article

Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review

Authors:

Jeffrey V. NickersonAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Volume 38, Issue 3

Pages 7 - es

https://doi.org/10.1145/1132960.1132961

Published: 30 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Laboratory-based courses play a critical role in scientific education. Automation is changing the nature of these laboratories, and there is a long-running debate about the value of hands-on versus simulated laboratories. In addition, the introduction of remote laboratories adds a third category to the debate. Through a review of the literature related to these labs in education, the authors draw several conclusions about the state of current research. The debate over different technologies is confounded by the use of different educational objectives as criteria for judging the laboratories: Hands-on advocates emphasize design skills, while remote lab advocates focus on conceptual understanding. We observe that the boundaries among the three labs are blurred in the sense that most laboratories are mediated by computers, and that the psychology of presence may be as important as technology. We also discuss areas for future research.

References

[1]

ABET. 2005. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved 10-25-05 from http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/05-06-EAC%20Criteria.pdf.

[2]

Aburdene, M. F., Mastascusa, E. J., and Massengale, R. 1991. A proposal for a remotely shared control systems laboratory. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education 21st Annual Conference. West Lafayette, IN. 589--592.

[3]

Agarwal, D. A., Sachs, S. R., and Johanston, W. E. 1998. The reality of collaboratories. Comput. Physt. Commun. 110, 134--141.

[4]

Albu, M. M., Holbert, K. E., Heydt, G. T., Grigorescu, S. D., and Trusca, V. 2004. Embedding remote experimentation in power engineering education. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19, 1, 139--143.

[5]

Amigud, Y., Archer, G., Smith, J., Szymanski, M., and Servatius, B. 2002. Assessing the quality of web-enabled laboratories in undergraduate education. In Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, MA. 12--16.

[6]

Arpaia, P., Baccigalupi, A., Cennamo, F., and Daponte, P. 1997. A remote measurement laboratory for educational experiments. Measurement 21, 4, 157--169.

[7]

Arpaia, P., Baccigalupi, A., Cennamo, F., and Daponte, P. 1998. A measurement laboratory on geographic network for remote test experiments. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology. 206--209.

[8]

Arpaia, P., Baccigalupi, A., Cennamo, F., and Daponte, P. 2000. A measurement laboratory on geographic network for remote test experiments. IEEE Trans. Instrumentation and Measurement 49, 5, 992--997.

Digital Library

[9]

ASEE. 1987. The national action agenda for engineering education: A summary. Eng. Education 78, 2, 95--99.

[10]

Barfield, W. and Weghorst, S. 1993. The sense of presence within virtual environments: A conceptual framework. In Human Computer Interaction: Software and Hardware Interfaces, G. Salvendy and M. Smith, Eds. Elsevier, 699--704.

[11]

Barnard, R. H. 1985. Experience with low cost laboratory data. Int. J. Mechanical Eng. Education 13, 91--96.

[12]

Bauchspiess, A., Guimaraes, B., and Gosmann, H. L. 2003. Remote experimentation on three coupled water reservoirs. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics. 572--577.

[13]

Baxendale, P. and Mellor, J. 2000. A ‘virtual laboratory’ for research training and collaboration. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 37, 1, 95--107.

[14]

Beck, H. V. 1963. Practical class work at the Cavendish laboratory. Contemporary Phy. 4, 206--220.

[15]

Bentley, F., Tollmar, O., Demirdjian, D., Oile, K., and Darrell, T. 2003. Perceptive presence. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 23, 5, 26--36.

Digital Library

[16]

Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., and Tibell, L. A. E. 2003. Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. Int. J. Sci. Education 25, 3, 351--372.

[17]

Biocca, F. 2001. Inserting the presence of mind into a philosophy of presence: A response to Sheridan and Mantovaniand Riva. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 10, 5, 546--556.

Digital Library

[18]

Boud, D. J. 1973. The laboratory aims questionnaire---A new method for course improvement? Higher Education 2, 81--94.

[19]

Bradner, E. and Mark, G. 2001. Social presence with video and application sharing. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Boulder, Colorado. ACM Press, New York, 154--161.

Digital Library

[20]

Budhu, M. 2000. Interactive multimedia web-based courseware with virtual laboratories. In Proceedings of the CATE Computers and Advanced Technology in Education 2000 Conference. Cancun, Mexico. 19--25.

