Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702359acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Transfer of Learning as HCI Similarity: Towards an Objective Assessment of the Sensory-Motor Basis of Naturalness

Published: 18 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Human-computer interaction should be natural. However, the notion of natural is questioned due to a lack of theoretical background and methods to objectively measure the naturalness of a HCI. A frequently cited aspect of natural HCIs is their ability to benefit from knowledge and skills that users develop in their interaction with the real (non-digital) world. Among these skills, sensory-motor abilities are essential to operate many HCIs. This suggests that the transfer of these abilities between physical and digital interactions could be used as an experimental tool to assess the sensory-motor similarity between interactions, and could be considered as an objective measurement of the sensory-motor grounding of naturalness. In this framework, we introduce a new experimental paradigm inspired by motor learning research to assess sensory-motor similarity, as revealed by the transfer of learning. We tested this paradigm in an empirical study to question the naturalness of three HCIs: direct-touch, mouse pointing and absolute indirect-touch. The study revealed how skill learning transfers from these three digital interactions towards an equivalent physical interaction. We observed strong transfer of skill between direct-touch and physical interaction, but no transfer from the other two interactions. This work provides a first objective assessment of the sensory-motor basis of direct-touch naturalness, and a new empirical path to question HCI similarity and naturalness.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn1188-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Accot, J., and Zhai, S. More than dotting the i's -- foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM (2002), 73--80.
[2]
Adams, J. A. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin 101, 1 (1987), 41.
[3]
Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Designing interaction, not interfaces. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, ACM (2004), 15--22.
[4]
Belda-Lois, J.-M., de Rosario, H., Pons, R., Poveda, R., Morón, A., Porcar, R., Gómez, A., et al. Can human movement analysis contribute to usability understanding? Human movement science 29, 4 (2010), 529--541.
[5]
Card, S., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
[6]
Clower, D. M., and Boussaoud, D. Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. Journal of Neurophysiology 84, 5 (2000), 2703--2708.
[7]
Fallman, D. The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2011), 1051--1060.
[8]
Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381--391.
[9]
Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F., and Bizzi, E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 9 (1996), 3843--3846.
[10]
Ghilardi, M. F., Moisello, C., Silvestri, G., Ghez, C., and Krakauer, J. W. Learning of a sequential motor skill comprises explicit and implicit components that consolidate differently. J Neurophysiol 101, 5 (May 2009), 2218--2229.
[11]
Gillies, M., and Kleinsmith, A. Non-representational interaction design. In Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory. Springer, 2014, 201--208.
[12]
Holden, M. K. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychology & behavior 8, 3 (2005), 187--211.
[13]
Houde, J. F., and Jordan, M. I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279, 5354 (1998), 1213--1216.
[14]
Jacob, R. J., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L. M., Horn, M. S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E. T., and Zigelbaum, J. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-wimp interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2008), 201--210.
[15]
Jetter, H.-C., Leifert, S., Gerken, J., Schubert, S., and Reiterer, H. Does (multi-)touch aid users' spatial memory and navigation in 'panning' and in 'zooming & panning' uis? In Proceedings of AVI, ACM (2012), 83--90.
[16]
Jetter, H.-C., Reiterer, H., and Geyer, F. Blended interaction: understanding natural human-computer interaction in post-wimp interactive spaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 5 (2014), 1139--1158.
[17]
Kirsh, D. Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 1 (2013), 3.
[18]
Krakauer, J. W., Ghez, C., and Ghilardi, M. F. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. The Journal of Neuroscience 25, 2 (2005), 473--478.
[19]
Krakauer, J. W., and Mazzoni, P. Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Current opinion in neurobiology 21, 4 (2011), 636--644.
[20]
Krakauer, J. W., Mazzoni, P., Ghazizadeh, A., Ravindran, R., and Shadmehr, R. Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. PLoS biology 4, 10 (2006), e316.
[21]
Mattar, A. A., and Ostry, D. J. Modifiability of generalization in dynamics learning. Journal of neurophysiology 98, 6 (2007), 3321--3329.
[22]
Norman, D. A. The way i see it: Natural user interfaces are not natural. interactions 17, 3 (2010), 6--10.
[23]
O'hara, K., Harper, R., Mentis, H., Sellen, A., and Taylor, A. On the naturalness of touchless: putting the "interaction" back into nui. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 1 (2013), 5.
[24]
Poddar, I., Sethi, Y., Ozyildiz, E., and Sharma, R. Toward natural gesture/speech hci: A case study of weather narration. In Proc. Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces (PUI), Citeseer (1998).
[25]
Shadmehr, R. Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. Human movement science 23, 5 (2004), 543--568.
[26]
Soukoreff, R. W., and MacKenzie, I. S. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of fitts' law research in hci. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 751--789.
[27]
Tan, D. S., Pausch, R., Stefanucci, J. K., and Proffitt, D. R. Kinesthetic cues aid spatial memory. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2002), 806--807.
[28]
Tremblay, S., Houle, G., and Ostry, D. J. Specificity of speech motor learning. The Journal of Neuroscience 28, 10 (2008), 2426--2434.
[29]
Van Dam, A. Post-wimp user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 40, 2 (1997), 63--67.
[30]
Wei, K., Yan, X., Kong, G., Yin, C., Zhang, F., Wang, Q., and Kording, K. P. Computer use changes generalization of movement learning. Current Biology 24, 1 (2014), 82--85.
[31]
Wigdor, D., and Wixon, D. Brave NUI world: designing natural user interfaces for touch and gesture. Elsevier, 2011.
[32]
Wobbrock, J. O., Aung, H. H., Rothrock, B., and Myers, B. A. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) Extended Abstracts, ACM (2005), 1869--1872.
[33]
Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., and Wilson, A. D. User-defined gestures for surface computing. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM (2009), 1083--1092.
[34]
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Flanagan, J. R. Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in cognitive sciences 5, 11 (2001), 487--494.
[35]
Zhu, F. F., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., Fan, J. K. M., Leung, G. K. K., and Masters, R. S. W. Refining the continuous tracking paradigm to investigate implicit motor learning. Exp Psychol 61, 3 (2014), 196--204.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Exploring Technical Reasoning in Digital Tool UseProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501877(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2020)When High Fidelity MattersProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3399715.3399815(1-9)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2020
  • (2020)Retroactive Transfer Phenomena in Alternating User InterfacesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376538(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Transfer of Learning as HCI Similarity: Towards an Objective Assessment of the Sensory-Motor Basis of Naturalness

