research-article

Towards Enhancing Virtual Museums by Contextualizing Art through Interactive Visualizations

Authors:

Christofer Meinecke,

Stefan JänickeAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, Volume 15, Issue 4

Article No.: 62, Pages 1 - 26

https://doi.org/10.1145/3527619

Published: 06 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, public spaces such as museums and art galleries are experiencing increased demands to offer virtual online access. While current solutions seek to replace or augment a real visit, online tours often suffer from being too passive and lack in-depth interactivity to keep virtual visitors meaningfully engaged with an exhibition. Museums and art galleries seeking to broaden and engage their audience more deeply should offer intriguing experiences that invite the visitor to explore, to be entertained, and to learn by interacting with the content. We propose a novel virtual museum experience that utilizes multiple visualizations to contextualize a gallery’s digitized artworks with related artworks from large image archives. We make use of the WikiArt dataset that includes more than 200,000 images and offers diverse metadata used for comparative visual exploration. In addition, we apply machine learning methods to extract multifaceted information about the objects detected in the images and to compute similarities across them. Visitors of our virtual museum can interactively explore the artworks using different search filters such as artist, style, or object classes detected within an image. The results are displayed through interactive visualizations offering different perspectives on artwork collections, leading to serendipitous discoveries and stimulating new insights. The utility of our concept was confirmed by an informal evaluation with virtual museum visitors.

References

[1]

James Andrews and Werner Schweibenz. 1998. New media for old masters: The Kress study collection virtual museum project. Art Document: J. Art Librar. Societ. North Amer. 17, 1 (1998), 19–27.

[2]

Taylor Arnold and Lauren Tilton. 2019. Distant viewing: Analyzing large visual corpora. Digit. Scholar. Human. 34, Supplement_1 (2019), i3–i16.

[3]

Benjamin B. Bederson. 2001. PhotoMesa: A zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 71–80.

Digital Library

[4]

Mafkereseb Kassahun Bekele, Roberto Pierdicca, Emanuele Frontoni, Eva Savina Malinverni, and James Gain. 2018. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 11, 2 (2018), 1–36.

Digital Library

[5]

Bernadette Biedermann. 2021. Virtual museums as an extended museum experience: Challenges and impacts for museology, digital humanities, museums and visitors–in times of (Coronavirus) crisis. Digit. Human. Quart. 15, 3 (2021).

[6]

Mark-Jan Bludau, M. Dörk, and F. Heidmann. 2019. Relational perspectives as situated visualizations of art collections. In Proceedings of the ADHO Conference on Digital Humanities (DH). 9–12.

[7]

Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D \(^3\) data-driven documents. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 17, 12 (2011), 2301–2309.

Digital Library

[8]

Markus M. Breunig, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Raymond T. Ng, and Jörg Sander. 2000. LOF: Identifying density-based local outliers. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 93–104.

Digital Library

[9]

Paolo Brivio, Marco Tarini, and Paolo Cignoni. 2010. Browsing large image datasets through Voronoi diagrams. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 16, 6 (2010), 1261–1270.

Digital Library

[10]

Daniel Alejandro Loaiza Carvajal, María Mercedes Morita, and Gabriel Mario Bilmes. 2020. Virtual museums. Captured reality and 3D modeling. J. Cult. Herit. 45 (2020), 234–239.

[11]

Richard J. Cole, Frithjof Dau, Jon Ducrou, Peter W. Eklund, and Tim Wray. 2019. Navigating context, pathways and relationships in museum collections using formal concept analysis. Int. J. Digit. Art Hist.4 (2019), 5–13.

[12]

Lhaylla Crissaff, Louisa Wood Ruby, Samantha Deutch, R. Luke DuBois, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Juliana Freire, and Claudio Silva. 2017. ARIES: Enabling visual exploration and organization of art image collections. IEEE Comput. Graph. Applic. 38, 1 (2017), 91–108.

[13]

Damon Crockett. 2016. Direct visualization techniques for the analysis of image data: The slice histogram and the growing entourage plot. Int. J. Digit. Art Hist.2 (2016).

[14]

Elliot J. Crowley, Omkar M. Parkhi, and Andrew Zisserman. 2015. Face painting: Querying art with photos. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (2015). BMVA Press.

[15]

Elliot J. Crowley and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. In search of art. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 54–70.

[16]

Elliot J. Crowley and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. The state of the art: Object retrieval in paintings using discriminative regions. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (2014). BMVA Press.

[17]

J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]

Jos Dirksen. 2013. Learning Three. Js: The JavaScript 3D Library for WebGL. Packt Publishing Ltd.