[21]

Bystrom, K. E. and Barfield, W. 1999. Collaborative task performance for learning using a virtual environment. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 8, 4, 435--448.

Digital Library

[22]

Canfora, G., Daponte, P., and Rapuano, S. 2004. Remotely accessible laboratory for electronic measurement teaching. Comput. Standards and Interfaces 26, 6, 489--499.

[23]

Canizares, C. A. and Faur, Z. T. 1997. Advantages and disadvantages of using various computer tools in electrical engineering courses. IEEE Trans. Education 40, 3, 166--171.

Digital Library

[24]

Carlson, L. E. and Sullivan, J. F. 1999. Hands-on engineering: Learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program. Int. J. Eng. Education 15, 1, 20--31.

[25]

Cawley, P. 1989. Is laboratory teaching effective? Int. J. Mechanical Eng. Education 17, 15--27.

[26]

Chaturvedi, S., Akan, O., Bawab, S., Abdej-Salam, T., and Venkataramana, M. 2003. A web-based multimedia virtual experiment. In Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, CO. T3F.3-T3F.8.

[27]

Chetty, M. and Dabke, K. P. 2000. Towards a web-based control engineering. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 37, 1, 39--47.

[28]

Clough, M. P. 2002. Using the laboratory to enhance student learning. In Learning Science and the Science of Learning, R. W. Bybee, Ed. National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC, 85--97.

[29]

Cohen, A. and Scardamalia, M. 1998. Discourse about ideas: Monitoring and regulation in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. Interactive Learning Environ. 6, 1--2, 93--113.

[30]

Collins, J. J. 1986. Reflections on teaching experimentation to “applications” engineering undergraduates. Int. J. Mechanical Eng. Education 14, 175--182.

[31]

Colwell, C., Scanlon, E., and Cooper, M. 2002. Using remote laboratories to extend access to science and engineering. Comput. and Education 38, 1--3, 65--76.

Digital Library

[32]

Cooper, M., Colwell, C., and Amaral, T. 2002a. Accessibility and usability in complex web based learning applications: Lessons from the PEARL project. In Proceedings of the Corporations, Government, Health, and World Conference on E-Learning in Higher Education. Montreal, Canada. 1358--1365.

[33]

Cooper, M., Donnelly, A., and Ferreira, J. M. 2002b. Remote controlled experiments for teaching over the Internet: A comparison of approaches developed in the PEARL project. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE Conference 2002. Auckland, New Zealand. UNITEC Institution of Technology, M2D.1-M2D.9.

[34]

Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., and Chassapis, C. 2004. Remote versus hands-on labs: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Savannah, GA. F1G.17-F1G.21.

[35]

Cruickshank, A. J. B. 1983. A teaching-laboratory experiment. Comput. and Education 7, 4, 209--222.

[36]

Dewhurst, D. G., Macleod, H. A., and Norris, T. A. M. 2000. Independent student learning aided by computers: An acceptable alternative to lectures? Comput. and Education 35, 3, 223--241.

Digital Library

[37]

Dibiase, D. 2000. Is distance teaching more work or less work? American J. Distance Education 14, 3, 6--20.

[38]

Dobson, E. L., Hill, M., and Turner, J. D. 1995. An evaluation of the student response to electronics teaching using a CAL package. Comput. and Education 25, 1--2, 13--20.

Digital Library

[39]

Drake, B. D., Acosta, G. M., Wingard, D. A., and R. L. Smith, J. 1994. Improving creativity, solving problems and communications with peers in engineering science laboratories. J. Chemical Education 71, 7, 592--596.

[40]

Edleson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., and Pea, R. D. 1999. Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. J. Learning Sci. 8, 3 and 4, 391--450.

[41]

Edward, N. S. 1996. Evaluation of computer based laboratory simulation. Comput. and Education 26, 1--3, 123--130.

[42]

Edward, N. S. 2002. The role of laboratory work in engineering education: Student and staff perceptions. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 39, 1, 11--19.

[43]

Elton, L. 1983. Improving the cost-effectiveness of laboratory teaching. Studies in Higher Education 8, 79--85.

[44]

Engum, S. A., Jeffries, P., and Fisher, L. 2003. Intravenous catheter training system: Computer-Based education versus traditional learning methods. American J. Surgery 186, 1, 67--74.

