Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1963405.1963447acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning to re-rank: query-dependent image re-ranking using click data

Published: 28 March 2011 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Our objective is to improve the performance of keyword based image search engines by re-ranking their original results. To this end, we address three limitations of existing search engines in this paper. First, there is no straight-forward, fully automated way of going from textual queries to visual features. Image search engines therefore primarily rely on static and textual features for ranking. Visual features are mainly used for secondary tasks such as finding similar images. Second, image rankers are trained on query-image pairs labeled with relevance judgments determined by human experts. Such labels are well known to be noisy due to various factors including ambiguous queries, unknown user intent and subjectivity in human judgments. This leads to learning a sub-optimal ranker. Finally, a static ranker is typically built to handle disparate user queries. The ranker is therefore unable to adapt its parameters to suit the query at hand which again leads to sub-optimal results. We demonstrate that all of these problems can be mitigated by employing a re-ranking algorithm that leverages aggregate user click data.
    We hypothesize that images clicked in response to a query are mostly relevant to the query. We therefore re-rank the original search results so as to promote images that are likely to be clicked to the top of the ranked list. Our re-ranking algorithm employs Gaussian Process regression to predict the normalized click count for each image, and combines it with the original ranking score. Our approach is shown to significantly boost the performance of the Bing image search engine on a wide range of tail queries.

    References

    [1]
    E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In SIGIR, 2006.
    [2]
    R. Agrawal, A. Halverson, K. Kenthapadi, N. Mishra, and P. Tsaparas. Generating labels from clicks. In WSDM, 2009.
    [3]
    N. Ben-Haim, B. Babenko, and S. Belongie. Improving web-based image search via content based clustering. In SLAM, 2006.
    [4]
    T. L. Berg and D. A. Forsyth. Animals on the web. In CVPR, 2006.
    [5]
    B. Carterette and R. Jones. Evaluating search engines by modeling the relationship between relevance and clicks. In NIPS, 2007.
    [6]
    O. Chapelle, Y. Chang, and T.-X. Liu. ICML 2010 workshop on the learning to rank challenge.
    [7]
    O. Chapelle and Y. Zhang. A dynamic Bayesian network click model for web search ranking. In WWW, 2009.
    [8]
    N. Craswell and M. Szummer. Random walks on the click graph. In SIGIR, 2007.
    [9]
    E. Cutrell and Z. Guan. What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In CHI, 2007.
    [10]
    N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005.
    [11]
    G. Dupret and C. Liao. A model to estimate intrinsic document relevance from the clickthrough logs of a web search engine. In WSDM, 2010.
    [12]
    R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. A visual category filter for google images. In ECCV, 2004.
    [13]
    R. Fergus, Y. Weiss, and A. Torralba. Semi-supervised learning in gigantic image collections. In NIPS, 2009.
    [14]
    S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM TOIS, 23(2):147--168, 2005.
    [15]
    F. Guo, L. Li, and C. Faloutsos. Tailoring click models to user goals. In WSCD, 2009.
    [16]
    Y. Jing and S. Baluja. VisualRank: Applying PageRank to large-scale image search. IEEE PAMI, 30(11):1877--1890, 2008.
    [17]
    T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, F. Radlinski, and G. Gay. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM TOIS, 25(2):7, 2007.
    [18]
    D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91--110, 2004.
    [19]
    T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa. Gray scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local ninary patterns. In ECCV, 2000.
    [20]
    F. Radlinski, M. Kurup, and T. Joachims. How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality? In CIKM, 2008.
    [21]
    C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. The MIT Press, December 2005.
    [22]
    M. Richardson, E. Dominowska, and R. Ragno. Predicting clicks: estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In WWW, 2007.
    [23]
    D. E. Rose and D. Levinson. Understanding user goals in web search. In WWW, 2004.
    [24]
    F. Scholer, M. Shokouhi, B. Billerbeck, and A. Turpin. Using clicks as implicit judgments: Expectations versus observations. In ECIR, 2008.
    [25]
    B. Scholkopf and A. Smola. Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, 2002.
    [26]
    F. Schroff, A. Criminisi, and A. Zisserman. Harvesting images databases from the web. In ICCV, 2007.
    [27]
    M. Shokouhi, F. Scholer, and A. Turpin. Investigating the effectiveness of clickthrough data for document reordering. In ECIR, 2008.
    [28]
    A. W. M. Smeulders, M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. C. Jain. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE PAMI, 22(12):1349--1380, 2000.
    [29]
    G. Smith and H. Ashman. Evaluating implicit judgments from image search interactions. In WebSci'09: Society On-line, 2009.
    [30]
    G. Wang and D. A. Forsyth. Object image retrieval by exploiting online knowledge resources. In CVPR, 2008.
    [31]
    L. Wang, L. Yang, and X. Tian. Query aware visual similarity propagation for image search reranking. In ACM Multimedia, 2009.
    [32]
    J. Weston, S. Bengio, and N. Usinier. Large scale image annotation: Learning to rank with joint word-image embeddings. In ICML Workshop on the Learning to Rank Challenge, 2010.
    [33]
    R. Yang, A. Hauptmann, and R. Jin. Multimedia search with pseudo-relevance feedback. In CIVR, 2003.
    [34]
    H. Zitouni, S. G. Sevil, D. Ozkan, and P. Duygulu. Re-ranking of image search results using a graph algorithm. In ICPR, 2008.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Comparing point‐wise and pair‐wise relevance judgment with brain signalsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24936Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Recallable Question Answering-Based Re-Ranking Considering Semantic Region for Cross-Modal RetrievalIEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing10.1109/OJSP.2023.32382804(1-11)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2021)Learning to Rank for Educational Search EnginesIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2021.307519614:2(211-225)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Learning to re-rank: query-dependent image re-ranking using click data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web
      March 2011
      840 pages
      ISBN:9781450306324
      DOI:10.1145/1963405
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. click data
      2. image re-ranking
      3. image search

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WWW '11
      WWW '11: 20th International World Wide Web Conference
      March 28 - April 1, 2011
      Hyderabad, India

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Comparing point‐wise and pair‐wise relevance judgment with brain signalsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24936Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
      • (2023)Recallable Question Answering-Based Re-Ranking Considering Semantic Region for Cross-Modal RetrievalIEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing10.1109/OJSP.2023.32382804(1-11)Online publication date: 2023
      • (2021)Learning to Rank for Educational Search EnginesIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2021.307519614:2(211-225)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021
      • (2020)Preference-based Evaluation Metrics for Web Image SearchProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3397271.3401146(369-378)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2020
      • (2020)Efficient Implicit Content-based Image Re-ranking ApproachJournal of Information & Knowledge Management10.1142/S021964922040003119:01(2040003)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2020
      • (2019)Improving Web Image Search with Contextual InformationProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3357384.3358011(1683-1692)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2019
      • (2019)Learning Click-Based Deep Structure-Preserving Embeddings with Visual AttentionACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/332899415:3(1-19)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2019
      • (2019)Grid-based Evaluation Metrics for Web Image SearchThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313514(2103-2114)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
      • (2019) Sparse Multi-Graph Ranking towards Social Image Retrieval † 2019 6th International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-Cultural Computing (BESC)10.1109/BESC48373.2019.8963052(1-7)Online publication date: Oct-2019
      • (2019)Aggregation of Multiple Pseudo Relevance Feedbacks for Image Search Re-RankingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29421427(147553-147559)Online publication date: 2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media