Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2229012.2229042acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Symmetries and optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design

Published: 04 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We efficiently solve the optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design problem for independent additive bidders with arbitrary demands when either the number of bidders is held constant or the number of items is held constant. In the first setting, we need that each bidder's values for the items are sampled from a possibly correlated, item-symmetric distribution, allowing different distributions for each bidder. In the second setting, we allow the values of each bidder for the items to be arbitrarily correlated, but assume that the distribution of bidder types is bidder-symmetric. These symmetric distributions include i.i.d. distributions, as well as many natural correlated distributions. E.g., an item-symmetric distribution can be obtained by taking an arbitrary distribution, and "forgetting" the names of items; this could arise when different members of a bidder population have various sorts of correlations among the items, but the items are "the same" with respect to a random bidder from the population.
For all ∈>0, we obtain a computationally efficient additive ∈-approximation, when the value distributions are bounded, or a multiplicative (1-∈)-approximation when the value distributions are unbounded, but satisfy the Monotone Hazard Rate condition, covering a widely studied class of distributions in Economics. Our running time is polynomial in max{#items,#bidders}, and not the size of the support of the joint distribution of all bidders' values for all items, which is typically exponential in both the number of items and the number of bidders. Our mechanisms are randomized, explicitly price bundles, and in some cases can also accommodate budget constraints.
Our results are enabled by several new tools and structural properties of Bayesian mechanisms, which we expect to find applications beyond the settings we consider here; indeed, there has already been follow-up research [Cai et al. 2012; Cai and Huang 2012] making use of our tools in both symmetric and non-symmetric settings. In particular, we provide a symmetrization technique that turns any truthful mechanism into one that has the same revenue and respects all symmetries in the underlying value distributions. We also prove that item-symmetric mechanisms satisfy a natural strong-monotonicity property which, unlike cyclic-monotonicity, can be harnessed algorithmically. Finally, we provide a technique that turns any given ∈-BIC mechansism (i.e. one where incentive constraints are violated by ∈) into a truly-BIC mechanism at the cost of O(√∈) revenue.

References

[1]
Alaei, S. 2011. Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers. In the 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
[2]
Bhattacharya, S., Goel, G., Gollapudi, S., and Munagala, K. 2010. Budget Constrained Auctions with Heterogeneous Items. In the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
[3]
Briest, P., Chawla, S., Kleinberg, R., and Weinberg, S. M. 2010. Pricing Randomized Allocations. In the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA).
[4]
Briest, P. and Krysta, P. 2007. Buying Cheap is Expensive: Hardness of Non-Parametric Multi-Product Pricing. In the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA).
[5]
Brown, G. W. and Neumann, J. 1950. Solutions of Games by Differential Equations. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (editors), Contributions to the Theory of Games. Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, 73--79.
[6]
Cai, Y. and Daskalakis, C. 2011. Extreme-Value Theorems for Optimal Multidimensional Pricing. In the 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
[7]
Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2012. An Algorithmic Characterization of Multi-Dimensional Mechanisms. In the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
[8]
Cai, Y. and Huang, Z. 2012. Simple and Nearly Optimal Multi-Item Auction. Manuscript.
[9]
Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., and Kleinberg, R. D. 2007. Algorithmic Pricing via Virtual Valuations. In the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC).
[10]
Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., Malec, D. L., and Sivan, B. 2010a. Multi-Parameter Mechanism Design and Sequential Posted Pricing. In the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
[11]
Chawla, S., Malec, D. L., and Sivan, B. 2010b. The Power of Randomness in Bayesian Optimal Mechanism Design. In the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC).
[12]
Daskalakis, C. and Weinberg, S. M. 2011. On Optimal Multi-Dimensional Mechanism Design. arXiv Report.
[13]
Dobzinski, S., Fu, H., and Kleinberg, R. D. 2011. Optimal Auctions with Correlated Bidders are Easy. In the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
[14]
Gale, D., Kuhn, H. W., and Tucker, A. W. 1950. On Symmetric Games. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (editors), Contributions to the Theory of Games. Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, 81--87.
[15]
Hartline, J. D., Kleinberg, R., and Malekian, A. 2011. Bayesian Incentive Compatibility via Matchings. In the Twenty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA).
[16]
Hartline, J. D. and Lucier, B. 2010. Bayesian Algorithmic Mechanism Design. In the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
[17]
Johnson, D. M., Dulmage, A. L., and Mendelsohn, N. S. 1960. On an Algorithm of G. Birkhoff Concerning Doubly Stochastic Matrices. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 3, 3, 237--242.
[18]
Manelli, A. M. and Vincent, D. R. 2007. Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Revenue Maximization and the Multiple-Good Monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory 137, 1, 153--185.
[19]
Myerson, R. B. 1981. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 1, 58--73.
[20]
Nash, J. F. 1951. Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics 54, 2, 286--295.
[21]
Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., and Vazirani, V. V., Eds. 2007. Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Settling the Competition Complexity of Additive Buyers over Independent ItemsProceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation10.1145/3670865.3673627(420-446)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Optimal Auctions through Deep Learning: Advances in Differentiable EconomicsJournal of the ACM10.1145/363074971:1(1-53)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Data market design through deep learningProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3666414(6662-6689)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Symmetries and optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    EC '12: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
    June 2012
    1016 pages
    ISBN:9781450314152
    DOI:10.1145/2229012
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 June 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. auction theory
    2. multi-dimensional mechanism design
    3. pricing
    4. revenue optimization
    5. symmetries

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    EC '12
    Sponsor:
    EC '12: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
    June 4 - 8, 2012
    Valencia, Spain

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

    Upcoming Conference

    EC '25
    The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
    July 7 - 11, 2025
    Stanford , CA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Settling the Competition Complexity of Additive Buyers over Independent ItemsProceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation10.1145/3670865.3673627(420-446)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Optimal Auctions through Deep Learning: Advances in Differentiable EconomicsJournal of the ACM10.1145/363074971:1(1-53)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Data market design through deep learningProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3666414(6662-6689)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
    • (2023)On the robustness of mechanism design under total variation distanceProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3666202(1620-1629)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Optimal-er auctions through attentionProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3600270.3602787(34734-34747)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022
    • (2022)On the Complexity of Optimal Lottery Pricing and Randomized Mechanisms for a Unit-Demand BuyerSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/17M113648151:3(492-548)Online publication date: 12-May-2022
    • (2022)The menu-size complexity of revenue approximationGames and Economic Behavior10.1016/j.geb.2021.03.001134(281-307)Online publication date: Jul-2022
    • (2021)An efficient ε-BIC to BIC transformation and its application to black-box reduction in revenue maximizationProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458145(1337-1356)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
    • (2021)The Sample Complexity of Up-to-ε Multi-dimensional Revenue MaximizationJournal of the ACM10.1145/343972268:3(1-28)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2021
    • (2020)Buy-many mechanismsACM SIGecom Exchanges10.1145/3440959.344096318:1(12-18)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media