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2015
        4290 pages
        ISBN:9781450331456
        DOI:10.1145/2702123
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 18 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. empirical methods
        2. interaction similarity
        3. motor learning
        4. naturalness
        5. nui
        6. sensory-motor skill
        7. transfer of learning

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        • ANR

        Conference

        CHI '15
        Sponsor:
        CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 18 - 23, 2015
        Seoul, Republic of Korea

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 486 of 2,120 submissions, 23%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI 2025
        ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 26 - May 1, 2025
        Yokohama , Japan

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
        Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2022)Exploring Technical Reasoning in Digital Tool UseProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501877(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
        • (2020)When High Fidelity MattersProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3399715.3399815(1-9)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2020
        • (2020)Retroactive Transfer Phenomena in Alternating User InterfacesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376538(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
        • (2019)Is it Real? Measuring the Effect of Resolution, Latency, Frame rate and Jitter on the Presence of Virtual EntitiesProceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/3343055.3359710(5-16)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2019
        • (2019)What Do We Mean by “Interaction”? An Analysis of 35 Years of CHIACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/332528526:4(1-30)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
        • (2018)Effect of Instrument Structure Alterations on Violin PerformanceFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2018.024369Online publication date: 6-Dec-2018
        • (2018)I Really did ThatProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173952(1-8)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
        • (2018)Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand visionExperimental Brain Research10.1007/s00221-018-5368-2236:12(3191-3201)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2018
        • (2017)Superiority of a Handheld Perspective-Coupled Display in Isomorphic Docking PerformancesProceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/3132272.3134124(72-81)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2017
        • (2017)Does Practice Make Perfect?Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025585(5619-5629)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media