Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

The many faces of information technology interruptions: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of their performance effects

Published: 01 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Despite the growing importance of information technology IT interruptions for individual work, very little is known about their nature and consequences. This paper develops a taxonomy that classifies interruptions based on the relevance and structure of their content, and propositions that relate different interruption types to individual performance. A qualitative approach combining the use of log diaries of professional workers and semi-structured interviews with product development workers provide a preliminary validation of the taxonomy and propositions and allow for the discovery of a continuum of interruption events that fall in-between the extreme types in the taxonomy. The results show that some IT interruptions have positive effects on individual performance, whilst others have negative effects, or both. The taxonomy developed in the paper allows for a better understanding of the nature of different types of IT interruption and their consequences on individual work. By showing that different types of interruptions have different effects, the paper helps to explain and shed light on the inconsistent results of past research.

References

[1]
<author>Adamczyk, P.D.</author> &<author>Bailey, B.P.</author>2004 If not now, when? The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
[2]
<author>Addas, S.</author> &<author>Pinsonneault, A.</author>2013 Electronic messaging interruptions and individual performance: a tale of two interruption types, working paper.
[3]
<author>Ang, S.</author>, <author>Cummings, L.L.</author>, <author>Straub, D.W.</author> &<author>Earley, P.C.</author>1993 The effects of information technology and the perceived mood of the feedback giver on feedback seeking. Information Systems Research, Volume 4, pp.240-261.
[4]
<author>Bailey, B.P.</author> &<author>Konstan, J.A.</author>2006 On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 22, pp.685-708.
[5]
<author>Bailey, B.P.</author>, <author>Konstan, J.A.</author> &<author>Carlis, J.V.</author>2001 The effects of interruptions on task performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In: Proceedings of the 8th IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2001, Tokyo, Japan.
[6]
<author>Barley, S.R.</author>, <author>Meyerson, D.E.</author> &<author>Grodal, S.</author>2011 E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, Volume 22, pp.887-906.
[7]
<author>Baron, R.S.</author>1986 Distraction-conflict theory: progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 19, pp.1-40.
[8]
<author>Bellotti, V.</author>, <author>Ducheneaut, N.</author>, <author>Howard, M.</author>, <author>Smith, I.</author> &<author>Grinter, R.E.</author>2005 Quality versus quantity: e-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. Human-ComputerInteraction, Volume 20, pp.89-138.
[9]
<author>Brixey, J.M.</author>, <author>Walji, M.</author>, <author>Zhang, J.</author>, <author>Johnson, T.R.</author> &<author>Turley, J.P.</author>2004 Proposing a taxonomy and model of interruption. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in the Healthcare Industry Healthcom 2004, Odawara, Japan.
[10]
<author>Cameron, A.-F.</author> &<author>Webster, J.</author>2013 Multicommunicating: juggling multiple conversations in the workplace. Information Systems Research, Volume 24, pp.352-371.
[11]
<author>Campion, M.A.</author> &<author>Lord, R.G.</author>1982 A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, Volume 30, pp.265-287.
[12]
<author>Carton, A.M.</author> &<author>Aiello, J.R.</author>2009 Control and anticipation of social interruptions: reduced stress and improved task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Volume 39, pp.169-185.
[13]
<author>Cutrell, E.B.</author>, <author>Czerwinski, M.</author> &<author>Horvitz, E.</author>2000 Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Netherlands.
[14]
<author>Czerwinski, M.</author>, <author>Cutrell, E.</author> &<author>Horvitz, E.</author>2000 Instant messaging: effects of relevance and time. In: Proceedings of HCI, Sunderland, UK.
[15]
<author>Dabbish, L.A.</author> &<author>Kraut, R.E.</author>2004 Controlling interruptions: awareness displays and social motivation for coordination. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL.
[16]
<author>Dabbish, L.A.</author> &<author>Kraut, R.E.</author>2008 Research note - awareness displays and social motivation for coordinating communication. Information Systems Research, Volume 19, pp.221-238.
[17]
<author>Dabbish, L.A.</author>, <author>Kraut, R.E.</author>, <author>Fussell, S.</author> &<author>Kiesler, S.</author>2005 Understanding email use: predicting action on a message. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, OR.
[18]
<author>Dennis, A.R.</author>, <author>Fuller, R.M.</author> &<author>Valacich, J.S.</author>2008 Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, Volume 32, pp.575-600.
[19]
<author>Ducheneaut, N.</author> &<author>Bellotti, V.</author>2001 E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management. Interactions, Volume 8, pp.30-38.
[20]
<author>Earley, P.C.</author>1988 Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 41, pp.50-64.
[21]
<author>Earley, P.C.</author>, <author>Northcraft, G.B.</author>, <author>Lee, C.</author> &<author>Lituchy, T.R.</author>1990 Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Academy of Management Journal, Volume 33, pp.87-105.
[22]
<author>Easterbrook, J.A.</author>1959 The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, Volume 66, pp.183-201.
[23]
