Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments

Published: 03 September 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Most head-mounted displays (HMDs) suffer from substantial optical distortion, and vendor-supplied specifications for field-of-view often are at variance with reality. Unless corrected, such displays do not present perspective-related visual cues in a geometrically correct manner. Distorted geometry has the potential to affect applications of HMDs, which depend on precise spatial perception. This article provides empirical evidence for the degree to which common geometric distortions affect one type of spatial judgment in virtual environments. We show that minification or magnification in the HMD that would occur from misstated HMD field of view causes significant changes in distance judgments. Incorrectly calibrated pitch and pincushion distortion, however, do not cause statistically significant changes in distance judgments for the degree of distortions examined. While the means for determining the optical distortion of display systems are well known, they are often not used in non-see-through HMDs due to problems in measuring and correcting for distortion. As a result, we also provide practical guidelines for creating geometrically calibrated systems.

References

[1]
Andre, J. and Rogers, S. 2006. Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis. Percept. Psychophys. 68, 3, 353--361.
[2]
Azuma, R. and Bishop, G. 1994. Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH'04). ACM, New York, 197--204.
[3]
Bax, M. R. 2004. Real-time lens distortion correction: 3D video graphics cards are good for more than games. Stanford Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. Res. J.
[4]
Campos, J., Freitas, P., Turner, E., Wong, M., and Sun, H.-J. 2007. The effect of optical magnification/minimization on distance estimation by stationary and walking observers. J. Vision 7, 9, 1028a.
[5]
Ellis, S. R. and Nemire, K. 1993. A subjective technique for calibration of lines of sight in closed virtual environment viewing systems. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Display. Society for Information Display, Campbell, CA.
[6]
Gardner, P. L. and Mon-Williams, M. 2001. Vertical gaze angle: Absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension. Exper. Brain Res. 136, 3, 379--385.
[7]
Genc, Y., Tuceryan, M., and Navab, N. 2002. Practical solutions for calibration of optical see-through devices. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'02). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
[8]
Gilson, S. J., Fitzgibbon, A. W., and Glennerster, A. 2008. Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head mounted display. J. Neurosci. Methods 173, 1, 140--146.
[9]
Grutzmacher, R. P., Andre, J. T., and Owens, D. A. 1997. Gaze inclination: A source of ocolomotor information for distance perception. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Perception and Action (Studies in Perception and Action IV). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 229--232.
[10]
Knapp, J. 1999. The visual perception of egocentric distance in virtual environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Santa Barbara.
[11]
Kraft, R. N. and Green, J. S. 1989. Distance perception as a function of photographic area of view. Percept. Psychophys. 45, 4, 459--466.
[12]
Kuhl, S. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2008. Recalibration of rotational locomotion in immersive virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 5, 3.
[13]
Kuhl, S. A., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2006. Minification influences spatial judgments in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York, 15--19.
[14]
Kuhl, S. A., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2008. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York.
[15]
Loomis, J. M. and Knapp, J. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, Eds. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 21--46.
[16]
Lumsden, E. A. 1983. Perception of radial distance as a function of magnification and truncation of depicted spatial layout. Percept. Psychophys. 33, 2, 177--182.
[17]
McGarrity, E. and Tuceryan, M. 1999. A method for calibrating see-through head-mounted displays for AR. In Proceedings of the IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 75--84.
[18]
Messing, R. and Durgin, F. 2005. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2, 3, 234--250.
[19]
Mohler, B. J., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2006. The influence of feedback on egocenteric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York, 9--14.
[20]
Ooi, T. L., Wu, B., and He, Z. J. 2001. Distance determination by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature 414, 197--200.
[21]
Richardson, A. R. and Waller, D. 2005. The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 19, 1089--1108.
[22]
Rinalducci, E. J., Mapes, D., Cinq-Mars, S. G., and Higgins, K. E. 1996. Determining the field of view in HMDs: A psychophysical method. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 5, 3, 353--356.
[23]
Robinett, W. and Rolland, J. P. 1992. A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 1, 1, 45--62.
[24]
Rogers, S. 1995. Perceiving pictorial space. In Perception of Space and Motion, W. Epstein and S. Rogers, Eds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 119--163.
[25]
Sahm, C. S., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W. B., and Willemsen, P. 2005. Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 1, 3, 35--45.
[26]
Sedgwick, H. A. 1983. Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: Available information from texture and perspective. In Human and Machine Vision, J. Beck, B. Hope, and A. Rosenfeld, Eds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 425--458.
[27]
Smith, O. W. 1958a. Comparison of apparent depth in a photograph viewed from two distances. Perceptual Motor Skills 8, 79--81.
[28]
Smith, O. W. 1958b. Judgments of size and distance in photographs. Amer. J. Psych. 71, 3, 529--538.
[29]
Stoper, A. E. 1999. Height and extent: Two kinds of perception. In Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honor of Ulric Neisser, E. Winograd, R. Fivush, and W. Hirst, Eds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
[30]
Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 13, 5, 560--571.
[31]
Tsai, R. Y. 1987. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE J. Rob. Autom. 3, 4, 323--344.
[32]
Watson, B. A. and Hodges, L. F. 1995. Using texture maps to correct for optical distortion in head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 172--178.
[33]
Weng, J., Cohen, P., and Herniou, M. 1992. Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 10, 965--980.
[34]
Willemsen, P., Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2009. The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field-of-view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 6, 2, 8:1--8:14.
[35]
Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2008. Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 17, 1, 91--101.
[36]
Witmer, B. G. and Kline, P. B. 1998. Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 7, 2, 144--167.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)虚拟空间动态几何畸变量化方法Laser & Optoelectronics Progress10.3788/LOP23235161:10(1011007)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Size perception in stereoscopic displays based on binocular disparity considering interpupillary distanceJournal of Advanced Simulation in Science and Engineering10.15748/jasse.11.9311:1(93-101)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)VR/AR MetaverseColour Futures10.1007/978-3-031-70920-3_10(165-206)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 6, Issue 3
August 2009
130 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/1577755
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 September 2009
Accepted: 01 June 2009
Revised: 01 May 2009
Received: 01 February 2009
Published in TAP Volume 6, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Immersive virtual environment
  2. field of view
  3. minification
  4. perception
  5. pincushion distortion
  6. pitch

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)虚拟空间动态几何畸变量化方法Laser & Optoelectronics Progress10.3788/LOP23235161:10(1011007)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Size perception in stereoscopic displays based on binocular disparity considering interpupillary distanceJournal of Advanced Simulation in Science and Engineering10.15748/jasse.11.9311:1(93-101)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)VR/AR MetaverseColour Futures10.1007/978-3-031-70920-3_10(165-206)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
  • (2023)The contribution of image minification to discomfort experienced in wearable opticsJournal of Vision10.1167/jov.23.8.1023:8(10)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Manipulation of Motion Parallax Gain Distorts Perceived Distance and Object Depth in Virtual Reality2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR55154.2023.00055(398-408)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2023)Distance Perception in Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Head-Mounted Display CharacteristicsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.319660629:12(4978-4989)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2023)Reliability of distance estimation in virtual reality spaceComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107773145:COnline publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Accurate measurement of virtual image distance for near-eye displays based on auto-focusingApplied Optics10.1364/AO.47293161:30(9093)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2022
  • (2022)VR Distance Judgments are Affected by the Amount of Pre-Experiment Blind WalkingACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202210.1145/3548814.3551463(1-5)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Color-to-Depth Mappings as Depth Cues in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545646(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media