[19]

Marian Dörk, Christopher Pietsch, and Gabriel Credico. 2017. One view is not enough: High-level visualizations of a large cultural collection. Inf. Des. J. 23, 1 (2017), 39–47.

[20]

Johanna Drucker. 2013. Is there a “digital” art history? Vis. Resour. 29, 1-2 (2013), 5–13.

[21]

Bruno Dumas, Bram Moerman, Sandra Trullemans, and Beat Signer. 2014. ArtVis: Combining advanced visualisation and tangible interaction for the exploration, analysis and browsing of digital artwork collections. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. 65–72.

[22]

Timothy A. M. Ewin and Joanne V. Ewin. 2016. In defence of the curator: Maximising museum impact. Museum Manag. Curator. 31, 4 (2016), 322–330.

[23]

Marco Fiorucci, Marina Khoroshiltseva, Massimiliano Pontil, Arianna Traviglia, Alessio Del Bue, and Stuart James. 2020. Machine learning for cultural heritage: A survey. Pattern Recog. Lett. 133 (2020), 102–108. DOI:

[24]

Paul Fraisse. 1963. The psychology of time. Harper & Row.

[25]

Paul Fraisse. 1984. Perception and estimation of time. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 35, 1 (1984), 1–37.

[26]

Noa Garcia, Benjamin Renoust, and Yuta Nakashima. 2019. Context-aware embeddings for automatic art analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. 25–33.

Digital Library

[27]

Noa Garcia and George Vogiatzis. 2018. How to read paintings: Semantic art understanding with multi-modal retrieval. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops.

[28]

Ivan Giangreco, Loris Sauter, Mahnaz Amiri Parian, Ralph Gasser, Silvan Heller, Luca Rossetto, and Heiko Schuldt. 2019. VIRTUE: A virtual reality museum experience. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 119–120.

[29]

Katrin Glinka, Christopher Pietsch, and Marian Doerk. 2017. Past visions and reconciling views: Visualizing time, texture and themes in cultural collections. Digit. Human. Quart. 11, 2 (2017).

[30]

Doron Goldfarb, Max Arends, Josef Froschauer, and Dieter Merkl. 2011. Revisiting 3D information landscapes for the display of art historical web content. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. 1–8.

Digital Library

[31]

Nicolas Gonthier, Yann Gousseau, Said Ladjal, and Olivier Bonfait. 2018. Weakly supervised object detection in artworks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).

[32]

Flavio Gortana, Franziska von Tenspolde, Daniela Guhlmann, and Marian Dörk. 2018. Off the grid: Visualizing a numismatic collection as dynamic piles and streams. Open Lib. Human. 4, 2 (2018).

[33]

Peter Hall, Hongping Cai, Qi Wu, and Tadeo Corradi. 2015. Cross-depiction problem: Recognition and synthesis of photographs and artwork. Computat. Vis. Media 1, 2 (2015), 91–103.

[34]

Masaki Hayashi, Steven Bachelder, and Masayuki Nakajima. 2016. Automatic generation of personal virtual museum. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). IEEE, 219–222.

[35]

Jeffrey Heer and Michael Bostock. 2010. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using Mechanical Turk to assess visualization design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 203–212.

Digital Library

[36]

Nadav Hochman and Lev Manovich. 2013. Zooming into an Instagram city: Reading the local through social media. First Mond. 18, 7 (2013).

[37]

Stefka Hristova. 2016. Images as data: Cultural analytics and Aby Warburg’s Mnemosyne. Int. J. Digit. Art Hist.2 (2016).

[38]

Chun-Rong Huang, Chu-Song Chen, and Pau-Choo Chung. 2005. Tangible photorealistic virtual museum. IEEE Comput. Graph. Applic. 25, 1 (2005), 15–17.

Digital Library

[39]

Stefan Jänicke. 2018. Timages: Enhancing time graphs with iconographic information. In Proceedings of the Leipzig Symposium on Visualization in Applications.

[40]

Stefan Jänicke, Josef Focht, and Gerik Scheuermann. 2015. Interactive visual profiling of musicians. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 22, 1 (2015), 200–209.

Digital Library

[41]

Ali Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein und Eshraghi. 2019. Digital natives vs digital immigrants. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 32, 6 (2019).

[42]

Jeff Johnson, Matthijs Douze, and Hervé Jégou. 2019. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Trans. Big Data 7, 3 (2019).

[43]

Pauline Junginger, Dennis Ostendorf, Barbara Avila Vissirini, Anastasia Voloshina, Timo Hausmann, Sarah Kreiseler, and Marian Dörk. 2020. The close-up cloud. Int. J. Digit. Art Hist.5 (2020), 6–2.