<author>France, D.J.</author>, <author>Levin, S.</author>, <author>Hemphill, R.</author>, <author>Chen, K.</author>, <author>Rickard, D.</author>, <author>Makowski, R.</author>, et al.2005 Emergency physicians' behaviors and workload in the presence of an electronic whiteboard. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 74, pp.827-837.
[24]
<author>Gievska, S.</author>, <author>Lindeman, R.</author> &<author>Sibert, J.</author>2005 Examining the qualitative gains of mediating human interruptions during HCI. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV.
[25]
<author>Goldkuhl, G.</author>2001 Communicative vs material actions: instrumentality, sociality and comprehensibility. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling LAP 2001, Montreal, Canada.
[26]
<author>Gupta, A.</author>, <author>Li, H.</author> &<author>Sharda, R.</author>2013a Should I send this message? Understanding the impact of interruptions, social hierarchy and perceived task complexity on user performance and perceived workload. Decision Support Systems, Volume 55, pp.135-145.
[27]
<author>Gupta, A.</author>, <author>Sharda, R.</author>, <author>Dong, Y.</author>, <author>Sharda, R.</author>, <author>Asamoah, D.</author> &<author>Pickering, B.</author>2013b Improving rounding in critical care environments through management of interruptions. Decision Support Systems, Volume 55, pp.516-527.
[28]
<author>Hemp, P.</author>2009 Death by information overload. Harvard Business Review, Volume 87, pp.82-82.
[29]
<author>Ho, J.</author> &<author>Intille, S.S.</author>2005 Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR.
[30]
<author>Ilgen, D.R.</author>, <author>Fisher, C.D.</author> &<author>Taylor, M.S.</author>1979 Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume 64, pp.349-349.
[31]
<author>Iqbal, S.T.</author> &<author>Horvitz, E.</author>2007 Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA.
[32]
<author>Jackson, T.</author>, <author>Dawson, R.</author> &<author>Wilson, D.</author>2003 Reducing the effect of email interruptions on employees. International Journal of Information Management, Volume 23, pp.55-65.
[33]
<author>Jett, Q.R.</author> &<author>George, J.M.</author>2003 Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, Volume 28, pp.494-507.
[34]
<author>Kahneman, D.</author>1973 Attention and Effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[35]
<author>Kapitsa, M.</author> &<author>Blinnikova, I.</author>2003 Task performance under the influence of interruptions. In: Operator Functional State: The Assessment and Prediction of Human Performance Degradation in Complex Tasks, pp. pp.323-329. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[36]
<author>Karr-Wisniewski, P.</author> &<author>Lu, Y.</author>2010 When more is too much: operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 26, pp.1061-1072.
[37]
<author>Kettinger, W.J.</author> &<author>Grover, V.</author>1997 The use of computer-mediated communication in an interorganizational context. Decision Sciences, Volume 28, pp.513-555.
[38]
<author>Kluger, A.N.</author> &<author>DeNisi, A.</author>1996 The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, Volume 119, pp.254-284.
[39]
<author>Langer, E.J.</author>1989 Mindfulness. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
[40]
<author>Latorella, K.A.</author>1999 Investigating interruptions: implications for flightdeck performance, Industrial Engineering Department, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York, NASA Center for AeroSpace Information CASI.
[41]
<author>Louis, M.R.</author> &<author>Sutton, R.I.</author>1991 Switching cognitive gears: from habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, Volume 44, pp.55-76.
[42]
<author>McCrickard, D.S.</author>, <author>Catrambone, R.</author>, <author>Chewar, C.M.</author> &<author>Stasko, J.T.</author>2003 Establishing tradeoffs that leverage attention for utility: empirically evaluating information display in notification systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 58, pp.547-582.
[43]
<author>McDaniel, M.A.</author>, <author>Einstein, G.O.</author>, <author>Graham, T.</author> &<author>Rall, E.</author>2004 Delaying execution of intentions: overcoming the costs of interruptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Volume 18, pp.533-547.
[44]
<author>McFarlane, D.C.</author>1997 Interruption of people in human-computer interaction: a general unifying definition of human interruption and taxonomy, In NRL Formal ReportNaval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.
[45]
<author>McFarlane, D.C.</author>2002 Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 17, pp.63-63.
[46]
<author>Middleton, C.A.</author>2007 Illusions of balance and control in an always-on environment: a case study of BlackBerry users. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, Volume 21, pp.165-178.
[47]
<author>Miller, S.L.</author>2002 Window of opportunity: using the interruption lag to manage disruption in complex tasks. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, MD.
[48]
<author>Monk, C.A.</author>, <author>Trafton, J.G.</author> &<author>Boehm-Davis, D.A.</author>2008 The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Volume 14, pp.299-313.
[49]
<author>O'Conaill, B.</author> &<author>Frohlich, D.</author>1995 Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO.
[50]
<author>Okhuysen, G.A.</author> &<author>Eisenhardt, K.M.</author>2002 Integrating knowledge in groups: how formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, Volume 13, pp.370-386.
[51]
<author>O'Leary, M.B.</author>, <author>Mortensen, M.</author> &<author>Woolley, A.W.</author>2011 Multiple team membership: a theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, Volume 36, pp.461-478.
[52]
<author>Oulasvirta, A.</author> &<author>Saariluoma, P.</author>2004 Long-term working memory and interrupting messages in human-computer interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, Volume 23, pp.53-64.
[53]
<author>Patton, M.Q.</author>2002 Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[54]
