Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2656075.2656094acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Policy-based message scheduling using FlexRay

Published: 12 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes a virtual communication layer for time-triggered networks, enabling a policy-based message scheduling as well as preemption which in turn simplifies real-time verification. The introduced layer is particularly advantageous in the automotive domain since it reduces the complexity of scheduling time-triggered communication systems and simplifies incremental changes of existing schedules. We propose a framework to schedule event-triggered messages based on a predefined policy in time-triggered communication slots, improving the network utilization while logically separating messages from different devices. Furthermore, we enhance the versatility of the system, allowing to transmit data that exceeds the size of one time-triggered slot. The proposed policy-based scheduling with fixed priorities enables the integration of mixed criticality applications in time-triggered networks, while ensuring hard deadline constraints. A prototypical implementation is provided for FlexRay, complying with the existing protocol and, thus, making it possible to coexist with the standard transmission scheme. Our experimental results demonstrate the advantages of the virtual layer, showing an increase in flexibility and significantly lower message latencies in case of asynchronous communication.

References

[1]
K. Tindell, A. Burns, and A. J. Wellings. Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times. Control Engineering Practice, 1995.
[2]
R. I. Davis, A. Burns, R. J. Bril, and J. J. Lukkien. Controller area network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised. Real-Time Systems, 35(3):239--272, 2007.
[3]
E. G. Schmidt and K. Schmidt. Schedulability analysis and message schedule computation for the dynamic segment of FlexRay. Proc. of VTC, page 1--5, 2010.
[4]
H. Kopetz and G. Grunsteidl. TTP - a protocol for fault-tolerant real-time systems. Computer, 27(1):14--23, 1994.
[5]
M. Hamdaoui and P. Ramanathan. A service policy for real-time customers with (m, k) firm deadlines. Proc. of FTCS, page 196--205, 1994.
[6]
H.-Y. Tyan and J. C. Hou. A rate-based message scheduling paradigm. In Proc. of WORDS, page 203--215, 1999.
[7]
G. Manimaran, M. Shashidhar, A. Manikutty, and C. S. R. Murthy. Integrated scheduling of tasks and messages in distributed real-time systems. Proc. of WPDRTS, page 64--71, 1997.
[8]
M. Grenier, L. Havet, and N. Navet. Configuring the communication on FlexRay-the case of the static segment. Proc. of ERTS 2008, 2008.
[9]
M. Lukasiewycz, M. Glaß, P. Milbredt, and J. Teich. Flexray schedule optimization of the static segment. In Proc. of CODES+ISSS, volume 9, page 363--372, 2009.
[10]
K. Schmidt and E. G. Schmidt. Message scheduling for the FlexRay protocol: The static segment. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(5):2170--2179, 2009.
[11]
K. Schmidt and E. G. Schmidt. Optimal message scheduling for the static segment of FlexRay. Proc. of VTC, 2010.
[12]
H. Zeng, M. Di Natale, A. Ghosal, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. Schedule optimization of Time-Triggered systems communicating over the FlexRay static segment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(1):1--17, February 2011.
[13]
H. Zeng, A. Ghosal, and M. Di Natale. Timing analysis and optimization of FlexRay dynamic segment. Proc. of ICCIT, page 1932--1939, June 2010.
[14]
M. Neukirchner, M. Negrean, R. Ernst, and T. T. Bone. Response-time analysis of the exray dynamic segment under consideration of slot-multiplexing. In Proc. of SIES, pages 21--30, June 2012.
[15]
R. Maier. Event-triggered communication on top of time-triggered architecture. In Proc. of DASC, volume 2, page 13C5-1--13C5-9 vol.2, 2002.
[16]
V. Claesson and N. Suri. TTET: event-triggered channels on a time-triggered base. Proc. of ICECCS, 2004.
[17]
H. Kopetz and G. Bauer. The Time-Triggered architecture. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(1):112--126, 2003.
[18]
R. Obermaisser. End-to-End delays of Event-Triggered overlay networks in a Time-Triggered architecture. Proc. of INDIN, page 541--546, July 2007.
[19]
R. Lange and F. Vasques. Guaranteeing real-time message deadlines in the FlexRay static segment using a on-line scheduling approach. Proc. of WFCS, 2012.
[20]
A. Easwaran, I. Shin, O. Sokolsky, and I. Lee. Incremental schedulability analysis of hierarchical real-time components. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM & IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software, EMSOFT '06, page 272--281, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[21]
M. Anand, S. Fischmeister, and I. Lee. A comparison of compositional schedulability analysis techniques for hierarchical real-time systems. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst., 13(1):2:1--2:37, September 2013.
[22]
L. Thiele, S. Chakraborty, and M. Naedele. Real-time calculus for scheduling hard real-time systems. In Proc. of ISCAS, volume 4, pages 101--104 vol.4, 2000.
[23]
J.-Y. Le Boudec and P. Thiran. Network Calculus: A Theory of Deterministic Queuing Systems for the Internet. 2001.
[24]
E. Wandeler, L. Thiele, M. Verhoef, and P. Lieverse. System architecture evaluation using modular performance analysis: A case study. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 8(6):649--667, October 2006.
[25]
D. Le Berre and A. Parrain. The SAT4J library, release 2.2, system description. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation, 7:59--64, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Reliable Real-Time Message Scheduling in Automotive Cyber-Physical SystemsMachine Learning and Optimization Techniques for Automotive Cyber-Physical Systems10.1007/978-3-031-28016-0_1(3-42)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2023
  • (2019)JAMS-SGACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/335539224:6(1-31)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2019
  • (2018)A Design of a Lightweight In-Vehicle Edge Gateway for the Self-Diagnosis of an Autonomous VehicleApplied Sciences10.3390/app80915948:9(1594)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Policy-based message scheduling using FlexRay

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CODES '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis
      October 2014
      331 pages
      ISBN:9781450330510
      DOI:10.1145/2656075
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 12 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. FlexRay
      2. scheduling

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      ESWEEK'14
      ESWEEK'14: TENTH EMBEDDED SYSTEM WEEK
      October 12 - 17, 2014
      New Delhi, India

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 280 of 864 submissions, 32%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Reliable Real-Time Message Scheduling in Automotive Cyber-Physical SystemsMachine Learning and Optimization Techniques for Automotive Cyber-Physical Systems10.1007/978-3-031-28016-0_1(3-42)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2023
      • (2019)JAMS-SGACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/335539224:6(1-31)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2019
      • (2018)A Design of a Lightweight In-Vehicle Edge Gateway for the Self-Diagnosis of an Autonomous VehicleApplied Sciences10.3390/app80915948:9(1594)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2018
      • (2017)JAMSProceedings of the Eleventh IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Networks-on-Chip10.1145/3130218.3130234(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2017
      • (2017)Generalized Asynchronous Time-Triggered Scheduling for FlexRayIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems10.1109/TCAD.2016.257042136:2(214-226)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
      • (2017)VEGa: A High Performance Vehicular Ethernet Gateway on Hybrid FPGAIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2017.270027766:10(1790-1803)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
      • (2016)Message Optimization based on Scheduling Model for FlexRay Static Segment ApplicationInternational Journal of Modeling and Optimization10.7763/IJMO.2016.V6.5456:6(317-322)Online publication date: Dec-2016

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media