[45]

Ertugrul, N. 1998. New era in engineering experiments: An integrated and interactive teaching/learning approach, and real-time visualizations. Int. J. Eng. Education 14, 5, 344--355.

[46]

Ertugrul, N. 2000a. Cost effective and advanced teaching laboratory development at the University of Adelaide. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advance Technology in Education. Cancun, Mexico. 188--193.

[47]

Ertugrul, N. 2000b. Towards virtual laboratories: A survey of LabVIEW-Based teaching/learning tools and future trends. Int. J. Eng. Education 16, 3, 171--180.

[48]

Faria, A. J. and Whiteley, T. R. 1990. An empirical evaluation of the pedagogical value of playing a simulation game in a principles of marketing course. Development in Business Simul. Experiential Learning 17, 53--57.

[49]

Farrington, P. A., Messimer, S. L., and Schroer, B. J. 1994. Simulation and undergraduate engineering education: The technology reinvestment project (TRP). In Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference. Lake Buena Vista, FL. J. D. Tew et al., Eds. 1387--1393.

Digital Library

[50]

Faucher, G. 1985. The role of laboratories in engineering education. Int. J. Mechanical Eng. Education 13, 195--198.

[51]

Feisel, L. D. and Rosa, A. J. 2005. The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. J. Eng. Education, 121--130.

[52]

Fernandez-Inglesias, M. J., Gonzalez-Castano, F. J., and Pousada-Carballo, J. M. 2000. An undergraduate low-level computer communications laboratory oriented towards industry. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 37, 2, 146--156.

[53]

Ferrero, A., Salicone, S., Bonora, C., and Parmigiani, M. 2003. ReMLab: A Java-Based remote, didactic measurement laboratory. IEEE Trans. Instrumentation and Measurement 52, 3, 710--715.

[54]

Finholt, T. and Olson, G. 1997. From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Sci. 8, 1, 28--36.

[55]

Fisher, B. C. 1977. Evaluating mechanical engineering laboratory work. Int. J. Mechanical Eng. Education 5, 147--157.

[56]

Foley, M., Chen, Y., and Bose, A. 1990. A modern digital simulation laboratory for power systems. IEEE Comput. Appl. Power 3, 2, 16--19.

[57]

Foster, I., Kesselman, C., and Tuecke, S. 2001. The anatomy of the grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. Int. J. Supercomput. Appl. 15, 3, 1--25.

Digital Library

[58]

Fujita, J. S. T., Cassaniga, R. F., and Fernandez, F. J. R. 2003. Remote laboratory. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics. Rio. de Janeiro, Brazil. 1104--1106.

[59]

Garcya-Luque, E., Ortega, T., Forja, J. M., and Gomez-Parra, A. 2004. Using a laboratory simulator in the teaching and study of chemical processes in estuarine systems. Comput. and Education 43, 81--90.

Digital Library

[60]

Gillet, D., Nguyen, A. V., and Rekik, Y. 2005. Collaborative web-based experimentation in flexible engineering education. IEEE Trans. Education PP 99, 1--9.

Digital Library

[61]

Gomes, V. G., Choy, B., Barton, G. W., and Romagnoli, J. A. 2000. Web-based courseware in teaching laboratory-based courses. Global J. Eng. Education 4, 1, 65--71.

[62]

Grant, A. 1995. The effective use of laboratories in undergraduate courses. Int. J. Mechanical Eng. Education 23, 2, 95--101.

[63]

Gustavsson, I. 2002. Remote laboratory experiments in electrical engineering education. In Proceedings of the 4th International Caracas Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICCDCS 2002). Aruba. I025.1--I025.5.

[64]

Gustavsson, I. 2003. A remote access laboratory for electrical circuit experiments. Int. J. Eng. Education 19, 3, 409--419.

[65]

Hartson, H. R., Castillo, J. C., Kelso, J., and Neale, W. C. 1996. Remote evaluation: The network as an extension of the usability laboratory. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground. Vancouver, Canada. 228--235.

Digital Library

[66]

Hegarty, E. H. 1978. Levels of scientific inquiry in university science laboratory classes: Implications for curriculum deliberations. Research Sci. Education 8, 45--57.

[67]

Herron, M. D. 1971. The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review 79, 2, 171--212.