[44]

Katerina Kabassi. 2017. Evaluating websites of museums: State of the art. J. Cult. Herit. 24 (2017), 184–196.

[45]

Chairi Kiourt, Anestis Koutsoudis, and George Pavlidis. 2016. DynaMus: A fully dynamic 3D virtual museum framework. J. Cult. Herit. 22 (2016), 984–991.

[46]

Alina Kuznetsova, Hassan Rom, Neil Alldrin, Jasper Uijlings, Ivan Krasin, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Shahab Kamali, Stefan Popov, Matteo Malloci, Tom Duerig, et al. 2020. The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 128, 7 (2020), 1956–1981.

[47]

Sabine Lang and Björn Ommer. 2018. Attesting similarity: Supporting the organization and study of art image collections with computer vision. Digit. Scholar. Human. 33, 4 (2018), 845–856.

[48]

Fotis Liarokapis, Stella Sylaiou, Anirban Basu, Nicholaos Mourkoussis, Martin White, and Paul F. Lister. 2004. An interactive visualisation interface for virtual museums. In Proceedings of the VAST Conference. 47–56.

[49]

Céline Loscos, Franco Tecchia, Antonio Frisoli, Marcello Carrozzino, Hila Ritter Widenfeld, David Swapp, and Massimo Bergamasco. 2004. The museum of pure form: Touching real statues in an immersive virtual museum. In Proceedings of the VAST Conference. 271–279.

[50]

Jean-Luc Lugrin, Florian Kern, Ruben Schmidt, Constantin Kleinbeck, Daniel Roth, Christian Daxer, Tobias Feigl, Christopher Mutschler, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2018. A location-based VR museum. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games). IEEE, 1–2.

[51]

Joyce Ma, Kwan-Liu Ma, and Jennifer Frazier. 2019. Decoding a complex visualization in a science museum–an empirical study. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 26, 1 (2019), 472–481.

[52]

Eetu Mäkelä, Eero Hyvönen, and Tuukka Ruotsalo. 2012. How to deal with massively heterogeneous cultural heritage data–lessons learned in CultureSampo. Semant. Web 3, 1 (2012), 85–109.

Digital Library

[53]

André Malraux. 1954. Le Musée Imaginaire de la Sculpture Mondiale. Vol. 3. Gallimard.

[54]

Hui Mao, Ming Cheung, and James She. 2017. DeepArt: Learning joint representations of visual arts. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1183–1191.

Digital Library

[55]

Leland McInnes, John Healy, and Steve Astels. 2017. HDBSCAN: Hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw. 2, 11 (2017), 205.

[56]

L. McInnes, J. Healy, and J. Melville. 2018. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. ArXiv e-prints (Feb.2018). arxiv:stat.ML/1802.03426

[57]

Leland McInnes, John Healy, Nathaniel Saul, and Lukas Grossberger. 2018. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 29 (2018), 861.

[58]

Francisco J. Melero, Jorge Revelles, and Maria Luisa Bellido. 2018. Atalaya3D: Making universities’ cultural heritage accessible through 3D technologies. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. 31–35.

[59]

Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization Analysis and Design. CRC Press.

[60]

Matterport Inc. Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art. Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art - Matterport Model. Retrieved from https://my.matterport.com/show/?m=hPsqTjD3PNQ.

[61]

Hermann Pflüger and Thomas Ertl. 2016. Sifting through visual arts collections. Comput. Graph. 57 (2016), 127–138.

Digital Library

[62]

Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. 2015. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 91–99.

Digital Library

[63]

James Rice. 1988. Serendipity and holism: The beauty of OPACs. Libr. J. 113, 3 (1988), 138–41.

[64]

Corina Sas, Gregory O’Hare, and Ronan Reilly. 2004. A performance analysis of movement patterns. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science. Springer, 954–961.

[65]

Joseph Schlecht, Bernd Carqué, and Björn Ommer. 2011. Detecting gestures in medieval images. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, 1285–1288.

[66]

Werner Schweibenz. 2004. Virtual museums. Devel. Virt. Mus., ICOM News Mag. 3 (2004), 3.

[67]

Xi Shen, Alexei A. Efros, and Mathieu Aubry. 2019. Discovering visual patterns in art collections with spatially-consistent feature learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 9278–9287.

[68]

Google LLC Statens Museum for Kunst. SMK-Statens Museum for Kunst in Copenhagen, Google Arts and Culture Tours. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/maps/@55.6887473,12.5786094,2a,75y,91.15h,81.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWSukjJxQiuc0fX6hOdAzsg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656.

