Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1793274.1793282acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using clicks as implicit judgments: expectations versus observations

Published: 30 March 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Clickthrough data has been the subject of increasing popularity as an implicit indicator of user feedback. Previous analysis has suggested that user click behaviour is subject to a quality bias--that is, users click at different rank positions when viewing effective search results than when viewing less effective search results. Based on this observation, it should be possible to use click data to infer the quality of the underlying search system. In this paper we carry out a user study to systematically investigate how click behaviour changes for different levels of search system effectiveness as measured by information retrieval performance metrics. Our results show that click behaviour does not vary systematically with the quality of search results. However, click behaviour does vary significantly between individual users, and between search topics. This suggests that using direct click behaviour--click rank and click frequency--to infer the quality of the underlying search system is problematic. Further analysis of our user click data indicates that the correspondence between clicks in a search result list and subsequent confirmation that the clicked resource is actually relevant is low. Using clicks as an implicit indication of relevance should therefore be done with caution.

References

[1]
Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S.: Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: Efthimiadis, et al. (eds.) {7}, pp. 19-26.
[2]
Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S., Ragno, R.: Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In: Efthimiadis, et al. (eds.) {7}, pp. 3-10.
[3]
Allan, J., Carterette, B., Lewis, J.: When will information retrieval be "good enough"? In: Marchionini, et al. (eds.) {15}, pp. 433-440.
[4]
Bailey, P., Craswell, N., Hawking, D.: Engineering a multi-purpose test collection for web retrieval experiments. Information Processing and Management 39(6), 853-871 (2003).
[5]
Buckley, C., Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation. In: TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval {21}.
[6]
Craswell, N., Szummer, M.: Random walks on the click graph. In: Kraaij, et al. (eds.) {14}, pp. 239-246.
[7]
Efthimiadis, E., Dumais, S., Hawking, D., Järvelin, K. (eds.): Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WA (2006).
[8]
Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., White, T.: Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 23(2), 147-168 (2005).
[9]
Harman, D.K.: The TREC test collection. In: TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval {21}.
[10]
Joachims, T.: Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 133-142. ACM Press, New York (2002).
[11]
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In: Marchionini, et al. (eds.) {15}, pp. 154-161.
[12]
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Radlinski, F., Gay, G.: Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 25(2), 7 (2007).
[13]
Kemp, C., Ramamohanarao, K.: Long-term learning for web search engines. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, London, UK, pp. 263-274. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).
[14]
Kraaij, W., de Vries, A., Clarke, C., Fuhr, N., Kando, N. (eds.): Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2007).
[15]
Marchionini, G., Moffat, A., Tait, J., Baeza-Yates, R., Ziviani, N. (eds.): Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Salvador, Brazil (2005).
[16]
Radlinski, F., Joachims, T.: Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback. In: Proceeding of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 239-248 (2005).
[17]
Radlinski, F., Joachims, T.: Active exploration for learning rankings from click-through data. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, San Jose, California, pp. 570-579 (2007).
[18]
Turpin, A., Scholer, F.: User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks. In: Efthimiadis, et al. (eds.) {7}, pp. 11-18.
[19]
Turpin, A., Scholer, F., Billerbeck, B., Abel, L.: Examining the pseudostandard web search engine results page. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 9-16 (2006).
[20]
Turpin, A., Tsegay, Y., Hawking, D., Williams, H.E.: Fast generation of result snippets in web search. In: Kraaij, et al. (eds.) {14}, pp. 127-134.
[21]
Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K.: TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005).

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)MergeRUCBProceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/2684822.2685290(17-26)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2015
  • (2014)Relative confidence sampling for efficient on-line ranker evaluationProceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining10.1145/2556195.2556256(73-82)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2014
  • (2013)Fidelity, Soundness, and Efficiency of Interleaved Comparison MethodsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/2536736.253673731:4(1-43)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Using clicks as implicit judgments: expectations versus observations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ECIR'08: Proceedings of the IR research, 30th European conference on Advances in information retrieval
    March 2008
    718 pages
    ISBN:3540786457
    • Editors:
    • Craig Macdonald,
    • Iadh Ounis,
    • Vassilis Plachouras,
    • Ian Ruthven,
    • Ryen W. White

    Sponsors

    • Yahoo! Research
    • Google Inc.
    • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research
    • Matrixware Information Services

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 30 March 2008

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2015)MergeRUCBProceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/2684822.2685290(17-26)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2015
    • (2014)Relative confidence sampling for efficient on-line ranker evaluationProceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining10.1145/2556195.2556256(73-82)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2014
    • (2013)Fidelity, Soundness, and Efficiency of Interleaved Comparison MethodsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/2536736.253673731:4(1-43)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013
    • (2013)Discovering semantic associations from web search interactionsProceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media10.1145/2481492.2481517(202-207)Online publication date: 1-May-2013
    • (2012)On caption bias in interleaving experimentsProceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management10.1145/2396761.2396780(115-124)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2012
    • (2011)A probabilistic method for inferring preferences from clicksProceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management10.1145/2063576.2063618(249-258)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2011
    • (2011)Implicit association via crowd-sourced coselectionProceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia10.1145/1995966.1995972(7-16)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2011
    • (2011)Learning to re-rankProceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web10.1145/1963405.1963447(277-286)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2011
    • (2009)Are Clickthroughs Useful for Image Labelling?Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 0110.1109/WI-IAT.2009.35(191-197)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2009
    • (2008)Matching task profiles and user needs in personalized web searchProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management10.1145/1458082.1458175(689-698)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2008

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media