[68]

Hessami, M. and Sillitoe, J. 1992. The role of laboratory experiments and the impact of high-tech equipment on engineering education. Australasian J. Eng. Education 3, 119--126.

[69]

Hodson, D. 1996. Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. J. Curriculum Studies 28, 115--135.

[70]

Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. 1982. The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Education Research 52, 201--218.

[71]

Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. N. 2004. The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Sci. Education 88, 1, 28--54.

[72]

Hutzel, W. J. 2002. A remotely accessed HVAC laboratory for distance education. Int. J. Eng. Education 18, 6, 711--716.

[73]

Ijsselsteijn, W. A., Ridder, H. D., Freeman, J., and Avons, S. E. 2000. Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V Conference. San Jose, CA. 3959--3976.

[74]

Karady, G. G., Heydt, G. T., Olejniczak, K. J., Mantooth, H. A., Iwamoto, S., and Crow, M. L. 2000a. Role of laboratory education in power engineering: Is the virtual laboratory feasible? I. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. 1471--1477.

[75]

Karady, G. G., Reta-Hernandez, M., and Bose, A. 2000b. Role of laboratory education in power engineering: Is the virtual laboratory feasible? II. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. 1478--1483.

[76]

Kasten, D. G. 2000. Integrating computerized data acquisition and analysis into an undergraduate electric machines laboratory. In Proceedings of the 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Kansas City, MO. T1D.13--T1D.18.

Digital Library

[77]

Keilson, S., King, E., Sapnar, M. I. S., King, E., and Sapnar, M. 1999. Learning science by doing science on the web. In Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontier in Education Conference. San Juan, Puerto Rico., 13d4.7--13d4.12.

[78]

Kolberg, S. and Fjeldly, T. A. 2004. Web services remote educational laboratory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education. Gainesville, FL. 1--6.

[79]

Ko, C. C., Chen, B. M., Chen, S. H., Ramakrishnan, V., Chen, R., Hu, S. Y., and Zhuang, Y. 2000. A large-scale web-based virtual oscilloscope laboratory experiment. Eng. Sci. Education J. 9, 2, 69--76.

[80]

Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., and Marx, N. 2000. The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. J. Learning Sci. 9, 2, 105--143.

[81]

Krehbiel, D., Zerger, R., and Piper, J. K. 2003. A remote-access LabVIEW-Based laboratory for environmental and ecological science. Int. J. Eng. Education 19, 3, 495--502.

[82]

Lederberg, J. and Uncapher, K. 1989. Towards a national collaboratory. Report of an Invitational Workshop at Rockefeller University. Washington, DC.

[83]

Lee, S. L. and Carter, G. 1972. A sample survey of departments of electrical engineering to determine recent significant changes in laboratory work patterns at first year level. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 10, 131--135.

[84]

Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. 1997. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 3, 2. Online journal.

[85]

Loomis, J. M. 1992. Presence and distal attribution: Phenomenology, determinants and assesment. In Proceedings of SPIE 1992. Boston, MA. 590--595.

[86]

Magin, D. J. 1982. Collaborative peer learning in the laboratory. Studies in Higher Education 7, 105--117.

[87]

Magin, D. J. 1984. Confidence and critical awareness as factors in the development of experimentation skills in laboratory courses. Higher Education 13, 275--288.

[88]

Magin, D. J., Churches, A. E., and Reizes, J. A. 1986. Design and experimentation in undergraduate mechanical engineering. In Proceedings of a Conference on Teaching Engineering Designers. Sydney, Australia. Institution of Engineers, 96--100.

[89]

Magin, D. J. and Kanapathipillai, S. 2000. Engineering students' understanding of the role of experimentation. European J. Eng. Education 25, 4, 351--358.

[90]

Magin, D. J. and Reizes, J. A. 1990. Computer simulation of laboratory experiments: An unrealized potential. Comput. and Education 14, 3, 263--270.

Digital Library

[91]

Mania, K. and Chalmers, A. 2001. The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 4, 2, 247--264.

[92]

Mann, S. and Fung, J. 2002. Mediated reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 11, 2, 158--175.

Digital Library

[93]

Mann, V. and Parashar, M. 2002. Engineering an interoperable computational collaoratory on the grid. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 14, 1569--1593.

