Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1142405.1142422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation

Published: 26 June 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) often focuses on how designers can develop systems that convey a single, specific, clear interpretation of what they are for and how they should be used and experienced. New domains such as domestic and public environments, new influences from the arts and humanities, and new techniques in HCI itself are converging to suggest that multiple, potentially competing interpretations can fruitfully co-exist. In this paper, we lay out the contours of the new space opened by a focus on multiple interpretations, which may more fully address the complexity, dynamics and interplay of user, system, and designer interpretation. We document how design and evaluation strategies shift when we abandon the presumption that a specific, authoritative interpretation of the systems we build is necessary, possible or desirable.

References

[1]
Aoki, P. & Woodruff, A.(2005). Making space for stories: Ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. Proc. CHI '05. NY: ACM Press, 181--190.
[2]
Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[3]
Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., & Wright, P. (eds) (2003). Funology: From usability to enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[4]
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Romberger, S., & Sjöögren, D. (Eds.). (1985). The UTOPIA project: An alternative in text and images (Graffiti 7). Swedish Center for Working Life, the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, & the University of Aarhus.
[5]
Böhlen, M. & Mateas, M. (1998). Office Plant #1: Intimate Space and Contemplative Entertainment. Leonardo. Vol 31, no. 5, 345--348.
[6]
Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. (2005). Affect: From Information to Interaction. Proc. Critical Computing '05.
[7]
Boehner, K., & Hancock, J (2006). Advancing Ambiguity. Proc. CHI 2006, pp 103--106.
[8]
Boehner, K., Thom-Santelli, J., Zoss, A., Gay, G., Hall, J., & Barrett, T. (2005). Imprints of Place: Creative Expressions of the Museum Experience. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2005. NY: ACM Press, 1220--1223.
[9]
Chalmers, M., Dieberger, A., Höök, K., & Rudströöm, Å. (2004). Social Navigation and Seamful Design. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society. 11(3), pp 171--181.
[10]
Chalmers, M., MacColl, I., & Bell, M. (2003). Seamful design: Showing the seams in wearable computing. Proc. IEE Eurowearable 2003, 11--17.
[11]
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action is. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
[12]
Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., & Wright, P. 2004. Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts. NY: ACM Press, 1727--1728.
[13]
Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2001). Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhääuser.
[14]
Flintham, M., Benford, S., Anastasi, R., Hemmings, T., Crabtree, A., Greenhalgh, C., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., & Row-Farr, J. (2003). Where on-line meets on the streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games. Proc. CHI '03. NY: ACM Press, 569--576.
[15]
Friedman, B., Freier, N. G., and Kahn, P. H. (2004). Office window of the future?: two case studies of an augmented window. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts. NY: ACM Press, 1559--1559.
[16]
Gaver, W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proceedings of CHI'03. NY: ACM Press, 233--240.
[17]
Gaver, W., Boucher, A., & Martin, H. (2003). Evaluating the Double-Deck Desk. Proc. HCII '03.
[18]
Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N., & Walker, B. (2004). The Drift Table: Designing for ludic engagement. Proc. CHI'04 Design Expo. New York: ACM Press, 885--900.
[19]
Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Law, A. Pennington, S. and Villars, N. (submitted). The History Tablecloth: Illuminating Domestic Values. Submitted to DIS 2006.
[20]
Gaver, W.W., & Martin, H. (2000). Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. Proc. CHI'00, NY: ACM Press, 209--216.
[21]
Gay, G. & Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity-Centered Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[22]
Höök, K. 2004. Active co-construction of meaningful experiences: but what is the designer's role?. In Proc. NordiCHI '04, vol. 82. NY: ACM Press, 1--2.
[23]
Höök, K., Sengers, P. & Andersson, G. (2003). Sense and sensibility: Evaluation and interactive art. In Proc. CHI '03, 241--248.
[24]
Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., & Eiderbääck, B. 2003. Technology probes. In Proc. CHI '03. NY: ACM Press, 17--24.
[25]
Kline, R. & Pinch, T. (1996). Users as agents of technological change. Technology and culture, Vol. 37, No. 4., 763--795.
[26]
McCarthy, J. & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[27]
McNichol, Tom. Roads gone wild. Wired, Vol 12, No. 12, December 2004. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/traffic.html
[28]
Mitchell, W., Inouye, A. and Blumenthal, M., eds. Beyond Productivity: Information Technology, Innovation, and Creativity. National Research Council (2003).
[29]
Nickerson, R. & Landauer, T. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Background and issues. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), The handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 3--31). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
[30]
Norman, D. A. (1986) . Cognitive Engineering. In Norman D. A. & Draper S. W. {Eds.}:User-Centered System Design. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
[31]
Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, T., eds. (2003). How users matter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[32]
Penny, S., Smith, J., Sengers, P., Bernhardt, A., and Schulte, J. (2001). Traces: Embodied Immersive Interaction with Semi-Autonomous Avatars. Convergence. Vol. 7, No. 2.
[33]
Picard, Rosalind (1997). Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[34]
Pinch, T. & Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch, eds., The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17--50.
[35]
Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C., and Fraser, M. (2005). Designing the spectator experience. In Proc. CHI '05. NY: ACM Press, 741--750.
[36]
Rogers, Y., Rutherford, A., & Bibby, P. (Eds.) (1992). Models In the Mind. London: Academic Press.
[37]
Romero, M. & M. Mateas (2005). A preliminary investigation of Alien Presence. Proc. HCII '05.
[38]
Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. (eds). (1993) Participatory Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
[39]
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. (2005). Reflective Design. Proc. Critical Computing, 49--58.
[40]
Sengers, P. & Gaver, B. (2005). Design for Interpretation. Proc. HCII '05.
[41]
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
[42]
Sundström, P., Ståhl, A. & Hööök, K. (2005) eMoto - Affectively Involving both Body and Mind. Extended Abstracts of CHI'05, 2005--2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Simple Scores are Messy Signals: How Users Interpret Scores on Real Estate PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869358:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Designing with Data: An Annotated PortfolioACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368527231:6(1-25)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Auditory-Tactile Narratives: Designing New Embodied Auditory-Tactile Mappings Using Body MapsProceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures10.1145/3678299.3678310(105-115)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '06: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems
    June 2006
    384 pages
    ISBN:1595933670
    DOI:10.1145/1142405
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 June 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. arts
    2. design
    3. evaluation
    4. hermeneutics
    5. humanities
    6. interpretation

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    DIS06
    Sponsor:
    DIS06: Designing Interactive Systems 2006
    June 26 - 28, 2006
    PA, University Park, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)257
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Simple Scores are Messy Signals: How Users Interpret Scores on Real Estate PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869358:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Designing with Data: An Annotated PortfolioACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368527231:6(1-25)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Auditory-Tactile Narratives: Designing New Embodied Auditory-Tactile Mappings Using Body MapsProceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures10.1145/3678299.3678310(105-115)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Questions without Answers: Enjoyment of Irresolution in Mystery Player ExperienceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36771008:CHI PLAY(1-28)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The Undertable: A Design Remake of the Mediated BodyProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660698(2591-2610)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)A Steampunk Critique of Machine Learning AccelerationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660688(246-257)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Responding to Generative AI Technologies with Research-through-Design: The Ryelands AI Lab as an Exploratory StudyProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660677(1823-1841)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Machine Learning Processes As Sources of Ambiguity: Insights from AI ArtProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642855(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Technical Mentality: Principles for HCI Research and PracticeProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642720(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)What's the Rush?: Alternative Values in Navigation Technologies for Urban PlacemakingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642470(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media