Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2049536.2049549acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The vlogging phenomena: a deaf perspective

Published: 24 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Highly textual websites present barriers to Deaf people, primarily using American Sign Language for communication. Deaf people have been posting ASL content in form of vlogs to YouTube and specialized websites such as Deafvideo.TV. This paper presents some of the first insights into the use of vlogging technology and techniques among the Deaf community. The findings suggest that there are differences between YouTube and Deafvideo.TV due to differences between mainstream and specialized sites. Vlogging technology seems to influence use of styles that are not found or are used differently in face-to-face communications. Examples include the alteration of vloggers' signing space to convey different meanings on screen.

References

[1]
Bauman, H. ed. Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2008.
[2]
Bellugi, U. and Klima, E. The Signs of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979.
[3]
Davenport, S. Improving communication with the deaf patient. The Journal of Family Practice, 4, 6, 1977, 1065.
[4]
Fels, D., Gerdzhev, M., Hibbard, E., Goodrum, A., Richards, J., Hardman, J. and Thompson, N. Sign language online with Signlink Studio 2.0. In UAHCI '09 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Part III: Applications and Services. 2009, 492--501.
[5]
Fels, D., Konstantinidis, B., Hardman, J., Carey, C. and Porch, W. Providing inclusive video-mediated communication. Annu. Rev. Commun., 57, 2004, 593--601.
[6]
Gaillard, H. The Universal Magic of Sign Language. In Buchanan, B. ed. Gaillard in Deaf America, a portrait of the Deaf community, 1917, Gallaudet Press, Washington, D.C., 2002, 19--51.
[7]
Herring, S., Scheidt, L., Bonus, S. and Wright, E. Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. In Proceedings 37th Annual HICSS Conference. 2004, 40101b-40112.
[8]
Keating, E. and Mirus, G. American sign language in virtual space: Interactions between deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices. Lang Soc, 32, 5 2003, 693--714.
[9]
Lange, P. Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube. J. Computer-Mediat. Comm., 13, 1 2008, 361--380.
[10]
Mayberry, R. I. First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. J. Speech Hear. Res., 36, 6 1993, 1258--1270.
[11]
McKeague, M. T. The 21st Century Addiction: User Generated Content Dependency and Media Aesthetic Expectations as Experienced Through YouTube. Doctorate in Philosophy Thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania 2011.
[12]
Mitchell, W. J. T. There are no visual media. J. Vis.Cult., 4, 2 2005, 257--266.
[13]
Molyneax, H., O'Donnell, S. and Gibson, K. Exploring the gender divide on YouTube: An analysis of the creation and reception of vlogs. American Commun. J., 10, 1 2008.
[14]
Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J. and Gumbrecht, M. Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? In CSCW '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 2004, 222--231.
[15]
Ong, W. Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word. Routledge Press, New York, 2004.
[16]
Padden, C. and Humphries, T. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, 1998.
[17]
Schwier, R. A. and Misanchuk, E. R. Technical Quality and Perceived Quality in Multimedia Materials--Are They the Same or Different Things? In Annual Convention of the Association for Media and Technology in Education in Canada. Saskatoon, 1997.
[18]
Veditz, G. Preservation of the sign language. Film. 1913.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Accessibility-Related Publication Distribution in HCI Based on a Meta-AnalysisExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519701(1-28)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
  • (2021)What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”?Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445412(1-18)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2020)Deaf and hard-of-hearing users' prioritization of genres of online video content requiring accurate captionsProceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference10.1145/3371300.3383337(1-12)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ASSETS '11: The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
October 2011
348 pages
ISBN:9781450309202
DOI:10.1145/2049536
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. access
  2. deaf
  3. sign language
  4. technology
  5. video
  6. vlog
  7. website

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ASSETS '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Accessibility-Related Publication Distribution in HCI Based on a Meta-AnalysisExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519701(1-28)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
  • (2021)What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”?Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445412(1-18)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2020)Deaf and hard-of-hearing users' prioritization of genres of online video content requiring accurate captionsProceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference10.1145/3371300.3383337(1-12)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
  • (2018)Understanding Blind or Visually Impaired People on YouTube through Qualitative Analysis of VideosProceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video10.1145/3210825.3213565(191-196)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2018
  • (2014)Health Vlogs as Social Support for Chronic Illness ManagementACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/263006721:4(1-31)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2014
  • (2014)TerpTube: A Signed Language Mentoring Management SystemComputers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-319-08599-9_62(408-414)Online publication date: 2014
  • (2013)Health vlogger-viewer interaction in chronic illness managementProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2470654.2470663(49-58)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2013

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media