[94]

Martin, D. G. 1969. Ends and means in laboratory teaching. Bulletin of Mechanical Eng. Education 8, 185--189.

[95]

Martin, D. G. and Lewis, J. C. 1968. Effective laboratory teaching. Bulletin of Mechanical Eng. Education 7, 51--57.

[96]

Matthews, M. R., Ed. 1991. History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching. OISE Press, Toronto, Canada.

[97]

McAteer, E., Neil, D., Barr, N., Brown, M., Draper, S., and Henderson, F. 1996. Simulation software in a life sciences practical laboratory. Comput. and Education 26, 1--3, 102--112.

[98]

McComas, W. F. 1997. The nature of the laboratory experience: A guide for describing, classifying and enhancing hands-on activities. CSTA J., Spring, 6--9.

[99]

McLellan, H. 1995. Situated Learning Perspectives. Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

[100]

Miller, R. B. 1954. Psychological Considerations in the Designs of Training Equipment. Wright Air Development Center, Wright Patterson AFB, OH.

[101]

Miller, R. L., Ely, J. F., Baldwin, R. M., and Olds, B. M. 1998. Higher-Order thinking in the unit operations laboratory. Chemical Eng. Education 32, 2, 146--151.

[102]

Naghdy, F., Vial, P., and Taylor, N. 2003. Embedded Internet laboratory. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 19, 3, 427--432.

[103]

Nash, E. B., Edwards, G. W., Thompson, J. A., and Barfield, W. 2000. A review of presence and performance in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum. Comput Interact 12, 1, 1--41.

[104]

Nedic, Z., Machotka, J., and Nafalski, A. 2003. Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories. In Proceedings of the 2003 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, CO. T3E.1-T3E.6.

[105]

Nersessian, N. J. 1991. Conceptual change in science and in science education. In History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching, M. R. Matthews, Ed. OISE Press, Toronto, Canada, 133--148.

[106]

Newby, M. 2002. An empirical study comparing the learning environments of open and closed computer laboratories. J. Inf. Syst. Education 13, 4, 303--314.

[107]

Noel, R. W. and Hunter, C. M. 2000. Mapping the physical world to psychological reality: Creating synthetic environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. New York. 203--207.

Digital Library

[108]

Nunez, D. and Blake, E. 2003. Conceptual priming as a determinant of presence in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualization and Interaction in Africa. Cape Town, South Africa. 101--108.

Digital Library

[109]

Oehmke, R. L. T. and Wepfer, W. J. 1985. Microcomputers in the undergraduate instrumentation lab. In Proceedings of the ASME Computers in Engineering 1985 Conference. Boston, MA. 159--165.

[110]

Ogot, M., Elliott, G., and Glumac, N. 2003. An assessment of in-person and remotely operated laboratories. J. Eng. Education 92, 1, 57--62.

[111]

Papathanassiou, A., Oster, J., and Baier, P. W. 1999. A novel simulation concept of reduced computational cost for TD-CDMA mobile radio systems with adaptive antennas. In Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 1999), Fall. Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 218--222.

[112]

Parush, A., Hamm, H. and Shtub, A. 2002. Learning histories in simulation-based teaching: The effects on self-learning and transfer. Comput. and Education 39, 319--332.

[113]

Patrick, J. 1992. Training: Research and Practice. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

[114]

Philippatos, G. C. and Moscato, D. R. 1971. Effects of constrained information on player decisions in experimental business simulation: Some empirical evidence. J. ACM 18, 1, 94--104.

Digital Library

[115]

Pea, R. D. 1993. Learning scientific concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist 28, 3, 265--277.

[116]

Pea, R. D. 1994. Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. J. Learning Sci. 3, 3, 283--298.

[117]

Pea, R. D. 2002. Learning science through collaborative visualization over the internet. In Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium (NS 120). Stockholm, Sweden. 1--13.

[118]

Psillos, D. and Niedderer, H. 2002. Issues and questions regarding the effectiveness of labwork. In Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory, D. Psillos and H. Niedderer, Eds. Kluwer Academic, 21--30.

[119]

Raineri, D. 2001. Virtual laboratories enhance traditional undergraduate biology laboratories. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 29, 4, 160--162.

[120]

Reiner, M. and Gilbert, J. 2000. Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning. Int. J. Sci. Education 22, 5, 489--506.