[69]

Gjorgji Strezoski, Lucas Fijen, Jonathan Mitnik, Dániel László, Pieter de Marez Oyens, Yoni Schirris, and Marcel Worring. 2020. TindART: A personal visual arts recommender. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 4524–4526.

Digital Library

[70]

Gjorgji Strezoski, Inske Groenen, Jurriaan Besenbruch, and Marcel Worring. 2018. ArtSight: An artistic data exploration engine. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1240–1241.

Digital Library

[71]

Gjorgji Strezoski, Arumoy Shome, Riccardo Bianchi, Shruti Rao, and Marcel Worring. 2019. ACE: Art, color and emotion. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1053–1055.

Digital Library

[72]

Gjorgji Strezoski and Marcel Worring. 2018. OmniArt: A large-scale artistic benchmark. ACM Trans. Multim Comput., Commun. Applic. 14, 4 (2018), 1–21.

Digital Library

[73]

Sylaiou Styliani, Liarokapis Fotis, Kotsakis Kostas, and Patias Petros. 2009. Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. J. Cult. Herit. 10, 4 (2009), 520–528.

[74]

Christian Szegedy, Sergey Ioffe, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Alexander A. Alemi. 2017. Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[75]

Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2012. The bohemian bookshelf: Supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1461–1470.

Digital Library

[76]

Martin Tröndle, Steven Greenwood, Konrad Bitterli, and Karen van den Berg. 2014. The effects of curatorial arrangements. Museum Manag. Curator. 29, 2 (2014), 140–173.

[77]

Michael Twidale. 1993. Redressing the balance: The advantages of informal evaluation techniques for intelligent learning environments. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 4 (1993), 155–155.

[78]

Ignacio Úbeda, Jose M. Saavedra, Stéphane Nicolas, Caroline Petitjean, and Laurent Heutte. 2020. Improving pattern spotting in historical documents using feature pyramid networks. Pattern Recog. Lett. 131 (2020), 398–404.

[79]

Maria Vayanou, Akrivi Katifori, Angeliki Chrysanthi, and Angeliki Antoniou. 2020. Cultural heritage and social experiences in the times of COVID 19. In Proceedings of the AVI \(^2\) CH@ AVI Conference.

[80]

Krzysztof Walczak, Wojciech Cellary, and Martin White. 2006. Virtual museum exbibitions. Computer 39, 3 (2006), 93–95.

Digital Library

[81]

Chaoli Wang, John P. Reese, Huan Zhang, Jun Tao, Yi Gu, Jun Ma, and Robert J. Nemiroff. 2015. Similarity-based visualization of large image collections. Inf. Visualiz. 14, 3 (2015), 183–203.

[82]

Martin Warnke and Lisa Dieckmann. 2016. Prometheus meets meta-image: Implementations of Aby Warburg’s methodical approach in the digital era. Vis. Stud. 31, 2 (2016), 109–120.

[83]

Nicholas Westlake, Hongping Cai, and Peter Hall. 2016. Detecting people in artwork with CNNs. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 825–841.

[84]

Melvin Wevers and Thomas Smits. 2020. The visual digital turn: Using neural networks to study historical images. Dig. Scholar. Human. 35, 1 (2020), 194–207.

[85]

Mitchell Whitelaw et al. 2015. Generous interfaces for digital cultural collections. Digit. Human. Quart. 9, 1 (2015).

[86]

Florian Windhager, Paolo Federico, Günther Schreder, Katrin Glinka, Marian Dörk, Silvia Miksch, and Eva Mayr. 2018. Visualization of cultural heritage collection data: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Visualiz. Comput. Graph. 25, 6 (2018), 2311–2330.

[87]

Andy T. Woods, Carlos Velasco, Carmel A. Levitan, Xiaoang Wan, and Charles Spence. 2015. Conducting perception research over the internet: A tutorial review. PeerJ 3 (2015), e1058.

[88]

So Yamaoka, Lev Manovich, Jeremy Douglass, and Falko Kuester. 2011. Cultural analytics in large-scale visualization environments. Computer 44, 12 (2011), 39–48.

Digital Library

[89]

Pradeep Yarlagadda, Antonio Monroy, Bernd Carque, and Björn Ommer. 2010. Recognition and analysis of objects in medieval images. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 296–305.

