extended-abstract

Human social response toward humanoid robot's head and facial features

Authors:

Jun Ki Lee,

Cynthia BreazealAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 4237 - 4242

https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754132

Published: 10 April 2010 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

This study explores how people's social response toward a humanoid robot can change when we vary the number of the active degrees of freedom in the robot's head and face area. We investigate this problem by conducting two wizard-of-oz user studies that situate an elder person in a self-disclosure dialogue with a remotely operated robot. In our first study, we investigated the effect of expressive head gestures with a four-degree-of-freedom neck. In the second study we focused on the face where we investigated the effect of expressive eyebrow movement versus active gaze and eyelid movement. In the first study, we found that participants are willing to disclose more to the robot when the robot moved its neck in an expressive manner. In the second study, our data suggests a trend where gaze and expressive eyelid movement results in more disclosure over eyebrow movement

References

[1]

Breazeal, C.L. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2002.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

DiSalvo, C.F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., and Kiesler, S. All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, ACM (2002), 326.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Ekman, P. and Friesen, W.V. Facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1978.

Google Scholar

[4]

Fogg, B.J. and Tseng, H. The elements of computer credibility. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, ACM New York, NY, USA (1999), 80--87.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., and Dautenhahn, K. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3--4 (2003), 143--166.

Google Scholar

[6]

Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of computer-Mediated communication 3, 2 (1997), 20.

Google Scholar

[7]

Moon, Y. Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure From Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 26, 4 (2000), 323--339.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Powers, A. and Kiesler, S. The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, ACM (2006), 218--225.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Rubin, R.B., Palmgreen, P., Sypher, H.E., and Beatty, M. Communication research measures: A sourcebook. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004.

Google Scholar

[10]

Takayama, L., Groom, V., and Nass, C. I'm sorry, Dave: I'm afraid I won't do that: social aspects of human-agent conflict. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM New York, NY, USA (2009), 2099--2108.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Nanavati AWalker NTaber LMavrogiannis CTakayama LCakmak MSrinivasa SSakamoto DWeiss AHiatt LShiomi M(2022)Not All Who Wander Are LostProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3523760.3523817(422-431)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3523760.3523817
Penčić MČavić MOros DVrgović PBabković KOrošnjak MČavić D(2022)Anthropomorphic Robotic Eyes: Structural Design and Non-Verbal Communication EffectivenessSensors10.3390/s2208306022:8(3060)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083060
Chandra SGupta GLoucks TDautenhahn K(2022)Opportunities for social robots in the stuttering clinic: A review and proposed scenariosPaladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics10.1515/pjbr-2022-000113:1(23-44)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2022-0001
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Human social response toward humanoid robot's head and facial features
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Humanoid robot control using depth camera
HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction

Most human interactions with the environment depend on our ability to navigate freely and to use our hands and arms to manipulate objects. Developing natural means of controlling these abilities in humanoid robots can significantly broaden the usability ...
Exploring head tracked head mounted displays for first person robot teleoperation
IUI '14: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces

We explore the capabilities of head tracking combined with head mounted displays (HMD) as an input modality for robot navigation. We use a Parrot AR Drone to test five techniques which include metaphors for plane-like banking control, car-like turning ...
On the Benefit of Independent Control of Head and Eye Movements of a Social Robot for Multiparty Human-Robot Interaction
Human-Computer Interaction
Abstract
The human gaze direction is the sum of the head and eye movements. The coordination of these two segments has been studied and models of the contribution of head movement to the gaze of virtual agents or robots have been proposed. However, these ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2010

2219 pages

ISBN:9781605589305

DOI:10.1145/1753846

General Chairs:
Elizabeth Mynatt
Georgia Institute of Technology
,
Don Schoner
Georgia Institute of Technology
,
Program Chairs:
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Vienna University of Technology
,
Scott Hudson
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Keith Edwards
Georgia Tech
,
Tom Rodden
University of Nottingham

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 April 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Extended-abstract

Conference

CHI '10

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '10: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 10 - 15, 2010

Georgia, Atlanta, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI EA '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 350 of 1,346 submissions, 26%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

17
Total Citations
View Citations
532
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)20
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Nanavati AWalker NTaber LMavrogiannis CTakayama LCakmak MSrinivasa SSakamoto DWeiss AHiatt LShiomi M(2022)Not All Who Wander Are LostProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3523760.3523817(422-431)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3523760.3523817
Penčić MČavić MOros DVrgović PBabković KOrošnjak MČavić D(2022)Anthropomorphic Robotic Eyes: Structural Design and Non-Verbal Communication EffectivenessSensors10.3390/s2208306022:8(3060)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083060
Chandra SGupta GLoucks TDautenhahn K(2022)Opportunities for social robots in the stuttering clinic: A review and proposed scenariosPaladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics10.1515/pjbr-2022-000113:1(23-44)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2022-0001
Nanavati AWalker NTaber LMavrogiannis CTakayama LCakmak MSrinivasa S(2022)Not All Who Wander Are Lost: A Localization-Free System for In-the-Wild Mobile Robot Deployments2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889620(422-431)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889620
Ahmad IAsghar ZKumar TLi GManzoor AMikhaylov KShah SHoyhtya MReponen JHuusko JHarjula E(2022)Emerging Technologies for Next Generation Remote Health Care and Assisted LivingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.317727810(56094-56132)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177278
Monaikul NAbbasi BRysbek ZDi Eugenio BZefran M(2020)Role Switching in Task-Oriented Multimodal Human-Robot Collaboration2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223461(1150-1156)Online publication date: Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223461
Lambert ANorouzi NBruder GWelch G(2020)A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Research on Human Interaction with Social RobotsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2020.180117236:19(1804-1817)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801172
Trainer TTaylor JStanton C(2020)Choosing the Best Robot for the Job: Affinity Bias in Human-Robot InteractionSocial Robotics10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_41(490-501)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_41
Ghazali AHam JBarakova EMarkopoulos P(2018)Effects of Robot Facial Characteristics and Gender in Persuasive Human-Robot InteractionFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2018.000735Online publication date: 21-Jun-2018
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00073
Castro-Gonzalez AAlcocer-Luna JMalfaz MAlonso-Martin FSalichs M(2018)Evaluation of Artificial Mouths in Social RobotsIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2018.281261848:4(369-379)Online publication date: Aug-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2812618
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Humanoid robot control using depth camera

Exploring head tracked head mounted displays for first person robot teleoperation

On the Benefit of Independent Control of Head and Eye Movements of a Social Robot for Multiparty Human-Robot Interaction