[121]

Riffell, S. and Sibley, D. 2004. Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of a hybrid course format. Comput. and Education 44, 3, 217--235.

Digital Library

[122]

Rice, S. L. 1975. Objectives for engineering laboratory instruction. Eng. Education 65, 285--288.

[123]

Rohrig, C. and Jochheim, A. 1999. The virtual lab for controlling real experiments via Internet. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design. Kohala Coast Island of Hawaii, Hawaii. 279--284.

[124]

Rohrig, C. and Jochheim, A. 2001. Group-Based learning using a remote laboratory. In Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. 1153--1154.

[125]

Ross, R. J., Boroni, C. M., Goosey, F. W., Grinder, M., and Wissenbach, P. 1997. Weblab&excl; A universal and interactive teaching, learning, and laboratory environment for the world wide web. In Proceedings of the 28th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. San Jose, CA. 199--203.

Digital Library

[126]

Roth, W. M., Mcrobbie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., and Boutonne, S. 1997. The local production of order in traditional science laboratories: A phenomenological analysis. Learning and Instruction 7, 2, 107--136.

[127]

Sakis Meliopoulos, A. P. and Cokkinides, G. J. 2000. Role of laboratory education in power engineering: Is the virtual laboratory feasible? III. Virtual power system laboratories: Is the technology ready. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. 1484--1489.

[128]

Saltsburg, H., Heist, R. H., and Olsen, T. 1982. Microcomputers in a college teaching laboratory-Part I. Micro 53, 53--55.

[129]

Scanlon, E., Colwell, C., Cooper, M., and Paolo, T. D. 2004. Remote experiments, reversioning and rethinking science learning. Comput. and Education 43, 1--2, 153--163.

Digital Library

[130]

Scanlon, E., Morris, E., Di Paolo, T., and Cooper, M. 2002. Contemporary approaches to learning science: Technologically-mediated practical work. Studies in Sci. Education 38, 73--114.

[131]

Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., and John, J. 1995. Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. J. Learning Sci. 4, 2, 131--166.

[132]

Schwab, J. 1964. Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In The Structure of Knowledge and the Curriculum, G. W. Ford and L. Pugno, Eds. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago, 6--30.

[133]

Schwartz, T. L. and Dunkin, B. M. 2000. Facilitating interdisciplinary hands-on learning using LabView. Int. J. Eng. Education 16, 3, 218--227.

[134]

Sehati, S. 2000. Re-engineering the practical laboratory session. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 37, 1, 86--94.

[135]

Selvaduray, G. 1995. Undergraduate engineering ceramics laboratory development. Int. J. Eng. Education 11, 4--5, 374--379.

[136]

Shaheen, M., Loparo, K. A., and Buchner, M. R. 1998. Remote laboratory experimentation. In Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. Philadelphia, PA. 1326--1329.

[137]

Shen, H., Xu, Z., Dalager, B., Kristiansen, V., Strom, O., Shur, M. S., Fjeldly, T. A., Lu, J.-Q., and Ytterdal, T. 1999. Conducting laboratory experiments over the Internet. IEEE Trans. Education 42, 3, 180--185.

Digital Library

[138]

Sheridan, T. B. 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1, 120--125.

Digital Library

[139]

Sheridan, T. B. 1999. Descartes, Heidegger, Gibson, and God: Towards an eclectic ontology of presence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 8, 5, 551--559.

Digital Library

[140]

Shin, D., Yoon, E. S., Lee, K. Y., and Lee, E. S. 2002. A web-based, interactive virtual laboratory system for unit operations and process systems engineering education: Issues, design and implementation. Computers and Chemical Eng. 26, 2, 319--330.

[141]

Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley and Sons, London.

[142]

Sicker, D. C., Lookabaugh, T., Santos, J., and Barnes, F. 2005. Assessing the effectiveness of remote networking laboratories. In Proceedings of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, CO. 7--12.

[143]

Slater, M. and Usoh, M. 1993. Presence in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. Seattle, WA. 90--96.

[144]

Smith, P. R. and Pollard, D. 1986. The role of computer simulations in engineering education. Comput. and Education 10, 3, 335--340.