<author>Perlow, L.A.</author>1999 The time famine: toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 44, pp.57-81.
[55]
<author>Ratwani, R.M.</author>, <author>Andrews, A.E.</author>, <author>McCurry, M.</author>, <author>Trafton, J.G.</author> &<author>Peterson, M.S.</author>2007 Using peripheral processing and spatial memory to facilitate task resumption. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, MD.
[56]
<author>Robertson, T.J.</author>, <author>Prabhakararao, S.</author>, <author>Burnett, M.</author>, <author>Cook, C.</author>, <author>Ruthruff, J.R.</author>, <author>Beckwith, L.</author> &<author>Phalgune, A.</author>2004 Impact of interruption style on end-user debugging. In: Proceedings of the CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
[57]
<author>Rukab, J.A.</author>, <author>Johnson-Throop, K.A.</author>, <author>Malin, J.</author> &<author>Zhang, J.</author>2004 A framework of interruptions in distributed team environments. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Volume 107, pp.1282-1286.
[58]
<author>Sitzmann, T.</author>, <author>Ely, K.</author>, <author>Bell, B.S.</author> &<author>Bauer, K.N.</author>2010 The effects of technical difficulties on learning and attrition during online training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Volume 16, pp.281-292.
[59]
<author>Speier, C.</author>, <author>Valacich, J.S.</author> &<author>Vessey, I.</author>1997 The effects of task interruption and information presentation on individual decision making. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA.
[60]
<author>Speier, C.</author>, <author>Vessey, I.</author> &<author>Valacich, J.S.</author>2003 The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sciences, Volume 34, pp.771-797.
[61]
<author>Szalma, J.L.</author>, <author>Hancock, P.A.</author>, <author>Dember, W.N.</author> &<author>Warm, J.S.</author>2006 Training for vigilance: the effect of knowledge of results format and dispositional optimism and pessimism on performance and stress. British Journal of Psychology, Volume 97, pp.115-135.
[62]
<author>Weick, K.E.</author>1990 Technology as equivoque: sense-making in new technologies. In: Technology and Organizations, Goodman, P.S. &Sproull, L.S. eds., pp. pp.1-44. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[63]
<author>Wickens, C.D.</author>2002 Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Volume 3, pp.159-177.
[64]
<author>Woolley, A.W.</author>1998 Effects of intervention content and timing on group task performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Volume 34, pp.30-46.
[65]
<author>Yin, R.K.</author>2009 Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury, CA.
[66]
<author>Zellmer-Bruhn, M.E.</author>2003 Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition. Management Science, Volume 49, pp.514-528.
[67]
<author>Zijlstra, F.R.H.</author>, <author>Roe, R.A.</author>, <author>Leonora, A.B.</author> &<author>Krediet, I.</author>1999 Temporal factors in mental work: effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Volume 72, pp.163-185.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The many faces of information technology interruptions: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of their performance effects
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Information Systems Journal
    Information Systems Journal  Volume 25, Issue 3
    May 2015
    195 pages
    ISSN:1350-1917
    EISSN:1365-2575
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 May 2015

    Author Tags

    1. IT interruptions
    2. individual performance
    3. interviews
    4. log diaries
    5. taxonomy

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)The duality of ICT-mediated overloadInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2023.10386460:8Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
    • (2023)A Literature Review on Positive and Negative Effects of Interruptions and Implications for DesignHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42293-5_38(373-379)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Interruptions in the Workplace: An Exploratory Study Among Digital Business ProfessionalsHCI in Business, Government and Organizations10.1007/978-3-031-36049-7_29(400-422)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
    • (2022)Wait a second! Assessing the impact of different desktop push notification types on software developersProceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics10.1145/3552327.3552328(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2022
    • (2022)The digital workplace and its dark sideComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2021.107118128:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Monitoring Maritime Industry 4.0 Systems through VR EnvironmentsCHI Greece 2021: 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3489410.3489429(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Absorbed in technology but digitally overloadedInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2021.10353358:8Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
    • (2021)Technostress operationalised as information and communication technology (ICT) demands among managers and other occupational groups – Results from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH)Computers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2020.106486114:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2021)NotificationManager: Personal Boundary Management on Mobile DevicesHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_15(243-261)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2021
    • (2020)A symbolic interactionism perspective of using social media for personal and business communicationInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.00751:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media