Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2639189.2641205acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design strategy for a national integrated personal health record

Published: 26 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper addresses the timely and internationally relevant problem of designing a national integrated personal health record. Health care reforms around the world are changing the way health-related activities are performed. The goal is to empower patients to gain control of their healthcare information and foster health care team collaboration through integrated national health information systems. To accomplish this goal it is urgent to engage users in the use of these platforms. We present the process for creating a meaningful design strategy for a citizen portal that incorporates an integrated personal health record. This portal is part of a national health data platform cross-channel experience, connecting health care providers with patients, counting over 750,000 users. We applied a user experience design process to create an effective design solution for an integrated PHR and prototype that can be extended to the development of this new type of PHR.

References

[1]
Adikari, S., McDonald, C., and Campbell, J. A design science framework for designing and assessing user experience. In Proc. HCII 2011, Springer-Verlag (2011), 25--34.
[2]
Al-Ubaydli, M. Personal Health Records: A Guide for Clinicians. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[3]
Archer, N. N., Fevrier-Thomas, U. U., Lokker, C. C., McKibbon, K. A. K., and Straus, S. E. S. Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18, 4 (2011), 515--522.
[4]
Australian Government, Concept of Operations. http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/PCEHRSIntrotoc#.U1kjLeZdWTD
[5]
Baird, A., North, F., and Raghu, T. S. Personal Health Records (PHR) and the future of the physician-patient relationship. In Proc. iConference 2011, ACM Press (2011), 281--288.
[6]
Belden, J. L., Grayson, R., and Barnes, J. Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating. Tech report. HIMSS EHR Usability Task Force, 2009.
[7]
Brennan, P. F., Downs, S., and Casper, G. Project HealthDesign: rethinking the power and potential of personal health records. Journal of biomedical informatics 43, 5 Suppl (2010), S3--S5.
[8]
Butler, C. and Wirtanen, A. All Together Now: Introducing the participatory expert review. http://uxmag.com/articles/all-together-now.
[9]
Carneiro, C. M. D. S. Voluntary Electronic Patient Record State Of The Art. PhD Thesis. Universidade da Beira Interior, 2012.
[10]
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS). Stage 2. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-andGuidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Stage_2.html.
[11]
Constantine, L., ed. Collaborative Usability Inspection. http://www.foruse.com/presentations/inspections.pdf.
[12]
Detmer, D. E., Bloomrosen, M., Raymond, B., and Tang, P. Integrated personal health records: Transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8, 1 (2008), 45.
[13]
eHGI. Article 14 eHealth Network - Conclusions and Discussion Papers - All Documents. eHealth Governance Initiative.
[14]
epSOS. Final definition of functional service requirements: patient summary, 2012.
[15]
Garrett, J. J. The Elements of User Experience. Peachpit Press, 2003.
[16]
Harrell, E., In Denmark's Electronic Health Records Program, a Lesson for the U.S. content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1891209,00.html.
[17]
Huba, N. and Zhang, Y. Designing Patient-Centered Personal Health Records (PHRs): Health Care Professionals' Perspective on Patient-Generated Data. Journal of Medical Systems 36, 6 (2012), 3893--3905.
[18]
ISO 9241-210, User experience definitions. http://www.allaboutux.org/ux-definitions.
[19]
Kaelber, D. C. D., Jha, A. K. A., Johnston, D. D., Middleton, B. B., and Bates, D. W. D. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 15, 6 (2008), 729--736.
[20]
Kientz, J. A., Choe, E. K., Birch, B., et al. Heuristic evaluation of persuasive health technologies. In Proc IHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 555--564.
[21]
Kim, M. I. and Johnson, K. B. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 9, 2 (2002), 171--180.
[22]
Morville, P. User Experience Design. http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php.
[23]
Neuhauser, L., Kreps, G. L., Morrison, K., Athanasoulis, M., Kirienko, N., and Van Brunt, D. Using design science and artificial intelligence to improve health communication: ChronologyMD case example. Patient education and counseling 92, 2 (2013), 211--217.
[24]
Nielsen, J., ed. 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.
[25]
Portal da Saúde, ed. Portuguese Health Record. http://www.portaldasaude.pt/portal/conteudos/a+saude+em+portugal/informatizacao/PDSenglishm.htm.
[26]
Porter, J. Designing for the Social Web. New Riders, 2008.
[27]
Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J. J., Bunker, D., Russo, N. L., and DeGross, J. I. Human Benefit Through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research. Springer, 2010.
[28]
Spencer, D. Card Sorting. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2011.
[29]
Tang, P. C. P., Ash, J. S. J., Bates, D. W. D., Overhage, J. M. J., and Sands, D. Z. D. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13, 2 (2006), 121--126.
[30]
Trotter, F. and Uhlman, D. Meaningful Use and Beyond: A Guide for IT Staff in Health Care. O'Reilly Media, 2011.
[31]
Tufte, E., ed. Sparkline theory and practice. http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0001OR.
[32]
Unger, R. and Chandler, C. A Project Guide to UX Design: For user experience designers in the field or in the making (2nd Edition). New Riders, 2012.
[33]
Vincent, A., Kaelber, D. C., Kaelber, D. C., Pan, E., Shah, S., Johnston, D., Middleton, B. A patient-centric taxonomy for personal health records (PHRs). In Proc. AMIA Annu Symp 2008, AMIA (2008), 763--767.
[34]
Young, I. Mental Models. Rosenfeld Media, 2011.
[35]
Zhang, Y. and Fu, W. T. Designing consumer health information systems: what do user-generated questions tell us? Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Directing the Future of Adaptive Systems, (2011), 536--545.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Integrated personal health record (PHR) security: requirements and mechanismsBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making10.1186/s12911-023-02225-023:1Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2021)The Current Status of Online Resources from the Portuguese Health System for Childbirth Education2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476461(1-4)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2021
  • (2021) Design considerations for patient‐centered eHealth interventions in an underserved context: A case of health and wellbeing services within Nairobi's informal settlements in Kenya THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES10.1002/isd2.1216488:3Online publication date: 12-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Design strategy for a national integrated personal health record

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '14: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational
      October 2014
      361 pages
      ISBN:9781450325424
      DOI:10.1145/2639189
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. card sorting
      2. eHealth
      3. health communication
      4. participatory design
      5. personal health records
      6. user experience design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      NordiCHI '14

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 89 of 361 submissions, 25%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Integrated personal health record (PHR) security: requirements and mechanismsBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making10.1186/s12911-023-02225-023:1Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
      • (2021)The Current Status of Online Resources from the Portuguese Health System for Childbirth Education2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476461(1-4)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2021
      • (2021) Design considerations for patient‐centered eHealth interventions in an underserved context: A case of health and wellbeing services within Nairobi's informal settlements in Kenya THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES10.1002/isd2.1216488:3Online publication date: 12-Jan-2021
      • (2019)The Extent and Coverage of Current Knowledge of Connected Health: Systematic Mapping StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/1439421:9(e14394)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2019
      • (2017)Characteristics of Innovators Adopting a National Personal Health Record in Portugal: Cross-Sectional StudyJMIR Medical Informatics10.2196/medinform.78875:4(e37)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2017
      • (2017)Public Sector Shared Services Move Out of the "Back-Office"ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3130515.313052148:3(83-109)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2017
      • (2016)Perspectives on user experience for a nation-wide senior telehealth programProceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.46(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016
      • (2016)How Far in the Future will We Start From?Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2851581.2851593(899-909)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
      • (2016)Insights from the Design and Evaluation of a Personal Health DashboardProceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)10.1109/HICSS.2016.435(3483-3492)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2016

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media