Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism

Published: 05 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

It has been known for some time that graph isomorphism reduces to the hidden subgroup problem (HSP). What is more, most exponential speedups in quantum computation are obtained by solving instances of the HSP. A common feature of the resulting algorithms is the use of quantum coset states, which encode the hidden subgroup. An open question has been how hard it is to use these states to solve graph isomorphism. It was recently shown by Moore et al. [2005] that only an exponentially small amount of information is available from one, or a pair of coset states. A potential source of power to exploit are entangled quantum measurements that act jointly on many states at once.
We show that entangled quantum measurements on at least Ω(n log n) coset states are necessary to get useful information for the case of graph isomorphism, matching an information theoretic upper bound. This may be viewed as a negative result because in general it seems hard to implement a given highly entangled measurement. Our main theorem is very general and also rules out using joint measurements on few coset states for some other groups, such as GL(n,Fpm) and Gn where G is finite and satisfies a suitable property.

References

[1]
Aharonov, D., Kitaev, A., and Nisan, N. 1998. Quantum circuits with mixed states. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'98). ACM, New York, 20--30.
[2]
Aharonov, D., and Ta-Shma, A. 2003. Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'03). ACM, New York, 20--29. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0301023).
[3]
Alagic, G., Moore, C., and Russell, A. 2007. Quantum algorithms for Simon's problem over general groups. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'07). ACM, New York, 1217--1224. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant-ph/0603251.)
[4]
Bacon, D., Childs, A., and van Dam, W. 2005. From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0504083.
[5]
Bacon, D., Childs, A., and Dam, W. v. 2006. Optimal measurements for the dihedral hidden subgroup problem. Chicago J. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 2006, 2, 1--25. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0501044).
[6]
Beals, R. 1997. Quantum computation of Fourier transforms over the symmetric groups. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'97). ACM, New York, 48--53.
[7]
Bennett, C., Bernstein, E., Brassard, G., and Vazirani, U. 1997. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM J. Comput. 26, 5, 1510--1523.
[8]
Berkovich, Y. G., and Zhmud, E. M. 1999. Characters of Finite Groups, Part 2. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 181. American Mathematical Society, New York.
[9]
Brassard, G., and Høyer, P. 1997. An exact polynomial--time algorithm for Simon's problem. In Proceedings of 5th Israeli Symposium on Theory of Computing and Systems. ISTCS, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 12--33. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9704027.)
[10]
Childs, A., and Wocjan, P. 2007. On the quantum hardness of solving isomorphism problems as nonabelian hidden shift problems. Quant. Inf. Comput. 7, 5&6, 371--382. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0510185.)
[11]
Ettinger, M., and Høyer, P. 2000. On quantum algorithms for noncommutative hidden subgroups. Adva. Appl. Math. 25, 3, 239--251.
[12]
Ettinger, M., Høyer, P., and Knill, E. 1999a. A quantum observable for the graph isomorphism problem. (ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9901029.)
[13]
Ettinger, M., Høyer, P., and Knill, E. 1999b. Hidden subgroup states are almost orthogonal. (ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9901034.)
[14]
Ettinger, M., Høyer, P., and Knill, E. 2004. The quantum query complexity of the hidden subgroup problem is polynomial. Information Processing Letters 91, 1, 43--48. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0401083).
[15]
Friedl, K., Ivanyos, G., Magniez, F., Santha, M., and Sen, P. 2003. Hidden translation and orbit coset in quantum computing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'03). ACM, New York, 1--9. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0211091.)
[16]
Fulton, W., and Harris, J. 1991. Representation Theory: A First Course. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 129. Springer, New York.
[17]
Gallagher, P. X. 1994. Character values at involutions. Proc. AMS 120, 3, 657--659.
[18]
Gavinsky, D. 2004. Quantum solution to the hidden subgroup problem for Poly-Near-Hamiltonian groups. Quant. Inf. Computat. 4, 3, 229--235.
[19]
Grigni, M., Schulman, L., Vazirani, M., and Vazirani, U. 2004. Quantum mechanical algorithms for the nonabelian hidden subgroup problem. Combinatorica 24, 1, 137--154.
[20]
Grover, L. 1996. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'96). ACM, New York, 212--219. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9605043.)
[21]
Hallgren, R., Moore, C., Rötteler, M., Russell, A., and Sen, P. 2006. Limitations of Quantum Coset States for Graph Isomorphism. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'06). ACM, New York, 604--617.
[22]
Hallgren, S. 2002. Polynomial-time quantum algorithms for Pell's equation and the principal ideal problem. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'02). ACM, New York, 653--658.
[23]
Hallgren, S. 2005. Fast quantum algorithms for computing the unit group and class group of a number field. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'05). ACM, New York, 468--474.
[24]
Hallgren, S., Russell, A., and Ta-Shma, A. 2003. The hidden subgroup problem and quantum computation using group representations. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 4, 916--934.
[25]
Isaacs, I. M. 1976. Character Theory of Finite Groups. Academic Press, New York.
[26]
Ivanyos, G., Magniez, F., and Santha, M. 2003. Efficient quantum algorithms for some instances of the non-Abelian hidden subgroup problem. Int. J. Foundations of Computer Science 14, 5, 723--740. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0102014.)
[27]
Ivanyos, G., Sanselme, L., and Santha, M. 2007. An efficient quantum algorithm for the hidden subgroup problem in extraspecial groups. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS'07). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4393. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 586--597. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0701235.)
[28]
James, G., and Kerber, A. 1981. The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
[29]
Kitaev, A. Y. 1995. Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem. (ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9511026.)
[30]
Köbler, J., Schöning, U., and Torán, J. 1993. The Graph Isomorphism Problem. Birkhäuser, Boston.
[31]
Kuperberg, G. 2005. A subexponential-time quantum algorithm for the dihedral hidden subgroup problem. SIAM J. Comput. 35, 1, 170--188. (Also arxiv preprint quant--ph/0302112.)
[32]
Lafferty, J. D., and Rockmore, D. 1992. Fast Fourier analysis for SL2 over a finite field and related numerical experiments. Exp. Math. 1, 2, 115--139.
[33]
Moore, C., Rockmore, D., Russell, A., and Schulman, L. 2007a. The power of strong Fourier sampling: quantum algorithms for affine groups and hidden shifts. SIAM J. Comput. 37, 3, 938--958. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0503095.)
[34]
Moore, C., and Russell, A. 2005a. Explicit multiregister measurements for hidden subgroup problems. (ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0504067.)
[35]
Moore, C., and Russell, A. 2005b. The symmetric group defies strong Fourier sampling: Part II. (ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0501066.)
[36]
Moore, C., Russell, A., and Schulman, L. 2005. The symmetric group defies strong Fourier sampling. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 479--488. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0501056.)
[37]
Moore, C., Russell, A., and Śniady, P. 2007b. On the impossibility of a quantum sieve algorithm for graph isomorphism. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'07). ACM, New York, 536--545. (Also: ArXiv preprint quant-ph/0612089.)
[38]
Moore, C., Russell, A., and Vazirani, U. 2007c. A classical one-way function to confound quantum adversaries. (ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0701115.)
[39]
Mosca, M., and Ekert, A. 1998. The hidden subgroup problem and eigenvalue estimation on a quantum computer. In Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1509. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 174--188.
[40]
Nielsen, M., and Chuang, I. 2000. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[41]
Radhakrishnan, J., Rötteler, M., and Sen, P. 2009. Random measurement bases, quantum state distinction and applications to the hidden subgroup problem. Algorithmica 55, 3, 490--516. (Also: ArXiv preprints quant--ph/0503114 and quant--ph/0512085.)
[42]
Regev, O. 2004a. New lattice-based cryptographic constructions. J. ACM 51, 6, 899--942.
[43]
Regev, O. 2004b. Quantum computation and lattice problems. SIAM J. Comput. 33, 2, 738--760.
[44]
Roichman, Y. 1996. Upper bound on the characters of the symmetric groups. Invent. Math. 125, 451--485.
[45]
Schmidt, A., and Vollmer, U. 2005. Polynomial time quantum algorithm for the computation of the unit group of a number field. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'05). ACM, New York, 475--480.
[46]
Serre, J. P. 1977. Linear Representations of Finite Groups. Springer, New York.
[47]
Shor, P. 1997. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J. Comput. 26, 5, 1484--1509.
[48]
Simon, D. R. 1994. On the power of quantum computation. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'94). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 116--123.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Applications of Finite Non-Abelian Simple Groups to Cryptography in the Quantum EraLa Matematica10.1007/s44007-024-00096-z3:2(588-603)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Quantum Complexity for Discrete Logarithms and Related ProblemsAdvances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 202410.1007/978-3-031-68391-6_1(3-36)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2024
  • (2024)On Digital Signatures Based on Group Actions: QROM Security and Ring SignaturesPost-Quantum Cryptography10.1007/978-3-031-62743-9_8(227-261)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal of the ACM
      Journal of the ACM  Volume 57, Issue 6
      October 2010
      151 pages
      ISSN:0004-5411
      EISSN:1557-735X
      DOI:10.1145/1857914
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 November 2010
      Accepted: 01 March 2010
      Revised: 01 March 2010
      Received: 01 October 2008
      Published in JACM Volume 57, Issue 6