Cited By

Anastasovitis EGeorgiou GMatinopoulou ENikolopoulos SKompatsiaris IRoumeliotis M(2024)Enhanced Inclusion through Advanced Immersion in Cultural Heritage: A Holistic Framework in Virtual MuseologyElectronics10.3390/electronics1307139613:7(1396)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071396
TYMCHENKO TMYKOLAICHUK A(2024)THE ROLE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EXPERTISE AND POPULARIZATION OF EASEL PAINTINGSThe Ethnology Notebooks10.15407/nz2024.02.415176:2Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2024.02.415
Vasic IQuattrini RPierdicca RMancini AVasic B(2024)3VR: Vice Versa Virtual Reality Algorithm to Track and Map User ExperienceJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/365634617:3(1-19)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656346
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards Enhancing Virtual Museums by Contextualizing Art through Interactive Visualizations
1. Applied computing
  1. Arts and humanities
    1. Fine arts
  2. Computers in other domains
    1. Digital libraries and archives
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Computer vision
  2. Computer graphics

Recommendations

The expansion of art through cultural postproduction in online virtual museums
VRCAI '16: Proceedings of the Symposium on VR Culture and Heritage - Volume 2

Online virtual museums transform art exhibitions into sites of cultural postproduction. Audiences see photographic replicas of artworks instead of the original artworks, and together these images and originals extend the "aura" for the artworks, thereby ...
Museums, galleries, art sites, virtual curating and the world wide web
Virtual Museums: an Innovative Kind of Museum Survey
VRIC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Virtual Reality International Conference

Virtual Museums are seen as potentially real Museums produced on digital medium as new means of representing museal objects. Trials to classify a very rich, varied and exponentially growing production exist. They fall under the difficulty of which ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Volume 15, Issue 4

December 2022

483 pages

ISSN:1556-4673

EISSN:1556-4711

DOI:10.1145/3572828

Editor:
Franco Niccolucci
VAST-LAB at PIN, University of Florence, Italy

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 December 2022

Online AM: 25 July 2022

Accepted: 17 March 2022

Revised: 03 March 2022

Received: 23 August 2021

Published in JOCCH Volume 15, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
1,295
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)640
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)72

Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Anastasovitis EGeorgiou GMatinopoulou ENikolopoulos SKompatsiaris IRoumeliotis M(2024)Enhanced Inclusion through Advanced Immersion in Cultural Heritage: A Holistic Framework in Virtual MuseologyElectronics10.3390/electronics1307139613:7(1396)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071396
TYMCHENKO TMYKOLAICHUK A(2024)THE ROLE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EXPERTISE AND POPULARIZATION OF EASEL PAINTINGSThe Ethnology Notebooks10.15407/nz2024.02.415176:2Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2024.02.415
Vasic IQuattrini RPierdicca RMancini AVasic B(2024)3VR: Vice Versa Virtual Reality Algorithm to Track and Map User ExperienceJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/365634617:3(1-19)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656346
Kim HShakeri MShin JWoo W(2024)Space-adaptive Artwork Placement Based on Content Similarities for Curating Thematic Spaces in a Virtual MuseumJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/363113417:1(1-21)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631134
Meinecke CGuéville EWrisley DJänicke S(2024)Is medieval distant viewing possible? : Extending and enriching annotation of legacy image collections using visual analyticsDigital Scholarship in the Humanities10.1093/llc/fqae02039:2(638-656)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae020
Mantzou PBitsikas XFloros A(2023)Enriching Cultural Heritage through the Integration of Art and Digital TechnologiesSocial Sciences10.3390/socsci1211059412:11(594)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110594
Li JWider WOchiai YFauzi M(2023)A bibliometric analysis of immersive technology in museum exhibitions: exploring user experienceFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2023.12405624Online publication date: 12-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1240562
Ofianto OErniwati EFitrisia ANingsih TMulyani F(2023)Development of Online Local History Learning Media Based on Virtual Field Trips to Enhance the Use of Primary Source EvidenceEuropean Journal of Educational Research10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.775volume-12-2023:volume-12-issue-2-april-2023(775-793)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.775
YILDIZ NYAZICI AYYILDIZ ATAVUKÇUOĞLU T(2022)Müzelerde Dijitalleşme Sürecine İlişkin Sanal Müzelerin İncelenmesiExamination of Virtual Museums Related to the Digitalization Process in MuseumsTurist Rehberliği Dergisi (TURED)10.34090/tured.11847875:2(117-141)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.34090/tured.1184787
Meinecke C(2022)Labeling of Cultural Heritage Collections on the Intersection of Visual Analytics and Digital Humanities2022 IEEE 7th Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH)10.1109/VIS4DH57440.2022.00009(19-24)Online publication date: Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS4DH57440.2022.00009

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents