Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531635acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Catalyst: triggering collective action with thresholds

Published: 15 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The web is a catalyst for drawing people together around shared goals, but many groups never reach critical mass. It can thus be risky to commit time or effort to a goal: participants show up only to discover that nobody else did, and organizers devote significant effort to causes that never get off the ground. Crowdfunding has lessened some of this risk by only calling in donations when an effort reaches a collective monetary goal. However, it leaves unsolved the harder problem of mobilizing effort, time and participation. We generalize the concept into activation thresholds, commitments that are conditioned on others' participation. With activation thresholds, supporters only need to show up for an event if enough other people commit as well. Catalyst is a platform that introduces activation thresholds for on-demand events. For more complex coordination needs, Catalyst also provides thresholds based on time or role (e.g., a bake sale requiring commitments for bakers, decorators, and sellers). In a multi-month field deployment, Catalyst helped users organize events including food bank volunteering, on-demand study groups, and mass participation events like a human chess game. Our results suggest that activation thresholds can indeed catalyze a large class of new collective efforts.

References

[1]
Doodle. http://www.doodle.com.
[2]
Kickstarter. http://www.kickstarter.com.
[3]
Kickstarter stats. http://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats.
[4]
U.S. census bureau genealogy data. http: //www.census.gov/genealogy/www/data/index.html.
[5]
5. We the people. http://petitions.whitehouse.gov.
[6]
Zokos. http://www.zokos.com.
[7]
Arkes, H. R., and Blumer, C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational behavior and human decision processes (1985).
[8]
Backman, E. V., and Smith, S. R. Healthy organizations, unhealthy communities' Nonpro't Management and Leadership (2000).
[9]
Banerjee, A. V. A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1992).
[10]
Becker, G. S., and Murphy, K. M. The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1992).
[11]
Bédoyan, I., Aelst, P. V., and Walgrave, S. Limitations and possibilities of transnational mobilization: the case of eu summit protesters in brussels, 2001. Mobilization: An International Quarterly (2004).
[12]
Beenen, G., Ling, K., et al. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In Proc. CSCW (2004).
[13]
Benkler, Y. Coase's penguin, or, linux and- the nature of the 'rm'. Yale Law Journal (2002), 369--446.
[14]
Bryant, S. L., Forte, A., and Bruckman, A. Becoming wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proc. GROUP (2005).
[15]
Byers, J. W., Mitzenmacher, M., Potamias, M., and Zervas, G. A month in the life of groupon. CoRR (2011).
[16]
Cialdini, R. B. Influence: Science and practice. 2001.
[17]
Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. Suggestbot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia. In Proc. IUI (2007).
[18]
Das, E., Kerkhof, P., and Kuiper, J. Improving the effectiveness of fundraising messages: The impact of charity goal attainment, message framing, and evidence on persuasion. Applied Communication Research (2008).
[19]
Donath, J. S. Identity and deception in the virtual community. Communities in cyberspace (1999).
[20]
Forte, A., Kittur, N., et al. Coordination and beyond: social functions of groups in open content production. In Proc. CSCW (2012).
[21]
Gine, X., Karlan, D., and Zinman, J. Put your money where your butt is: a commitment contract for smoking cessation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (2010).
[22]
Granovetter, M. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology (1978).
[23]
Grudin, J. Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM (1994).
[24]
Hill, B. M. Almost wikipedia: What eight collaborative encyclopedia projects reveal about mechanisms of collective action. 2011.
[25]
Hui, J., Greenberg, M., and Gerber, E. Understanding crowdfunding work: implications for support tools. In Proc. CHI Extended Abstracts (2013).
[26]
Khondker, H. H. Role of the new media in the arab spring. Globalizations (2011).
[27]
Kittur, A., and Kraut, R. E. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proc. CSCW (2008).
[28]
Klandermans, B. Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansisons of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review (1984).
[29]
Kriplean, T., Morgan, J., et al. Supporting reflective public thought with considerit. In Proc. CSCW (2012).
[30]
Lee, Y.-H., and Hsieh, G. Does slacktivism hurt activism?: the effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proc. CHI (2013).
[31]
Lou, H., Luo, W., and Strong, D. Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems (2000).
[32]
Luther, K., and Bruckman, A. Leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proc. CSCW (2008).
[33]
Luther, K., Fiesler, C., and Bruckman, A. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proc. CSCW (2013).
[34]
Marwell, G., Oliver, P. E., and Prahl, R. Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. iii. American Journal of Sociology (1988).
[35]
Milgram, S., Bickman, L., and Berkowitz, L. Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1969).
[36]
Mollick, E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: Determinants of success and failure. Journal of Business Venturing (2013).
[37]
Muller, M., Geyer, W., et al. Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration. In Proc. CSCW (2013).
[38]
Okolloh, O. Ushahidi, or testimony : Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory learning and action (2009).
[39]
Oliver, P., Marwell, G., and Teixeira, R. A theory of the critical mass. i. interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology (1985).
[40]
Oliver, P. E., and Marwell, G. Mobilizing technologies for collective action. Frontiers in social movement theory (1992).
[41]
Olson, M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. 1965.
[42]
Pickard, G., Rahwan, I., et al. Time critical social mobilization: The darpa network challenge winning strategy. CoRR (2010).
[43]
Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M., and Ostrom, E. Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton University Press, 2010.
[44]
Prasarnphanich, P., and Wagner, C. Creating critical mass in collaboration systems: Insights from wikipedia. In DEST (2008).
[45]
Resnick, P., and Zeckhauser, R. Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of ebay's reputation system. Advances in applied microeconomics (2002).
[46]
Ringlemann, M. Recherches sur les moteurs animés: Travail de lhomme. In Annales de lInstitut national Agronomique (1913).
[47]
Ross, L., and Nisbett, R. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. 1991.
[48]
Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., and Watts, D. J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science (2006).
[49]
Starbird, K., and Palen, L. "voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proc. CHI (2011).
[50]
Suh, B., Convertino, G., Chi, E. H., and Pirolli, P. The singularity is not near: slowing growth of wikipedia. In Proc. WikiSym (2009).
[51]
Verhallen, T. M., and Robben, H. S. Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology (1994).
[52]
Voida, A., Harmon, E., and Al-Ani, B. Bridging between organizations and the public: volunteer coordinators' uneasy relationship with social computing. In Proc. CHI (2012).
[53]
Wang, L. S., Chen, J., Ren, Y., and Riedl, J. Searching for the goldilocks zone: trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups. In Proc. CSCW (2012).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Comfort Activism: Online Photography for Social Change in a Minority GroupProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794687:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Nooks: Social Spaces to Lower Hesitations in Interacting with New People at WorkProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580796(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Galileo: Citizen-led Experimentation Using a Social Computing SystemProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445668(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Catalyst: triggering collective action with thresholds

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
    February 2014
    1600 pages
    ISBN:9781450325400
    DOI:10.1145/2531602
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 February 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. activation thresholds
    2. collective action
    3. critical mass

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW'14
    Sponsor:
    CSCW'14: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 15 - 19, 2014
    Maryland, Baltimore, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 134 of 497 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Comfort Activism: Online Photography for Social Change in a Minority GroupProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794687:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Nooks: Social Spaces to Lower Hesitations in Interacting with New People at WorkProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580796(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2021)Galileo: Citizen-led Experimentation Using a Social Computing SystemProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445668(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2020)From novices to co-pilotsProceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability10.1145/3401335.3401814(294-304)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2020
    • (2019)Programmable DonationsProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300609(1-13)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2019)WhatFuturesProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300389(1-14)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2019)Monetize This? Marketized-Commons Platforms, New Opportunities and Challenges for Collective ActionHuman-Computer Interaction. Design Practice in Contemporary Societies10.1007/978-3-030-22636-7_9(130-147)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2019
    • (2019)Crowdsourcing Change: A Novel Vantage Point for Investigating Online Petitioning PlatformsInformation in Contemporary Society10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_34(353-364)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2019
    • (2018)Out of SiteProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32743752:CSCW(1-28)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
    • (2018)Crowdsourcing the Installation and Maintenance of Indoor Localization Infrastructure to Support Blind NavigationProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31917412:1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media