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Graph isomorphism
      2. hidden subgroup problem
      3. quantum algorithms
      4. quantum computation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Applications of Finite Non-Abelian Simple Groups to Cryptography in the Quantum EraLa Matematica10.1007/s44007-024-00096-z3:2(588-603)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Quantum Complexity for Discrete Logarithms and Related ProblemsAdvances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 202410.1007/978-3-031-68391-6_1(3-36)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2024
      • (2024)On Digital Signatures Based on Group Actions: QROM Security and Ring SignaturesPost-Quantum Cryptography10.1007/978-3-031-62743-9_8(227-261)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2024
      • (2022)Leveraging the hardness of dihedral coset problem for quantum cryptographyQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-022-03592-921:9Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
      • (2022)Practical Post-Quantum Signature Schemes from Isomorphism Problems of Trilinear FormsAdvances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 202210.1007/978-3-031-07082-2_21(582-612)Online publication date: 25-May-2022
      • (2019)Quantum Algorithm Design: Techniques and ApplicationsJournal of Systems Science and Complexity10.1007/s11424-019-9008-032:1(375-452)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2019
      • (2019)General Linear Group Action on Tensors: A Candidate for Post-quantum CryptographyTheory of Cryptography10.1007/978-3-030-36030-6_11(251-281)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019
      • (2018)Limitations of single coset states and quantum algorithms for code equivalenceQuantum Information & Computation10.5555/2871393.287139715:3-4(260-294)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
      • (2017)Efficient quantum tomography IIProceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3055399.3055454(962-974)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2017
      • (2017)Quantum game players can have advantage without discordInformation and Computation10.1016/j.ic.2017.07.004256:C(174-184)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media