Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

PICA: Processor Idle Cycle Aggregation for Energy-Efficient Embedded Systems

Published: 01 July 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Processor Idle Cycle Aggregation (PICA) is a promising approach for low-power execution of processors, in which small memory stalls are aggregated to create large ones, enabling profitable switch of the processor into low-power mode. We extend the previous approach in three dimensions. First we develop static analysis for the PICA technique and present optimal parameters for five common types of loops based on steady-state analysis. Second, to remedy the weakness of software-only control in varying environment, we enhance PICA with minimal hardware extension that ensures correct execution for any loops and parameters, thus greatly facilitating exploration-based parameter tuning. Third, we demonstrate that our PICA technique can be applied to certain types of nested loops with variable bounds, thus enhancing the applicability of PICA. We validate our analytical model against simulation-based optimization and also show, through our experiments on embedded application benchmarks, that our technique can be applied to a wide range of loops with average 20% energy reductions, compared to executions without PICA.

References

[1]
Azevedo, A., Issenin, I., Cornea, R., Gupta, R., Dutt, N., Veidenbaum, A., and Nicolau, A. 2002. Profile-based dynamic voltage scheduling using program checkpoints. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE’02). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 168.
[2]
Benini, L., Bogliolo, A., and Micheli, G. 2000. A survey of design techniques for system-level dynamic power management. IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst. 8, 3, 299--316.
[3]
Brockmeyer, E., Miranda, M., Corporaal, H., and Catthoor, F. 2003. Layer assignment techniques for low energy in multi-layered memory organisations. In Proc. 6th ACM/IEEE Design and Test in Europe Conf. Munich, Germany, 1070--1075.
[4]
Burd, T. D. and Brodersen, R. W. 2000. Design issues for dynamic voltage scaling. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED’00). ACM, New York, NY, 9--14.
[5]
Chatterjee, S., Parker, E., Hanlon, P. J., and Lebeck, A. R. 2001. Exact analysis of the cache behavior of nested loops. SIGPLAN Not. 36, 286--297.
[6]
Choi, K., Soma, R., and Pedram, M. 2005. Fine-grained dynamic voltage and frequency scaling for precise energy and performance tradeoff based on the ratio of off-chip access to on-chip computation times. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Design Cir. Syst. 24, 1, 18--28.
[7]
Ghosh, S., Martonosi, M., and Malik, S. 1997. Cache miss equations: An analytical representation of cache misses. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS’97). ACM, New York, NY, 317--324.
[8]
Gowan, M. K., Biro, L. L., and Jackson, D. B. 1998. Power considerations in the design of the alpha 21264 microprocessor. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference. 726--731.
[9]
Issenin, I., Brockmeyer, E., Miranda, M., and Dutt, N. 2004. Data reuse analysis technique for software-controlled memory hierarchies. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe. 202--207.
[10]
Kandemir, M. and Choudhary, A. 2002. Compiler-directed scratch pad memory hierarchy design and management. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference. 690--695.
[11]
Lee, J. and Shrivastava, A. 2008. Static analysis of processor stall cycle aggregation. http://www.public.asu.edu/~ashriva6/papers/pica.html.
[12]
Lee, J.-E., Kwon, W., Kim, T., Chung, E.-Y., Choi, K.-M., Kong, J.-T., Eo, S.-K., and Gwilt, D. 2005. System level architecture evaluation and optimization: An industrial case study with AMBA3 AXI. J. Semiconductor Technol. Sci. 5, 4, 229--237.
[13]
McCalpin, J. D. 1995. Memory bandwidth and machine balance in current high performance computers. IEEE Comput. Soc. Tech. Comm. Comput. Architect. Newsl., 19--25.
[14]
Mowry, T. C., Lam, M. S., and Gupta, A. 1992. Design and evaluation of a compiler algorithm for prefetching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. 62--73.
[15]
Rabaey, J. and Pedram, M., Eds. 1996. Low Power Design Methodologies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
[16]
Shrivastava, A., Earlie, E., Dutt, N., and Nicolau, A. 2005. Aggregating processor free time for energy reduction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS’05). 154--159.
[17]
Shrivastava, A., Lee, J., and Jeyapaul, R. 2010. Cache vulnerability equations for protecting data in embedded processor caches from soft errors. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 45, 4, 143--152.
[18]
Unsal, O. S., Koren, I., Krishna, C. M., and Moritz, C. A. 2002. Cool-fetch: Compiler-enabled power-aware fetch throttling. IEEE Comput. Architect. Lett. 1.
[19]
VanderWiel, S. P. and Lilja, D. J. 2000. Data prefetch mechanisms. ACM Comput. Surv. 32, 2, 174--199.
[20]
Verdoolaege, S., Seghir, R., Beyls, K., Loechner, V., and Bruynooghe, M. 2007. Counting integer points in parametric polytopes using Barvinok’s rational functions. Algorithmica 48, 1, 37--66.
[21]
Zivojnovic, V., Martinez, J., Schläger, C., and Meyr, H. 1994. DSPstone: A DSP-oriented benchmarking methodology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing Applications and Technology (ICSPAT’94).

Index Terms

  1. PICA: Processor Idle Cycle Aggregation for Energy-Efficient Embedded Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
      ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 11, Issue 2
      July 2012
      342 pages
      ISSN:1539-9087
      EISSN:1558-3465
      DOI:10.1145/2220336
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Journal Family

      Publication History

      Published: 01 July 2012
      Accepted: 01 May 2011
      Revised: 01 February 2011
      Received: 01 July 2008
      Published in TECS Volume 11, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Low power
      2. code transformation
      3. embedded systems
      4. memory bound loops
      5. processor free time
      6. stall cycle aggregation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 310
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media