier, A. Schur, and V. Crow. Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents. In Information Visualization, 1995. Proceedings., pages 51–58. IEEE, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive VisualizationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641895(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Clover Connections: Visualising Character Dynamics in Novels for Non-ExpertsProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638384(191-201)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Portrayal: Leveraging NLP and Visualization for Analyzing Fictional CharactersProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596000(74-94)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Poemage: Visualizing the Sonic Topology of a Poem
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      Publisher

      IEEE Educational Activities Department

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 31 January 2016

      Author Tags

      1. graph/network data
      2. Visualization in the humanities
      3. design studies
      4. text and document data

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive VisualizationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641895(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2023)Clover Connections: Visualising Character Dynamics in Novels for Non-ExpertsProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638384(191-201)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Portrayal: Leveraging NLP and Visualization for Analyzing Fictional CharactersProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596000(74-94)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Soliloquy: Fostering Poetry Comprehension Using an Interactive Think-aloud VisualizationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581374(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Working with Forensic Practitioners to Understand the Opportunities and Challenges for Mixed-Reality Digital AutopsyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580768(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2022)DramatVis Personae: Visual Text Analytics for Identifying Social Biases in Creative WritingProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533526(1260-1276)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
      • (2022)Implicit Error, Uncertainty and Confidence in Visualization: An Archaeological Case StudyIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2021.308833928:12(4389-4402)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media