Digital Library

[145]

Snow, M. P. 1996. Charting presence in virtual environments and its effects on performance. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Digital Library

[146]

Sonnenwald, D. H., Whitton, M. C., and Maglaughlin, K. L. 2003. Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: Results of a controlled experiment. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact 10, 2, 150--176.

Digital Library

[147]

Staden, J. C. V., Braun, M. W. H., and Tonder, B. J. E. V. 1987. Computerized pendulum experiment for the introductory physics laboratory. Comput. and Education 11, 4, 281--292.

Digital Library

[148]

Striegel, A. 2001. Distance education and its impact on computer engineering laboratories. In Proceedings of the 2001 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Reno, NV. F2D.4--F2D.9.

Digital Library

[149]

Subramanian, R. and Marsic, I. 2001. ViBE: Virtual biology experiments. In Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference. Hong Kong. 316--325.

Digital Library

[150]

Tan, K. K., Lee, T. H., and Leu, F. M. 2000. Development of a distant laboratory using labVIEW. Int. J. Eng. Education 16, 3, 273--282.

[151]

Tapper, J. 1999. Topics and manner of talk in undergraduate practical laboratories. Int. J. Sci. Education 21, 4, 447--464.

[152]

Thakkar, U., Carragher, B., Carroll, L., Conway, C., Grosser, B., Kisseberth, N., Potter, C., Robinson, S., Sinn-Hanlon, J., Stone, D., and Weber, D. 2000. Formative evaluation of bugscope: A sustainable world wide laboratory for K-12. Retrieved 07-1900 from Http://www.itg.uiuc.edu/publications/techreports/00-008/.

[153]

Torres, K., Loker, D., and Weissbach, R. 2001. Introducing 9--12 grade students to electrical engineering technology through hands-on laboratory experiences. In Proceedings of the 2001 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Reno, NV. F2E.12-F2E.16.

Digital Library

[154]

Tuckman, B. W. 2002. Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Compute. and Education 39, 3, 261--269.

Digital Library

[155]

Tuma, T., Bratkovic, F., Fajfar, I., and Puhan, J. 1998. A microcontroller laboratory for electrical engineering. Int. J. Eng. Education 14, 4, 289--293.

[156]

Tzeng, H.-W. 2001. The design of pedagogical agent for distance virtual experiment. In Proceedings of the 2001 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Reno, NV. F1F.18-F1F.23.

Digital Library

[157]

Vaidyanathan, R. and Rochford, L. 1998. An exploratory investigation of computer simulations, student preferences, and performance. J. Education Business 73, 3, 144--149.

[158]

Vial, P. J. and Doulai, P. 2003. Using embedded Internet devices in an Internet engineering laboratory set-up. Int. J. Electrical Eng. Education 19, 3, 441--444.

[159]

Vuorela, M. and Nummenmaa, L. 2004. How undergraduate students meet a new learning environment? Comput. Hum. Behavior 20, 6, 763--777.

[160]

Watt, J. H., Walther, J. B., and Nowak, K. L. 2002. Asynchronous videoconferencing: A hybrid communication prototype. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii. 1--9.

Digital Library

[161]

Weick, K. E. 1996. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

[162]

Wentz, W. H. and Snyder, M. H. 1974. Teaching research in an undergraduate laboratory. Eng. Education 65, 247--250.

[163]

Whiteley, T. R. and Faria, A. J. 1989. A study of the relationship between student final exam performance and simulation game participation. Simul. Games 21, 1, 44--64.

Digital Library

[164]

Wicker, R. B. and Loya, H. I. 2000. A vision-based experiment for mechanical engineering laboratory courses. Int. J. Eng. Education 16, 3, 193--201.

[165]

Winer, L. R., Chomienne, M., and Vazquez-Abad, J. 2000. A distributed collaborative science learning laboratory on the Internet. American J. Distance Education 14, 1.

[166]

Witmer, B. and Singer, M. J. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7, 3, 225--240.

Digital Library

[167]

Yoo, S. and Hovis, S. 2004. Technical symposium on computer science education. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY. 311--314.

Digital Library

[168]

Youngblut, C. and Huie, O. 2003. The relationship between presence and performance in virtual environments: Results of a VERTS study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003 Conference. Los Angeles, CA. 277--278.

Digital Library

[169]

Zeltzer, D. 1992. Autonomy, interaction and presence. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1, 1, 127--132.

