Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1935826.1935882acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Topical semantics of twitter links

Published: 09 February 2011 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Twitter, a micro-blogging platform with an estimated 20 million unique monthly visitors and over 100 million registered users, offers an abundance of rich, structured data at a rate exceeding 600 tweets per second. Recent efforts to leverage this social data to rank users by quality and topical relevance have largely focused on the "follow" relationship. Twitter's data offers additional implicit relationships between users, however, such as "retweets" and "mentions". In this paper we investigate the semantics of the follow and retweet relationships. Specifically, we show that the transitivity of topical relevance is better preserved over retweet links, and that retweeting a user is a significantly stronger indicator of topical interest than following him. We demonstrate these properties by ranking users with two variants of the PageRank algorithm; one based on the follows sub-graph and one based on the implicit retweet sub-graph. We perform a user study to assess the topical relevance of the resulting top-ranked users.

    References

    [1]
    State of twitter spam: http://blog.twitter.com/2010/03/state-of-twitter-spam.html.
    [2]
    Tunkrank: http://tunkrank.com/.
    [3]
    The web ecology project: http://www.webecologyproject.org/.
    [4]
    A. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Stata, A. Tomkins, and J. Wiener. Graph structure in the web. Computer Networks, 33(1--6):309--320, 2000.
    [5]
    J. Cho and S. Roy. Impact of search engines on page popularity. In WWW '04, pages 20--29, 2004.
    [6]
    A. Das Sarma, A. Das Sarma, S. Gollapudi, and R. Panigrahy. Ranking mechanisms in twitter-like forums. In WSDM '10, pages 21--30, 2010.
    [7]
    G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles. Efficient identification of web communities. In KDD '00, pages 150--160, 2000.
    [8]
    K. E. Gill. How can we measure the influence of the blogosphere? In WWW '04, May 2004.
    [9]
    D. Gruhl, R. Guha, D. Liben-Nowell, and A. Tomkins. Information diffusion through blogspace. In WWW '04, pages 491--501, 2004.
    [10]
    Z. Gyöngyi, H. Garcia-Molina, and J. Pedersen. Combating web spam with trustrank. In VLDB '04, pages 576--587, 2004.
    [11]
    B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. CoRR, 2008.
    [12]
    A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07, pages 56--65, 2007.
    [13]
    G. Jeh and J. Widom. Scaling personalized web search. In WWW '03: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 271--279, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
    [14]
    J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1999.
    [15]
    B. Krishnamurthy, P. Gill, and M. Arlitt. A few chirps about twitter. In WOSP '08, pages 19--24, 2008.
    [16]
    R. Kumar, J. Novak, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. On the bursty evolution of blogspace. In WWW '03, pages 568--576, 2003.
    [17]
    R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. Trawling the web for emerging cyber-communities. In Computer Networks, pages 1481--1493, 1999.
    [18]
    J. Leskovec, M. Mcglohon, C. Faloutsos, N. Glance, and M. Hurst. Cascading behavior in large blog graphs. In SDM, 2007.
    [19]
    Y.-M. Li, C.-Y. Lai, and C.-W. Chen. Identifying bloggers with marketing influence in the blogosphere. In ICEC '09, pages 335--340, 2009.
    [20]
    R. L. P. Melville, V. Sindhwani. Social media analytics: Channeling the power of the blogosphere for marketing insight. In WIN '09, 2009.
    [21]
    L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
    [22]
    J. C. R. Almeida, B. Mozafari. On the evolution of wikipedia. In ICWSM '07, 2007.
    [23]
    D. Ramage, S. Dumais, and D. Liebling. Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In ICWSM '10, 2010.
    [24]
    A. Ritter, C. Cherry, and B. Dolan. Unsupervised modeling of twitter conversations. In HLT-NAACL, 2010.
    [25]
    K. Sia, C. J, K. Hino, Y. Chi, S. Zhu, and B. Tseng. Monitoring rss feeds based on user browsing pattern. In ICWSM '07, 2007.
    [26]
    J. Weng, E.-p. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM '10, 2010.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)From City Hall to Twitter: Navigating political context in US mayors’ online engagementCommunication and the Public10.1177/205704732312248199:1(114-127)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Scalable Spatio-temporal Top-k Interaction Queries on Dynamic CommunitiesACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/364837410:1(1-25)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Predicting users’ future interests on social networks: A reference frameworkInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10376561:5(103765)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '11: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
    February 2011
    870 pages
    ISBN:9781450304931
    DOI:10.1145/1935826
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 February 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. link semantics
    2. modeling
    3. ranking
    4. twitter
    5. web graph

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    Acceptance Rates

    WSDM '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 83 of 372 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)From City Hall to Twitter: Navigating political context in US mayors’ online engagementCommunication and the Public10.1177/205704732312248199:1(114-127)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Scalable Spatio-temporal Top-k Interaction Queries on Dynamic CommunitiesACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/364837410:1(1-25)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Predicting users’ future interests on social networks: A reference frameworkInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10376561:5(103765)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2023)Spotlight Tweets: A Lens for Exploring Attention Dynamics within Online Sensemaking During Crisis EventsACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/35772136:1-2(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
    • (2023)User's Cognitive-Behavior-Based Preference Access Under Disease-Specific Online Medical Inquiry Text MiningIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management10.1109/TEM.2022.314343270:8(2827-2845)Online publication date: Aug-2023
    • (2023)Social Network Analysis of Irish Covid-19 Interactions on Telegram2023 31st Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (AICS)10.1109/AICS60730.2023.10470867(1-8)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2023
    • (2023)The power of empathy and positive emotions in enhancing the communication of environmental issues: a case study of ‘wandering elephant in Yunnan’ on twitterEnvironmental Research Communications10.1088/2515-7620/aced3a5:8(085003)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
    • (2021)A Framework to Capture the Shift in Dynamics of a Multi-phase Protest—A Case Study of Hong Kong ProtestsEmerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security10.1007/978-981-15-9774-9_10(95-110)Online publication date: 5-May-2021
    • (2020)Twitter as a mirror - perspectives of common men and key personalities2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ic-ETITE)10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.436(1-5)Online publication date: Feb-2020
    • (2019)Similarity Analysis of Criminals on Social Networks: An Example on Twitter2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)10.1109/ICCCN.2019.8847028(1-9)Online publication date: Jul-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media