Digital Library

[170]

Zimmerli, S., Steinemann, M.-A., and Braun, T. 2003. Educational environments: Resource management portal for laboratories using real devices on the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Review 53, 3, 145--151.

Digital Library

[171]

Zywno, M. S. and Kennedy, D. C. 2000. Integrating the Internet, multimedia components, and hands-on experimentation into problem-based control education. In Proceedings of the 2000 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Kansas City, MO. T2D.5--T2D.10.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ji QZhang RDuan XTripp JLiu XCheng C(2024)Using hands-on learning video assignments in online and in-person contexts: A longitudinal studyEurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education10.29333/ejmste/1470620:7(em2466)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14706
Harahus MČavojský MBugár GPleva M(2024)Interactive Network Learning: An Assessment of EVE-NG Platform in Educational SettingsActa Electrotechnica et Informatica10.2478/aei-2023-001123:3(3-9)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.2478/aei-2023-0011
Ye DPennisi SNaranjo L(2024)Incorporating hands‐on experiments into an online science courseJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1296040:4(1400-1412)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12960
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review

Recommendations

Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories

Laboratories play a crucial role in the education of future scientists and engineers, yet there is disagreement among science and engineering educators about whether and which types of technology-enabled labs should be used. This debate could be ...
A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education

Economic pressures on universities and the emergence of new technologies have spurred the creation of new systems for delivering engineering laboratories in education, in particular simulations and remote-access laboratory systems. Advocates of ...
Sharing Laboratories across Different Remote Laboratory Systems
ICALT '12: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies

An educational remote laboratory is a software and hardware tool that enables students to remotely access real equipment located in the university as if they were in a hands-on-lab session. In order to be able to increase the curricula of universities, ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Computing Surveys

ACM Computing Surveys Volume 38, Issue 3

2006

129 pages

ISSN:0360-0300

EISSN:1557-7341

DOI:10.1145/1132960

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2006 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 September 2006

Published in CSUR Volume 38, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

579
Total Citations
View Citations
8,228
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)301
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ji QZhang RDuan XTripp JLiu XCheng C(2024)Using hands-on learning video assignments in online and in-person contexts: A longitudinal studyEurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education10.29333/ejmste/1470620:7(em2466)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14706
Harahus MČavojský MBugár GPleva M(2024)Interactive Network Learning: An Assessment of EVE-NG Platform in Educational SettingsActa Electrotechnica et Informatica10.2478/aei-2023-001123:3(3-9)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.2478/aei-2023-0011
Ye DPennisi SNaranjo L(2024)Incorporating hands‐on experiments into an online science courseJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1296040:4(1400-1412)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12960
Fernandez RGarcia-Loro FAlves GLópez-Rey AMeier RCastro M(2024)New Scenarios and Trends in Nontraditional Laboratories From 2000 to 2020IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2024.338728017(1568-1587)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3387280
Caetano TMoreira CJunior M(2024)Computer-Aided Experiments (CAE): A Study Regarding a Remote-Controlled Experiment, Video Analysis, and Simulation on KinematicsIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2023.334909267:2(245-255)Online publication date: Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3349092
Basava JParuchuri SVinnakota SPeddi B(2024)Implementation of Supervisory Level in Industrial Automation Pyramid2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON)10.1109/INOCON60754.2024.10511566(1-6)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/INOCON60754.2024.10511566
Guitart JCosta J(2024)Remote DasaLAB: datacenter as a laboratory for remote learningInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2024.2309277(1-21)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2309277
Rehaimi ASadqi YMaleh YGaba GGurtov A(2024)Towards a federated and hybrid cloud computing environment for sustainable and effective provisioning of cyber security virtual laboratoriesExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124267252(124267)Online publication date: Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124267
Hsu HBowden DAcosta S(2024)The Relations Among Students’ Digital Accessibility, Digital Competence, Self-Efficacy for Self-Direction in Learning and Self-Rated Performance in Engineering Virtual LaboratoriesJournal for STEM Education Research10.1007/s41979-024-00130-3Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00130-3
Clark-Stallkamp RReis N(2024)Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation of a Hybrid Remote Quantum Laboratory Supporting HBCU PartnershipsJournal of Formative Design in Learning10.1007/s41686-024-00088-w8:1(1-14)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-024-00088-w
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents